Compare And Contrast Mauryan And Byzantine Empires

692 Words2 Pages

As civilizations arose they began to differ in many ways dependant upon their geographic location. Such as, the Mauryan and Byzantine empires. Their geologic location determined the outside influences that could have shaped their religions and languages, adaptations of people and animals, and source of food, and etc. Both civilizations took their own courses of action to build their great Empires. They are as much similar as they are different in many ways. The location influenced many parts of each empire which gave them some major differences. The Mauryan empire was located in India with center of Pataliputra and spanned across Asia. India with the Arabian sea to the west, indian ocean to the south, and Bay of Bengal east, is a peninsula. The location of the empire provided security against Northern and Eastern invaders due to the Himalayan and Hindu Kush Mountains. India has a tropical monsoonal climate. The Hot seasons last from March to November, the Rainy season is from June to September and the dry period is from January to April, November, and December. Whereas the Byzantine Empire was located in Italy with a center of Constantinople and spanned across Africa, Europe, and Asia. The Bosphorus river and black sea surround the Byzantine Empire. Just as the …show more content…

In the Mauryan empire the people believed that the emperor had the right to rule through arthashastra which in the Byzantine empire was the divine right of emperors to rule. The Mauryans provided security and justice for their merchants, farmers, and traders. Their main port of trade was the Khyber pass. They exported textiles,spices,exoctic foods, and luxury goods. They Byzantine empire used the Red sea to make trade possible between the Mediterranean and Indian ocean. The empires imports consisted of silk, spices, incense, and luxury goods received from empires like the

Open Document