Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rethinking the social responsibility of the business
Rethinking the social responsibility of the business
Impact of company social responsibility on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rethinking the social responsibility of the business
A, has recently made business decisions that appear to be attempts to protect the company by minimizing losses. Closing two stores in high crime areas, and declining to donate day old products to local food banks due to the possibility of fraud and concerns of employee theft may initially help Company Q’s bottom line, the passive attitude toward social responsibility will have a much greater negative impact on the company in the long run. In closing the two stores in high crime areas, Company Q initially may have eliminated losses in those two stores due to theft, vandalism and other crimes. And although this initially appears to have a positive impact as far as protecting the company and its investors, it also completely removes any chance …show more content…
of profitability those two stores might have had. In addition, closing the stores causes a negative impact on the community due to loss of jobs and elimination of the goods and services the stores were offering to those communities. As high crime areas, those communities would stand to benefit the most by having socially responsible businesses located there. Based on the facts provided, it is unknown what Company Q’s attitude is towards its legal social responsibility. No evidence has been provided to determine if Company Q is in fact complying with and obeying all laws and regulations, therefore it is impossible to offer an opinion on that aspect. It is stated that they do have a great concern about their employee’s potential to commit fraud and/or theft. Employee theft and fraud would contribute to higher prices in the marketplace which also impacts the community and it is important for Company Q to address these concerns as well as implementing measures to deter these actions. Company Q has both ethical and legal concerns regarding the potential for fraud and theft by its employees, so much so that they declined to donate their day old items to local food banks citing those reasons in particular. This seriously hampers what could be a prime opportunity to build their philanthropic social responsibilities and calls into question the larger picture ethical responsibility towards its primary stakeholders, in particular its employees, shareholders, suppliers and the community, which would greatly benefit by Company Q making their ethics concerns part of their business foundation. Company Q does show a small measure of philanthropic responsibility by starting to carry, as consumer request over many years, a small selection of health conscious and organic products. However, due to the high margin nature of these items, it may impact their ability to turn a profit on these items which could impact inventory expansion in this area or the elimination of these products all together which would negate the initial positive impact. Evaluation of Company Q and Recommendations Part B. Company Q can make several changes to turn around its current attitude toward social responsibility, which will in turn create a better bottom line financially, create a better working environment for its employees, foster and improve relationships with its suppliers and the community, and have a positive impact philanthropically on the communities they serve. 1. Develop an ethics program that applies to employees at all staffing levels that develops an atmosphere of trust and honesty. This program should address all areas of current concern such as fraud and theft, but also include clear and concise expectations on employee attendance, performance, ethics, dress code, customer service, and all other areas that could impact the operation of the business and its duties to its stakeholders both primary and secondary. The program should provide regular reviews and updates on training and also provide an avenue for employees and other stakeholders to report concerns and violations without concern for retaliation. The policy should include background checks and drug screening for all levels of staff. Regular reviews should be conducted for each employee and any questionable behavior should be addressed and documented, Ethics violations should be dealt with immediately and fairly. Teamwork, camaraderie, pride in the job and workplace, and social responsibility should be encouraged and rewarded. 2.
Develop tighter standards for inventory control. Work with suppliers to account for incoming inventory and compare stock levels to sales to determine losses. Identify ways implement loss control measures such as security, both physical and electronic surveillance, employee engagement with customers, and through ethics training with employees to prevent internal losses. Utilize inventory control measures further to develop a charitable donations program to allow donations of day old products to local food banks and other organizations such as schools, churches and for community fundraising events. For example, inventory day old products creating a list of items to be donated. Have inventory signed off by at least two members of staff, one of which should be a supervisor or store manager. Have a representative of the receiver of the donation review the list for accuracy and also sign off on the inventory list. Donation lists can then be used for regular inventory tracking and also as tool for proving tax deductible charitable donations for the company. This will foster higher ethical behavior for the company’s staff, lower losses due to consumer theft, and begin to create an environment of community involvement and charitable
giving. 3. Develop new and stronger relationships with suppliers of health conscious and organic products, local suppliers if possible, and expand the availability of these products in store. By developing these relationships, products can be obtained at a much lower price which would reduce the margin for markup to the consumer, making the products more affordable. Local farmers markets and small upstart companies are a good starting point. This not only will allow for the expanded ability to provide these products to the consumer at affordable prices, but also helps to support local growers and upstart businesses in the community. Consider including products from these categories in the charitable donations program. By beginning with these recommendations, Company Q can be well on its way to having a better reputation of community involvement, employee engagement, customer service and a much better relationship with and attitude toward the communities they serve. In turn this will increase profits and create the ability to grow the business.
After extensive last minute digging, I finally found a manager who trusted me enough to supply me with the name of the inventory system that is used. Unfortunately for me this is all I could uncover from my employer, but it is a start. Wal-Mart uses the SMART system. Because of the way it is spelled I can only assume that it is an acronym. I have been searching for over an hour on Google.com and finally produced some meager results, but here they are.
