Coca Cola (older established beverage company) and Ruth's Chris (fine high end beef eating restaurants) are very different. Since their product offerings and clientele differ greatly they both required tailored approaches to market expansion. Both had foot prints internationally; both are leaders in their respective industries with brand recognition. With Ruth's Chris very successful IPO in 2005 both had access to capital to invest in market expansion. There are typically four areas for market expansion; product development, diversification, penetration, and market development. What business you are in, what brands you have, and the type of products you offer will influence the type of market expansion that best fits the business. Coca Cola is giant in all the areas noted above when it comes to market expansion but what both companies had in common was the recognition that "Market development” was essential to revenue growth. Ruth's Chris settled on only one strategy model "Market development”, more of the same restaurants in new international markets. In 2005 they had four very successful international markets - Canada, Hong Kong, Mexico and …show more content…
Taiwan. To continue this success they settled on the need to identify additional markets (cities) that met the criteria that could successfully support high end steak restaurants with enough disposable income and beef eaters. The expansion depended on the need to maintain the current model and a brand based on fine dining steak houses. This need also included the ability to secure USDA prime beef (or equivalent). Dan Hannah, vice-president for business development, gathered information from several reliable U.S. government and private sources like World Resources Institute, "Meat Consumption: Per Capita (1984-2002)”, Earth Trends, and World Bank Key Development Data & Statistics, and related websites including information like (Per Capita Beef Consumption (kg) Population (1,000s) Urbanization Rate (%) Per Capita GDP (PPP in US$)) which helped select the target markets that Ruth's Chris was aiming for. Product development, diversification, and penetration models were not part of Ruth's Chris market expansion plan due to the success criteria they have established. In contrast Coca Cola's "Market development” approach is very different.
Coca Cola is more interested in penetrating all markets and is willing to invest heavily in areas that will support distribution to emerging markets like South Africa. Coca Cola does this by establishing bottling plants as close to their consumers as possible. This puts the production and distribution (and jobs) directly in the hands of the local territories; this allows communities to be invested in the success and distribution of Coca Cola. As an example; in South Africa they have the first all-Black managed bottling plant which has won Coca Cola a tremendous amount of respect and continues to perpetuate brand loyalty in that region. This Model has allowed Coca Cola to expand to 56 countries with 160 plants alone on the African
continent. Coca Cola's willingness to enter emerging markets and establish local bottling plants has put them in over 200 countries with 80% of their sales coming in from international markets. Coca Cola estimates there are still approximately 900 million people who don't have access to Coca Cola products. Another key to success is Coca Cola's willingness to invest heavily in international marketing in overseas markets which perpetuates brand recognition and therefore brand loyalty at the point of purchase.
Ruth’s Chris enjoys a stronger brand presence compared to its competitors in the ever-crowding industry.
Coca Cola Company has over 300 different brands across 200 countries. The company offers customers both carbonated and non-carbonated beverages which include fruit drink, fruit juice, sports drinks, bottle water and coffees. To stay ahead of the competition, Coca Cola is always developing new and existing brand locally and globally. The company does a good job investing a lot of money in marketing campaigns. These campaigns are meant to help with spreading awareness so that customers can stay inform of new and existing brands.
Coke vs Pepsi Fighting for Foreign Markets Introduction The soft-drink battleground has now turned toward new overseas markets. While once the United States, Australia, Japan, and Western Europe were the dominant soft-drink markets, the growth has slowed down dramatically, but they are still important markets for Coca-Cola and Pepsi. However, Eastern Europe, Mexico, China, Saudi Arabia, and India have become the new "hot spots. " Both Coca-Cola and Pepsi are forming joint bottling ventures in these nations and in other areas where they see growth potential.
Key success factors in the industry are a strong brand presence, maintaining customer loyalty as exploring new markets and distribution channels as well as offering a diversified product line. Implications of these factors are strong competition and dependency of company’s behavior and marketing strategies on competitors’ behavior. This is especially true for Coca-Cola and PepsiCo since their flagship products are very much alike in look and taste.
