Cochlear Arguments In Defending Deaf Culture

558 Words2 Pages

Sparrow, Robert. "Defending deaf culture: The case of cochlear implants." Journal of Political Philosophy 13.2 (2005): 135-152. Accessed September14, 2017.
Robert Sparrow, who holds a Ph.D. from Australian National University, argues in his article”Defending deaf culture: The case of cochlear implants." That rather than decide if it is ethical to use cochlear or not, we should focus on the ethics of this technology and ask ourselves, Is it ethical to support the development of cochlear implants financially. Robert believes that Deaf culture considers as one of the minority cultures inside the community that has the right to be respected and to build a satisfying life without adding the word “disable” to their identities.

Nunes, Rui. "Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation." Theoretical medicine and bioethics 22.4 (2001):
But instead, this technology aims to solve the deafness similar to overcome another disease.

Hladek, Glenn A. "Cochlear implants, the deaf culture, and ethics." Monash bioethics review 21.1 (2002): 29-44.Accessed September15, 2017.
In the article, “Cochlear implants, the deaf culture, and ethics’, author Glenn Hladek, who is an Audiologist Specialist in Missoula, Montana, claims that the ethical impacts of cochlear implants cannot be limited by philosophical point of view because we cannot deny the involvement of biomedicine, for example, the operation may not be successful as a result being deaf was better than unexpected medical mistake. In addition, Hladek lights in his article on the differences between Hearing people and Deaf culture, for instance, members of the Deaf community are often married another

More about Cochlear Arguments In Defending Deaf Culture

Open Document