Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lack of funds in schools for sports
Introduction on college sports
Introduction on college sports
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lack of funds in schools for sports
Work Without Pay
It is one of the fastest growing industries in the country. In 1970 the median amount of money was 6.5 million dollars. What is that figure now? A whopping 56 million dollars.That is a 49.5 million dollar increase over about 40 years… or an astounding 861% increase (Marc and Rohan).
College sports is a multi-billion dollar industry; yet, unlike professional sports the athletes do not get paid. The individual college and the NCAA are the ones making the money off the kids. In a way, colleges are even allowed to market their athletes. Sure, although they can not put the names of a player on a jersey, they can sell it with that intention. The university can also put up posters and even show tv commercials with their athlete, but the athlete can’t profit in any way. Since when is it okay for people generating billions of dollars to not get anything for all their hard work?
…show more content…
The college football industry is huge and it is only getting bigger.
In 2012 the profit was somewhere north of a BILLION dollars. Roughly 60% of all the profit made goes back into the program to pay for new uniforms, upkeep of their million dollars stadiums, and to give out scholarships. The other 40% are paying for people’s yachts and ridiculous salaries. For example, Jim Harbaugh, former coach of the San Francisco 49’s, left the NFL for a much more lucrative coaching job at University of Michigan. And nobody can blame the guy. In 2015 alone he made seven million dollars (Gaines). Meanwhile the people actually bringing in all the money, the athletes themselves, are getting
nothing. People often argue that college athletes shouldn’t be paid because if they are playing at a national level, odds are, they’re education is already being paid for by the school. So if they are going to a really expenses school (we’ll call that $40,000 a year) they are “making” $160,000. Be that as it may, if they are playing at a national level their team is probably bringing in a ton of money. According to ESPN the top ten highest grossing college football teams are bringing in an average revenue of $104,527,502 per year (College Athletics Revenue 2008). So paying out $160,000 to a few kids isn’t going to put much of a dent in a football program’s overall revenue. Some argue: they are still college kids, so it’s not like they should be able to make a living off of money earned through their sport, nor should they be getting a straight check. They should just be getting enough to repay them for for all of their hard work and sacrifices they’ve made on their journey to being a successful Division 1 or Division 2 athlete. There are tons of expenses that athletes have to endure throughout their career before college such as travel teams, equipment, lessons, and the biggest expense of all: time. Weekends are given to tournaments, weeknights to practices, mornings to workouts, and school gets the rest of their time. The path to being a successfully athlete is a tireless one, and not for the weak of heart. They don’t get to have the childhood that other kids have time for, they are too busy working, practicing, and playing to have that luxury. For some, the road ends there. For years they can practice and work at becoming the best athlete they possibly can, and it still may not pay off. They will try and justify it by saying things like, “Oh yeah I had a blast,” and, “I never really wanted to play college ball anyway,” but in the end it will always be their biggest regret. All of the time and money put into a dying cause. Sacrificing their childhood for a dream that they could never truly achieve. Then, for the few and far between, their goal of going on and playing on a competitive college team is achieved. They get their full ride scholarships and they head off across the nation to play their game. They practice and workout every single day, rain or shine, and put their heart and soul into the game. Most of the time their classwork and education doesn’t make it’s way into their routine. Time that could be spent getting job interviews or doing independent studies is spent on the field which, for most, isn’t going to pay off in the long run. Sure they may win that week, maybe even going on to become division champions, but only the best of the best get to move on to the nearly unreachable goal of playing in the professional leagues. The rest of the athletes are then hung out to dry. Four of the “best years of their life” went by in a flash but they won’t have much to show for it, even if it is a big name school. That is why it is only fitting that they are getting some sort of compensation for all of their hard work and dedication. An athlete that competitively plays in a Division 1 sport isn’t going to have time to be fully dedicated to their schoolwork. They will need to practice constantly, both on the field and off. When they aren’t on the field practicing, they are hitting the gym or studying game film. They are risking their future by committing to a sport that may or may not pay their bills later. For all of the good-but-not-great players, they are often left out in the cold. For four years they did little except practice and play and are rewarded with a slap on the back from their coach and a diploma that they somehow managed to earn through taking the easiest classes available. So what does that get them? What does a 2.0 GPA and a diploma from a big name school get an athletic 22 year old? Not the career that many of his hard working classmates are out getting, especially the ones that had the time to have internships and other job experience. That’s why they should be receiving some money from the school while they are there. Otherwise what is the point of playing if they aren’ t going to go pro? College athletes shouldn’t be paid enough to making a living, that would be ridiculous. But their hard work and time should still be