Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Different perspectives of William Bradford
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
William Bradford was the leader of one of the earliest colonial settlements in the United States. Thomas Morton was one of the settlers with him. Bradford documented his escapade in "Of Plymoth Plantation" to gain support from his home country and fellow colonists. Bradfords work, however differs from Mortons "New English Canaan" which also describes Mortons view on the settlements and the colonies. Morton is just a relaxed person who wants to sit around and party and does not really believe in anything. Bradford on the other hand believes that God is good and all powerful, he will strike you down if you dont go to church every Sunday and do as he says. These two werent the only settlers. Around one hundred years later came Jonathan Edwards.
Edwards believed that everyone was screwed. God was angry with everyone and when he wanted to he would strike you down. Practically we are sitting in his hand like little ants and whenever he wants he can just crush us. Edwards states on page 3 of Sinners in the hands of an angry GOD that God will simply make everyone burn in hell but a select few. If you worship and praise him and make him happy you will not burn in hell. In Thomas Mortons story "The New English Canaan" He states on page 2 and 3 that all they want to do is drink and party. They dont have to worry about anything, they can sit back and just go about their day. William Bradford simply wants everyone to worship God and praise him so that they could all live happy. He is a strict leader with a hard set of rules. He believes that the people who dont go to church on Sunday and decide to dance around the Maypole with Morton will be punished in the after life. Morton on the other hand just has a giant Maypole to tell everyone where the party is at and where to find them, he does this just to annoy Bradford at times.
An anti-"city on a hill" with a maypole compensating for something? A pleasurable refuge for indentured servants freed from service and respected natives? A place where a man just wanted to annoy his uptight, religious neighbors? Those are the obvious conclusions, but with like most anything in history, there's meaning and significance that we don't catch at first glance. Thomas Morton had an agenda, puritan leader John Winthrop may have had a secret, and there are so many fictions surrounding their whole story, it's hard to tell what's reality and what's not. It's time to sift through the parts, and piece together a bigger picture, asking one, main question: Why were Morton and the Puritans engaged in a seemingly never-ending conflict with each other?
There may not be two more contrasting characters of early America then Thomas Morton and John Winthrop. Morton was nicknamed, "Leader of Misrule" while Winthrop was seen as the "model of [a] perfect earthly ruler" (147). These two figures not only help settle a new land, they also had firsthand knowledge of each other. They are not two people that lived years apart from each other but rather they lived concurrently. With two such polarizing people living in a small new land, there was bound to be at least one disagreement. We are fortunate to have writings from each of these two fascinating men. One can't help but be thoroughly entertained when reading the words that each man left behind. Morton was the rebellious and raucous and Winthrop was the conservative preacher. Each had different ideas and ideals for what America was to become. Their two opinions could not differ much more from the other but they both weren't quite right. It seems that America has found a middle ground. Perhaps these two help set the path to where we stand now.
John Winthrop was given the role of Governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, which was the first major settlement, and his original aim as governor of this land was to make the colony a democracy. The Massachusetts Bay Colony was a successful settlement thanks to the group of governors and leaders the colony had. Even though Winthrop did not succeed making the Massachusetts Bay Colony a democratic colony he was still a great leader because of his leadership skills, he was one of the most educated men in “the new world”, and his determination for success, which helped push the colony in a positive way.
Bix Beiderbeck and Louis Armstrong, both legendary jazz musicians and trumpet players, had quite a different career and life. They received different levels of recognition at the time. This is not because of their style, as they both are legendary complex stylists who are great at messing with the beat, but rather the changes they bring to the world of jazz. Bix Beiderbecke defined and performed great jazz music while Louis Armstrong revolutionized jazz and innovated numerous performing techniques that led to the jazz we love today.
Each of these individuals did their part in making a historical effort on this time period. Their tributes to their communities helped form the nation we are still living in today. William Bradford was a natural born leader and assisted to better his colony in the best of his ability. He was very successful in his trials of teaching and learning as well. Jonathan Edwards was also authentically well in his purposes. From preaching impacting sermons regularly, to being recognized as one of the most prominent philosophers of all time, Edward’s left behind some very big shoes to fill. Bradford, leading his colony as governor in a more lenient matter, and Edward’s, was the stricter of the two. Their differences is what made them both so unique as authors, because their writing skills helped connect with their
In the early American writing, Of Plymouth Plantation by William Bradford, accounts the beginnings of an isolated colony in Massachusetts. In the documentation, a strong feeling of community is established among the settlers.
