Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How developing countries compete with developed countries
Nature of competitive advantage
Competitive advantage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1.) Comparative advantage speaks about win-win situation for countries in trade but there are many criticisms regarding comparative advantage theory such as consideration of trade costs, import substitution industrialization and also criticism from a economist Ha- Joon Chang speaking about Technology making Developed countries rich and Developing countries as it were form past. Our Question is based on criticism made by Ha- Joon Chang i.e. developed countries maintain relatively advanced technology and industry compared to developing countries which lead to countries with good technology to export and become richer and countries with low technology lead them to become more poor by importing. In a paper "Should Industrial Policy in Developing …show more content…
Trade deficit and foreign investment are dependent as we know from economics that if we are having lot of imports rather than exports we do not have foreign savings which is part of investment for development of firms so domestic savings are needed for investing in companies so we call for foreign investment or borrow foreign aid for improving our firms. But always this trade deficit and foreign investment are always a political issues as if we consider U.S economy which has current trade deficit and it has lot of its trade balance by foreign investment. This can be serious political as there are lot of serious concerns such as national security, trade relations and economy. For example consider lot of U.S imports are from China and Major investor in U.S is China i.e. U.S current deficit is 38.7 billion dollars and China investment is 31 billion dollars. These proves how U.S is dependent on China. So if stops investing and exporting goods to U.S leads a great damage to U.S economy. These is the reason why republicans rejected the bill of increasing interest rate of federal bonds proposed by democrats. Also U.S has imposed many tariffs as trade barriers for reducing imports and reducing trade deficit. But as I had mentioned in third essay regarding trade deficit there is no clear problem having trade deficit. U.S has power of commanding world i.e. stability of dollar which can help U.S in drawing investments no matter of the interest rate for federal bonds. So economists claim that due to impose of tariffs on imports make people of U.S to pay more for these goods. There are more such arguments which led more favor to laissez faire trade i.e. No government intervention in trade. If we look at Exports and unemployment rate. Exports increased as firms production increased leading to more employment which lead people to consume more which led to increase in Imports as well so there is no point in telling that due to trade deficit unemployment has increased. Due to
...conomically beneficial trade and technology development. In this regard the Epilogue uses sound logic to plausibly answer the wealth question. On the other hand, Mr. Diamond uses the same "national competition" thesis to purport that Asia's large, centralized governments were conspicuously growth-inhibitive. This argument would not seem to pass muster given what we have learned about the role of governments. Professor Wright's slides state that "Centralization may limit predation and even allow for growth" as "centralized predation = incentives to maximize the haul " This clearly refutes Mr. Diamond's argument that centralized, monopolistic Asian governments impaired societal advances. Thus, Guns, Germs, and Steel can scantly explain why China and the Middle East remain emerging markets while Western and Northern Europe enjoy significantly larger national wealth.
...that used latest of technology. They made Japan a major trade area so they could have access to other goods.
It is seen that Japan while allowing these relations even against their better judgment were found to be better for it. China on the other hand suffered due to their resistance. Western powers fought their way in but it was fought every step of the way. While the treaties and agreements made by Japan weren’t done with terms favorable to its country, a dynamic economy was the result of it deciding to open itself back up to relations with the outside world. Japan had realized after the Meiji transformation period that if they wanted to become a world power much like those who had forced their ways on them, that they would have to welcome these powers and when they did many doors starting to open for them. These doors opening included establishing new industries and adopting new agriculture advancements. From the start China was in the mind set of defiance against any and all western influence. It didn’t stop the influence from coming but China went kicking and screaming the entire way. The country tried its best to reform and make effort to advance the country as challenged to do so by the west while trying to preserve Chinese customs and values. They tried valiantly to make themselves a super power like Japan had but they couldn’t find the right formula to make themselves strong enough and were
Heiduk, G., & McCaleb, A. (2012). China’s competitiveness in international trade: The impact of innovation and human capital – Review of empirical literature. WORLD ECONOMY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, 310.
During the Meiji Restoration, Japan transformed into a strong industrialized nation by adopting the Western political, cultural, and technological ideas. Japan was the “only non-Western country to industrialize in the nineteenth century and that, moreover, she did so in an extremely short time” (Sugiyama 1). Japan’s social, political, and economic aspects were all affected by the Western technologies to transform Japan into an industrialized nation (Wittner 1). By adopting the Western ideas during the Meiji Restoration, Japan has turned into a powerful industrialized nation by becoming an “international political player in the 1880s” (Wittner 1).
Krugman defines comparative advantage as “the view that countries trade to take advantage of their differences” (1987, p. 132). Comparative advantage theories assume constant returns to scale and perfect competition. Krugman writes that trade exists when countries differ from one another in goods they have to offer, technology, or factor endowments. Although there are multiple models explaining the cause of trade, each differs as to what factors are included to explain why trade takes place. Economist Ohlin and authors Burenstam-Linder and Vernon began introducing counter-points to comparative advantage as early as the late 1950’s, saying that formal models of comparative advantage did not take into account all factors affecting international trade. International specialization and trade caused by increasing returns, as well as economies of scale and techn...
