Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Representation of gays/lesbians in cinema
Representation of gays/lesbians in cinema
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Representation of gays/lesbians in cinema
Although Clark preferred men, his expression and desperate reasons to make her leave showed he cared for Joan since it was only to protect her from Menzie, who lied to him that Menzie sent her in prison. After Menzie threatened Alan of his secret and that he would make him a spy, Menzie told him that Joan is actually not in prison. The scene began with a montage of Joan as she showed her ID to the guards while Alan watched her. She approached Alan while smiling at him, but Alan did not return it. As the scene started, the voice-over of Alan said, “I need you to leave Bletchley. It’s Menzies. I don’t trust him. It’s not safe here.” Then, Joan asked, “Do you think it’s safer anywhere else?” Alan blurted, “You need to get away.” Through a medium shot, Joan asked, “Alan. What’s …show more content…
I’m... I’m a homosexual.” Cut to Joan of more reaction shot, she gasped, nodded, saying, “Alright.” Alan eyes reddened with tears and exclaimed, “No, no. M-men, Joan. Not women.” Joan shrugged and said, So what? I had my suspicions. I always did. But we’re not like other people. We love each other in our own way, and we can still live the life together that we want. You won’t be the perfect husband? I can promise you I harboured no intention of being the perfect wife. We’ll have each other’s minds. Sounds like a better marriage than most. Because I care for you. And you care for me. And we understand one another more than anyone else ever has.” Initially, in the montage, Alan didn’t return the smile because his mind was preoccupied on how to make Joan leave. Through a medium shot, it revealed how was thinking since he knew that just telling Joan wouldn’t budge her. When he broke the engagement, by a reaction shot, Joan seemed
Archer’s awareness of his Uncle Paul’s sexuality-and of Paul’s growing bond with Mr. McLeod, unfolds at a pace that feels authentic to an eleven -year old boy trying to make sense of the world. Uncle Paul alludes to his sexuality in multiple conversations with Archer. “Everybody had a crush on Shoewalter,” Paul says about the father of Archer’s classmate; “I think I had a crush on him to.” However, Archer misses these references entirely. When Archer’s father takes him on an unexpected trip as a mission to persuade Paul to get serious about Mr. McLeod, Archer asks “If they will talk it over.” His father responds by saying “No, we’re guys. We will talk about the Cubs or cars, but we’ll make sure to Paul sees there’s a place for Ed McLeod in our family. During this scene, Archer was moved emotionally to encourage Uncle Paul that he sees no problem for the two of them to be together because love is love, regardless of the gender. With Archer’s caring personality, he gives Uncle Paul words of wisdom, only appreciated him more for being a great role model in his life, especially when Paul helped handle a bully. In its quiet way, by normalizing a variety of flavors of gay and straight masculinity for the first generation raised in a world in which gay marriage is the law of the land, The Best Man shows readers how families can come together with a full team of support for same sex
Half Mammals of Dixie, written by George Singleton, is a collection of short stories about events that unfold in the South. Among those stories is Fossils, which is about a boy named Compton and his father’s desire to change the racist community they live in and bring down a corrupt newspaper owner degrading the black community by cutting out any news about them in the paper. Another great Southern criticism reviewed is The Sahara of the Bozart written by H.L Mencken. This takes place in 1920s and is about how the American South has lost all of its sense of culture and arts. Mencken has the desire to change his senseless community for the better and have a more cultural diverse society. He explains that there is no art, theaters, or music
John Steinbeck was inspired by the line "The best schemes o' mice an' men [often go awry]" by Robert Burns in one of his poems. This line refers to ambitions that went off track during the process. There are multiple examples in the novel that refers to the line in the poem, that inspired John Steinbeck. Those examples are Curley's boxing career coming to an end, Curley's wife not becoming a actress, and Lennie's plans of tending the rabbits, but messed everything up.
I love little pussy, /Her coat is so warm, /And if I don’t hurt her, /She’ll do me no harm. /So I’ll not pull her tail, /Nor drive her away, /But pussy and I, /Very gently will play. (http://www.zelo.com/family/nursery/pussy.asp)
Ray Bradbury depicted a society where human culture is altered. People’s interaction is uncommon and is accepted in a contradictory way. People stopped thinking, "then they feel like they're thinking, they'll get a sense of motion with out moving." (pg. 61). "Typical" marriage between Mildred and Montag is displayed as total indifference to each other. Liaison in their culture is less passionate than it is in ours. These people are not devoted to one another. Montag, is hardly in love with Millie - they seem to be distant, nevertheless they look after each other. As far as I understand, these people have just got lost their way in showing it. In spite of ...
over him. 1this entire incident shows how Crooks wants his loneliness to end. As Lennie entered Crooks room he
The body of this argument lies in a meager psychoanalysis of Melville. I have had to take a very broad approach, look at Melville purely as a man. I have attempted to put the reader into Melville's head, where I have attempted to put myself. To better achieve this I discuss much of Melville's background, hoping to give the reader a sense of what he had experienced. I have written with confidence, but hopefully not too much, you must decide for yourselves what of mine you feel is right. It is always very hard to use psychoanalytical approaches, because, as the mind is a mystery, it is all ultimately unproved. All psychoanalytical opinion is based on event, as all psychology is based on the idea that men are shaped by experience. I speculate below, on things I cannot really know, and I do this only to achieve some rough personal connections between Melville and his Moby-Dick. It serves me, and I hope you as well.
