Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research into the mind of killers
Essays on the psychology of serial killers
Essays on the psychology of serial killers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Research into the mind of killers
Typically, a psychiatrist is a well-known - highly qualified profession; so how would someone feel if theirs was a ravenous cannibal? Specifically correlating to Dr. Lecter, who is infamous for being the cannibalistic serial killer from the cinema picture, The Silence of the Lambs. Early in his childhood, Lecter experiences trauma from watching his parents being murdered and his sister cooked, which made him susceptible to severe psychological disorders. Likewise is Grendel, a notorious villain from the epic, Beowulf. Grendel was a human in a past life, but since he was not able to move on after his death, he became a monster who roams the Earth. Although both of these characters have vastly different back stories; they both are fated to have …show more content…
Overall, Lecter and Grendel comparatively have a desire to bring evil into society, yet Lecter kills with an incentive to become God-like, antithetical to Grendel who murders out of jealously and anger. Both Lecter and Grendel are terrorizing figures in their cultures, therefore, proving their sly mannerisms. Dr. Lecter, a psychopath, kills not because of his mental deficits, but because he despises the rude and the intolerable. Unlike …show more content…
His overwhelming sense of entitlement and hypocrisy, is proven when he refers to himself as ‘royalty.’ Hannibal’s occasional nice gestures are undermined when he is consumed with his cannibalistic urges. Some may say, he is only psychotic because of his early exposure to PTSD, but this theory is proven wrong. He showed severe symptoms earlier in his life, and the trauma only exaggerated the effects. His cunning and manipulative ways are far from unintentional; he manipulates people’s truth to discover their behavior and actions, so when he kills them it is more pleasurable. Hannibal’s unquestionable parasitic lifestyle is verified when he discusses the ‘finer things in life’. He discusses his interest in - dinner parties, fine arts, and fine dining. Authenticating his strange sense of
Grendel, as a character, has a much more complex identity than just a monster and a human. Some, such as Ruud, classify him as a mixture of three different characteristics, but alone, they tend to conflict with each other. By making the connection that Grendel represents immorality, the previous idea makes more sense, while simultaneously incorporating more aspects of the character into the analysis. In either case, Grendel represents much more than meets the eye, and provides a fascinating insight into
What's the difference between good and evil? In John Gardner’s classic tale Grendel the line between good and evil is exceedingly blurred. Gardner does a phenomenal job of forcing the reader to question who the real hero of the story is. So is Grendel evil or simply misunderstood? To answer this question one must look at his basic character traits. Grendel is an unloving creature, he enjoys killing and torturing humans, and when he shows any sort of mercy, he later regrets it. Due to these facts it is impossible to label him as “good”.
Our first character, Grendel, is an exceptionally diverse character. It is implied that in both book and poem, Grendel is a blood-thirsty monster. All Grendel does is go through meadhalls and kill the drunk, often asleep people. But when narrated through the eyes of Grendel, the true nature of this beast is discovered. The author of Grendel entails that Grendel is a depressed and misunderstood monster, restrained to the confinements of his own underwater cave. He is a lot like the monster in the book Frankenstein. Both Grendel and Frankenstein are born with no real purpose to life, going off of what they hear other people say and taking it as the truth. Both monsters, knowing that everyone detests them for being unattractive and different, retaliate by way of murder and mayhem. From the perspective of the people in the stories itself, Grendel is exactly how the narrator in the poem Beowulf makes him out to be. The people, or the thanes, of Hrothgar’s kingdom see Grendel as a demon from hell, representing all that’s evil in the world. He’s a supernatural creature and in this time period anything supernatural that wasn’t human was considered a spirit, a god, evil or, in Grendel...
Even if, at first, Grendel seems almost kind, and the reader is pleased with his character, he soon becomes more and more evil, and his actions bring about a feeling of uneasiness, to say the least. Before, the killing of people for no apparent reason disgusted Grendel. However, when he brings Unferth home, he kills the two guards "so I wouldn't be misunderstood" (90). Later, in probably the most disturbing scene of the book, we see how meaningless killing has become to Grendel. He brutally attacks the queen and is determined to kill her.
In Chapter 8, Grendel exclaims, “I’m a machine. Like all of you. Blood-lust and rage are my character,” (Gardner 123). This profound statement establishes a connection between Grendel and the ambiguous “you,” the reader. The monster, though he confesses to his wrongdoing, asserts that readers are no better than he. Countless bible verses reiterate this concept: “For all have sinned,” (Romans 3:23) “[Humans] are all. .impure with sin,” (Isaiah 64:6). Gardner’s reminder to readers of mankind’s predisposition to sin earns pity for the monster. He expands on these sympathies by describing the nature of Grendel’s lonely existence. “But there was one thing worse,” Grendel states after discovering the dragon’s charm, “no weapon could cut me,” (Gardner 75). In this moment, nihilism overcomes Grendel; if fighting poses no danger, it has no purpose, and neither does he. Any reader who has had an experience which challenged his or her values cannot help but feel empathetic towards the purposeless creature. Perhaps more piteous, however, is the suggestion that Grendel has no choice in being “the dark side. . the terrible race God cursed,” (Gardner 51). The dragon condemns Grendel as “the brute existent by which [humans] learn to define themselves,” telling him that it is worthless to better his character (Gardner 72). It is not until after
As Friedrich Nietzsche said; “What does nihilism mean? That the highest values devaluate themselves. The aim is lacking; “why?” finds no answer.” Grendels journey through finding himself, leads him ultimately to becoming a nihilist. After his newfound view on the universe, Grendel steps out in his overly destructive ways only to be shown up by the hero, Beowulf. In John Gardner’s novel, Grendel, it shows Grendel throughout his life, from rejecting the morals and beliefs of the Anglo-Saxons, and his philosophical views on Nihilism. As seen through both Grendel and Beowulf, Grendel shows characteristics of a monster with no motive for destruction. Grendel only strives to live based on his ability to continue terrorizing and destroying all things that don’t believe in Nihilism.
