Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of ethics in an organization
The role of ethics in an organization
Chapter 4 business ethics and social responsibility quizlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of ethics in an organization
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Employees habitually face ethical predicaments. These ethical behaviors refers to treating others fairly, it specifically refers to; Being honest, Maintain confidence and trust of their employers, Following rules and regulations set up in the organizations, Conducting themselves in a proper manner, Demonstrating loyalty to company and its associate (Weber, 2002). An ethical predicament comes into being in a circumstance when potential negative ethical code is being used to make a decision. In a situation where an employee is being encouraged to inflate the expense account to meet his selfish needs would call for a deep examination and determination of the most appropriate step to take. The decision made can either be influenced by ones individual moral development as a loyal employee or on the other hand by the cultural values established by the organization to regulate the conduct of employees.
Majority of the organization’s management comprehend that paying attention to ethical and social responsibility is as vital as organizational issues such as paying attention to organizational costs, profits and overall growth of the organization. Unsurprisingly, the affiliation of a corporation’s principles and social responsibility to its economic performance relates to both managers and management intellectuals, which has caused a hectic debate. Organizations are also looking forward to measuring the nonfinancial factors that create value for the business. Researchers find, for example that people prefer to work for companies that demonstrate a high level of ethics and social responsibility. This will therefore create a center of attention and retain high quality human resources....
... middle of paper ...
...cial Exclusion and Culture: The role of group norms, group identity, and fairness, Anales de Psicologia: Special Issue: Prejudice: Sociodevelopmental Perspectives
• Wainryb, C, & J.G. Smetana 2006, Moral development in culture: Diversity, tolerance, and justice, Handbook of Moral Development, NY: Wiley.
• Killen, M., Mulvey, K., L., Richardson, C., Jampol, N., & Woodward, 2011, The accidental transgressor: Testing theory of mind and morality knowledge in young children, Cognition
• Pettigrew, F., 2008, How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology
• Eisenberg, N., 2000, Emotion, Regulation, and Moral Development, Annual Review of Psychology
• International Accounting Standards Committee 1995, International Accounting Standard London, International Accounting Standards Committee.
Do you agree with Schmeltekopf that business schools are not preparing students well for the for the ethical challenges they will face in the workplace? Why or why not?
I HAVE A STRONG belief that PREJUDICE also HAPPENS within a group. If you belong to a social group and there is OTHER group who are OPPOSE TO PREVIOUS GROUP, for example 'charvas ' and 'Goths ' there is usually hostility between the THIS GROUPS, because they HAVE DIFFERENT DRESS CODE and enjoy DIFFERENT HOBBIES. However, if these OPPOSITE groups HAVE NO OPTION TO COORPORATE together in a CERTAIN POSITION that they had NO OTHER CHOICE, the BOUNDARY 'drawn ' between them LIKE 38TH PARALLEL would BE DESTORYED and BE ABLE get along TOGETHER. However, as discussES in a VARITIES of EXPERIMENT, Aronson et. al. who OPERATED with the jigsaw SERVEY technique, it has CERTIFIED that changes in prejudGEMENTAL arising from the PERFORMING situation may not generalize to other INCIDENTS and until prejudice is DEDUCED in society, for example through edification which will practice these methods, people will be further likely to stay within their private group and remain to be unreceptive to groups that are diverse from
Another type of pluralistic ignorance sheds light on interactions between different ethnic groups. Research done by Nicole Shelton and Jennifer Richeson (2005) predicted that due to pluralistic ignorance, outgroup members avoid intergroup interactions. The study shows that outgroup members have interpersonal conflicts about outgroups rejecting other outgroup members which deters intergroup interactions. This study highlights the possible causes for why interracial contacts maybe low because ethnic groups misconstrue the feelings held by outgroup members (Shelton & Richeson, 2005). It is important to understand why and how social groups implement attributional biases about other social groups. This understanding will further our knowledge of how human beings choose not to interact with other groups due to the fear that the other group will reject them.
Bobo, L. (1999). microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Prejudice as group position, J. Soc. Issues 55:445–72.
