Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Unfair advantages for college athletes
Ethical problems in ncaa sports
Ethical problems in ncaa sports
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Unfair advantages for college athletes
The NCAA and its student-athletes deal with much more than are seen by the general public. The coaches and players always have hidden agendas. Scandals or infractions are committed every year in collegiate sports and are left unnoticed. The NCAA does its best in trying to keep this under control but have difficulty doing so. Student-Athletes receiving improper benefits and breaking NCAA rules are a common group and information on these atrocities must be brought to light.
The receiving of improper benefits expand over a wide range of topics and areas. All forms of “Extra-benefits are forbidden by the NCAA…” (NCAA Compliance 1). Athletes from every state are subjected to these rules without any exceptions. Receiving these benefits are grounds for the taking away of athletic eligibility. There are many forms of improper benefits “[that] include cash, gifts, loans, flowers, etc.,…” (NCAA Compliance 4). There are exceptions that apply to certain benefits although, for example “[if] the gift is available to the whole student body of an institution than it is not [considered] improper” (NCAA Compliance 3). Exceptions also include team meals that “must be for special occasions and [must] happen infrequently” (NCAA Compliance 3). These team meals in their defense are good for the athletes on the team to eat and bond together to improve chemistry. This being said, the athletes may not be given top quality food all the time. Housing is another issue that must not be improved for a certain superstar athlete. They must be housed in the same dorms as the rest of the student body.
These benefits and infractions aren’t only included in gifts given and received, but also in recruiting violations and admission scandals. Coaches are allowed to...
... middle of paper ...
...2728/major-ncaa-violations-yield-relatively-minor-consequences>.
"National Collegiate Athletic Association Compliance." Remaining Eligible. Web. 22 Mar. 2012. .
Ryan, Matt. "Big Ten Football." Bleacher Report. Web. 23 Mar. 2012. .
Telep, Dave. "Big Changes in Recruiting On tap." ESPN. ESPN Internet Ventures, 20 Oct. 2011. Web. 23 Mar. 2012. .
Weiss, Dick. "NCAA Hits Ohio State with Probation." New York Daily News. Web. 23 Mar. 2012. .
The 2012 Heisman Trophy winner, Johnny Manziel, began the 2013 season sitting on the sidelines. Due to a half game suspension handed down by Texas A&M University, Manziel was only allowed to watch as A&M took the field versus the visiting Rice Owls. To “Aggies” fans, this half game suspension came as a huge relief. It had been feared that Manziel may receive a multiple game or year-long ban from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) for violating NCAA Bylaw 12.5.2.1. The bylaw prohibits athletes from allowing their name or picture to be used in a commercial matter (Berkes, 2013). Luckily for him, a half-game suspension would be his only punishment. Manziel was put into this predicament after reports surfaced that he had accepted money in return for autographs. No proof of this was ever found, but it was proved that someone, probably a memorabilia collector, profited from his signature (Berkes, 2013). So wait, a man can’t receive money for signing his own autograph? The answer is “no”, if he is a student athlete following the strict rules of the NCAA. The only benefits he can accept are those included in a lucrative scholarship given by universities. As more incidents like Johnny Manziel’s have occurred, it has been debated by sports analysts and the news media whether or not these scholarships are a fair payment. Another Heisman Trophy winner, Cam Newton, was accused of trying to sell his services to Mississippi State University after his decision to transfer from a community college following his junior year. While an NCAA investigation would find that his father had indeed tried to shop Cam to prospective schools, Newton was cleared to play (Wojciechowski, 2010). The 2005 Heisman Trophy winner, Reggie Bush, was ...
Those who play popular and highly competitive college sports are treated unfairly. The colleges and universities with successful sports like football and basketball receive millions of dollars in television and ad space revenues, so do the National Collegiate Athletic Association, which is the governing body of big time college sports. Many coaches are also paid over $1 million per year. Meanwhile, the players that help the colleges receive these millions of dollars are forbidden to receive any gifts or money for their athletic achievements and performances. As a solution college athletes ...
Spillane, Matt. "COLLEGE RECRUITING MAKES HEADLINES FOR CHEATING AND DISHONESTY." Www.academic.marist.edu/mwwatch/spring08/articles/sports/sports12.html. 10 Nov. 2011. Web. 14 Nov. 2011. .
...hedules the athletes had, they are still considered just a student. The NCAA cannot continue to allow these schools to work the athletes as much as they do without giving the athletes what they deserve.
People believe that paying college athletes will ruin the tradition and innocence of the game. However, people forget that Olympians get paid, and most of them are amateur athletes. "Gold medallists from the United States receive a minimum of $15,000 for their success (from the U.S. Olympic Committee and the national governing body of the winner's sport), USA Today, Final Ed." These Olympians can also capitalize on endorsement deals and other additional bonuses, most of which are illegal in college athletics. The innocence of the game is already in jeopardy, in a June 24th, 1996 issue of The NCAA News, " Studies indicate that 75 percent of underclassmen have received cash or gifts from an agent." That’s a pretty high number, three out of every four are involved in illegal activities involving agents, and 90...