Comparative advantage means that an industry, firm, country or individual are able to produce goods and services at a lower opportunity cost than others which are also producing the same goods and services. Also, in order to be profitable, the number in exports must be higher than the number in import. From the diagram we seen above, Singapore is seen to have a comparative advantage in some services. The services are Transport, Financial, business management, maintenance & Repair and Advertising & Market Research, etc. These export services to other countries improve the balance of payment. On the other side, Singapore is seen to have a comparative disadvantage in some services. The services are Travel, Telecommunications, Computer & Information,
This case depicts about the success stories of the collaboration in the automobile industry by the Japanese and US firm though they were obviously competitors. One significant success story emerging from the alliance involves Ford probe and Mazda MX-6. There were swapping of resources and capabilities between the two firms. Mazda designers design the basic platform, engine and drive train for the cars. Mazda then design the outside of the MX-6 and Ford does same for the probe. Finally both cars are assembled at a factory owned by the two firms. Ford escort was another successful offspring of the alliance where again the Mazda engineers designed the car and Ford made it. But the alliance was not without spots. Mazda Navaho one of the offspring of the alliance which was basically build upon the on of the Ford popular product Ford explorer and build by the Ford makers. Ford made an opposite step by denying to provide the Japanese partners Navaho production to continue production of its own product line. The partner Mazda in addition fell into financial distress and Ford got the effective management control of Mazda and took some bold steps which eventually went against the collaboration.
All nations can get the benefits of free trade by being specialized in producing goods they have a comparative advantage and then trade them with goods produced by other nations in the world. This is evidenced by comparative advantage theory. Trade depends on many factors, country's history, institution, size and. geographical position and many more. Also, the countries put trade barriers for the exchange of their goods and services with other nations in order to protect their own company from foreign competition, or to protect consumers from undesirable products, or sometimes it may be inadvertent.
and denial on some others for example: the way Japan will only let certain foreign cars into Japan and even then they are so heavily taxed that they are The average Japanese person cann't pay that much and will have to buy a Japanese made car and at the same time in other countries they are selling their cars for less. than anyone else in that country and that is what they do with most of their products and is how they get trade surplus year after year. & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Manufacturing is the most important economic activity in Japan. accounts for about 28% of its GDP. The Japanese people import more than half.
In order for international trade to work well, governments must allow the world market to determine how goods are sold, manufactured and traded for all to economically prosper. While all nations may have the capability to produce any goods or services needed by their population, it is not possible for all nations to have a comparative advantage for producing a good due to natural resources of the country or other available resources needed to produce a good or service. The example of trading among states comprising the United States is an example of how free trade works best without the interve...
Basically, David Ricardo talked about gains from trade through comparative advantage and specialization. When countries specialize in goods that they have a comparative advantage in, each country benefits from trade. This statement is also a way that specialization could lead to peace through codependency.
Trade is more than the exchange of goods and services; it sows the seeds for growth, development and provides the knowledge and experience that makes development possible (Cho, 1995). Trade is considered one of the main driving forces behind economic growth and poverty reduction, especially in Africa (Fosu and Mold, 2008). Adam Smith’s 1776 theory of absolute advantage states that a trading nation can gain by specialising in the production of the commodity of its absolute advantage and exchanging part of this output with other trading partners for the commodities of its absolute disadvantage (Llorah, 2008). This process enables countries to extend beyond their borders, allowing greater specialisation in production, enhanced effectiveness in use of thin resources, the growth of national income, the capacity to accumulate independent wealth and enhances the growth of the economy (Cho, 1995). According to DFID’s report, Trade Matters, other positive derivatives include raised employment, increased household income and the chance for people to earn their way out of poverty, independent of aid (DFID, 2005). The role of trade, while strongly advocated, is still highly debated (Collins and Graham, 2004; Madeley, 2000) and many recent studies question the positive role of economic growth on open trade (Bene, 2009). The extensive arguments surrounding this controversial discussion empirically highlight the difficulty in isolating the effect of trade liberalisation on economic growth, although it is clear that it does, and will continue to have, an important role in poverty alleviation.
International trade is an economic practice where countries can import and export goods with no concerns to government intervention which includes tariffs and import/export bans or limitations. International trade has several advantages on developing countries; who are nations with low levels of economic resources or low standard of living. Developing countries can advance their economy through strategic free trade agreements. Free trade generally improves the quality of life of poor nations. Nations can import goods that are not easily available within their borders; importing goods may be cheaper for than trying to produce consumer goods. Many developing nations do not have the production procedures available for translating raw materials into valuable goods.
Theoretical model of modern economic growth shows that long-term economic growth and raise the level of per capita income depends on technological progress. This is because of without technological progress and with the increase of capital per capita, marginal returns of capital would diminish and output per capita growth would eventually stagnate (Solow, 1956; Swan, 1956). Studies have shown that “experience, skills and knowledge in the long-term economic growth is playing an increasingly important role” (World Bank, 1999). Despite how technological progress work on economic growth, and how there are different views on the role of in the end, but I am afraid no one would deny that technical progress in the important role of economic development. In this sense, for a country to achieve long-term economic growth, we must continue to promote technological progress. However, economic growth theory is analyzed in general, and usually under the assumption that in the closed economy, and technological progress in a country not normally have taken place in various departments at the same time, and now the economy are often increasingly open economy. In this way, the technological progress in different economic impact on a country may be quite different. In addition, we assume that technological progress is Hicks neutral, is to an industry in itself, but technological progress also reflects the establishment of new industries and development. The new industries and technology-intensive industries generally older than the high, the use of less labor. Even the old industries, the general trend of technological progress is labor-saving.