Compare And Contrast Gandhi And Civil Disobedience

534 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Violent v non violent protests

Civil disobedience is practiced by many people who then incorporate this idea into non-violent protests. In today’s society, we have witnessed this philosophy in action, whether it be through marches or public rallies. Some protests prove to be successful but others break out in violence. Historical leaders, Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi, advocated for non-violence as they applied civil disobedience in their teachings. Thesis: King was influenced by Gandhi’s thoughts which focused on the idea of “Satyagraha,” making a majority of their practices and ideas similar. Though they have common ideas, they seem to divide in some aspects within their beliefs.

Gandhi and King had similar views regarding non-violence and civil disobedience. …show more content…

In addition to passive resistance, both leaders believed that they were fighting against injustice and not the actual person
King understood that not all white people had the same mentality of discriminating against African-Americans. He was fighting for equality; not fighting against the white people.
Delivering vengeance on the enemy wasn’t the goal. “Winning” over the other person in hopes of healing the situation and changing the law was the intent.

III. Though both men referred back to religion to incorporate into their teachings, King solely focused on Christianity and unjust laws while Gandhi derived his views from many religions and leaned towards more to a self-government
“A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God” The law is just not “the law.” If it degrades human morals and God, then it can’t be considered a law.
Gandhi was inspired by Jesus, Hindu Bhagavad, elements of the Quran, etc. He wanted his fellow Indians to see that they were self-sufficient and that they didn’t have to depend on the British empire.

IV. Gandhi believed there are times where violence is necessary, unlike King who didn’t believe that violence was

Show More
Related

  • Comparing The Boston Tea Party, The Salt March, And The Civil Rights Movement

    592 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gandhi developed the idea of satyagraha which centered around nonviolent resistance to opposition and evil. The goal of this march was to protest the taxation on salt production and transport in India by the British government. Gandhi's march sparked a wave of civil disobedience which contributed to the expulsion of the British empire. This march had a long term effect, as it inspired many to take part in a successful, organized civil protest. Furthermore, the protest stimulated further motivation for other disobedience and influenced the thinking of many civil disobedience leaders, such as Martin Luther King during the Civil rights

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King And On The Duty Of Civil Disobedience

    1177 Words  | 3 Pages

    History has encountered many different individuals whom have each impacted the 21 in one way or another; two important men whom have revolted against the government in order to achieve justice are Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. Both men impacted numerous individuals with their powerful words, their words carried the ability to inspire both men and women to do right by their morality and not follow unjust laws. “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” by David Henry Thoreau along with King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, allow the audience to understand what it means to protest for what is moral.

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience And Letter From Birmingham Jail By Martin Luther King Jr.

    799 Words  | 2 Pages

    applies the principles of civil disobedience in his procedure of a nonviolent campaign. According to him, “In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self-purification; and direct action” (King 262). The first step, which is “collection of the facts,” clarify whether the matter requires civil disobedience from the society (King 262). The second step, “negotiation,” is the step where civil disobedience is practiced in a formal way; to change an unjust law, both sides come to an agreement that respects each other’s demand, (King 262). Should the second step fail, comes the “self-purification,” in which the nonconformists question their willingness to endure the consequences without any retaliation that follow enactment of civil disobedience (King 262). The fourth and the last step, “direct action,” is to execute it; coordinated actions such as protests or strikes to pressure no one, but the inexpedient government to conform to them, and advocate their movement, and thus persuade others to promote the same belief (King 262). This procedure along with principles of civil disobedience is one justifiable campaign that systematically attains its objective. King not only presents, but inspires one of the most peaceful ways to void unjust

    Read More

  • Compare Martin Luther King And Civil Disobedience

    1142 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the time of Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr., freedom for African-Americans was relative terminology in the fact that one was during slavery and the other during the Civil Rights era. “Civil Disobedience,” written by Thoreau, analyzes the duty and responsibility of citizens to protest and take action against such corrupt laws and other acts of the government. Likewise, King conveys to his “Letter from Birmingham Jail” audience that the laws of the government against blacks are intolerable and that civil disobedience should be used as an instrument of freedom. Both writers display effective usage of the pathos and ethos appeal as means to persuade their audience of their cause and meaning behind their writing, although King proves to be more successful in his execution.

    Read More

  • Resistance to Civil Government: Henry David Thoreau

    1381 Words  | 3 Pages

    After spending a night in jail for his tax evasion, he became inspired to write “Civil Disobedience.” In this essay, he discusses the importance of detaching one’s self from the State and the power it holds over its people, by refraining from paying taxes and putting money into the government. The idea of allowing one’s self to be arrested in order to withhold one’s own values, rather than blindly following the mandates of the government, has inspired other civil rights activists throughout history, such as Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King , Jr. Both these men fought against unjust laws, using non-violent, yet effective, methods of protest.

