Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of revenge as a theme
Themes of a worthwhile revenge
Themes of a worthwhile revenge
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of revenge as a theme
“Revenge only engenders violence, not clarity and true peace. I think liberation must come from within” Sandra Cisneros. Cisneros is saying that with revenge only comes violence; it won’t free people from anything. Only acceptance and moving on will unshackle someone from what revenge would only lock them into. Simply put, revenge creates a prison in one’s own mind seeking out that revenge will not lead to freedom. In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado” and Kurt Wimmer’s Law Abiding Citizen both storylines reflect on this idea that when a person seeks revenge he or she is really building a prison of guilt. Similarities are best found between the setting and the plot whereas the characters differ throughout each story.
The settings from both stories share the idea that revenge creates a prison in a person’s mind. Not only is the prison from Law Abiding
…show more content…
Citizen and the catacombs from “The Cask of Amontillado” physical places where they seek out their revenge, but are also places where Clyde and Montresor develop the idea that revenge is not only created physically but mentally as well. This is best shown in “The Cask of Amontillado” when Montresor says, “I had finished a portion of the last and the eleventh; there remained but a single stone to be fitted and plastered in. I struggled with its weight; I placed it partially in its destined position.” (Poe 214) The stones that Montresor places together represent the prison that is both built physically and mentally. This idea is similarly shown when Clyde expresses his hate towards his cell in prison. He states, “I want one of those really nice beds. I just…I can’t think straight without a nice sleep. The bed in my cell is just so lumpy.” Irony is shown while Clyde is in prison because he hates his cell, but it was all part of his plan from the beginning to go to prison. By going to prison, Clyde starts to develop the so called prison inside his head. As a result, the setting in both stories create what leads to the idea that revenge builds a mental prison. Similarities are not only shown in setting, but also in the plot of the stories. Both plots relate to each other due to the significance of revenge.
Characters from each story are wronged and seek revenge but come to find out that revenge is not always the right answer. For example, in “The Cask of Amontillado,” Montresor says at the end of the story, “Against the new masonry I re-erected the old rampart of bones. For the half of a century no mortal has disturbed them.” (Poe 214) This simply expresses that he sought out his revenge but eventually was unable to keep it a secret hence why he is sharing this story out of guilt fifty years later. This idea is also expressed in Law Abiding Citizen when Clyde states, “I’m just getting started. I’m gonna pull the whole thing down. I gonna bring the whole diseased corrupt temple down on your heads. It’s gonna be Biblical.” At this point in the movie, Clyde is perceived to be driven crazy with the idea of revenge. This is a perfect example of the idea that people have the ability to develop a mental prison while seeking revenge. However, the characters in both stories reflect differences in their idea of
revenge. The character, Montresor, from the “The Cask of Amontillado” and Clyde Shelton, the character from Law Abiding Citizen, have similar ideas of revenge but both have their own ways of seeking it. For example, Montresor is secretly planning revenge against Fortunato while Clyde is openly arranging revenge against people that did him wrong. The quote by Clyde Shelton, “Well, justice should be harsh Nick…especially for those who denied it to others,” expresses Clyde’s strong views on his open revenge against those who mistreated him and his family. On the contrary, the passage “There were no attendants at home…I had told them that I should not return until the morning, and had given them explicit orders not to stir from the house. These orders were sufficient, I well knew, to insure their immediate disappearance, one and all, as soon as my back was turned”, (Poe 210) from “The Cask of Amontillado,” explains the secrecy behind Montresor’s plot of revenge. Nevertheless, both characters are essentially seeking revenge but both use different methods to accomplish their vengeance. In conclusion, the idea that revenge does not lead to freedom, but rather captivates a person’s mind, is best shown through the plot and setting of Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado” and Kurt Wimmer’s Law Abiding Citizen. The methods of revenge differ between characters of both stories. The method of secrecy is Montresor’s way of seeking revenge while Clyde openly pursues his revenge. Unknowingly, both characters are driven crazy by their choice of revenge which strengthens the idea that revenge will essentially never lead to freedom.
