Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Military higher education
Analysis of the structure of the United States Army
The US Army's organizational structure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Military higher education
For a Common Defense is a book written by three military experts named Allan R. Millett, Peter Maslowski, and William B. Feis. The book is about the structure of the military and the series of events that are involved with it. It also highlights the important events that took place during the many American wars in detail. Not only does it give readers an insight of the wars, it also explains all of the events that happened in between wars and how the military played a role in all of these events. The timeline of the book is rather extensive. It starts in 1607 when people first founded a settlement called Jamestown in what would some day become America. The book’s events take place from the first settlement all the way to 2012. The authors …show more content…
Millett is the senior author of For the Common Defense. He worked on it for three editions during the last thirty or more years. The book started when Millett was a student in the American military history class taught by Harry L. Coles at Ohio State University (Millett et al., v). He also served three years in the Marine Corps and an infantry officer. After some time teaching at the University of Missouri-Columbia, Millett went on to be a teacher as an alumnus at the Ohio State University. He “inherited” the American Military class he once took from his former teacher. Given the fact that Millett was a formerly involved in American military and his experience as an American military professor at two universities makes him a very reliable source for the …show more content…
The first is “rational military considerations alone have rarely shaped military policies and programs” (xiv). What this means is that a lot of military factors are not focused on the needs of the military, but on the American people. For instance, there have been several occasions in the past where the military need money but they are not granted the access to the funds that they need. In another instance, it has been shown that people regulate the military fearing that it will overpower the people. This can potentially inhibit the military from taking the necessary actions to protect its
Stewart R. W. (2005). American Military History (Vol. 1). The United States Army and the
- - -, ed. "The Anti-War Movement in the United States." English.Illnois.edu. Ed. Oxford Companion to American Military History. 1st ed. Vers. 1. Rev. 1. Oxford Companion to American Military History, 1999. Web. 24 Feb. 2014. .
Grizzard, F. E., & Smith, D. (2007). Jamestown Colony : A Political, Social, and Cultural History. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO.
Virtual Jamestown. "Indenture Contract of Richard Lowther." Personal Narratives from the Virtual Jamestown Project, 1575-1705. http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/jamestown-browse?id=J1046
The book, The Devil in the White City, takes place during the late nineteenth century. During that time, the total picture of the late nineteenth - century America that emerges from The Devil in the White City is very different than now.
Throughout history there have been few military theorists who have influenced military thinking. The military revolution that occurred during the American Civil War changed the face of warfare. The theories of both Antione-Henri Jomini and Carl von Clausewitz, the two most prominent military theorists of the 19th Century, can be seen in many aspects of the conflict. While Jomini’s tactics played a large role on the battlefield, the strategic concepts of Carl Von Clausewitz best characterize the nature of the Civil War. The writings of Clausewitz proved prophetic in three distinct areas: the strength of the defense over the offense, the concept of “Total War” used by General Grant, and the theory of war as an extension of policy.
“However, it seems he ¬¬–Eisenhower, never considered how easily our leaders would turn to borrowing to continue feeding the military-industrial complex war beast. Look at America's financial and social conditions today and consider the validity of Eisenhower's warnings expressed more than five decades ago. One truly unfortunate side effect of the military industry's quest for growth is that wars must be fought to justify and increase demand for its products.”
2. Clarefield, Gerard. Security with Solvency: Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Shaping of the American Military Establishment. Westport, CT, Praeger, 1999.
4) Newton, Huey Percy, 1942-1989, In Defense of Self Defense in Essays From the Minister of Defense. Privately published, 1968, pp. 2-15 [Bibliographic Details] [06-20-1967] S8195-D002.Web. 07 May, 2014.
Following World War II, the beginning of the Cold War and the U.S. vs. Soviet fight for global dominance prompted the U.S. government's rapid increase in military spending. The central foreign and domestic policy goal of the U.S. was to contain and eventually deter Soviet influence at home and abroad, a goal that paved the way for a significant increase in the influence of the military establishment in both foreign and domestic policy. Ever since the era of increased military influence, the military and government have kept the United States in consistent military operations in order to provide a market for weapons contractors. This military-industrial complex, although rarely discussed, is one of the, if not the single most important factor
Chapter 2: Strategic Defense, Phony Facts, & the Creation of the George C. Marshall Institute
World War II was the largest and most violent armed disagreement in the history of the world. However, the 50 year that now separates us from that war has exacted its toll on our unified knowledge. While World War II continues to consume the interest of military scholars and historians, as well as its veterans, a generation of Americans has grown to maturity largely unaware of the political, social, and military implications of a war that, more than any other, united us as a people with a common intention.
Martin L. Cook. The Moral Warrior – Ethics and Service in the U.S. Military (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004) 21.
Watson, Cynthia Ann. Combatant Commands Origins, Structure, and Engagements. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2011. Print.
Military theory is equivalent to an education and those who study it reap the benefit of knowledge. While experience is valuable, Liddell Hart would claim it was better to learn from the experiences of others. Properly guided by military theory, a strategist can craft an appropriate strategy while avoiding pitfalls. Because of their symbiotic relationship, military theory and strategy complement one another benefitting from a feedback loop. Neither is a fixed sum and can and should be adjusted with the import of new, clarifying information. If either is absent, the remainder is ineffectual at best but most likely quite dangerous. Most significantly, military theory and its relationship to strategy enable a strategist to better complete his daunting task. Any generated strategy would remain merely a guess, but, benefitting from theory, it would be an educated