Color Brave Rhetorical Analysis

860 Words2 Pages

The concepts of color brave and color blind have been debated through different approaches, bearing in mind racial problems. This becomes most visible during the TED Talks. Race matter discussion should be done in the spirit of "Color Brave" to those who are willing to freely express their belief in multiraciality. But if being color blind means ignoring race and treating all people the same regardless of what color they are, that flies in the face of the very differences we have created in our society. The purpose of this essay is to examine the definitions of color brave and color blind that are related to the subject of race and to find out what connection they have to sociological perspectives. In her TED Talk address, Mellody Hobson focuses …show more content…

Hobson attempts to provide factual evidence. Her statement uses a point to prove that they don’t just look pretty- they get the job done. This, first of all, is a direct outcome of the different points of view and experiences of an individual from different backgrounds, which in turn are improved by the fact that better decision-making and innovation are fostered. Hobson acknowledges the inevitability of the discomfort that can accompany talking about race, as the issue is an important one to face. She demands that individuals cross their comfort thresholds and make space for open dialogue, even meeting eye to eye in disagreement or the change of their outlook. Melody Hobson's TED talk is a plea and a call to action. It helps people to become color brave and challenge the blindness of color. In his TED talk, Colman Hughes proposes “color blindness” as a method of encouraging equality and freedom through the process of recognizing people as individuals with diverse racial backgrounds. He endorses seeing people not as a race, but primarily as being themselves, giving special spotlight to equal

Open Document