Compare And Contrast The 12 Table Of The Roman Law

756 Words2 Pages

The twelve tables of the roman law a document detailing laws in Ancient rome that the people went by. Code of Hammurabi was harsh penalties document in Babylon during king Hammurabi reign. Code of Assura document penalizing women for cheating or hitting husband but if proven men were also found guilty. All these laws help as a hole to shape today’s world. twelve table of Rome and code of Assura, Hammurabi are different as twelve table of rome is democratic law and allowed to defend yourself in court while code of Assura, Hammurabi is to break law you are given harsh penalties and man was seen higher than women.
The twelve tables are a document during 451 to 450 B.C. it was one of the earliest attempts of creating code of law so it’s basically the roman law each table is responsible for a section in the law for example table one is the law pertaining to procedure for the courts and trials this part in the document states that the prosecutor summons the defendant to court they have to attend what I took from this part of the roman law was that fair justice was a …show more content…

In Babylon the law was harsher and stricter these laws where very dark but it gave us the idea of a justice system but their punishment wasn’t something to be desired usually the people found guilty were sentenced to the removal of a tongue, breast, hands, eye, or ear (history.com). as to the code of Assura there laws where mostly against women though men could be tried but untimely it was a man’s word over a women and the man’s word was more believable than a woman but here in these set a laws it states the consequences of cheating on your husband or sleeping with another

Open Document