Evil exists naturally in the world, and there are many acts that are considered evil. As a result, evil is often a theme in literature. “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” by William Shakespeare, and “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe each rely heavily on evil to portray a message. Out of all of the evil acts that exist, exacting revenge is the evilest act that a person can make, for a person’s rash decision to exact revenge will ruin their sense of morality. The characters of Hamlet and Laertes in “Hamlet” each commit terrible acts of revenge, as does Montresor in “The Cask of Amontillado.”
Many people percieve revenge to be something that falls under justice, as they are driven by emotions, while others consider getting the police involved as serving justice. Moreover, some people find revenge to be pleasing and satisfying, but to argue the point that just because something is more satisfying does not mean it is
In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado,” the main character, Montresor, leads his enemy, Fortunato, into his catacombs, and there buries him alive by bricking him up in a niche in the wall; Poe gives no actual reason for this except to say that Montresor has been “insulted” in some way. In his Science Fiction work “Usher II,” Ray Bradbury adopts many of Poe’s works in creating his story—including pieces from “TCoA.” What separates Bradbury’s work from other authors who borrow works and re-imagine them (Gregory Maguire’s Wicked, Geraldine Brooks’s March, and Peter Carrey’s Jack Maggs, for instance), is that “Usher II,” in its imaginative way, is trying to be one with its predecessor. Bradbury seeks to retain Poe’s love of the double and the secretive (Gothic mentalities where the reader is meant to be a bit uncertain about what they’re reading and what’s going on) while adding, most notably regarding “TCoA,” the things Poe never had much care for: a beginning, an end, and reason—thus making “Usher II” not only an homage to Poe’s work, but a companion piece whose beating heart lies within the original work.
"An eye for an eye", this quote is used often among many diversities of people; however, Edgar Allan Poe took this quote to extremes in his story The Cask of Amontillado. Poe's usage of dramatic and verbal irony, foreshadowing and symbolism brings about a strong tale of revenge. Revenge is a feeling that has the ability to over come a person's grip on reality. The narrator, Montresor feels that he was greatly insulted by the unfortunate Fortunado. For this reason Montresor seeks revengeance on Fortunado for his heinous crime.
Edgar Allen Poe’s tale of murder and revenge, “The Cask of Amontillado”, offers a unique perspective into the mind of a deranged murderer. The effectiveness of the story is largely due to its first person point of view, which allows the reader a deeper involvement into the thoughts and motivations of the protagonist, Montresor. The first person narration results in an unbalanced viewpoint on the central conflict of the story, man versus man, because the reader knows very little about the thoughts of the antagonist, Fortunato. The setting of “The Cask of Amontillado”, in the dark catacombs of Montresor’s wine cellar, contributes to the story’s theme that some people will go to great lengths to fanatically defend their honor.
The pursuit of revenge is not always the right choice to make. As this theme is shown in the short stories written by Edgar Allen Poe and William Faulkner. The two main characters of the stories have hate fueling their motivation to commit cruel acts against others. In the story “Cask of Amontillado”, written by Edgar Allen Poe, Montresor kills a man simply for insulting his family name. In the story “Barn Burning”, written by William Faulkner, Abner takes out his anger on others by destroying property and punishing the world for his poor lifestyle. Abner and Montresor seek revenge for different reasons; however, they do it to honor themselves. These actions will lead to their impending demise.
In The Cask of Amontillado by Edgar Allen Poe, the tale is told in 1st person by an extremely vengeful character. This character, Montresor, would first appear to the reader as a victim but in reality, he is plotting to take the life of Fortunato.