Because many people consider philanthropy to be a completely voluntary or discretionary aspect of corporate social responsibility, failure to be philanthropic is generally not considered as unethical; some may question whether it is a corporate ‘‘responsibility’’ at all. (Brian K. 2005) The caring approach seems much more realistic to use in terms of how people in business actually make decisions, as well as how they should make decisions. Managerial experience and observation of managers leads to conclude that morally and economically effective managers consider possible effects on other individuals, not amorphous groups, unless those groups are very homogeneous in nature. These managers think about themselves as well as others. When faced with conflicts they try to find the actions that fit the particular situation the best, intuitively understanding that each situation is different and deserves full consideration itself, and not some
A business should make sure its methods of production are not negatively affecting its employees and that all the people in the business are happy and willing to work. Also, a business should make sure that its methods of production are not producing any waste on land or water or air pollution, for these negatively affect society. A business that cares about it’s influence on the environment, and its consumers is bound to make a difference. For example: General Mills wants to reduce the amount of energy it uses. In order to do this, they had energy monitors installed into some of their equipment in one of their manufacturing plants. The result: General Mills saved around six hundred thousand dollars (James). Profit can be obtained faster by a business that is looked upon as a positive influence on the environment and its employees. Overall, a business should be careful about how it produces its products and think about society’s health before it makes a decision, for if it doesn’t, the liability for damage is a much greater price to
Vicky must avoid harming the powerless versus harming the powerful. The powerless in this case are the other stores that are going to compete with K.I. in the New England states region. Vicky is in charge of coming up with a unique pricing strategy that will run the competitors out of business within an 18-month period. The other competitors’ stores are considered powerless when compared to the gigantic and powerful Koke International. Vicky must consider the harm that is going to affect the powerless stores, which will lead them to bankruptcy according to Wendy’s plan. Vicky must also consider harming many versus harming few. The many in this case would be employees of the other five major players in the region and the few are K.I.’s employees. If the plan is successful then K.I. becomes a monopoly in the region while the competitors go out of business leaving their staff unemployed. Therefore Vicky must be concerned about the harm that is going to affect the many left unemployed versus the harm that is going to affect the few at K.I.
In response to the brief presented case study, Company Q has stores in high crime areas, and has chosen to close these stores citing above average losses because of shrinkage or theft by both customers and employees.
To supply the wants and needs of a consumer, society entrusts wealth-producing resources to the business enterprise.” (Santayana, George. Is The Tyranny Of Shareholder Value Finally Ending? So before we go into greater detail on the different perspectives related to social responsibility, one might question the meaning of social responsibility. It is generally agreed that social responsibility is defined as the business obligation to make decisions that benefit society.... ...
A proactive strategy is, “a social responsiveness strategy in which a company anticipates a problem before it occurs and does more than society expects to take responsibility for and address the problem” (Williams, 85). A more minimal social responsiveness strategy might dictate that we go ahead and try to maximize our profits and adjust our policies as we go. However within the framework of a proactive strategy we anticipate possible reactions from the community and our employees and retain the employee as it is in their best interest. It has been shown that adopting a proactive strategy is not only beneficial for the stakeholders but also for the shareholders as there is “a small positive relationship between social responsibility and economic performance that becomes stronger when a company or its products have a positive reputation for social responsibility” (Williams,
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Launched by Jeff Bezos, the Amazon.com website started in 1995 and is today considered as one of the most prominent retail website on the internet with a record turnover of US$ 14.87 billion in 2007. Jeff Bezos’s intention was to create an internet based company with the most dedicated product portfolio on the internet where customers could find anything they might want. Amazon’s success is based on technology, services and products (Jens et al., 2003).
Social responsibility allows for the market system to be centrally controlled by forcing shareholders to unwillingly contribute to social responsibility. While this idea of social responsibility may help companies in the short run, it will ultimately hurt them in the long run. Each person has their own values and responsibilities and “society is a collection of individuals and of the various groups they voluntarily form” (55). Businesses, as Friedman understands, are separate from this society since individuals are the only ones who can hold values and responsibilities. Subsequently, businesses are freed of the need to embed social responsibility into their practices and should focus only on creating the largest profit possible for their shareholders
The just-in-time (JIT) inventory system was developed in Japan after World War II, in an effort to control costs during fiscally challenging economic times (Waguespack and Cantor, 1996). The challenge that faced many Japanese companies in the post-War era was to find a way to meet the needs of customers and businesses while utilizing as few resources and as little capital as possible. The Japanese developed these set of techniques in order to control production, limit unnecessary products and reinvest the valuable capital left from the savings back into the business structure (Waguespack and Cantor, 1996). Much of the success of many Japanese corporations over the past four or five decades has been was linked to the principles of JIT (Chhikara and Weiss, 1995).
Friedman, M., (2007). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. In W.
In today’s fast paced business world many managers face tough decisions when walking the thin line between what’s legal and what’s socially unacceptable. It is becoming more and more important for organisations to consider many more factors, especially ethically, other than maximising profits in order to be more competitive or even survive in today’s business arena. The first part of this essay will discuss managerial ethics[1] and the relevant concepts and theories that affect ethical decision making, such as the Utilitarian, Individualism, Moral rights approach theories, the social responsibility of organisations to stakeholders and their responses to social demands, with specific reference to a case study presenting an ethical dilemma[2], where Mobil halts product sales to a garage, forcing the garage owner to stop selling solvents to young people. The second section of this essay will focus on advice that should be given to any manager in a similar position to the garage owner with relevance to the organisational strategic management, the corporate objective and the evaluation of corporate social performance by measuring economic, legal, ethical and discretionary responsibilities. It will address whom to think of as stakeholders and why the different aspect could cost more than a manager or an organisation could have imagined.
It seems obvious that large corporations have a tendency to ignore the negative effects of their actions in favor of profit. This example, although sensationalized, still says to me that with power comes responsibility. It affirmed my belief that a corporation’s goal cannot be just to provide profit to shareholders, but there must also be an element of social responsibility.
Corporations that place an importance on corporate social responsibility usually have an easier experience when dealing with politicians and government regulators. In compare, businesses that present an irresponsible disregard for social responsibility tend to find themselves fending off various reviews and probes, often brought on at the assertion of public service organizations. The more positive the public insight is that a corporation takes social responsibility seriously; the less likely it is that innovative groups will launch public campaigns and claim government inquiries against it.