Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“A man of distinguished courage or ability,admired for his brave deeds and noble qualities” (“hero”). A hero is a person who cares for people, is determined to obtain his goals, and is very brave and lets no one stop him from achieving his dreams. Gilgamesh is a man who is also part god that has lost his best friend Enkidu and now searches for eternal life due to the death of his friend. Noah is a very religious man who the Lord trusted very much and was tasked with building an arch and housing animals and his family in it to save them from an incoming flood. They are both epic heroes from their respective stories. Gilgamesh is a better example of an epic hero then Noah because he is a brave, caring, and determined person.
Gilgamesh is far more brave than most “heroes” in stories let alone Noah. Gilgamesh endured many frightening obstacles while on the other hand the most frightening thing Noah dealt with was the animals he had to load into the arch. Gilgamesh states “Although I
…show more content…
[Gilgamesh] should go in sorrow and in pain, with sighing and weeping, still I must go. Open the gate of the mountain” (Sandars 143). Here you can see what Gilgamesh had gone through and where his bravery allowed him to overcome obstacles. Noah isn’t what most people would consider brave he isn’t ready to face the obstacle given to him by his lord but however is forced to for his own good. Here you can see the true lack of Noah’s bravery “I [The Lord] have decided to put an end to all flesh… And Noah did as the Lord commanded him” (noah… 171-172). The Lord is going to kill everything and Noah doesn't even try to save all of man, he is overpowered by the lord and only saves his family. However, being brave is not the only thing that makes you an “epic hero”, Gilgamesh is also caring. Gilgamesh has a kind heart and it is made very apparent in the story.
The entire story Gilgamesh laments his friends passing. Gilgamesh lamented “Now I will pray to the great gods, for my friend has had an ominous dream” (Sandars 141). This shows Gilgamesh’s true kindness, his best friend Enkidu had a dream of his death and the afterlife and Gilgamesh prays to his gods to try and save his friends life because he cares for him so. Meanwhile Noah is the opposite of caring and only cares for his life and enjoyment. Noah had left the rest of the world to be flooded out and die while he only saved his family. And another event of Noah’s lack of a heart “Cursed be Canaan; The lowest of slaves shall he be to his brothers” (“noah… 175). Noah had cursed his own son to being a slave because his son had covered himself (noah) when he was drunk and naked. It is quite obvious that Gilgamesh was far more caring then Noah. Right along with Gilgamesh’s kind heart he is also a very determined
person. Gilgamesh’s determination is unmatched by any character from any other story. Gilgamesh states “I will cross the ocean if it is possible; if it is not I will wonder still farther into the wilderness” (Sandars 144). It’s obvious Gilgamesh is determined to acquire eternal life, he seems to be willing to do anything. Noah on the other hand seems to do as little as he needs and doesn't save more people or animals. The author writes “How can I [Gilgamesh] be silent, how can I rest, when Enkidu whom I love is dust, and I too shall die and be laid in the earth” (Sandars 144). Gilgamesh is so determined to obtain eternal life, whenever he is told just to stop that isn’t meant for Man he ignores it and keeps on going no matter what happens. The determination is only one of the few things that makes Gilgamesh such an excellent hero. The better example of an epic hero of the two, Gilgamesh and Noah, is obviously Gilgamesh, he is so much more brave, caring, and determined. Gilgamesh sets out on his own adventure while Noah is told to go and allows all of humanity to be murdered. Gilgamesh cares for his friend, Enkidu, so much you would have to be blind not to see it, Noah, he, just lets all of humanity die and he has no sadness of it. Noah yet again is in the back, he isn't determined, does not make his own adventure however is told to and he is never stopped by obstacles, While Gilgamesh is constantly being stopped and harassed but he overcomes it. A hero is a person who cares for people, is determined to obtain his goals, and is very brave and lets no one stop him from achieving his dreams.
The Sumero-Babylonian version of the epic of Gilgamesh, after two and a half millennia of dormancy, was resurrected by British archaeologists in the nineteenth century. Amid the rubble of an Assyrian palace, the twelve clay tablets inscribed the adventures of the first hero of world literature – King Gilgamesh, whose oral folk tales go back to at least 3000 years before Christ (Harris 1). Tablet XI contains the story of the Flood. In this essay let us compare this flood account to the more recent Noah’s Flood account in Genesis of the Old Testament.
