Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Native Americans and colonial relations
Native Americans and colonial relations
Relationship between mankind and nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Native Americans and colonial relations
Nature causes life, beautiful scenery, and a place for humans to live. Nature also causes death, sickness, and worldwide disasters. One can view nature with an optimistic or pessimistic outlook. Some people go through life by taking nature for granite and not realizing that they live at the mercy of nature. Comparatively, there are groups of people who view the nature with all the beauty it provides. The Native Americans’ treated nature with great respect; however, the Europeans did not hold nature in a high regard. The Native American cosmology allowed the land and other living creatures to be treated with great spiritual respect and with the notion that nature is more important than man. The first Europeans who came to the New World thought of land as a place to make profit and living …show more content…
creatures as strictly food. The Europeans view of nature and the values that the Europeans posses; differ extraordinarily from those of the Native Americans. Native Americas sought preservation of nature, land, and the environment. They systematically fished for food with hope to never kill more fish than they could eat. Although some people argue that the Native Americans were responsible for killing the majority of bison, the Natives did what they had to do to survive. They treated nature with the highest regard. They held nature in a higher regard than man. The Native American cosmology allowed them to treat the land and environment with a spiritual respect. This spiritual respect for the environment was called Manitou. Manitou represented everything that the Native Americans could not understand about nature. This was a moral ground for the Native Americans and their respect for the environment. “A mysterious, awe-inspiring force that affected human life for both good and evil, such power united all nature in an unbroken web,” (Boyer 13). Although the Native Americans did not have a complete understanding for nature, they respected it and treated it as if it had a spiritual value. They did understand that nature affects humans in a positive and negative way. With this knowledge they treated nature as if it could control the outcome of their lives. The first Europeans who came to the New World had a completely different view on nature and the environment than the Native Americans.
The Europeans believed that the land was there so people can make a profit. “Seeking riches, resources, and trading opportunities…” (Gillon 53). They also believed that living creatures were on Earth so they could have food. The Europeans did not think of nature as if it was a spirit, they thought of nature as a place for people to make money, live, and eat. When the Europeans first settled in the New World they did not understand that the Native Americans knew how to manage the environment. The Europeans were faced with many starving years and many freezing winters. Eventually they lived in harmony with the Native Americans after they requested the help of the Natives even though their methods and cultures were so different. “[The colonizers] might have been completely perished if the Indians nearby had not helped by bringing food,” (Gillon 54). The Indians helped to Europeans through the three years (1606-1609) by giving them food. The Europeans treated the land as a place to strictly make profit and not as a spiritual
power. The Native Americans treated nature as a spirit. This allowed them to treat the land and other living creatures with great respect and with awe. However, the Europeans treated the land as a place where they can grow crops and make profit. Also, they treated the animals as food and not as a part of nature. The Europeans had a pessimistic outlook on nature; however, the Native Americans always displayed an optimistic perspective on nature.
Cronon raises the question of the belief or disbelief of the Indian’s rights to the land. The Europeans believed the way Indians used the land was unacceptable seeing as how the Indians wasted the natural resources the land had. However, Indians didn’t waste the natural resources and wealth of the land but instead used it differently, which the Europeans failed to see. The political and economical life of the Indians needed to be known to grasp the use of the land, “Personal good could be replaced, and their accumulation made little sense for ecological reasons of mobility,” (Cronon, 62).
The Native Americans were the earliest and only settlers in the North American continents for more than thousands of years. Like their European counterparts, the English colonists justified the taking of their territories was because the natives were not entitled to the land because they lacked a work ethic in which shows that the colonists did not understand the Native Americans system of work and ownership of property. They believed the “Indians seemed to lack everything the English identified as civilized” (Takaki, Pg. 33). Because the settlers were living far away from civilizations, to ensure that they were civilized people, the settlers had negative images of the Native Americans so that they would not be influenced and live like the how the natives do, ensuring that these groups are savages who are uncivilized. Many began to believe this was God’s plans for them to civilize the country in which many would push westward and drive the Indians out to promote civilization and progress. While the United States was still in its early stages of development,
The Indians thought of land very differently to the white man. The land was sacred, there was no ownership, and it was created by the great spirit. They could not sell their land to others, whereas the white people could fence off the land which belonged to them, and sell it freely to whoever they wanted. The Europeans didn't think that the Indians were using the land properly, so in their eyes, they were doing a good favour to the earth. To the Indians, the land was more valuable than the money that the white man had brought with him, even though it didn't belong to them.
Shetler, in the book Seeds of Change: Five Hundred Years Since Columbus, supports the myth that the new world was an unspoiled paradise by stating that " Native people were transparent in the landscape, living as natural elements of the ecosphere. Their world…was a world of barely perceptible human disturbances"(Shetler 1991). Sale contends that the Indians had a benign effect and refering to them as the "Ecological Indian".(Sale 1990) These are fine examples of the new way of portraying the Native Americans as "Noble Savages". There is no question that the Europeans had a more obvious influence on the landscape than the American Indian, but the notion that the Native Americans were "transparent" or "benign" to the landscape is an absurd over exaggeration. When in fact, "twenty million indigenous people were hunting gathering, burning, tilling, and otherwise managing North America"(Anderson 1991). It is not the intention of this paper to claim the American Indians did more harm to the environment than the European Settlers, but one important notion that must be understood before proceeding is that "even though a landscape may appear green it is not in indicator of natural ecology". It is the intention of this paper to show that the Native Americans had a significant impact on the ecology of the Eastern North American Landscape, which is unknown to many scholars.
