Civil War Vs South Dbq

792 Words2 Pages

Revolution occurs when two popular forces occupying one area lose reality of their relation to each other. The same can be said for the American Civil War and the leading events that amounted into turmoil. The Southern way of life was trampled over and forgotten by the manufacturers, abolitionists and westward expansionist of the North. However, these people did not move alone, there was a present constitutional and social upheaval that turned the North against South and their way of living delegitimize as “American”. From the social status of African Americans, to the economic devastation in the South that came with the Civil War, America came out a much different nation than previously conceived by the end of 1877 which would have impacts …show more content…

For two hundred years, the idea of states’ rights and the benefits of federalism reigned supreme in the South. According to Document B and the justifications of secession are to be thought, “It has been the principle of states rights, that bad sentiment that has elevated state authority above national authority, the main instrument by which our government is sought to be overthrown.” The South had its social issues that cannot be denied, but there were also constitutional and economic changes that left the South in the late colonial era while the North moved towards the future. The North began to embark on the long and prosperous road of manufacturing and industry, manifesting a wedge between the agrarian South and the industrial North, further dividing the nation. In addition, the North began to use the constitution and the political climate to restrict the expansion of slavery and the Southerner’s way of life. From the efforts of self-determination to the multiple geographic borders to separate slave from free states, the Northern politician attempted to eradicate slavery long before the Civil War began in order to secure more political power for himself. According to Document A, the Southerners believed that the national government had no jurisdiction to demand these actions as it argues, “…the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited to any states, are reserved to the states respectively or to the

Open Document