An epic hero is character who is brave and noble, and that person is someone who carries good leadership traits and goes through an epic journey. Usually an epic hero is from an epic, and an example is Odysseus. Odysseus goes through a journey to return back to Ithaca, his homeland. In the modern era, there are epic heroes all around us. They can be in books, movies, or plays. One great example of a modern epic hero is Woody from Toy Story 3. He is confident, courageous,selfless, and humane. Woody is a toy cowboy and his owner, Andy is going off to college. Woody and his buddies get misplaced and get donated to a child day care center. There, they have to try to escape and return home, after realizing how bad the place
The dictionary defines hero in mythology and legend as, "a man who is endowed with great courage and strength, celebrated for his bold exploits, and born of divine or royal blood. He is a person noted for feats of courage or nobility of purpose, especially one who has risked or sacrificed his or her life." In addition, I believe a hero is one to be looked up to and emulated. What is interesting about epic heroes is that their great deeds and exploits all have to do with defeating themselves, so with help from the gods they can truly become heroic. They can only defeat themselves with the help of the gods.
Merriam- Webster online dictionary defines an epic hero as, “ A grand and noble character in an epic poem, admired for great achievements or effected by grand events.” The same dictionary also defines an epic poem as, “a story told about a hero or exciting events.” The Epic of Gilgamesh is often considered the oldest story on earth; which would make Gilgamesh, the story’s controversial main character, and the world’s oldest epic hero. This epic set a precedent for all epics to follow; it displayed most of the traits that society commonly perceives an epic hero and epic poem should have. The Epic of Gilgamesh exhibits tendencies of an epic poem through its inclusion of an epic hero, multiple gods and goddesses, and it’s vast array of settings across the world. Additionally, Gilgamesh presents attributes of an epic hero through his quest for immortality, his noble birth and his battles with superhuman foes.
Some of the simpler similarities are that the extent of the flood reaches every part of the earth, the flood is intended to destroy mankind, aside from the heros and their families, Utnapishtim and Noah are found righteous by their God or gods, and they build an ark to certain qualifications. An example of a less obvious similarity is the location of where the arks first touche land. In the general sense, they both landed on a mountain: Noah’s “ ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventh day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat” (Genesis 75) and Utnapishtim's “boat stuck fast beside Mt. Nimush” (Gilgamesh 57). Taking this information a Step deeper reveals that Mt. Ararat and Mt. Nimush are about 300 miles apart. Both boats land in a relatively close proximity. Further proving the idea that the Sumerians and Hebrews experience the same event. Utnapishtim’s and Noah’s lives are dramatically changed by the flood. They sacrifice all that is familiar to them in order to receive the blessings of God or the gods. The heroes are both examples of a term I will call the archetypal path of blessing. Utnapishtim and Noah are both comfortable with what they have before the flood, but as Christopher Columbus States “One can never cross the ocean until one has the courage to leave the shore.” Utnapishtim and Noah give up what is ordinary to receive what is great. The blessings of both characters exceed
The Epic of Gilgamesh has many similarities to The Legend of King Arthur. Although Gilgamesh and King Arthur have comparison they also have differences. The main difference is that one is an Epic and the other is a Legend. To compare and contrast The Epic of Gilgamesh and The Legend of King Arthor, one must first know what the words, "Epic" and "Legend" mean. Primarily, "epic" is a long narrative poem about the deeds of a semi-god, also known as a superhuman hero who's actions are depended on as the fate of a nation, tribe or a human race. This usually consists of an adventure filled plot and is concerned with timeless human problems such as honour, jealousy, war and hatred. These contain gods and goddesses and the setting is fixed in a far distant place at a time long past. Epics are based on legends and myths.
The epic hero’s journeys hold the hopes for future of ordinary people’s lives. The Epic of Gilgamesh was written in approximately 2000 B.C.E which is highly enriched with Ancient Mesopotamian religions, and The Ramayana was written by ancient Indians in around 1800 B.C.E. The stories were written in two different parts of the world. However, these two stories etched great evidence that show people from generation to generation that different cultures and religions are interconnected; they share ideas with each other. Both Gilgamesh and Rama traveled long journeys in these tales. These epic journeys played a role in the creation of different archetypes. We can clearly see that these two tales share similarities between these archetypes. Although
In both versions of the flood story something angers God (in Genesis) and the gods (in Gilgamesh). "The uproar of mankind is intolerable and sleep is no longer possible by reasons of the babel" (Gilgamesh 12). The Gilgamesh reason seems very illogical. The Gods decide to destroy mankind because they are making too much noise. It seems that the gods didn't think over their decision wisely. They are gods, wouldn't they have the power to block out the sound? One would think so, but obviously that was not the case. This is the first major difference between the two stories.
