Compare And Contrast Durkheim And Weber The Development Of Society

1498 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compare and contrast Max Weber and Emile Durkheim contribute to the development of sociology

the development of society. It seemed like Weber dislike for traditional and things like supernatural, religion as irrational because they didn’t have a systematic development and instead they depend on personal perceptions which included feelings and emotions that are part of irrationality. Conversely, Weber liked a rationality that was made up of social actions that were practiced with reason or reasoning, calculation and the pursuit of personal interest. In addition, Weber believed that rationality was also part of the rational legal authority and that these had certain characteristics such as calculations. With this, he meant that businesses and institutions would come up calculations of methods that would give results and help achieve the goals. Efficiency is another one with …show more content…

Moreover, Weber thought rationality was helpful for organizations to operate in an efficient manner. He knew that even in modern societies rationality would expand into more and more societies because it was necessary for organizations to operate efficiently. However, he also feared that so much of this would increase the control of the individual limiting human action. These have been some of the features both Durkheim and Weber identified as distinctive of the modern era. The reason why these processes have such an important role in modern society is because they helped society evolve and as time passed these processes improved more and more helping society progress. For example Durkheim’s Division of labor had a key role in solidarity which it was reflected on organic solidarity. It helped societies evolve from simple to complex that leads to today’s social integration. Perhaps if it wasn’t for this shift the social systems of society wouldn’t be as coordinated as it is in many societies. It created a collective dependency to work amongst each other that in the long run helps

Show More
Related

  • Modern Society: Mass Effects In Modern Life, 1925

    1103 Words  | 3 Pages

    The modern world is described by vast process of collectivization. Collectivization is the way of moving into new things, such as collective efforts or collective work. The word mass has its own meaning as it shows the physic term used in polities, and it is the synonym for people. Human beings are not the same; they are hierarchical societies which make the history of the world. According to the Churchill, the mass production has positive sides for the society as it increased the economy of the regions. Also, products were more available to the people and were much cheaper, so they became wealthier as well. Another major point is that the amount of working also increased as people could get jobs and have

    Read More

  • The Struggles of the Working Class 1860-1914,

    1295 Words  | 3 Pages

    The antithesis would come with the unification of the proletariats, forming the trading unions. The role of synthesis is given to the emergence of political democracy and mass political parties. The time period from 1860 to 1914 is defined by the surfacing of the "mass societies." The social order practically ignored the industrial proletariat and the foundation for a reform was laid. The industrial proletariat refers to all the workers who desperately depended on their wages.

    Read More

  • Weber And Weber's Theory Of Protestantism

    1368 Words  | 3 Pages

    3). One concept that Weber would disagree with Durkheim about is his attitude towards functionalism, Durkheim believed that coherence versus class conflict helps to define a society, and Durkheim towards Weber would argue that conflict is inevitable. Weber believed that class conflict was essential within a society’s social order and opposing opinions were necessary. In my opinion Durkheim would agree with Weber’s view on religion due to a more modern society being based upon just that which helps to view it in a way in which society must depend upon religion like a political system. Weber would agree with Durkheim about empiricism which states “that knowledge comes only or primarily from sensory experience” (wikipedia.com/empiricism). relating to his own view on rationalization.

    Read More

  • Marx and Durkheim’s View on the Benefits and Dangers of Modern Capitalism

    1978 Words  | 4 Pages

    Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Émile Durkheim (1858-1917) were sociologists who both existed throughout similar time periods of the 19th and early 20th centuries, resulting in both Marx, and Durkheim to be concerned about similar effects and impacts among society (Appelrouth and Edles: 20, 77). Marx’s main focus was on class distinctions among the bourgeoisie and proletariat, forces and relations of production, capital, surplus value, alienation, labour theory of value, exploitation and class consciousness (Appelrouth and Edles: 20). Whereas Durkheim’s main focus was on social facts, social solidarity – mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity, anomie, collective conscience, ritual, symbol, and collective representations (Appelrouth and Edles: 77). For the purpose of this essay, we will be focusing on the concerns that arised among Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim towards the benefits and dangers of modern capitalism. Marx and Durkheim’s concepts are comparable in the sense that Marx focuses on alienation and classes, which is similar to Durkheim’s concepts of anomie and the division of labour. The beginning of the Industrial Revolution and technological advances can be seen as a key factor that gave emergence to modern capitalism, as the economic system was based on private ownership, mass production, and increased profits, resulting in people to be separated based on class and the division of labour, later giving rise to alienation and anomie. In this essay, I will explore Karl Marx’s and Émile Durkheim’s evaluation of the benefits and dangers that came about with the rise of modern capitalism. Through these two theorists and sociologists, we can analyze, discuss, compare, critique, and come to understand how modern cap...

    Read More

  • Ratism By Weber And Weber's Theory Of Rationalism

    1873 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rationality is this idea by Weber that it is potentially what created capitalism. Formal rationality is the set of pre-determined criteria that we use to make decisions and conduct activities. He basically says that as humans, we set goals for ourselves and we take whatever steps necessary to reach those goals. These steps though, have to be rational i.e. they are based off of our past experiences, logic or even science. Weber best describes this through the Protestant Ethic, in which he speaks of traditional capitalism, and rational capitalism.

    Read More

  • Marx Vs. Weber And Weber's Theory Of Capitalism

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    statues tried to lengthen it by compulsion” ( Section 5 SFNWO ). Marx argued that capitalism withhold the economy and create a recession and collapse of the economy. Industrial and factory working class has to work and be dependent on their employers because they don’t own land and capital (10/16).

