Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership theory of walt disney
Disney leadership style then and now
What words or phrases are used to describe Walt Disney's leadership style
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leadership theory of walt disney
Common Sense and Conflict
Michael Eisner is an American entertainment executive, whose leadership in the 1980s and 1990s revitalized the Walt Disney Company. Born in New York City, Eisner was educated at Denison University, where he studied literature and theater. After graduating in 1964, he worked for six weeks as a clerk at NBC and then briefly in the programming department at CBS. His career crystallized at ABC, which he joined as a programming assistant in 1966 and where he spent the next ten years, ultimately becoming senior vice president of prime-time production and development. Eisner's rise through the corporate ranks was paralleled by ABC's leap from third place to first place in the network viewing ratings. In 1976 he was named president and CEO of Paramount Pictures. During his eight-year tenure the motion-picture studio moved from last place to first place among the six major studios. In 1984 Eisner left Paramount to become chairman and chief executive of Walt Disney Productions (renamed the Walt Disney Company in 1986). Eisner admired Walt Disney and was especially interested in children's programming and family entertainment. The company's success included several feature-length animated films in the Disney tradition.
Michael Eisner was an optimistic person and he was well known for being a genius in creativity. He has made Disney a company that is built on a strong combination of institutionalized creativeness that constantly produces potent ideas, and also having common sense. One question that we must ask ourselves is how does Michael Eisner have such good leadership. Well as he describes in his interview, he says that being a leader requires 4 main parts: being an example, being there, being a nudge and finally being an idea generator.
There are many things that I agree upon in Michael Eisner’s way of having leadership in a company. One thing that I strongly agree on is that he has situated his company in being an “idea generator”, which to me is so powerful in a company. When setting your company to be an “idea generator”, you must have a loose environment so people are not afraid to speak their thoughts and ideas. He strongly encourages this type of behavior within his company. From seeing this way of leadership also shows me that the culture at Walt Disney is fun oriented, exciting and loose. Having this type o...
... middle of paper ...
...hat is spread out across the top and not just the very top. Eisner says that he focuses on the 40 people that he interacts with everyday. That is good because it shows to those people that you truly care about them and they feel wanted. The other leaders in the organization focus on other groups of people. Disney’s management teams are always moving around the entire world but they stay focused on what is most important to them. Eisner says that he wishes that he could be there for every signal person in his organization whenever someone needed help. But unfortunately, that can’t happen but that just goes to show you how committed Michael Eisner is and also why he is so powerful as a leader.
To me, being a nudge in an organization can be an ok thing, but at the same time it is very disturbing to employees. Eisner feels that being a nudge constantly reminds people of their ideas and what they need to do. That is true but the way he inputs it into the organization can be very frustrating to others. Eisner says that he does not keep many notes, which he should because that way you know at all times what needs to be done today and also what may need to be done in a week.
There have been countless books, lectures, and and trainings, and retreats constructed around the idea of cultivating leadership in an individual. However, cultivating individuals’ ability to follow great leadership has received far less attention. Who are these people leading if each person within an organization is being trained to be a leader? The word follower has negative connotations, evoking the images of a weak, uncreative, milquetoast personality. However, Jimmy Collins, in his book, “Creative Followership: In the Shadow of Greatness”, suggests that the ability to be led brings as much creativity, consciousness, and indeed leadership to an organization or team as the leader himself. Great followership is a reflection of great leadership. In this, the follower is just as important as the leader in the relationship. Many great leaders have asserted that a leader with even a modicum of understanding of what drives their subordinates can take their organization to previously undreamt-of heights in creativity and productivity. Collins does not disabuse us of this notion, he does however add that the follower is indispensable agent in this interplay between leader and follower.
Due to the two terms {“Pick your battles” and health promotion program} being distinctively different, will first define the two terms (through credible medical sources). Afterwards, use cross-contextual analysis through the module readings to answer the question.
During a time of great tribulations, each colonist would be forced to chose a side. Their options were either to fight for their rights and freedom or stay loyal to the royal monarchy of Britain. Both sides had support from people of great power. Two men by the names of Thomas Paine and James Chalmers wrote to defend their position and influence others to do the same with pamphlets titled Common Sense and Plain Truth, respectively. After reading, re-reading and analyzing both of the documents, it is clear that each hold debatable arguments, however, when pinned against each other and set side by side, Common Sense holds more power and influence, whereas Plain Truth highlights greater intellectual and logical arguments.
After Walt Disney death, the studio is struggling but was saving by the arrival of Michael Eisner as a CEO and Jeffrey Katzenberg as chairman of Walt Disney Studios. The studio produced many hits animation like Beauty and the Beast, The Little Mermaid and The Lion King. The Lion kings generated more than $ 1 billion revenue to Disney (ALCACER, COLLIS, & FUREY, 2010).
The Walt Disney Company is a highly diversified media and entertainment company that has been growing by leaps and bounds since its inception in the late 1920’s. In the past few decades, The Walt Disney Company has expanded into numerous markets and diversified its business greatly. The company states that their corporate strategy is targeted at creating high-quality family content, exploiting technological innovations to make entertainment experiences more memorable, and expanding internationally. Upon studying the happenings of the company throughout the years, it is easy to see that the company is executing this strategy well through numerous strategic moves in the industry.
[1] Information was mainly taken from the Harvard Business Case Study “The Walt Disney Company: The Entertainment King”
Criminology theories are Conflict Theory which is based upon the view that the fundamental causes of crime are the social and economic forces operating within society. Critical Theory approaches to culture, and esp. to literature, that seeks to confront the social, historical, and ideological forces and structures that produce and constrain it. Labeling Theory is how the self-identity and behavior of individuals may be determined or influenced by the terms used to describe or classify them. Life Course Theory focuses on the stage of life that exposure to health promoting or harmful influences occurs and the duration of exposure to these influences. Positivist Theory concerns with positive facts and phenomena, and excluding speculation upon ultimate causes or origins.