God does not smile upon the prideful. Throughout the bible he rebukes those who are too prideful. Back to the story of Gilgamesh, or Odysseus, or Nebuchadnezzar. In each of these stories these men were punished for their pride by the gods. Odysseus was forced to roam the seas for 10 years before he could return home. Gilgamesh was so prideful when he found out he could not be immortal he could not believe it. Nebuchadnezzar was turned into a beast of the field. After Nebuchadnezzar was returned to his normal state of mind, he stated “Now I, Nebuchadnezzar, praise and extol and honor the King of heaven, all of whose works are truth, and His ways justice. And those who walk in pride He is able to abase” (Holy Bible) in Daniel 4:37. James 4:6
In Gilgamesh, he fights Humbaba with Enkidu, his best friend. Humbaba is the guardian of the Cedar Forest who was assigned by the god Enlil. Gilgamesh doesn't fight for the world, but he has his own reasons. In the text, it states, “Even if I fail I will have made a lasting name for myself’’ (181). In other words, Gilgamesh's motivation to slaughter Humbaba is not just to get rid of evil but to let his people remember him. Gilgamesh is being selfish because if he's dead, Uruk won't have a ruler, which means Uruk will be out of control. The choice Gilgamesh makes causes him not to care about Uruk but only himself. However, the encounter of Enkidu's death has turned Gilgamesh into another person. He couldn't confront the truth that Enkidu has died. Enkidu was more than a best friend to him, he was a brother whom he loved. Because of his love for Enkidu, Gilgamesh builds a statue so everyone in Uruk will remember him. This demonstrates Gilgamesh changing from selfish to selfless. This change is part of Gilgamesh's transformations towards becoming a hero. Gilgamesh changes as a result of Enkidu's death. According to the text, it states, “Gilgamesh interferes in the lives of his subjects beyond his right as king”(175). This proves that Gilgamesh was bothering and annoying the people of Uruk. Gilgamesh is going to become king soon and he shouldn’t disregard or interfere with his subject’s private life.
With Gilgamesh being all of those things in one being, it is easy to see why he had such an “I’m due” attitude. He was thought to have taken each woman, fought each man, and just been a level above everyone else. It took a tragedy in him losing his best friend, Enkidu, to make him realize he was as mortal as mortal as the people he ruled over. Enkidu can be seen as a religious influence in a subtle way. He was a man who knew very little of sin or “worldly” ways. In Christianity he could be looked at as pure or someone who has not sinned carnally, but for someone be without sin is near unheard of, because Christians believe, as stated in the Bible, “Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mothe...
How to Treat a God One of the most fascinating aspects of the ancient epic is the window it provides into the relationship between humans and their gods. Just as the hero of the classical epic represents an embodiment of the ideals of that society, observing the interactions between an epic’s hero and his gods, can provide some of the most revealing insights into the fascinating relationship between a given society and their gods. Through careful analysis of The Epic of Gilgamesh and Homers’ The Odyssey, we learn of similarities between the Greek and Sumerian relationship with their gods, in that both the goddesses Ishtar and Circe are revered, feared, and idolized by the hero; and of the differences between the two empires’ divine relationships, as Odysseus treats Circe much more as one would a human, than
The flood story that is told in The Epic of Gilgamesh has the same principle as the story of Noah told in the book of Genesis in the Bible, but there are some major differences. In the epic, Utnapishtim is immortal and, although Noah was extremely old when he died, he wasn’t immortal. Utnapishtim was a human, but because he saved mankind, Enlil said, “Hitherto Utnapishtim has been a human, now Utnapishtim and his wife shall become like us gods.” (Gilgamesh 11.206-207) In the Biblical story, God told Noah that he was going to send a flood and asked him specifically to make the ark in order to save mankind. In Genesis 6:13-22, God tells Noah why he’s flooding the earth and exact instructions to build the ark. “13 So God said to Noah, “I am going to put an end to all people, for the earth is filled with violence because of them. I am surely going to destroy both them and the earth. 14 So make yourself an ark of cypress[a] wood; make rooms in it and coat it with pitch inside and out. 15 This is how you are to build it: The ark is to be three hundred cubits long, fifty cubits wide and thirty cubits high.[b] 16 Make a roof for it, leaving below the roof an opening one cubit[c] high all arou...
When you think about the word “nature”, what comes to mind? Are you visualizing cheerful chirping birds, beautiful rainbows, and pretty flowers, or are you visualizing wicked snakes, treacherous jungles, and raging waters in your head? While nature is mostly viewed in a usually neutral sense, nature can also sometimes be viewed in both extremities in literature. One piece of literature can view nature as beautiful addition to Earth and have its characters coexist with it, on the flip side though, literature can also depict nature as inferior to man and have the characters disrespect it. Although the stories have similar morals, the two opposing views are similar to the ones of the first man on Earth and one of the greatest heroes of all time.
The Epic of Gilgamesh and The Odyssey both are held in high respect by literature analysts and historians alike for the characterization of the hero and his companion, the imagery brought to mind when one of them is read, and the impressive length in relation to the time period it was written in. The similarities that these two epics share do not end with only those three; in fact, the comparability of these works extend to even the information on the author and the archetypes used. However, The Odyssey and The Epic of Gilgamesh contrast from one another in their writing styles, character details, and main ideas. Both epics weave together a story of a lost man who must find his way, but the path of their stories contrast from one another.