    Read More

  • Max Weber's The Protestant Ethic And The Spirit Of Capitalism

    1390 Words  | 3 Pages

    Moreover, Weber argues that this spirit of capitalism was not a result of technological advances and/or the division of labor as many believe, it is from religious beliefs. But not just any religious belief, due to business leaders being frequently Protestant, Weber theorizes that protestantism enabled western rational capitalism. He utilizes empirical research by first going back to the beginning of protestantism with Martin Luther and his belief of the calling. Luther 's frustration with the corruption of Catholicism caused him to separate from it. As a Catholic, when you do something bad you confess to the priests and are cleansed. Thus, one can keep repeating sinful acts as long as they repent. Another problem that

    Read More

  • Comparing and Contrasting Sociological Theorists Max Weber, Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx

    1584 Words  | 4 Pages

    Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, and Max Weber are all important characters to be studied in the field of Sociology. Each one of these Sociological theorists, help in the separation of Sociology into its own field of study. The works of these three theorists is very complex and can be considered hard to understand but their intentions were not. They have their similarities along with just as many of their differences.

    Read More

  • Major Sociological Perspective Essay

    752 Words  | 2 Pages

    Emile Durkheim is another sociologist who used Herbert Spencer’s theory to explain the change in society. He believed that society is a very intricate system of interrelated and interdependent parts that work together to maintain stability (Durkheim 1893). This ensures that the social world is held together by shared values and languages. He wrote the Division of Labor.

    Read More

  • Max Weber's View on Social Science

    3303 Words  | 7 Pages

    Max Weber thought that "statements of fact are one thing, statements of value another, and any confusing of the two is impermissible," Ralf Dahrendorf writes in his essay "Max Weber and Modern Social Science" as he acknowledges that Weber clarified the difference between pronouncements of fact and of value. 1 Although Dahrendorf goes on to note the ambiguities in Weber's writings between factual analysis and value-influenced pronouncements, he stops short of offering an explanation for them other than to say that Weber, being human, could not always live with his own demands for objectivity. Indeed, Dahrendorf leaves unclear exactly what Weber's view of objectivity was. More specifically, Dahrendorf does not venture to lay out a detailed explanation of whether Weber believed that the social scientist could eliminate the influence of values from the analysis of facts.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Karl Marx and Max Weber

    568 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the nineteenth century, Karl Marx and Max Weber were two of the most influential sociologists. Both of them tried to explain social change taking place in a society at that time. On the one hand, their views are very different, but on the other hand, they had many similarities.

    Read More

  • The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism by Max Weber

    1113 Words  | 3 Pages

    Weber saw religion from a different perspective; he saw it as an agent for change. He challenged Marx by saying that religion was not the effect of some economical social or psychological factor. But that religion was used as a way for an explanation of things that cause other things. Because religious forces play an important role in reinforces our modern culture, Weber came to the conclusion that religion serves as both a cause and an effect. Weber didn’t prose a general theory of religion but focused on the interaction between society and religion. Weber believed that one must understand the role of religious emotions in causing ideal types such as capitalism. He explained the shift in Europe from the other worldliness of Catholicism to the worldliness of early Protestantism; according to Weber this was what initiated the capitalist economic system.

    Read More

  • Max Weber's Theory On The Growth Of Rationalization

    1270 Words  | 3 Pages

    While sociologists have often studied social change, Max Weber was particularly focused on understanding the progression of rationalization. Many of his works detail his analysis of the growth of rationality in the Western world, as well as the development of bureaucracies as a sign of this process. Although his argument that the modern world is marked by an increase in both does provide a valuable and multifaceted view, it does have its problems. Namely, Weber’s conceptualization of rationality fails to properly separate the different forms, which weakens his subsequent argument on the growth of rationality. In contrast, Weber is highly effective in determining the characteristics of bureaucracies, which allows for a strong discussion on increasing bureaucratization.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx And Weber's Theory Of Criticism

    1091 Words  | 3 Pages

    During our studies on the classical sociological theorist there has been a heavy focus on three key figures inspired the enlightenment period. Karl Marx was one of the first enlighten thinkers of his time, he saw the usefulness of observing the world with empirical data to obtain information about the world. He view the mode of production and the source of materialism the source for all things. He viewed the interaction between people and the material they worked with influence each other. He also believed that capitalism created a sort of alienation between all things in the world: Alienation from work, from people and from the world itself. He also focused on the bourgeoisies and their interaction with the proletariat class. Following Marx

    Read More

  • Max Weber's Functional View Of Religion

    1628 Words  | 4 Pages

    Max Weber had much to say about the organization of capitalism and the disparity of the system, but unlike others, Weber also paid a lot of attention to the traditional, non-monetary incentives underlying social action. Weber wrote extensively about religion, though both he and Durkheim had a functional perspective on religion. Weber was more concerned with the functional perspective of religion while Durkheim focused particularly on how social order was possible within a religious context. Weber’s idea of the iron cage was significant as he believed that society was no longer driven by non- physical conception, such as religious values but instead by economic interests. He believed that work shouldn’t be just our occupation and inclination; Weber believe that the strains of our capitalist society has become so prevalent and governing that we are forced into fulfilling rational costs to benefit the expectations of the capitalist marketplace. Thus Max Weber asserts that in order to relinquish rational control we must live in this so called iron cage for the greater good on society. “Furthermore the puritans believed that fate decreed that the cloak should become an iron cage” (lecture November 6, 2013)[Footnote]. He further stated these ideal were that material goods have gained an increasing and ultimately an unavoidable power. The material goods has contributed to keeping us trapped in this iron cage, and for many individuals it has become the rational choice to stay there, rather than to follow the values of religion. Weber would conclude that within our society today, we have given the attitude of involved reasonableness which pervades so many aspects of our lives and of our culture as a whole; creating an iron cage of econom...

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Durkheim And Weber The Development Of Society

Open Document