5.) Crooks- Crooks, the black stable-hand, gets his name from his crooked back. He is isolated from the other men because of the color of his skin. Soon, Crooks becomes fond of Lennie, and even though he claims to have seen countless men following empty dreams of buying their own land, he asks Lennie if he can go with them, because he wants to hoe in the garden.
In the story Say Yes by Tobias Wolff, a marriage is broken overnight by a revelation of the insufficiency of their love in the test. Along with the husband’s wrong response to the “Love Test”, the relationship is dramatically demolished by Ann’s sudden realization of the superficial love of her husband. Even though her husband tries to please Ann with the right answer, her feelings of love has already been shattered by distrust and suspicion. The hypothetical “Love Test” in the story reveals the superficiality of his love, drastically shifting the relationship from intimacy to uncertainty.
Despite having settled with a second husband, the wife continues her regular correspondence with the blind man, distancing her second husband in the same way she had distanced her first. Her husband’s agitation at this constant correspondence is evident when he states, “She and I began going out, and of course she told her blind man about it. She told him everything, or so it seemed to me” (185). From the onset of the story, the wife 's actions cause the husband to feel alienated. Additionally, she fails repeatedly to confide in her husband. A study on the functions of communication in marriage reveals that, “Quality communication depends equally on the capacity of a spouse to both send and receive communicational cues,” neither of which the wife seems capable of employing (Montgomery 22). What few words she does speak to her husband are harsh, rude, and antagonistic; she is constantly either questioning her husband or shouting at him: “[The blind man 's] wife’s just died! Don’t you understand that? The man’s lost his wife!,” and later, “Are you crazy? … Have you just flipped or something? … What’s wrong with you? … Are you drunk?” (Carver 185). Although her husband acts in a less than plausible manner, the wife 's continuous stream of insults and criticism suggest that she is
Dysfunctional. Codependent. Enmeshed. Low self-esteem. Emotional problems of the modern twenty-first century or problems of the past? In his play, The Glass Menagerie, Tennessee Williams portrays a southern family in the 1940's trying to deal with life's pressures, and their own fears after they are deserted by their husband and father. Although today, we have access to hundreds of psychoanalysis books and therapists, the family problems of the distant past continue to be the family problems of the present.
Generally when some one writes a play they try to elude some deeper meaning or insight in it. Meaning about one's self or about life as a whole. Tennessee Williams' "The Glass Menagerie" is no exception the insight Williams portrays is about himself. Being that this play establishes itself as a memory play Williams is giving the audience a look at his own life, but being that the play is memory some things are exaggerated and these exaggerations describe the extremity of how Williams felt during these moments (Kirszner and Mandell 1807). The play centers itself on three characters. These three characters are: Amanda Wingfield, the mother and a women of a great confusing nature; Laura Wingfield, one who is slightly crippled and lets that make her extremely self conscious; and Tom Wingfield, one who feels trapped and is looking for a way out (Kirszner and Mandell 1805-06). Williams' characters are all lost in a dreamy state of illusion or escape wishing for something that they don't have. As the play goes from start to finish, as the events take place and the play progresses each of the characters undergoes a process, a change, or better yet a transition. At the beginning of each characters role they are all in a state of mind which causes them to slightly confuse what is real with what is not, by failing to realize or refusing to see what is illusioned truth and what is whole truth. By the end of the play each character moves out of this state of dreamy not quite factual reality, and is better able to see and face facts as to the way things are, however not all the characters have completely emerged from illusion, but all have moved from the world of dreams to truth by a whole or lesser degree.
While viewing this film, most of the audience may not be as fortunate and sophisticated as Phillip and Brandon were, but we all have the same rights as they did within the freedom of our own happiness. Between the two main characters, one is egotistical and the other a self-assured psycho. It’s clear that the two men shared a close homosexual relationship. Although, nothing is said straightforwardly, the snippy attitude and at times, loving wordplay between Brandon and Phillip imply the intimate communication of lovers.
The 1990s saw a surge of gay characters in both television and movies. From Ellen Degeneres and her character Ellen Morgan coming out under much scrutiny on the TV show ‘Ellen,’ to Julia Roberts and Rupert Everett comedically playing off each other in the motion picture ‘My Best Friend’s Wedding.’ Sure, gays and lesbians have been around forever, especially in Hollywood. But never has there been a time to be more out. With the popularity of shows like Will and Grace, which feature leading gay characters, as well as Dawson’s Creek
Wilton, Tamsin. "Which One's the Man? The Heterosexualisation of Lesbain Sex." Gender, Sex, and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University, 2009. 157-70. Print.