Grendel is born a neutral being, perhaps even good, but nevertheless, without hate. The transition which he undergoes to become evil is due to misunderstandings between himself and humans and also meeting with a dragon who is questionably evil. As a young “monster”, Grendel knew nothing other than the cave he lived in and his mother who could not speak any distinguishable language. He was a playful creature who seemed to be like a “bla...
An FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin contends, “Psychopathy is the most dangerous of the personality disorders. To understand it, one must know some fundamental principles about personality. Individuals' personalities represent who they are; they result from genetics and upbringing and reflect how persons view the world and thinks the world views them” (Babiak 3). In “The Cask of Amontillado”, Poe directs his attention to Montresor who is a man that Fortunato continues to torture with sick and foolish pranks. Very little is recognized that Montresor is a psychopath that will acquire his revenge. Psychopathy is a mental illness that could possibly exist through hereditary and genetics. Montresor’s family motto is,
Grendel then began to show even more human traits than before. He became envious their happiness and starting becoming the cruel one. He started torturing and killing humans quite frequently. He starts to enjoy being cruel during his first raid. “I felt a strange, unearthly joy. It was as if I’d made some incredible discover, like my discovery long ago of the moonlit world beyond the mere. I was transformed” (79). This kind of cruelness came easily to Grendel, not unlike the humans had watched for so long. Grendel slowly becomes more and less human. He starts to lose his humanity but shows off just how human he is. Grendel becomes what he hates the most, cruel and pointless. Though Grendel enjoys the human’s suffering, it only makes him feel worse. “I feel my anger coming back, building up like invisible fire, and at last, when my soul can no longer resist, I go up - as mechanical as anything else - fists clenched against my lack of will, my belly growling, mindless as wind, for blood” (Gardner 9). Grendel falls into the trap and start to enjoy the suffering of others. While this isn’t a problem at first, Grendel eventually realizes just how pointless this is. How pointless everything is. Grendel sees that the world doesn’t do anything for anyone. He won’t be given anything and he probably won’t ever be happy. As a result, Grendel learns to live with this hatred and continues
Grendel is the embodiment of all that is evil and dark. He is a descendant of Cain and like Cain is an outcast of society. He is doomed to roam in the shadows. He is always outside looking inside. He is an outside threat to the order of society and all that is good. His whole existence is grounded solely in the moral perversion to hate good simply because it is good.
...onclusion, I feel that Hannibal Lecter’s diagnosis would be Antisocial Personality Disorder with a tendency to be more on the psychopathy side of this disorder. He displayed six of the seven DSM criteria that identify a person with ASPD. Additionally, his behaviors fit well with psychopathy, which is a more narrowed view of ASPD. As mentioned earlier this can cause issues when looking to treat the disorder. Thus it was stated that no clear treatment exists. Due to this lack in treatment, I hypothesized that his future would end up in solitary or in death. However Hannibal Lecter is great at giving advice to both his friends and patients even if it was superficial. Also, he is a terrific cook and also was very well mannered. Overall, he is very intelligent in many areas other than psychology however his ASPD, serial killing, and cannibalism will be the end of him.
Popular films have a distorted picture of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. Such as in the film, Silence of the Lamb, the character Hannibal Lecter is a psychopath and cannibal who is known to eat his patients. Dr. Lecter must overcome his counter transference in order to achieve therapeutic success, which he personally psychologically evaluates FBI agent, Clarice Sterling in return give information about the killer. Dr. Hannibal Lecter has an antisocial personality disorder where he lacks remorse, failure to respect the law, deceit, charming, minimize their consequences, and show high intelligence. Antisocial personality disorder defined in DSM-IV and more commonly associated with psychopathy. The general population between 6%
Grendel was a monster, and a monster can’t help but act like monster. He throws objects, dislikes people, does whatever he wants when he wants to, kills and eats the Danes, and behaves like a wild animal. So just like wild animals that lack free will, so does Grendel. He is limited by his fate. Additionally, Grendel is evil, because he is a descendent of Cain, the first murderer
As he grew older he developed a strange taste for raw meat, which would eventually lead to cannibalism. Using his
War is key factor in Grendel, there is the war between kingdoms and groups, the war between Grendel and man, and the war between Grendel and himself, which all had the same outcome blood. Grendel learns of bloodlust though the man and how destructive it is. “ I was sickened, if only at the waste of it: all they killed-cows , horses, men- they left to rot or burn.” Grendel is disgusted by the man however, he goes to the heathhall killing for the first time and finding the bliss in the blood because Grendel learned what his and the shaper’s purpose is. “I fled with the body to the woods, heart churning- boiling like a flooded ditch- with glee and I felt a strange, unearthly joy;” Grendel infatuated with his bloodlust that he wants he self to bleed. Grendel cried, “Seize me! Seize me to you foul black bowels and crush my bones! Clawing my flesh, I fled.” The only things Grendel will not kill is deer, the Shaper, and the queen Wealtheow. Grendel would not kill deer because cows had more meat and were easier to kill. He loved Shaper and the queen and could not kill them however, he hates them the most, more than