Today there are over 450,000 college athletes and the National College Athletics Association (NCAA) faces a difficult decision on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe that they should and many believe they should not. There are several benefits that college’s athletes receive for being a student athlete. Why should they receive even more benefits than their scholarship and numerous perks?
Some people say that college athletes get paid by having a scholarship, but if you look at it a different way, scholarships might change your mind. Coaches try to get players who they think have the talent to make them win and to persuade them to come to their school by offering them scholarships. The whole idea behind a scholarship is to lure the athlete into coming to your school. Scholarships are nothing more than a recruitment tactic. They will give you a scholarship as long as you produce for them. It’s all about what you can do for them. Indeed these scholarships pay for tuition, room and board, and books, but these athletes don’t have money for other necessities. The NCAA doesn’t want friends or boosters to offer athletes jobs because they ...
College athletes are manipulated every day. Student athletes are working day in and day out to meet academic standards and to keep their level of play competitive. These athletes need to be rewarded and credited for their achievements. Not only are these athletes not being rewarded but they are also living with no money. Because the athletes are living off of no money they are very vulnerable to taking money from boosters and others that are willing to help them out. The problem with this is that the athletes are not only getting themselves in trouble but their athletic departments as well.
Luzer, Daniel. "College Guide: The Profit in College Sports." The Washington Monthly. N.p., 18 Sept. 2013. Web. 8 Apr. 2014.
In recent years the idea of student-athletes getting paid for playing in college has become more and more popular. There have been many instances where questions have been raised surrounding some of the finest athletes participating in the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Some of the biggest names in athletics have been involved, including Cam Newton, Reggie Bush, Johnny Manziel, along with many more athletes who have been exposed by the media for supposedly accepting cash benefits while in college. Most recently Johnny Manziel has been brought up in an autograph scandal. Apparently he was paid ten-thousand dollars for more than over one thousand and one hundred autographs. Ultimately Manziel was only suspended one half of a full collegiate football game, but is it really fair that he was forced to sit a half of football game because he simply gave some people his John Hancock? Reggie Bush and Cam Newton have both been involved in scandals involving mone...
Student athletes should not be paid more than any other student at State University, because it implies that the focus of this university is that an extracurricular activity as a means of profit. Intercollegiate athletics is becoming the central focus of colleges and universities, the strife and the substantial sum of money are the most important factors of most university administration’s interest. Student athletes should be just as their title states, students. The normal college student is struggling to make ends meet just for attending college, so why should student athletes be exempt from that? College athletes should indeed have their scholarships cover what their talents not only athletically but also academically depict. Unfortunately, the disapproval resides when students who are making leaps academically are not being offered monetary congratulations in comparison to student athletes. If the hefty amount of revenue that colleges as a conglomerate are making is the main argument for why athletes should be paid, then what is to stop the National Clearinghouse from devising unjust standards? Eventually if these payments are to continue, coaches, organizations, and the NCAA Clearinghouse will begin to feel that “c...
NCAA, O’Bannon filed an antitrust class action lawsuit against the NCAA. Stating that it was a violation of antitrust laws that Division I programs continue to use images of its former student athletes for commercial purposes. O’Bannon argues that upon graduation, a former player is entitled to compensation from the NCAA and the school for using their image and likeness for commercial gain. The NCAA, however, maintained that paying athletes would violate the idea of amateurism in sports. District Judge Claudia Wilken found that the NCAA’s rules and bylaws were a violation of antitrust laws. She ordered that the school should be allowed to pay for full cost of attendance to scholarship athletes, cover cost of living expenses that were not covered by scholarships in the past. In this ruling athletes are not paid to play but have most financial flexibility when deciding what school to
...multi-billion dollar deals the NCAA has with television networks and how they benefit from commercial sales of their product. Finally, showed the benefits student athletes receive pertaining to top notch tutors and facilities. Even though the student athlete receives a more than the average student they should be entitled to a little more thanks in part for what they bring to the school. College student athletes need to start being paid immediately!
...the NCAA, it would help to eliminate scandals that have to do with players receiving money or goods. A major problem in the NCAA right now is players talking to agents, which is not allowed. If players could hold regulated meetings with agents certified by the NCAA it would help eliminate more scandals and also protect the players from bad agents willing to break the law. Many people think the student athletes do not need money because they are given scholarships. Those scholarships are not enough because even if they are full rides they do not cover the entire cost of education. The NCAA must change its rules by paying athletes with stipends, making better system for agent-athlete interaction, and clearer and more stable scholarships. Doing so will help protect their student athletes, which is necessary if they want to keep growing and keep their prestigious image.
A lot of coaches don’t want to have to deal with these types of situations so they are trying to become a professional basketball coach where these rules do not exist and there is real money getting paid to the players. This scandal finally made the NCAA realize how much bribery actually goes on under the table.