Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Basic literary approaches
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Have you ever wanted to know the deep details of a story and how you can get more information that you would have never known? There are some novels that have a secret meaning to them such as In Cold Blood by Truman Capote and The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas by Ursala K. LeGuin. In order to get the deep secret information you have to do some criticism so you can understand it better. The main criticisms for the two novels is Psychoanalytical Criticism. Psychoanalytical Criticism is the focuses on the characters and what is going on internally and their motivations. It can also seek what is going on in the mind of the author. In the book In Cold Blood the author is focusing on what happened in Holcomb, Kansas. This is based on a true story …show more content…
where there were two convicts who murdered four members of the Clutter family with a shotgun that is held a few inches from the face in November, 1959. There was no apparent for the crime and there was almost no clues. During the scene Al Dewey, a sheriff and a special F.B.I. agent, was so obsessed with the Clutter case that he wanted to know who killed the family. As all of this is going on the whole town was scared about what happened and they wanted to know who killed them, so the killers could be punished big time. At this time the author was there during the whole scene and he gathered all the details of what happened to the family and gathered all of the information that was needed to tell the world about what the real truth of what happened to the Clutter Family. In Truman’s mind he is so sad and furiated about what happened with the family, so he goes around asking people if they know anything about the killers. Without giving up he found the right person name Willie- Jay, who was a former cellmate of Perry Smith and Dick Hickock. He gave the author all the information that he knew about the and some of the information he was given was needed for the case. The author found the parents of both killers later on and asked them some questions about their sons. They gave all the details from when they were little to when they were in high school and how bad they were and they already had a criminal case for doing something they shouldn’t have. One of the quote from the book is about the murders scene and what the killers did to the Clutter Family. “ "There's gotta be something wrong with somebody who'd do a thing like that," Perry said. "Deal me out, baby," Dick said. "I'm a normal." And Dick meant what he said. He thought himself as balanced, as sane as anyone—maybe a bit smarter than the average fellow, that's all. But Perry—there was, in Dick's opinion," something wrong" with Little Perry. (153)” In the mind of the killer they were crazy and bipolar. They took an action and did not think about the stuff that they were going to go through. But they just wanted the money ,which in that case is robbing, but they had planned to kill the Clutter family because Perry worked for Mr. Clutter in the fields and he was noisy and saw how much money Mr. Clutter had and Perry was going to get the money and also kill him because he didn’t get paid for working only 1 month as he was going to jail because of something he did wrong. So later in 1959 Perry got out of jail and had a friend name Dick that know everything about the Clutter family because Perry told him about the family and what his plan was to get the money. Also after they robbed them Perry have Dick kill them so the Clutter family does not say anything about them having a robbery. In the mind of the two killer they are just thinking about how nice the family was and how Perry was going to rape Connie Clutter and Dick stopped him from doing that because it wasn’t right to do that such a thing. Their mind was like a seesaw mean, nice, mean, nice… and this caused them to screw up their lives because the killed the clutter family. In the story, The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas the author is describing what it is like to be free and do anything you want such as: not following the rules of the house, making your own rules, drinking, doing anything you can to make you happy.