From the lone hiker on the Appalachian Trail to the environmental lobby groups in Washington D.C., nature evokes strong feelings in each and every one of us. We often struggle with and are ultimately shaped by our relationship with nature. The relationship we forge with nature reflects our fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us. The works of timeless authors, including Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard, are centered around their relationship to nature.
The nature in which we live is truly beautiful and something to preserve and treasure. When the Europeans first came to North America, they were immediately in love with the views they encountered. They were interested in wanting to know more about the land, the animals that peeked around, and the people who called it home. Artists such as, John White had heard the tales of what Christopher Columbus had described during his time in North America, which led to them wanting to make their own discoveries (Pohl 140). Everyone had their own opinions and views of the world, but artists were able to capture the natural images and the feeling they had through their paintings (Pohl 140).
Nature has been an important role in numerous stories in and past and present. The early myths and creation stories had the natural world as characters or playing an important part of the plot of the story. Strong examples of how nature has been an important part of stories are stories written for children and origin myth passed down through the generations. Just like many early creation stories of western civilizations nature plays a huge part in the origin myths of the Native Americans. Native Americans showed a strong connection to nature when they used parts of nature in their origin myths, examples can be found in "The Earth on Turtle's Back," when the animals helped save the sky chief’s wife, "When Grizzlies Walked Upright," how the first
Throughout the Romanticism period, human’s connection with nature was explored as writers strove to find the benefits that humans receive through such interactions. Without such relationships, these authors found that certain aspects of life were missing or completely different. For example, certain authors found death a very frightening idea, but through the incorporation of man’s relationship with the natural world, readers find the immense utility that nature can potentially provide. Whether it’d be as solace, in the case of death, or as a place where one can find oneself in their own truest form, nature will nevertheless be a place where they themselves were derived from. Nature is where all humans originated,
The Europeans and the Indians had very contrasting ideas of personal wealth and ownership. The Europeans believed that only the rich should own land, and strongly followed the practice that when you passed away, the land stays in the family to keep the family honor and pride alive. In European society, what one owned decided one's identity, political standpoint, wealth, and even independence. The Indians believed that property was part of a tribe, not a personal possession to own. One of their beliefs was that the land was sacred, and each family should have a piece of the whole. As a general rule, the Indians followed their belief that states that everything on the earth is given to all, and each person deserves their own share. In 1657, a French Jesuit said that, "Their kindness, humanity and courtesy not only makes them liberal with what they ha...
The Native American Indians have faced so many adversities of which some have kept them from flourishing. For example placing them in reservations has greatly decreased their chance to progress in life. They always have had to evolve their lives due to the changes of the environment due to the settlers. This inhibited them from having a solid place where they could settle and setup a foundation for their lives. The concept of freedom had been carried on throughout the history of the United States, yet it has failed to be carried with treating the American Indians. Reservations have been seen as the United States showing their gratitude towards the American Indians, but Carlos Motezuma who wrote What Indians Must do sees it as a wall of progress for them and must be done away with.
Native American cultures reflected their physical environments by what was readily available to them. For example, the wooded lands the east provided led to a denser population due to the increase of animals. The barren, drier lands the west provided led to a lighter population (Native Americans Part 1 PowerPoint, Slide #52). Also, the teepees they constructed reflected their nomadic lifestyle and culture. I think some Native American societies formed large-scale societies while most did not because of the sources that were available to them. Also, in the 1600 and 1700’s land wasn't available for Native Americans to have large societies. When the European settlers arrived they slowly began pushing Native Americans out of their land creating
The First Nations once walked the vast lands of North America as a free, simple, semi-nomadic group that was dependent on their surrounding environment where culture and social interactions were intertwined. This peaceful interaction between the First Nations and the environment was disrupted and destroyed with the invasion of the Europeans. Culture, land and all aspects of life were abruptly taken away from the Indigenous people, leaving them to be suppressed and assimilated. They were also stripped from interacting with the environment for resources which were essential in shaping a way of life. The invasive Europeans greatly disturbed the environment and implemented eurocentric value systems which were beneficial for successfully imposing
The First "Europeans" reached the Western Hemisphere in the late 15th century. Upon arrival they encountered a rich and diverse culture that had already been inhabited for thousands of years. The Europeans were completely unprepared for the people they stumbled upon. They couldn't understand cultures that were so different and exotic from their own. The discovery of the existence of anything beyond their previous experience could threaten the stability of their entire religious and social structure. Seeing the Indians as savages they made them over in their own image as quickly as possible. In doing so they overlooked the roots that attached the Indians to their fascinating past. The importance of this past is often overlooked. Most text or history books begin the story of the Americas from the first European settlement and disregard the 30,000 years of separate, preceding cultural development (Deetz 7).
Nature is important to Native American Literature because they believe in the Great Spirit and the idea land is sacred. We see the importance of nature in the “Iroquois Constitution”, a speech by Chief Dekanawidah. The constitution is about preserving and honoring nature. “Firefly Song” also deals with the theme of nature. This poem describes living with light, no matter what happens in life. It is relevant to nature because the Ojibwa tribe chose to use a firefly as a representation of light. The Ojibwa choosing to use a firefly tells us, even the smallest creature in nature is important to them. Another piece of Native American Literature that displays the theme of nature is “Brother Eagle Sister Sky”. In this message given by Chief
How did humans come to their current opinions of nature and how we should relate to it? Kevin Reilly suggests that nature influenced our religious beliefs, while the Economist article titled “The Plough and the Now” advocates that advancements in technology led to new power systems and social relations. These two combined factors have shaped modern beliefs which have in turn shaped the perception of nature, which is a repeated theme in Ishmael. Nature affected ancient religions while technology changed social interactions. Thousands of years later, these combined changes of humans perspectives toward the world are adjusting how they handle nature.