Michael Eisner, former CEO of Walt Disney Company strained several important relationships to the company because of his abrasive style and tendency toward micromanagement. During his 22-year tenure at Walt Disney, ex-CEO Eisner fought with the Miramax founders Harvey and Bob Weinstein over financial details relating to the purchase of Miramax. Eisner bumped heads several times with Steve Jobs who was then CEO of both Pixar and Apple Computer. The negative remarks Eisner made in front of Congress about Jobs Apple Computer was taken so personally that Jobs threatened to not renew the Disney-Pixar partnership if Eisner was still CEO of Disney. As well Eisner’s continuing disputes with Board of Director members Disney and Gold was that of disruptive behavior. For several years the long-standing board members repeatedly called for Eisner’s resignation.
They include: excellence in leadership, excellence in casting, guest satisfaction, financial results, and repeat business (Coverly, 2013). As it pertains to leadership excellence, Walt Disney is cognizant of the fact that communication is indeed the key driver and foundation for a collaborative culture within the company. Therefore, in this regard, the company encourages the cultivation of collaboration by essentially creating an enabling environment where ideas are spoken without fear of favoritism. Hence, Walt Disney promotes the use of positive language as part of its strategy of fostering leadership and collaboration. The use of positive language lays a basis for the realization of excellence in casting as one of the company’s policies. It is necessary to note that according to Coverly (2013), Walt Disney does not refer to its staff as employees; rather, the company classifies them as casts within the whole business arena. This concept, as Coverly (2013) continues to elaborate, emanates from the cognizance by the company that each employee has an intrinsic and unique role to pay within the company. As such, it is more natural to refer to them as casts, rather than the traditional “employee” notation. This strategy is very influential in generating and sustaining employee motivation which stems
Bob Iger is the CEO of Walt Disney Company since 2005 to present. He is the one of the most powerful in the world. Bob Iger working as the CEO of Disneyland, there are more than a hundred thousand employees in Walt Disney Company under his charge. Walt Disney Company not only built 8 Disneyland in America and other city in the world, but also owns filmmaking companies including Walt Disney Pictures and Pixar Animation Studios, one of three biggest radio company of America. Besides, Walt Disney Company is the second biggest Media & Entertainment company in worldwide, has distributing hundred of films and running multiple amusement park for years. The Shanghai Disneyland opened last year, which spent more than three billions RMB building it.
If Michael Eisner were to remain in his role as CEO, it’s likely he would face heavy opposition. Currently, three major stakeholders of the company have publicly disapproved of Eisner and called for his resignation. During an official vote, 45% of shareholders and 72.5% of 401(k) pensioners, who are essentially employees of Disney, voted that they were not confident in Eisner’s leadership. In response, Eisner resigned as the chairman of the board of directors. Additional to the shareholders and pensioners, two members of the board of directors resigned due to Eisner's leadership practices, and launched the “Save Disney” campaign. In order to regain the confidence of the board, shareholders, and pensioners, Eisner will not only need to address and remedy their complaints, but also alter his leadership style and take significant steps toward improving the economic condition of Disney.
In chapter eleven case study, we were asked, What special qualities of Steve Jobs seem to have contributed to his leadership success as Apple’s CEO? We think Steve Jobs was a successful leader because he was imaginative; passionate about his job, he had the ability to push employees to create new things, had confidence, and believed
It changed its operating name from “The Walt Disney Studios” to “Walt Disney Productions” in 1986, it began focusing on things such as radio, music, publishing, online media, and employed Mickey Mouse (An almost universally recognizable character from the 1928 animated film “Steamboat Willie” and onwards) as its company mascot. As of now, it is the second largest media conglomerate in the world. It owns and operates the broadcasting network: ABC, as well as cable broadcasting networks such as ESPN, A+E Networks, and Freeform. Such recognizable studios such as Pixar, Marvel, Touchstone, and Marvel all belong to Disney as of now. Their influence can be seen almost everywhere now, with all the advertisements and studio credits featuring the mouse, it’s hard not to see.
Reflecting on my roles and accomplishments in leadership in business, I can define leadership as the creation of a favorable culture under which an individual or a group of people can successfully carry out their roles. Leadership is all about assessing the environment wherein tasks are handled, with an emphasis on applying different strategies to overcome the challenges while increasing the opportunities; thereby, enabling individuals to fulfill their given roles. Some of the elements of strong leadership involve setting and communicating clear visions and boundaries, giving people the latitude to perform their tasks, monitoring ongoing achievements against the established vision; and continually assessing opportunities for improvement. Others are the involvement of all individuals in business by encouraging them to own the goals of the organisation or projects, and embracing positivity through the application of caution, courage, and determination. A further understanding of my application of these leadership attributes can
... settings, CEOs have to command action so that they can execute efficiently and capitalize on opportunities that are often fleeting. Leaders must recognize the value of learning quickly from events and the importance of keeping updated on developing events to stay ahead of competition. To create this scenario requires leaders must nurture creativity and openness, encourage exploration and invention, and facilitate cooperation across disciplines and perspectives. To meet conflicting demands, leaders must alternate between directing action and enabling innovation. As demonstrated by Sougarret, leaders must show decisiveness, give instructions, and periodically terminate discussions so teams can get things done. Yet, leaders need to understand that other times require them to create space for innovation, encourage opposition, ask questions, and promote experimentation.