In the short story The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas, the author describe the city as Joyous! meaning that the people living in the city is always happy and never gets upset or mad about anything not even the smallest thing because they get to do anything they want to to keep themselves happy and the city “flawless.” As the story going on we begin to figure out what the city is really becoming in order to keep everyone in the city happy. Like it said “ They were not simple folk, you see, though they were happy. But we do not say the word of cheer much any more. All smiles have become archaic. Given description such as this one tends to make certain assumptions” (23-5). In this quote the city has a secret that haven’t been release yet. This is letting us know that the city is becoming more and more exposed of how the city is always happy. In the author’s mind she is probably going through a tough time by holding in a secret that cannot yet be told to anyone. Also she is happy on the outside but what really counts is what is on the inside. For example, one of her friend is happy and notice that something was really wrong because she could’ve tell by the way she was acting. She notice that as the day goes by that what happened on the inside is about to come out like releasing a deep dark secret. Then her friend finally told her and it put a relief on her and her friend as well. The Ones Who Walked Away From Omelas is a perfect example of depression so you can just do something just to make you happy. Later on in the story the secret was finally out of why the city was really happy. “ A child of nine or ten sits at the edge of the crowd, alone, playing the wooden flute. People pause to listen, and they smile, but they
do not speak to him, for he never ceases playing and never sees them, his dark eyes wholly rapt in the sweet, thin magic of the tune (81-4) [...] Sober-faced, the young riders stroke the horses’ necks and soothe them, whispering, ‘Quiet, quiet, there my beauty, my hope…” (88-9) [...] In a basement under one of the beautiful public buildings of Omelas, or perhaps in the cellar of one of its spacious private homes, there is a room. (94-5) [...] It could be a boy or a girl. It looks about six, but actually is nearly ten. It is feeble-minded. Perhaps it was born with defective or perhaps it has become imbecile though fear, malnutrition, and neglect” (100-2). All of this quote is about what the whole city was depended on and the secret is out. There is a child that is getting beaten up because of the people being upset about somethings and they let all the anger out on this one child which is making this child's life miserable. It says that the child had defects and that could be caused by some of the people in Omelas which makes them happy. So this is the reason why this disgusted city is always happy. After the city found out that all of the anger was let out on the child then they left without rescuing the child from its misery. But if the child is rescued then they will replace that child spot with another child so they can keep the city happy and going. The Ones Who Walked Away From Omelas, this title is about how the people of the city walked away because of what the city is doing just to make someone or something happy. After the city found out that a child was being abused because everything was being put on this one child. This kind of relate to the upper classes and lower classes because the upper classes will not help the lower class back up on their feet so they can start their life over and restart to something new. In the minds of people of Omelas they are not thinking about what they are doing just to be happy instead of caring for one another. They are mean and an abuser because they took all the anger they had in their inner self and let it all out on this one lonely, sad, and desperate child. As you do the criticism you get to learn all of the stuff that you didn’t about the book. Such as In Cold Blood and The Ones Who Walked Away From Omelas you get to compare to anything that is related to it and realize that the real meaning means something else. Many authors have different mind set which make a huge different in the story after you read what is going on then you try to compare it to recent history and the meaning of it the first time means something totally different than the meaning of what it really is. Psychoanalytical Criticism is a huge thing when you are trying to find out any details that you’ve never heard or think of when you are reading the first time. When doing this hope you the details that you have been looking for for a long time.
In Cold Blood is a true account of a multiple murder case that took place in Holcomb, Kansas in 1959, written by Truman Capote. Capote’s attention to detail causes the reader to gain an extreme interest in the Clutter family even though they were an ordinary family. The suspense that is a result of minimal facts and descriptive settings was an elaborate stylistic technique that gave effective results throughout the book. His ability to make this account of a horrid crime more than just a newspaper description was a great success as a base of his many literary devices, not just is great focus to small details.
In Cold Blood is the true story of a multiple murder that rocked the small town of Holcomb, Kansas and neighboring communities in 1959. It begins by introducing the reader to an ideal, all-American family, the Clutters; Herb (the father), Bonnie (the mother), Nancy (the teenage daughter), and Kenyon (the teenage son). The Clutters were prominent members of their community who gained admiration and respect for their neighborly demeanors.
A place which is flawless and is free of sadness, distress, and unhappiness. The story states how there are no conflicts, violence, or negativity in the Omelas society. The author visualizes and describes everything that goes on in the Omelas Society in a really fantasy way and uses persuasive language to convince the audience to believe that whatever is going on is true. The author also shows the joyous celebrations of people for the Festival of Summer. The genre of this story is introduced as to be more of an imagination then being realistic at the beginning. According to the author, “In other streets the music beat faster, a shimmering of gong and tambourine, and the people went dancing. Children dodged in and out, crossing flights, over the music and singing”(Guin 1). The author states that everyone is enjoying the festival, people are happy, and everything is perfect, but changes happiness into
In Cold Blood, a novel written by Truman Capote and published in 1966, is, though written like fiction, a true account of the murder of the Clutter family of Holcomb, Kansas in 1959. This evocative story illuminates new insights into the minds of criminals, and how society tends to act as a whole, and achieves its purpose by utilizing many of the techniques presented in Thomas C. Foster’s How to Read Literature Like a Professor. In In Cold Blood, Capote uses symbols of escape and American values, and recurring themes of egotism and family to provide a new perspective on crime and illustrate an in-depth look at why people do the things they do.
