Without comparative method it would be very difficult to know why certain things exist differently, even though they share certain communality and therefore, we have to compare and contrast different variables under them as to see their common or different independent variables causing variance between them. Therefore, existence comparative politics is very important. As Giovanni Sartori (1994) “…..says we compare to control, control means the way that we use comparisons as a way to check (verify or falsify) whether our claims or assertions about certain phenomena are valid or not by controlling for, or holding constant, certain variables. Example: poverty causes corruption or, corruption causes poverty, also look, authoritarianism is more …show more content…
Moreover, when in-depth studying single case we are extensively studying them and even if we have limited variables it help us build our hypotheses. The case we selected may be for analysis because of an interest in case per se or because of an interest in theory-building on that particular case. We have different types of case studies so far, these are; theoretical case studies, interpretative case studies, hypothesis case studies, theory-confirming and theory-infirming case studies and finally deviant case studies. Theory-confirming and theory-infirming case studies are analysis of single cases with the framework of established generalizations. The case study is a test of the proposition, which may turn out to be confirmed or infirmed by it. Deviant case analyses are studies of single cases that are known to deviate from established generalization. From six theories, hypothesis-generating and deviant case studies have greatest value in terms of their contribution to
During this study some of these theories will be applied , like
Political Analysis Political analysis is the method by which the judgement upon any political event, in any part of the world, is performed. It is based on the perception of the political reality of the region or the country in question and the perception of the relationship of this political reality with international politics. In order to perceive the international situation and international politics, it is imperative to have general outlines that explain the political reality of every state and the relationships of these states with the other states of the world, especially the major powers that influence the progress of events in the world. Since the Islamic Ummah is commanded to carry the Islamic Da'wah to all people, it is therefore obligatory upon the Muslims to be in touch with the world with awareness of its conditions and perception of its problems. The Muslims must acquaint themselves with what motivates the states and the peoples and pursue the political actions that occur in the world.
The following article analysis review by Team B illustrates and identifies several examples of statistics abuse in the practical world as a result of flawed research. The following examples demonstrate how a manger could and in many examples, does make erroneous decisions due to inaccurate statistics. The team has compiled the results by detailing the respective articles.
First, ideological control is summed up as, belief systems. This control type manipulates people’s thinking patterns so they accept the ideology without question. Eitzen, et al explains that there are several agents of social control that are involved in Ideological conformity including, family, education, religion, sports, media and government. The other type of social control is Direct social control which is the attempt to punish or neutralize groups or people who deviate from society’s norms . The authors suggest that there are specific deviant targets including, the poor, the mentally ill, criminals, and political dissidents. Also, the agents of direct social control include, social welfare, science and medicine, and the government. There are many examples of how society is controlled by a variety of methods including internet’s private eye, recent surveillance of cell phone conversations, and face recognition camera in public places. These forms of society control have been challenged by protesters who feel their individual rights may be
Comparisons over time may be inaccurate due to changing measures, unchanging measures, or projections. Comparisons among places can go wrong not only in different countries, but in rural and urban areas as well. Making comparisons among groups can also be comparing apples and oranges, as people with different socioeconomic status, ethnicity, or religion cannot be compared as simply as desired. Even social problems cannot be compared to each other, because no two are the same and sometimes aren’t even similar.
1. In your opinion, which ancient political practice, protective or developmental republicanism, has had the greatest impact on our liberal democratic practice?
The purpose of this case study is to investigate and bring new insight to situations and behaviors within an organization. Case studies are learning tools which utilize social science research to identify and resolve individual and organizational challenges (K. Mariama-Arthur Esq., 2015).
What influence have the rationalist, structuralist and culturalist theoretical approaches had on the study of comparative politics?
Lijphart, Arend. "Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method." American Political Science Review. 65 (1971): 682-693.
Certain people of society feel that the government does not provide citizens with the freedom that they desire to lead the life that they believe they should have. They want to be under less governmental control so they can do whatever they want. Society is in constant demand for new laws and regulations to allow people to do what they wish. When people hear the word control they automatically think restriction and feel that they no longer have the choice to live their life they way they want
The father of quantitative analysis, Rene Descartes, thought that in order to know and understand something, you have to measure it (Kover, 2008). Quantitative research has two main types of sampling used, probabilistic and purposive. Probabilistic sampling is when there is equal chance of anyone within the studied population to be included. Purposive sampling is used when some benchmarks are used to replace the discrepancy among errors. The primary collection of data is from tests or standardized questionnaires, structured interviews, and closed-ended observational protocols. The secondary means for data collection includes official documents. In this study, the data is analyzed to test one or more expressed hypotheses. Descriptive and inferential analyses are the two types of data analysis used and advance from descriptive to inferential. The next step in the process is data interpretation, and the goal is to give meaning to the results in regards to the hypothesis the theory was derived from. Data interpretation techniques used are generalization, theory-driven, and interpretation of theory (Gelo, Braakmann, Benetka, 2008). The discussion should bring together findings and put them into context of the framework, guiding the study (Black, Gray, Airasain, Hector, Hopkins, Nenty, Ouyang, n.d.). The discussion should include an interpretation of the results; descriptions of themes, trends, and relationships; meanings of the results, and the limitations of the study. In the conclusion, one wants to end the study by providing a synopsis and final comments. It should include a summary of findings, recommendations, and future research (Black, Gray, Airasain, Hector, Hopkins, Nenty, Ouyang, n.d.). Deductive reasoning is used in studies...
The way that a country is controlled by the government depends on the relationship between the legislative and executive authority. Most democratic nations, today, generally use one of two governmental systems, either a parliamentary system or a presidential system. Today most of Europe prefers to use a parliamentary system, whereas the presidential form of government is preferred in places such as South Korea, South America and the United States. The differences between these two governmental systems are not obvious at first, but there are some key differences. However, neither one of them is necessarily superior to the other.
The next step is determining the information decision makers need to know and answer to arrive at a conclusion – the investigative questi...
The most significant feature of an investigative study is the precision and simplicity of the investigative problem. For a brief assertion, it definitely has a great deal of influence on the study. The statement of the problem is the central position of the study. The problem statement should affirm what will be studied, whether the study will be completed by means of experimental or non-experimental analysis, and what the reason and function of the results will bring. As an element of the opening, profound problem declarations satisfies the query of why the study should to be performed. The reason of this essay is to discuss the features of an investigative problem; in addition, the essay will center on what constitutes a researchable problem; the components of a well formed Statement of Research Problem; and, what constitutes a reasonable theoretical framework for the need of a study.
Politics-Administration Dichotomy essentially has a two part meaning; there are two functions of government for this idea, as the name implies politics, and administration. The argument about the dichotomy between politics and public administration has been around for several years with no overall consensus on why they should be distinct from one another. Looking critically at both sides of the idea, there are ways to demonstrate an accurate presentation of the administrative agencies working and there are also ways they have proved to be inaccurate. There are just as many downfalls to a politicized bureaucracy. There will be more benefits to the politics-administration dichotomy view with the concept put in place by Woodrow Wilson. He simply promotes a clear distinction between politics and administration and supports the idea that they are interdependent of one another, and they require one another for the appropriate balance between democracy and efficiency. The idea of Wilson’s concept will allow agencies to gain the most efficiency through interdependence of politics-administration.