Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parenting skills 03.08 answers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Throughout the world, for centuries, parents and infants have engage in many different sleeping arrangements. In the Western World solitary sleeping is strongly encouraged by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). Solitary sleeping, or sleeping in separate rooms and separate beds, is said to promote the infants independence and reduce the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). The AAP has even issued multiple warnings on the dangers of shared sleeping arrangements, citing concerns regarding the safety, wellbeing, and the independence of the child. While the health and safety of an infant is the top priority for all the Western idea of solitary sleeping does not consider the different cultural beliefs of others. Therefore, despite …show more content…
the warnings approximately ninety percent of the world participates in some form of a shared sleeping arrangement (170 Berk).
Co-sleeping and bedsharing are among the most popular forms of this practice. Most, who choose co-sleeping or bedsharing, feel the benefit out way the risk and it can be accomplice in a safe manner. Co-sleeping or room sharing is the practice of the infant sleeping in the same room while in their own bed or crib. Bedsharing is the practice of parent and infant sleeping on the same bed surface. In order to determine which sleeping style is the most beneficial for both the infant and parent it is important to first understand the similarities and differences of co-sleeping and bedsharing.
Co-sleeping and bedsharing are very similar in theory, and share many of the same benefits but have vase differences. One of the greatest benefits associated with shared sleeping is that it promotes breastfeeding. For these mothers co-sleeping provides quick accessibility to the infant during the night. While bedsharing
…show more content…
provides the same accessibility it is also shown to provide a greater benefit for the both mother and the child. For mothers that have their infants next to them the number of “breast feeding session per night increase significantly” (10 Gettler and McKenna), lasting longer, and have shorter intervals between feeding session. The increase induration and frequency provides greater protection for the infants immune and digestive systems. More frequent breastfeeding can also be attributed with providing the mother with “lactational amenorrhea, which may reduce the risk of certain female reproductive cancers” (5 Gettler and McKenna). Another benefit of co-sleeping and bedsharing is that it increases the bond between the infant and mother. Having the child close at night promotes positive interaction, promotes the infants well-being, and begins to give the infant independence. Keeping in line with promoting well-being bedsharing provides positive interaction but does not also for the child to engage in a sense of independence. A child’s lack of independence can cause undue stress when they began to solidarity sleeping. Lastly co-sleeping provides a major benefit in that it greatly reduce the risk of SIDS, opposed to bedsharing. According to the Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, “for infants <3 months old … the risk [of SIDS for those that participated] in co-sleeping was low (0.08 per 1000 births) but was over five times higher for bed sharing infants”. Initially I felt that co-sleeping and bedsharing where interchangeable, but after doing my research I found that they are similar but also very different. While they both provide vast benefits for the mother and child, it is in my opinion co-sleeping provides the maximum benefit and the least amount of risk to the infant. For breastfeeding mothers co-sleeping allows quick access to the infant during the night but also keeps the risk of SIDS low. Co-sleeping also increases the bond between a mother and child while still promoting the infants independence. In conclusion there are many similarities and differences regarding the benefits of co-sleeping and bedsharing.
It could be concluded that co-sleeping provides the maximum benefit for both the mother and infant. It promotes the health and well-being of the child while fostering their independence. On the other hand bedsharing may help build a stronger bond between the mother and child. However, sleeping arrangements much like child rearing is a personal choice that a family must decide for themselves. It is up to the family to look at their beliefs, values, life style, and consider which will work best for them. So may feel bedsharing will suite their needs while other my feel another sleeping arrangement is the most adequate for them. The goal of a parent is to provide an optimal environment for their infant and whichever sleeping arrangement promotes that is the arrangement they should
choose.
...leep from sharing bedroom or beds. Families that live in BBs accommodation may find themselves having to move more and disturbing the child’s education. Also poor housing can affect the child’s health and welfare, for example children who live in crowed home have a greater rick of accidents. Living in a cold and damp house can also cause illness especially breathing problems.
There was this study done by Meret A. Keller and Wendy A. Goldberg that is focused on if co-sleeping is affecting student’s independence and self-reliance in a negative way. They hypothesized that children who sleep on their own are more independent and self-reliant than children who co-sleep. The procedure focuses on 83 preschool aged children and their mothers. They send out surveys to the parents to answer questions that are about independence and self-reliance. For a child to be independent they need to be able to fall asleep on their own, sleep through the entire night all by themselves, and be weaned from breastfeeding. In order for the child to be self-reliant, they need to be able to do things themselves such as dress themselves. For the results the children were split into three categories, early co-sleeping where the parents started co-sleeping their child when they were infants, reactive co-sleeping where the parents started co-sleeping their child at or after they were a one-year-old, and solitary sleeper where the child sleeps in the different room as the parents. The results were interesting. They were split into three different types of results. There was “Children’s Self-reliance and Social Independence,” “Independent Sleep Behaviors,” and “Adaptive Independence.” In “Children’s
Beginning in the 80s, divorce rates began to skyrocket and parenting itself started to become hands off. On top of all this, there were a few people who gave advice on baby care. This being the hot topic of these decades (BBC). One of these people, Nancy Kohner wrote, "For the first two months or so, the safest way for babies to sleep is on their fronts, head to one side, or else curled up on one side. Then if they are sick there is no chance that they will choke." This was horrible advice from the child rearing "experts" at the time because they hadn't realized the baby would suffocate if placed face down (Gil, Ali, Jenny). For older children disciplining had transferred into the reasoning and praising of good behavior. The 1990s saw the continued rising of divorce rates and an increase in close parenting. This close parenting was known as “helicopter parenting". This form of parenting created antisocial behavior from children, yet children were increasingly independent
Sara believed that it was important for the infant to establish a sense of security by sleeping in the same room as the parents early on, so that in the future when the child becomes old enough to sleep in a different room, the child will feel secure and be calm even when she is alone by knowing that her parents are just in the other room. One way to understand the link between Sara’s sleeping arrangements and her goal of making the infant feel more secure is to consider Erik Erikson’s psychosocial stages of development (Erikson, 1963) The first stage of Erikson’s (1963) theory is trust versus mistrust, during which babies come to trust that their caregivers and other people will meet their physical and emotional needs or start to mistrust that the parents and other people will not take care of them. Sara hoped that by sleeping near her infant so that she could let her child see her when the child goes to sleep or wakes up in the middle of the night, the infant could feel more safe, or “trust,” that the infant’s needs would be tended to whenever necessary. The “trust” would then impact the child’s future development and especially when the time comes for the child to move to a separate room. The child, having received reliable
Even child experts, family doctors and counselors have differing opinions on co-sleeping, a term used to describe the practice of allowing a baby or child to sleep with one or both parents in bed. Other terms, such as bed-sharing or sleep-sharing have also been used. Scientists, pediatricians, family life experts and many authors have conflicting opinions on this custom based on conflicting results of their own research. In the end, some experts believe that it is really up to the family's decision to do what works for them, and no book, research or expert opinion can say definitely which one is best for every family.