The first –person narration style of “The Cask of Amontillado” is vital in creating the quality of the story. The story allows one of the main characters in the story Montresor, to tell the story from his point of view which gives the reader intimate yet disturbing look into the mind story teller thinks and feels which the reader doesn’t normally get from other narrative styles. The narrative style of this story is important because it sets the tone of the story. The reader become more familiar with the thoughts and intentions of the main character and this allows the reader to slightly figure out the outcome of the story and further understand the ironies throughout the story. If this story was told from a different angle I don’t believe it would be as powerful. First person narration
Revenge is best served cold or so says the well-known expression. This idea of revenge that they seek is usually to restore a balance and take an “eye for an eye” as the bible says. Revenge, if by chance everyone were in Plato’s perfect utopia, would be in a perfect form, where justice and revenge would be one, and the coined phrase an “eye for an eye” would be taken literally. By taking an eye for and eye, and punishing those who did wrong equally as they did wrong, there is justice. However, this revenge sometimes goes to far and is consequently not justice. This notion of Revenge and justice is often in literature, one of the better-known being the novel The Count of Monte Cristo, written by Alexandre Dumas. However, literature is not the only time that revenge and justice is discussed in. Works and Rules and real-life events that took place like the Bible, Hammurabi’s code, Twelve Tables, and others each have something different about the topic. More religious texts seem to forbid violence, while laws, such as the Hammurabi’s code, recommend revenge, but equal revenge. By judging from literature, it can be concluded that most authors have different opinions on the matter at hand, and revenge is sometimes justice, but usually not, and tends to lead to violence that was not intended.
Among Poe's most intriguing tales is "The Cask of Amontillado," first published in Godey's Lady's Book in November of 1847. A surface reading of that story reveals only a simple description by Montresor (the narrator) of how he kills another man who was called, ironically, Fortunato. Montresor exploits Fortunato's vanity concerning the connoiseurship of wine; specifically, Montresor pretends to want a wine cask of Amontillado verified as genuine. Montresor chooses a time when Fortunato is drunk to dupe him into going down the spiral stairs into the catacombs, which serve as a sort of family burial grounds for the race of Montresors. But rather than a mere cask of wine, Fortunato finds his death; for Montresor bricks him into a niche of the catacombs which has remained undisturbed for the fifty years since the murder was performed. How simple!
Revenge is such an enormous part of a being human. It is something that no matter how much you try to avoid part of you will persistently lust for it. When you are hurt in any way your natural instinct will always tell you to make the one who hurt you feel just as bad if not worse as how you felt. It is such a natural and powerful feeling, that when revenge is incorporated into a story it makes it so much stronger. Revenge will make you see so many more sides of characters and make them seem much more complex. Revenge can give fictional characters a more human quality. That is why so many writers use it as their theme.
Edgar Allan Poe is one of greatest American authors and poets. He is well-known as a master of using irony in his story. “The Cask of Amontillado” is a horror story about revenge of Montresor upon Fortunato. Fortunato believes Montresor is his good friend, but he ends up with being chained and walled in to the catacombs. There are three types of irony used in this short story: verbal irony, dramatic irony, and situational irony. Using these ironies, Poe wants the readers to understand about Montresor’s “friendship” with Fortunato.
Leading a drunk friend into the depths of a catacomb only to chain them up and brick up the entrance of the room for them to never be found. In the story Cast of Amontillado Montresor was the one who committed the action on his "Friend". The story started out with the two, Montresor and Fortuano's attending a carnival. Montresor is the one who is story teller and in the story he speaks shortly about Fortuano and how he bought a cask of alcohol that he want's Fortuano's to test the quality of. Montresor is the narrator as I previously said so he states the true intentions of being at the carnival.
The first-person narration style of "The Cask of Amontillado" is essential in creating the original quality of the story. The reason this is so important in this particular story, is because when a sane killer, Montresor, is allowed to tell the story from his point of view, the reader gets a unique, disturbing look into the calmness of his mind. The audience can more clearly see how he thinks and feels, which the audience does not normally get in mainstream, commercial literature. The reason the narration style is so important to the tone of the story, is because it lets the reader become personally acquainted with the thoughts and intentions of the main character, and since the reader somewhat knows the outcome from the beginning, it allows certain ironies to make sense to the reader. Furthermore, were it told from a different perspective, I do not believe the story would have been as psychologically powerful.
Poe starts out with a man, by the name of Montresor, wanting revenge on another man, named Fortunato. Most of the story takes place deep in the Montresor family catacombs. As Montresor lures Fortunato into the catacombs, he chains Fortunato up to a small hole in a wall, bricks it over, and leaves Fortunato to die. Even through the traits of anger, hatred, and revenge, as the story progresses on, Montresor, the main character in “The Cask of Amontillado”, starts to show signs of feeling guilty for wanting to murder Fortunato.