The moral development of children can depend on many factors. Parenting and upbringing of the child, their environment, social environment, gender, and race are all aspects that can contribute to how a child develops their moral standards and expectations. Many psychologist have tried for several years to develop a theory to how morality is developed. One in particular is Lawrence Kohlberg (1958), his moral development theory is based on the cognitive development of children and it is thought that moral development proceeds and changes as cognitive development occurs (Arnett, 2012). Kohlberg’s moral development theory consist of 3 different levels each containing 2 stages altogether making 6 stages of moral development, as Kohlberg conducted
Stereotyping, discrimination and prejudice are phenomena that motivate animated debate amid the scholars as well as the public. Many ponder on which acts should be deemed discriminatory, when they can come to a conclusion that a decision or a social guideline preference is actually founded on prejudice and the role played by prejudice in creating gender and racial disparities. Also of immense interest are queries regarding how the society should react to these problems and whether they have been dealt with in a pleasing manner. Social psychologists lunge into this dispute equipped with scientific method, hoping to gather evidence that can shed the much needed light on these continuing worries. In particular, this paper seeks to shed some light as to why stereotypes and prejudices occur in the mind of perceivers, as well as the manner and under which circumstances they are most likely to manipulate perceivers’ explicit behavior.
Explain the connection between the economic model of corporate social responsibility and “free market” or “neoclassical” economic theory.
In our global economy requiring functional and respectful relationships between nations, prejudice and stereotypes can be a destructive force both in the world and in individual societies, especially in diverse ones.
Today I will be interviewing Baumeister, Gilligan, and Piaget who are some of the most influential psychologists in the field of moral development. I will be interviewing these three so and I have three critical questions in the field of moral development that I would like each to answer. I will then conclude with a brief summary of the similarities and differences between the psychologists I have interviewed.
The basis for this concept, begins with the causes of prejudice. While there are many causes that relate to prejudice, the context ...
Jr., Bernard E. Whitley and Mary E. Kite. The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination. Belmont: Cengage Learning, 2010. Web.
Many often justify discrimination through the means of statistical evidence, claiming that groups that are stigmatized deserve their treatment by citing negative attributes about them. However, this paradox is frequently unresolved to even those who realize the fallacy in discrimination. Several researchers in social psychology, including Galen V. Bodenhausen and Jennifer A. Richeson, have offered potential reasons behind this happening; “It should come as no surprise that individuals’ attitudes and stereotypical beliefs affect the way intergroup interactions unfold. Indeed, individuals who harbor negative stereotypes about the group membership of their interaction partners often display behavior that conforms to their stereotypical beliefs”(Bodenhausen & Richeson, 361). This shows how those discriminated against are likely to adapt to their societal status, and thus often behave according to their respective stereotypes. From this, one can begin to infer that this paradox is a reinforcing cycle, and that prejudice forms as a result of discrimination. Building upon this trend, in the final chapters of the text, a Peters reflects on the trends and results derived from Jane’s exercises, and how it related to the act of discrimination itself; “But even more pernicious, [the exercise] also illustrates how the results of discrimination tend
The Facts: Kermit Vandivier works for B.F. Goodrich. His job assignment was to write the qualifying report on the four disk brakes for LTV Aerospace Corporation. LTV purchased aircraft brakes from B.F. Goodrich for the Air Force. Goodrich desperately wanted the contract because it guaranteed a commitment from the Air Force on future brake purchases for the A7D from them, even if they lost money on the initial contract.
...ciety has intergrouped individuals for many years. Society creates an image for various individuals, and many follow through with those associations and do not try to negate it.
The problem that was investigated consisted of a question that Milton Friedman posed in one of his articles, which was featured in The New York Times Magazine in 1970. The question was, “What does it mean to say that “business” has responsibilities” (Friedman, 2007, p. 173)? Friedman (1970) elaborated on how businesses cannot have assigned responsibilities. Furthermore, he described how groups or individuals should be the only ones that can hold responsibilities, not businesses. He stated that associating responsibilities with the word business is too ambiguous. I will examine three discussion questions and three compare and contrast questions which Jennings (2009) posed in a case study that is related to Friedman’s (1970) article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”.