Truman Capote finds different ways to humanize the killers throughout his novel In Cold Blood. He begins this novel by explaining the town of Holcomb and the Clutter family. He makes them an honest, loving, wholesome family that play a central role in the town. They play a prominent role in everyone’s lives to create better well-being and opportunity. Capote ends his beginning explanation of the plot by saying, “The suffering. The horror. They were dead. A whole family. Gentle, kindly people, people I knew --- murdered. You had to believe it, because it was really true” (Capote 66). Despite their kindness to the town, someone had the mental drive to murder them. Only a monster could do such a thing --- a mindless beast. However,
In both stories of “In Cold Blood” by Truman Capote and “A Good Man is Hard to Find” by O’Connor, similarities and contrasts exist in their literacy forms. The characters in both stories are also comparable, although diverse at certain points. Several of the similarities ranges from foreshadowing, character simulation, and even the setting is similar since it envies ' and harbor criminal incidences (O’Connor, 121). Characters have similar qualities that originate them advance their heinous acts. It’s evident when the two stories culminates with the unwarranted deaths of innocent individuals i.e. grandmother in cold blood and the Clutters by O’Connor’s story.
The novel In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, tells the story of the murder of a respectful family in Holcomb, Kansas. Four people were killed on September 15th, 1959 when two men broke into their home to rob their safe, which allegedly contained 10,000 dollars. However, they walked out the house with only 40 dollars, a radio, and the lives of four on their hands. Capote creates an attachment between the reader, the murderers, the victims, the townspeople, and the investigators. Due to this intimacy, sympathy arises for Perry regardless of him committing such an awful crime. Even if people have compassion for killers, Capote's writing objectivity allows the reader to sympathize with him. Throughout the novel, Capote includes the childhood and trauma
Capote never intended for In Cold Blood to be a documentary of the multiple murder that happened in the small town of Holcomb. When Capote published his novel, people where not familiar with non-fiction novels. People knew of the murders that had happened and started criticizing the book for not being truthful to what had really happened. This novel can not be looked at as journalism, which is often the mistake people made and still make today. Although there are many facts within the novel, the story that is being told is not always credible. Capote has also been criticized for his method of gathering information, because he did not take notes or record his interviews. Capote said that he had tested himself and that he had a 95% memory recall, but this was not always trusted by critics.Capote had made a mistake by telling the public that every word in the novel was true, this just opened him up for critics and journalists to challenge his bold statement.
In the early morning of November 15, 1959 four family members of the Clutter family were brutally murdered in the small town of Holcomb Kansas. Two men make an escape, fleeing across the country living what those two thought to be the dream. While on the run, a detective works tirelessly night and day to catch the despicable people who could commit such an atrocity. Truman Capote captures both realities, putting them together in a true crime story of convicts, Perry Smith and Richard Hitchcock who run from the law and Al Dewey’s hunt for the killers. In his nonfiction novel In Cold Blood, Truman Capote reflects on the events of his turbulent and lonesome life, exposes his internal struggles with the murder mystery case, but also the search
Psychoanalysis is the method of psychological therapy originated by Sigmund Freud in which free association, dream interpretation, and analysis of resistance and transference are used to explore repressed or unconscious impulses, anxieties, and internal conflicts (“Psychoanalysis”). This transfers to analyzing writing in order to obtain a meaning behind the text. There are two types of people who read stories and articles. The first type attempts to understand the plot or topic while the second type reads to understand the meaning behind the text. Baldick is the second type who analyzes everything. Since his article, “Allure, Authority and Psychoanalysis” discusses the meaning behind everything that happens in Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” we can also examine “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” in the same manner.