An individual as a caregiver has more one-on-one time with a child as long as their group of children is small. A child could form a stronger bond with a smaller setting and possibly have less separation anxieties to deal with. Some parents feel the time spent with one person could benefit their child more than being with multiple caretakers. The cost of a caregiver usually is less than the traditional day care centers because there is less overhead, but there are not as many opportunities available to them. If a caregiver becomes ill or needs to take a vacation, it is the parent’s responsibility to have a back up to take care of the child during that time. A child with many health problems would possibly not be exposed to as many germs at an individual’s house because they would not come into contact with as many other children on a daily basis. On the other hand, individuals may be more lenient and allow children that are ill to attend. This could be a problem if the parents do not have family or friends that would or could care for the child during this time. A parent may have to miss work entirely to take care of the child, and with the loss of income could put the whole family at risk. A child may have problems at a babysitter such as discipline, allergies, other children, but unless they mention it to the parents they will not...
12 March 2014. “Co-Sleeping Safety.” PhD in Parenting. n.p. 11 January 2009. Web.
Newborns do not contribute much to society at large. In fact, they do not do much in general. It is impossible to know the details of what goes on in an infant’s mind. One of the things we do know about newborns is that sleep is crucial and they spend an average of 16-18 hours each day sleeping (Ward, 2015). This paper will examine the experiences of one mother’s decisions in regard to sleeping arrangements and the values, both cultural and personal, that support these arrangements. It will also compare her decisions to the decisions of U.S. and Mayan mothers discussed in the research article “Cultural Variation in Infants’ Sleeping Arrangements: Questions of Independence.” The mother who was interviewed for this paper is 54 years old and
The advantages with bottle feeding can be share responsibility on the night feeding, this would appeal to mums, as the baby wouldn’t be attached to them at all times. Also feeding allows fathers to share the fed and helps the bonding between father and baby (Murkoff, 2008). The women would also feel she had more freedom if she bottle-fed; she would not need to worry about her diet. Babies will sleep for longer when formula is used (NHS, 2010).Bottle feeding is easier for baby to get started on than breastfeeding. In addition, for women who feel uncomfortable about breastfeeding there is no public display, when bo...
There has been a constant debate of whether co-sleeping is beneficial or detrimental to infants development. But studies have shown that co-sleeping with the parent influences emotional development between the parent and the infant. By co-sleeping with the parent the warmth from their body in addition, to the sense of protection allows for attachment between the two. The infant is able to follow the breathing rhythm of their parent while co-sleeping as well. Exposing infants to toxins in parents’ breath also assist in development. Furthermore, co-sleeping has been seen to have prolonged effects on social interactions between the parent and child. The purpose of this paper is to review how co-sleeping is beneficial to infants development.
Sleep is one of our basic needs to survive, however in the modern days sleep deprivation in increasing more and more each day, causing accidents and medical problems for the people and the community. This essay will look at the meaning of sleep and sleep deprivation and the basic perspectives on what motivates sleep and sleep deprivation with the five perspectives; evolutionary, psychodynamic, behaviourist, cognitive and the hierarchy of needs. This essay will also evaluate the best perspective to eliminate sleep deprivation with the cases studies discussing the general hypothesis of sleep and sleep deprivation.
The children’s nap time started about 1200. They sleep until about 0130. Small cots with sheets are spread out around the room. The cots sat only a few inches off the ground. The care providers started to calm the children down. The lights were dimmed and music was played to provide a soothing environment. If any children awaken earlier than the others, a quiet task such as arts and crafts or books are provided to keep the child
Feldman, Ruth, Weller, Aron, Sirota, Lea & Eidelman, Arthur I. (2002). Skin-to-skin contact (kangaroo care) promotes self-regulation in premature infants: Sleep-wake cyclicity, arousal modulation, and sustained exploration. Developmental Psychology, 38, 194-207. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.2.194
8. Set the scene. Set up a conducive environment for sleeping in a cool, comfortable room. Set the temperature at about 65-70 degrees and dim the lights. You may want to use shades to darken the room and install a night-light for use when the baby wakes up at night.
Sleep is important for health and well being at every age, but babies, children and adults sleep differently. The amount of time we spend in light and deep sleep varies depending on age. Babies are biologically programmed to sleep more lightly and wake more often than adults.