compensated. All of their classmates that aren’t occupied with sports work in their time and they make at least minimum wage, more often they will make more than that. So is it really that crazy to propose that the ones making their schools millions of dollars should get a little something something? Now of course some athletes should get more than others, for any number of reasons. Some sports make more money, some players play different roles, the time commitment for sports can vary, and of course some schools are bigger. Proposing that each player get some type of percentage of a school’s revenue would be crazy because players would be making a huge sum of money. Now of course this wouldn’t be applying to every athlete at all schools, it would only apply to the athletes that play for programs that are making money. Players would be paid a set amount depending on how much money their school is making off of their sport. For example, a Division 2 women’s golf team probably isn’t bringing in much money so odd are none of their athletes would be getting paid. On the other hand Alabama’s Crimson Tide football team is pulling in over $123 million dollars in revenue so their players should and would be getting a substantial sum (College Athletic Revenue 2008). They play on a national level on a weekly basis and their fanbase is enomourse. Starters would get a set amount as would second stringers and third stringers, decreasing accordingly. Also, the current system in place that doesn’t allow schools to sell a jersey with a player's name on it is ridiculous. They instead proceed to sell jerseys with the players number, clearly selling the identity of the player, but said player is given no recognition for it, or part of the profit (Kirk). Players that become the face of their school's athletic program deserve to make some money off of all the marketing the school does based around them, it’s only fair Marcus Mariota, currently the starting quarterback for the Tennessee Titans, graduated from Oregon State University in 2015. He was the clear cut Heisman Trophy winner and was the second overall pick in the 2015 draft. During his time at Oregon he practically achieved God-like status on and off the field. It was because of this, that Oregon was able to market him so successfully. During his senior year, the Oregon Duck’s official merchandising store offered 25 different variations of the number eight (his number) so how were they not selling the player (Holleran)? When he took the field there were literally thousands of fans cheering him on, all the while wearing his number. People say that you have to work hard if you want to be able to play hard, but for collegiate athletes that is often the same thing. Each and every one of them works so hard, not because they want to, but because they need to if they want to compete at that level. People that work so hard and generate so much money should be paid for their efforts, regardless of the fact that they play at a college level.
The proposal of payment toNCAA student-athletes has begun major conversations and arguments nationwide with people expressing their take on it. “This tension has been going on for years. It has gotten greater now because the magnitude of dollars has gotten really large” (NCAA). I am a student athlete at Nicholls State University and at first thought, I thought it would be a good idea to be able to be paid as a student-athlete.After much research however; I have come to many conclusions why the payment of athletes should not take place at the collegiate level.The payment of athletes is only for athletes at the professional level. They are experts at what they do whether it is Major League Baseball, Pro Basketball, Professional Football, or any other professional sport and they work for that franchise or company as an employee. The payment of NCAA college athletes will deteriorate the value of school to athletes, create contract disputes at both the college and professional level, kill recruiting of athletes, cause chaos over the payment of one sport versus another, and it will alter the principles set by the NCAA’s founder Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. Under Roosevelt and NCAA, athletes were put under the term of a “student-athlete” as an amateur. All student athletes who sign the NCAA papers to play college athletics agree to compete as an amateur athlete. The definition of an amateur is a person who “engages in a sport, study, or other activity for pleasure rather than for financial benefit or professional reasons” (Dictonary.com).
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
Over the years, the debate on whether or not to pay collegiate athletes, specifically Division 1, has increased greatly. With athletes bringing in millions of dollars to their respective schools, many believe it’s time to make a change. The debate has been ongoing since the 70’s, maybe even earlier, but it really came to the attention of many in the early 90’s, specifically 1995. Marcus Camby, a basketball player for the Toronto Raptors, admitted he took money and jewelry, from somebody who wanted to be his agent, while he was playing at the University of Massachusetts. This was one of many incidents that involved a player accepting money and other gifts from an agent and/or booster. I believe that college athletes deserve to be paid in some fashion. They devote their whole life to their sport, whether or not they are the starters, and most will not go on to the pros, even though they contribute to the team. They sell tickets, jerseys, T-shirts etc. for their school, and see none of the money. Coaches sign six figure deals with shoe companies, like Nike, Reebok, Converse, and the players are the ones wearing the shoes and jerseys, the coaches have on whatever they want. Even though just recently the NCAA Committee allowed athletes to get a job; between schoolwork, and practices, they don’t have enough time to find a job. Most of the kids come from poor backgrounds, and don’t have enough money to do normal college things, like going out to eat, going on a date, or out to the movies.