In Cold Blood is a work of art, and gave a true meaning to life itself. Capote referred to In Cold Blood as “New Journalism”. He said that he wanted to bring the art of the novelist together with the techniques of journalism. There is much truth in it, whether or not it is “true” is at least debatable (Garrett,80). This provoking book generates the kind of deep interest and deep discussion. Truman invented the genre of true crime. In Cold Blood is not a tragic drama but an intervention on reality (Dakes, 69). Its dramatic interest lies in the dramatic class of murders and the pursuit of the criminals. The material of In Cold Blood is to some extent a return to Capote’s childhood and a real-life confirmation of his earliest imaginative creations and techniques (Nance, Page 626). In Cold Blood consumed more than six years of his life, but it won him enthusiastic praise, mountains of publicity, and millions of dollars (Krebs,320). The novel tells the story of the murder of the Clutter family, consisting of Mr. and Mrs. Clutter and their two teenage children, and the events that lead the killers to murder. The family was living in Holcom...
Psychoanalytic Theory itself has, what seems to be, two contradictory halves: Freudian psychoanalysis and Lacanian psychoanalysis. The first half focuses solely on the author and the unconscious mind; the second considers the unconscious, but prefers to concentrate on outside influences by deconstructing the text itself. According to Freud, interpretation is achieved by examining conflicts and symbols, such as Freudian slips and dream images. These outlets are help to determine whether an individual’s external behavior coincides (or conflicts) with their internal emotion. Freud placed emphasis on sexuality and the Oedipus complex, which is the idea of repressed sexual feelings toward a parent of opposite sex. He also defined three levels of the subconscious mind: the ego, the super-ego, and the id. Barry explains that the stages align with “the consciousness, the conscience, and the unconscious” respectively (93). On the other hand, Lacan, a follower of Freud, concentrated on the relationship between an author and his or her work. He claimed the two were inexorably connected, that objectivity is nonexistent. In an essence: an author’s personality is used to interpret the text and, in contrast, the text is used to gain insight about the author. Regardless of the emphasis, psychoanalytic criticism engages an
Psychological criticism is known as the type of criticism that analyses the writer’s work within the realms of Freud’s psychological theories. Such approach can be used when trying to reconstruct an author’s position throughout their literary writings, as well as understanding whom the author was and how their mind created such works. When considering the work of Emily Dickinson, psychoanalytic criticism comes into play with the role of explaining the many meanings behind her poetry, as to make the reader relate to such poetry on a deeper level or not to who she was as a human being.
A good novel is hard to put down. The story in the novel is perfect with a great plot, convincing characters, and a suspenseful build up to the climax. You have been drawn into the story and it is almost like you are there, living along side the characters. You understand their background, their trials, and their joys. The story brings to life something from long ago that may or may not be fictional. It is hard to tell without doing further research. In reality, that further research does not mean much to you at the present moment. The story, in its entirety, is all the matters to you. This is Narrative Criticism. Narrative Criticism focuses on the stories told by a speaker or writer which help us to make meaning out of everyday life. Not only does Narrative Criticism focus on the speaker or writer, but the criticism also focuses on genre, structure, characterization, and the author’s perspective. The Narrative Criticism approach has roots in history and a type of criticism known as Historical Criticism. From Historical Criticism, Narrative Criticism has grown into a whole new understanding of the text: not in fragmented pieces or overanalyzed passages, but rather as a study of the story as a whole.
Literary criticism is used as a guideline to help analyze, deconstruct, interpret, or even evaluate literary works. Each type of criticism offers its own methods that help the reader to delve deeper into the text, revealing all of its innermost features. New Criticism portrays how a work is unified, Reader-Response Criticism establishes how the reader reacts to a work, Deconstructive Criticism demonstrates how a work falls apart, Historical Criticism illustrates how the history of the author and the author’s time period influence a text, and last of all, Psychological Criticism expresses how unconscious motivations drive the author in the creation of their work as well as how the reader’s motivations influence their own interpretation of the text (Lynn 139, 191). This creates a deep level of understanding of literature that simply cannot be gained through surface level reading. If not one criticism is beneficial to the reader, then taking all criticisms or a mixture of specific criticisms into consideration might be the best way to approach literary