Together both PepsiCo and Coca Cola are both companies that are known around the world for their goods. For decades now, these companies have been competitive against each other to “do better than” the other one, what some would call the “cola wars”. They individually offer a assortment of soft drinks; regular, diet, caffeine free and many other options for the public to choose from. Both of the companies also have quite a few different entities (or off springs) of their company, such as bottled water, energy drinks, and juices. Individually both PepsiCo and Coca Cola; better known as Pepsi and Coke, have produced goods for every income bracket.
Coca –Cola (KO) is one of the world’s largest beverage companies. Company was incorporated in September 1919 under the State of Delaware law and headquarters is located in Atlanta Georgia. But from 1886, company established its brand in US (Coca-Cola, 2012, p. 1). Currently company is providing for more than 500 varieties of non-alcoholic sparkles to the customers around the world. Apart from this, company also serve for still beverages that includes enhanced water, water, ready-to-drink, juices, energy drink, sport drinks and so on.
The Coca-Cola brand is the leading one in the beverage industry in the world. This company is the biggest producer, seller, and distributor of soft drinks and syrups throughout the globe (Oliver, 1986). In the US, it is the most popular and largest corporation. This firm is widely recognized through its popular product Coca-Cola which was discovered and made by John Smith in the late 1880s (Hays, 2004). Except of this core product, there are a number of other ones.
One could categorize Coca-Cola as a CPG company. Technically it could be thrown into that bucket, but in reality, Coca-Cola is not competing with companies like General Mills, Procter & Gamble, or Reckitt Benckiser. Coca-Cola sells perishable drinks, not reusable or disposable products. Coca-Cola is almost a medicine. As a matter of fact, the company’s original marketing strategies revolved around the ability of the drink to cure headaches. Its primary competitors are PepsiCo, Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, and less obvious, Starbucks and Nestle. As Coca-Cola partners with Dunkin Donuts on a new joint venture offering bottled coffee products, they enter into a niche product market where Nestle and Starbucks are their primary competitors (WSJ). Thus, if one was to classify Coca-Cola as something other than non-alcoholic beverages, then they could classify them as a bottling company. We chose to stick with the beverage industry because it requires more expertise to understand the chemistry and manufacturing involved with advantages in the unfamiliar bottling industry than it does to understand how brand equity drives competitive
As the world 's largest manufacturer and distributor of non-alcoholic beverages, Coca-Cola is certainly no stranger to global marketing. Established in the US, Coca-Cola initiated its global expansion in 1919 and now markets to more than 200 countries worldwide. It is one of the most recognizable brands on the planet and also owns a large portfolio of other soft drink brands including Schweppes, Oasis, 5 alive, Kea Oar, Fanta, Lilt, Dr Pepper, Sprite and PowerAde. Despite this, Coca-Cola often struggles to maintain its market share over its main rival PepsiCo in some overseas markets, particularly Asian countries.
Coca-Cola started out small in Atlanta, once as a Candler started the Coca-Cola company he " begun an active and innovative marketing campaign that spurred the wide distribution of Coke across the United States." Once he had this going he had to strategically plan on how to bottle his soft drink and get it ready for shipping. Once the product was bottled he had to plan on how his product would be distributed. "In 1899 the Coca-Cola company first signed a bottling contract, As a Candler did not believe bottling would be successful and sold the bottling rights to Benjamin Thomas and Joseph Whitehead." They successfully bottled the Coca-Cola product. Now that bottling and shipping the product wasn't the issue, Coca-Cola was shipped throughout the Un...