Paying College athletes has been a trending topic around the National Collegiate Athletic Association over the years. Many have strong opinions about this topic, and the opinions vary. The discussion of paying college athletes began in 1991 when the famed Fab Five became a household name in the United States. The Fab Five is arguably the greatest recruiting class of all time; all attending the same school (Baxter). The Fab Five first created controversy when they started to question why the university and university officials were making millions and millions of dollars off their names, and they were just deprived hungry college kids not making a dime. Nike even made billions by copyrighting their famed black athletic socks, black athletic shoes, and baggy shorts that they made famous throughout the nation. The question over the past several years has become a general and trending topic of argument. College athletes should not be paid for their performance or to perform for their universities because they are there for an education, questions will be asked, and universities would not make as big of an income off the games.
Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama University makes $123,769,841 in total revenue from sports. (College Athletics Revenue) Yes ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY THREE MILLION. Yet an athlete from Alabama can only receive benefits from a scholarship.. That doesn’t seem right. You would want to be payed when the opportunity arises. It should only be fair these players get a piece of the revenue pie, after all they are the ones creating the revenue. The players should be getting benefits to allow them to pay for basic college needs, grow up to be responsible adults, and allow the NCAA to thrive. This would allow for the NCAA to truly thrive as a sporting association.
College athletes juggle busy academic and practice schedules all throughout their stressful weeks, so why shouldn't they be compensated for their time dedicated to sports? NCAA rules strictly prohibits players from being paid for all the hard work they do to protect “amateurism”, but are you really an amateur putting in over 40 hours a week between practice and other activities? Although students earn a college scholarship, that doesn’t cover living expenses, and access to a degree at the end of their career, players should be paid because schools, coaching staffs and major corporations are profiting off their free labor.
A question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for their individual universities, colleges need to financially compensate players for their contributions. The colleges that these superstars represent are reaping all of the benefits of the accomplishments the athletes have, yet the big named players are making nothing from what they do.
The two revenue sports in college athletics are men's basketball, and football. These teams make millions of dollars, while the individual athlete receives no compensation for their efforts. They are controlled by a governing body (NCAA), which tells them when they work, and when they can't work (Barra). The teams are lead into battle by their coaches, their leaders. These coaches, leaders, partake in an annual payout in upwards of two million dollars, plus endorsement deals. Why then, in a country that...
College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. It’s simple: bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the university’s revenue, apparel sales, and lack of spending money.
College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.
College athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!
You could think that… but this is not true whatsoever, because if they are working on their sport for 7 hours a day and 43 hours a month. So how in the world can they not miss a big chunk of class time? Exactly it doesn't make sense to say that these students get a lot of work done or they are in class a majority of the time. Aside from this, you may be thinking that the NCAA spends most of that 11 billion dollars on good things. But the only thing about that is how can they spend 11 billion dollars and not give a single penny to any college athlete who put themselves on the line to make them that money. Even though the NCAA needs maybe a small portion of that money all of these college athletes should get rewarded with some type of payment that has more than just emotion. Some sources might say that these student athletes can control whether or not they go bankrupt after college sports. This could be true, but how are they supposed to do that with no education and money to start an afterlife. Exactly it does not make sense for them not to get some money to start a career afterward or even just to have at least some money in their hands. You can think what you want about these hard working devoted athletes but you should be for sure that they should get paid for what they do. There is no argument anymore these athletes must be paid no matter
Only about 2% percent of high school athletes get sports scholarships every year at NCAA colleges and universities. For those who do get one, the average scholarship is less than $11,000 (Eitzen, D. Stanley). Every year college athletes are publicized and exploited for their talents and skills. Universities and Colleges sell jerseys and put athletes names on billboards and jumbotrons, and even used their likeness to have video games dedicated to the athletes themselves. In 2011-2012, the NCAA made 871.6 million dollars in revenue (Eitzen, D. Stanley). And guess how much money the athletes, who actually make the money, get from this exposure, 0%. The exposure or publicity of the athletes is the main reason why college athletes should be paid. College athletes are publicized on TV, magazines, and
College Athletes and Money Many people debate over the topic on whether college athletes should receive compensation by their universities for participating in athletic activities. This question has sparked controversy as many people feel it is right for these hard-working athletes to receive money. However, there are also many people who feel the schools do enough for the athletes, and should not pay them. In my opinion, college athletes should receive compensation by their universities for playing sports because the athletes contribute greatly to the university’s income, and would receive what they deserve, and the athletes may stay all four years of college instead of declaring to play professionally.
Playing sports in college is really hard, college athletes work hard every day so they can win and go to a professional level and some of them don’t even make it, either they don’t have enough money for school supplies and failing classes or if they get a really bad injury that ends their career before even start it. College athletes school should get paid because they spend most of their time working hard, and bring in a lot of money each game they play, but they don’t even receive a penny out of the hard work and the money they help bring in. If the coaches get paid why not the athletes get paid too? College athletes should be paid because the money will help college athletes with school supplies,