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King Jr.

    578 Words  | 2 Pages

    King can be considered influential in his preaching of nonviolent protest during the civil rights movement. King quickly realized that there were two alternatives in the struggle against “the forces of injustice'; (Ansbro, 233): violence or nonviolence. He decided against violence for

    Read More

  • Comparison of Civil Disobedience

    3701 Words  | 8 Pages

    Despite the belief that fighting with violence is effective, civil disobedience has been tried throughout history and been successful. Fighting violence with violence leaves no oppertunity for peace to work. By refusing to fight back violently, Martin Luther King Jr. took a race of people, taught them the value of their voice, and they earned the right to vote. Henry David Thoreau presented his doctrine that no man should cooperate with laws that are unjust, but, he must be willing to accept the punishment society sets for breaking those laws, and hundreds of years later, people are still inspired by his words. Mohandas K. Gandhi lead an entire country to its freedom, using only his morals and faith to guide him, as well as those who followed him, proving that one man can make a difference. Civil disobedience is the single tool that any person can use to fight for what they want, and they will be heard. After centuries of questioning it, it appears that the pen truly is mightier than the sword.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Gandhi And Martin Luther King

    844 Words  | 2 Pages

    The definition of a leader is a person who influences people to a common purpose. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr are examples of great leaders who brought about social change through alternative means in the 20th century. Their means were through nonviolent protests of freedom. Gandhi fought for freedom from Great Britain, and King fought for freedom from segregation and equal rights for all Americans.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast X And Martin Luther King Jr

    665 Words  | 2 Pages

    He was an American Baptist minister, an activist, humanitarian. King growing up had both of his parents and lived in a middle class family. King was influenced by Gandhi’s and his way of nonviolence against unfair laws and equal rights as Gandhi with Great Britain. His mentions of non-violence encouraged many blacks to band together and protest without violent means.

    Read More

  • Montgomery Bus Boycott Outline

    1349 Words  | 3 Pages

    He was also good at expressing the goals of his congregation. King was deeply influenced by the accomplishments of Mahatma Gandhi's peaceful social campaign, which had been utilized against the British colonists in India. Martin Luther King, Jr. created ideas that shaped the core of his passive aggressive ideals, that the activists ought to take through nonviolent resistance that uncovers the brutality and

    Read More

  • Comparing Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela

    1055 Words  | 3 Pages

    II. Another similarity between King and Mandela is that they had the same beliefs. A. King firmly supported his nonviolent protest movement for the equality of blacks in America. B. Likewise, Mandela adhered to the ways of nonviolence to fight apartheid. III.

    Read More

  • Gandhi Movie Summary

    534 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gandhi is motivated by religious means; he believes that everyone is equal in God’s eyes. He gets involved in several movements for equality, and he stresses non-violence very strongly. The Indians are very mad because British rule continues to limit their rights. They are supposed to all get fingerprinted, and their marriage laws are invalid. Gandhi’s followers vow to fight their oppressors to the death, but he discourages them from violence.

    Read More

  • How Was Gandhi Successful In Fighting Injustice

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    He said they would not use violence but they made an oath that none of them were to go down to the authorities and register. Gandhi said they would let the police take his dead body but not his obedience. This means that he will let the officers beat him and kill him but that he would never give in and do as they say. If they kept fighting in this way, Gandhi thought they might even earn the respect of the men rather than them being scared of him. Now Gandhi tried to stop the law coming into affect.

    Read More

  • Equality: Mount Rushmore

    1359 Words  | 3 Pages

    is known for equality. When people think of equality, they usually can picture his face or hear his voice stating, “I have a dream”. But the way King went about his equality dream for Americans was different than anyone had ever seen. Mr. King once said, “Love is the only force capable of transforming an enemy into friend”. He studied Gandhi’s philosophy of change.

    Read More

  • Mahatma Gandhi’s Role in India’s Fight for Independence

    1328 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The strongest physical force bends before moral force when used in the defense of truth.” - Mahatma Gandhi (Bondurant). Mahatma Gandhi was the main leader in helping India become independent through the principles of non violence, self-rule, and the unity of Hindus and Muslims. His full name was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, but he was given the name Mahatma later on in his life. He wanted to see an united India without the rule of the British Empire. He accomplished this with passive resistance or resistance by non violence because he wanted to show that violence is not always the best answer.

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Gandhi And Civil Disobedience

Open Document