This proven track record for the company can be attributed to a number of factors, the first which is relatively crucial is the company's secret formula for Coca-Cola, which comparably tastes better than what competition has to offer in the market. The company's ability to come up with new products while at the same time reinventing the old products has offered them a competitive edge over their peers. The company boasts of having the world's most diverse and comprehensive distribution networks, this offers them accessibility to billions of people in areas that would prove rather difficult for their peers to distribute their products. The African continent has been cited as an excellent example, it is more often than not to see a distribution outlet for coke on a remote location on the continent
By successfully introducing Diet Coke the Coca Cola company extended its parent product i.e. Coca Cola through secondary brand association. The parent product Coca Cola was familiar with the consumers and they were really interested in something new that was offered by the company which was an extended version of the existing product. The most beneficial aspect of this extension was the company was promoting its new product along with its existing product with minimal additional expenses on the marketing campaigns. The company already had a vast distribution network which made easier for the company to reach maximum number of consumers across the globe (Pendergrast
Precisely, this study assesses the impact of the Coca-Cola system on the soft-drink network, globally. Part of the job of designing a plan is deciding specifically what is intended to accomplish. The most striking trend in business today is the growing globalization of markets worldwide for goods and services. In sharp contrast to such market integration is the uncertainty and turmoil of market fragmentation. These changes pose great threat to the marketing strategist, as years of central control have hampered development of the necessary market mechanisms and infrastructure to support the implementation of marketing strategies. Coca-Cola has emerged as a leading brand in the whole world, when we talk of the beverage industry. In case of a tangible product like Coca-Cola, marketers need to focus on several other important issues like establishing a strong distribution network, ensuring the availability of their product at the right place, at the right time and at the right price. In addition to this, Coca-Cola can forecast the future demands for its products and can preplan its production schedules. It can also keep control over the quality of its products through improvements in production processes and strict controls over the quality of inputs. While considering the case of Coca-Cola it can be said that the company is in a position to charge a premium over its original price because of its strong brand recognition globally. However, practically speaking tough competition from rivals, especially from Pepsi has forced the company to reduce its prices to the minimum possible level. In the late 1980s, competition with Pepsi led to a discount war in which the margins of bottlers were abruptly torn away. As a result, many of the ...
However, a sales performance review in the year 2015 of new soft drinks introduced by Coca cola established that in Mount Kenya region, only 15% had succeeded, 55% were performing poorly, 17.5% had failed completely, while another 12.5% exhibited abnormally high artificial growth.(MKBL,2015) Despite the introduction of new products by the Company, its market share in the soft drinks market dropped from a high of 98% in year 2013, to a low of 93% in 2015 in Mount Kenya region, which included Nyahururu town. (Ac Nielsen, 2016). There have been complaints by customers on the products attributes, pricing, distribution and the execution of promotional activities. Still, there is scanty and inconclusive empirical data that would explain this trend of Coca cola products within Nyahururu town. A study by Migwi (2012) researched on Mount Kenya Bottlers response strategies to changes in external environment. However this research did not study the effects of marketing mix variables of new Coca cola soft drink products on sales performance as it was out of scope. This study therefore, aimed at filling this knowledge gap by examining the effects of marketing mix variables of new Coca cola soft drink products on the company’s sales performance in Nyahururu town. It aimed at providing insights towards the application and integration of the marketing mix variables by marketing managers so as to achieve the envisaged goals. By gaining insights into how sales performance is affected by the marketing mix variables, the company is going to design and integrate the marketing mix better, therefore improving sales performance in terms of market share, growth and ultimately,
Pepsi and Coca-Cola are both sodas, but they differ in terms of the satisfying flavors, the color and the graphic design that represents their two products, and then how Coke makes more money than Pepsi. With that said, you should have gotten the ideology of what we will go further in discussing about. Everybody loves these two very well-known sodas which can inject caffeine into you, which makes you all jittery in filling you up with an energetic energy. Alright, enough of this, let's go straight in-depth in talking about the two rivals throughout this paper of how Pepsi beats Coke in sales, but Coke is usually ahead when it comes to annual net income (Feigin) or how Pepsi is a sweeter brand compared to Coke, though Coke brand is more valuable