Of Plymouth Plantation by William Bradford and A Description of New England by John Smith are essentially irrelevant to one another in the way that each piece has a very different point of view. The author John Smith was a pilgrim who arrived in the Americas and wrote a description of the new land. William Bradford was also a pilgrim who arrived at Plymouth and wrote more about the realities of his personal journey. The purpose of this essay is to contrast the purposes of the writers, their intended audiences, and how each writer gives out a specific feeling.
Anne Bradstreet and Edward Taylor are two of the most recognizable poets from early American History; they were also both American Puritans, who changed the world with their poetry. We can see many similarities in their poetry when it comes to the importance of religion and also on having children and losing children. There are however differences in the audience of their poetry and their personal views on marriage. Bradstreet and Taylor both came over to America in the 17th century and settled in New England. Though Taylor came years later we can see the similarities through their poetry.
William Penn was a great human being who went through tremendous hurdles in life, went against his family’s views but had a strong vision and a will to accomplish pacifism in a colony. Creating Philadelphia was a great accomplishment for the years he spent there and the belief of religious tolerance attracted many individuals to practice freely. I am overwhelmed by his actions he took at a young age and his strong will power to accomplish his goal. Even though, his colony negatively transformed after his departure, his vision was to care for the people and to eliminate differences based on ones’ skin, color, gender, or religious beliefs. To conclude, William Penn was a great human being who envisioned something different and tried his utmost best to create a peaceful colony for one to dwell in and allowing religious tolerance.
Although Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith have two distinct writing styles, their passion for literature, their desire for a better world, and the underlying topic of their work are all strikingly similar. The lives of these two famous authors also resemble each other’s, starting in poverty, living through life’s hardships, and ending in success. Swift and Goldsmith were two of the most famous authors of the 18th century. I believe if Swift and Goldsmith had met, they would have made great friends. For the reason that, along with their passions, their lives were bursting with challenges. Both were born in poverty and underwent numerous challenges, including the death of loved ones and the loss of purpose in life. In addition, Jonathan Swift
Unlike the pilgrims looking for freedom to worship the way they wished, or others looking to convert savage Indians to Christianity, some made the journey to America for profit. John Lawson was one of them. Almost on a whim, headed to South Carolina because an associate told him it was great country. After 200 years of voyages to America, much of the land was still unknown. Lawson worked to change that. Upon his arrival, he joined an expedition that travelled by canoe and by foot. He travelled with Indians and scouted locations for settlements, and gathered information on plants and animals, land, and Indians. Lawson was successful in the Carolinas. On a return trip to Europe, he published a book that promoted colonization. Eventually, he established a colony of his own, in North Carolina, populated with a few hundred Swiss and Germans. Just like previous settlers, he unknowingly transported deadly pathogens to the New World. Unfortunately for Lawson, he experienced firsthand what the
On reading the excerpts by Peter Berger and C. Wright Mills, it is obvious that these two sociologists have very different methods as to how the practice of sociology should be conducted. While these two authors may differ in their various methods, they both have an underlying point that they are trying to make which can be made applicable in any person’s daily life.
From the perch of their age, William Graham Sumner and Henry George shared the same view of the world. There can hardly be any dispute that what these men saw before them was a great division between the rich and poor in regards to their respective livelihoods. Based on the sources of their writings they shared this view of the world, but they differed in their worldviews. While their opinions regarding the inequality differ substantially, the general form of their arguments is similar. At the heart of each lies a fundamental view of nature, vice, and liberty. It is each of these they believe are the reasons for the current state of their world. By examining each of these points a better understanding of these two men’s ideologies can be attained.
Based on the excerpt from "Of Plymouth Plantation" by William Bradford and from the videos, the message that William Bradford is trying to convey in this narrative is despite the hardships being faced, one should never give up on their aspirations. At the beginning of the excerpt the passengers, and Bradford were still aboard the Mayflower and on their journey to America. On September 6th, he wrote about how many of the passengers were afflicted with sea sickness, but, there was one man who continued to lift peoples spirits, despite the sickness. This man died of disease and was the first among many thrown overboard. The other passengers knew the chances of dying of disease, but continued to be hopeful about the journey to America. After 66
What started as an interesting pairing between an anthropologist and a psychologist, lead to some of the most ground breaking explanations of psychoanalytic principles. John Dollard, an anthropologist, was interested primarily in human social conditions. He researched the ever important topic of discrimination based on race in the southern part of the United States. While Neal Miller, a psychologist, studied the theories of learning. He also is well known for this contributions on the area of biofeedback. These two joined forces at Yale University.