It has been said that movies have repeating themes. Ideas have just been circling around and what distinguishes a movie from the other is the way it was portrayed. Some of the most common themes that we can observe in films are the man versus nature where the characters are fighting for survival, man versus himself or the struggle of the character’s self-demise, loss of innocence that portrays the journey of the characters into self-identity, love conquers all which is basically inclined to romance, and good versus evil. The aforementioned central themes when used caused familiarity to the audience due to its countless repetition. This makes such movies relatable and therefore universal. Central themes in films have just these innate characteristics that makes it desirable and satisfying. …show more content…
Akira Kurosawa, the director, used the following themes in the said movie—revenge, death as part of life, and the battle. The two gangs in the movie headed by Seibei and Ushitora worsen their feud for they continue to outrank each other through vengeance. These has been represented in the film through the manipulation of Sanjuro, the Samurai that leads to the burning of the silk store, ransacking the barrels of Sake, and the kidnapping of the two parties. Their hatred with one another fueled by pride and power led to the death of the gamblers of the two gangs. This is why it has been said in the movie that the coffin maker is the only one in the village that is making money. Lastly, it is evident that battles have been a part in this film. The first shown battle between the two gangs has quite the humor added into it as both gangs move back and forth as they engage in battle. This shows how afraid they are in fighting despite their strong
The different groups of friends were completely different from each other. There was the group that wanted to be popular and get all the girls with a party, and there was a group that had all the music records that the other needed. That was the group that was trying to make money as well. Both parties also wanted girls. The fact that these two groups had seemingly presented themselves as gangs shows how much they wanted to be apart from each other. The gangs symbolized the separatism of the youth. The catch to their separateness is that they really needed one another to get what they wanted. The one group needed music and the other group needed money. They ended up making a deal with each other, which was conspired by Bacc. The fact that they were able to come together like that symbolized that they really should be together.
As a viewer of the film you share the suspense that is happening with characters in the film. The fundamental function is made to relate to the characters and feel
After watching the movie "Even the Rain", I was impressed how deeply it was thought out. With this film, I realized that people are ambiguous, and in different situations may not act the same way, showing the character from an unexpected side for others, and for himself. Also that history always repeats. Are hundreds of years old and forgotten, Read in dusty books suddenly is played at you through the window.
Have you ever watched a movie and been dissatisfied, because it was not similar to its book? There are multiple movies that seem as if they are their own story, for they don't resemble their book at all. For example, “The Pit and the Pendulum.” by Edgar Allen Poe. He, himself would not approve of the film that follows his story. For one thing, the storyline was no where near to being like his book. Another reasoning is that he wrote based of one man not multiple people. And finally, he wouldn’t of approved of the art on the walls in the room with the pit and pendulum. These are the reasonings of why Poe would not appreciate the film.
Even though the prison has multiple gangs inside, the producers focus on two rivalry gangs for their documentary. A Latino gang called Ogden Trece and a white supremacist group; the two groups go back and forth all the time. The prison has a cell block that is just devoted to gang members and the guards who work in that certain section has
The classic gangster film focusing on a host of norms defined by some of the first gangster films. This genre originated as an escapism from the negative depression era. People would flock to see the gangsters go from rags to riches with their glitzy lifestyle and beautiful women. As Shadoian puts it, “The gangster’s fizzy spirits, classy lifestyle, and amoral daring were something like Alka-Seltzer for the headaches of the depression” (Shadoin 29). Not all this came easily for the gangsters though, bloodshed is defined as a part of business with guns a constant motif. Despite these negative outcomes, it’s easy to see how this genre was such a great elusion from the everyday where the American Dream seemed like it might not even exist anymore.
Every movie that is written has a certain attitude to it. Some of these are intended to be laughed at and others are meant to be heartfelt. Though each movie is written with its own voice, so to speak, many have similar plots or themes. The two movies Fools Rush In and My Big Fat Greek Wedding are two of these movies that have similarities in the themes, but not necessarily in the plots. Both of these romantic comedies have strong religious backgrounds on the woman’s side of the family and differences in culture. The main theme between these two movies is the quest for happiness and all the troubles that must be overcome to achieve it.
The theme of a particular film is its subject or idea, however, films may contain several themes depending on the viewer. These may vary from religious themes, to political themes and may not be the intended target of a films writer or director. (Goodykoontz & Jacobs 2014)
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
A set of practices concerning the narrative structure compose the classical Hollywood Paradigm. These conventions create a plot centering around a character who undergoes a journey in an attempt to achieve some type of goal (). By giving the central character more time on screen, the film helps the audience to not only understand the character’s motivation but also empathize with his/her emotional state. Additionally, some antagonistic force creates conflict with the main character, preventing immediate success(). Finally, after confronting the antagonist, the main character achieves his or her goal along with growing emotionally(). This proven structure creates a linear and relatively easily followed series of events encompassing the leading character and a goal.
We can start off with something that we all easily take granted for in movies and that is the imagery. We all have imaginations that can produce an accurate image depending on what we read or see, but something the books or plays couldn’t accomplish is give the image to us. So we wouldn’t have to seco...
Just how it shows when the power falls into the hands of the group, the terror arise and the violence as well. When they are looking for the stranger it show how the family has no power of the situation and the individuals take control of the situation by showing the family they aren’t playing any games. They show them knifes and the chainsaws through the camera, and they give them a time period. The demand that is exposed in this part shows how the issue is no joke and they are not playing games. When the family runs out of time it gives them the under hand and the power stays with the group of people.
The actions that these two men do are so extreme and exaggerated that make it almost fake, but was needed to keep the movie fun. The men bust a gangster from a Mexican cartel and ends up putting them in grave danger. In the end the two men chase a few cartel members into a set up ambush and get shot down in an alleyway. The backup finally arrives and surrounds the “Curbside Gang” and shoot and kill them all. Although rough to watch, this is the best scene of the movie in regard to realism along with the entertainment factor involved.
However, the mystical question is, “Why do people watch films?” What is that magic potion, which keeps people’s eyes glued to habit of watching movies, even after more than 100 years after its arrival? And more importantly, why people love to watch the same movie time and again?
"Books and movies are like apple and oranges. They both are fruit, but taste completely different.” said Stephen King (goodreads.com). It is indeed true, books and movies have several common things and yet have differences. They both give us the same story, but are viewed completely different. Reading books and watching movies are similar as they both tell a story and give details and information about the story. Reading books or watching movies gives the reader and the viewer the same feeling and emotions about the story. People can feel gloomy or pleased with the story after reading a book or watching a movie. Both books and movies have the same general concepts, which are the themes and main characters of