Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Civil war medicine essay
Civil war medicine essay
Civil war medicine essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
While the stories of the Civil War are often dominated by those of courageous soldiers and their harsh conditions, often the history of those serving the soldiers is forgotten. While medical staff had been prominent in armies for hundreds of years, the American Civil War brought a new era of medical treatment and personnel to the world and future of warfare. Mass amputations and an almost organized chaos characterized both the Confederate and Union medical staffs. Out of the hundreds of thousands of deaths, more than half were caused by disease, rather than combat injuries. Unsanitary conditions and food with poor nutrients took the lives of many soldiers, with many other soldiers dying before they could reach a treatment center. Many surgeons …show more content…
wrote about their experiences throughout the war, and while some were able to commit heroic feats, and act upon the disorganization, others could only watch the giant tragedy take place. While it may seem that inexperienced surgeons were a major reason for the huge death toll, in reality the shear disorganization of both sides resulted in 750,000 dead soldiers. Dr. E.W.H Beck was a Union surgeon who recounted his experiences in the fields of battle across the country in his letters. Although Dr. Beck was very experienced from his service in the Mexican American war, the shear disorganization and clutter of the Union made it hard for him to fulfill his role as a physician with the mass amount of illness and poor hygiene that had spread throughout the camps. He explained how frequent rain showers and muddy conditions made soldiers very susceptible to disease, saying to his wife that “the men have no tents,” and are “right out in open fields.” Although surgeons, such as Dr. Beck, were experienced in their practice, they had no control of making sure soldiers had proper protection from the elements. In the beginning of the war, regulations focused on maintaining the cleanliness of camps were put in place, but they were quickly disregarded and not enforced. In a later letter to his wife, Dr. Beck wrote disgustedly about the filthy conditions in the camp. He noted that “hundreds of horses,” lay “unburied and several thousand dead bodies only just under the surface, the air is putrid.” On account of these terrible conditions, he observed that their “sick list is rapidly increasing.” Surgeons often did not have proper technology and medicine to treat these field illnesses. Most medication was used for combat injuries, but the few that were reserved for non-combat illnesses resulted in harsh side effects. While it may seem the deaths of soldiers throughout the Civil War were the result of bloody and gruesome battles, most died in less glorified circumstances. While the dirty conditions of military camps killed numerous soldiers throughout the war, other soldiers with treatable combat injuries often died before receiving treatment. Both armies did not have the capability of efficient and swift movement of the wounded off the battlefields to medical attention. Many soldiers with minor injuries could have been saved, if not for the lack of an organized ambulance system. On July 2, 1863, during the Battle of Gettysburg, after witnessing numerous soldiers die on route to care, Dr. Zabdiel Boylston Adams took control of the situation and risked he life in order to save his fellow service men. Dr. Adams constructed a simple, yet effective medical facility near the lines of battle. Adams worked valiantly for three straight days, and saved the lives of many, who without him, would have died. As Dr. Adams’ experience demonstrated, it was not necessarily a lack of experience which led to hundreds of thousands of deaths, but lack of organization. Many surgeons during battle had dead patients delivered to them, without having the chance to treat soldiers recently injured. This poor system was made evident in the Battle of Bull Run. The Union did not have a military controlled ambulance system and instead civilians were put in charge of moving wounded out of the line of battle and to treatment. In most cases, these civilians had no military experience and fled when the first shots were fired. This chaos resulted in hundreds of wounded being left on the battlefield for days without attention. Terrible organization, far from the common surgeon's control, resulted in the deaths of many, that may have stood a chance for survival. Throughout the Civil War a staggering 60,000 amputations were conducted on wounded soldiers.
Although a significant number, these amputations were often necessary. Antibiotics had not yet been discovered and infection quickly set in on field wounds. Amputations were far more controlled and thought out than what is now in the public belief. After months at war, it was discovered that amputation within the first 24 hours of injury produced a far lower mortality rate than in the first 48 hours. Furthermore, amputations were only conducted by the most experienced and qualified surgeons. Only one in fifteen surgeons were qualified for amputation, and the procedure was often not taken with ease. William Child, a surgeon with Fifth Regiment of the New Hampshire volunteers, wrote to his wife about the atrocities of the war. He was horrified to see “the poor wounded and mutilated soldiers” and prayed that “God may stop this infernal work.” It is a common misconception that a surgeon would see a line of wounded patients, and with each, rudely amputate limbs. While a huge amount of amputations were performed by both armies, they were most often conducted in a controlled environment, and performed by the most skilled and qualified
surgeons. It is often now thought that surgeons and other medical staff during the Civil War were untrained, prone to amputate, and not motivated. Surgeons, in reality, were often very dedicated to their work, extremely qualified, and ready to risk their own lives to save others. One cannot only blame the surgeons when there are other factors which caused the deaths of many. Surgeons could not perform their job properly with the lack organization of both sides. The logistics of treating and transporting the wounded were not capable of withstanding the size and complexity of the massive war, which was taking place. The infrastructure for the wounded was a disaster, with both armies lacking cleanliness in military camps, proper ambulance services, and medication. Even though the common surgeon could not fix the huge flaws in his respective side, he did the best that he could to make sure that his fellow soldiers stayed alive.
Resection was a process that “involved cutting open the limb, sawing out the damaged bone, and then closing the incision” (Jones, 1). Resection allows the patient to keep his limbs but it requires a great ordeal of time and skill. This also contributed to the common practice of amputation during the war. But there were cases where surgeons did use this method. Terry J. Jones said in his NY Times article, “resections were used more frequently after surgeons learned that amputations had a much higher mortality rate” (Jones, 1). In another article by Corydon Ireland, it describes Mitchell Adam’s, a Harvard lecturer, grandfather who served as a volunteer surgeon during the Civil War. In the article, “Adams was not a champion of hasty amputations, but argued for excision and other limb-saving measures. And he describes the everyday pressures of a country practice in Framingham, Mass” (Ireland, 1). This meant that not all surgeons at the time only wanted to amputate but strived for alternate methods. This new knowledge shows that some surgeons were more dedicated to thinking about the well-being of their patients than others and this opens up to other possibilities that may have occurred during the war. This allows an image to come to mind of a surgeon diligently operating on a soldier with care and compassion. However, even though there may be many possibilities, we can’t truly know every event that occurs during a
From July 1851 to March 1852, Dr. Wythe practiced medicine in Philadelphia, where upon he moved to Port Carbon, Pennsylvania, and practiced until 1857. He next became surgeon in the collieries of Carbon County, a post he held until 1860.23 Dr. Wythe was practicing in Mauch Chunk, Pennsylvania during the succeeding two years, when the Civil War began and he received his commission from Abraham Lincoln to assume the position of Assistant Surgeon of the United States Volunteers. In July 1862, he was promoted to Surgeon and five months later organized the Camp Parole Hospital near Alexandria, D. C., for sick and wounded paroled soldiers. On February 28, 1863, Dr. Joseph Henry Wythe was promoted to the full rank of surgeon. After the Civil War, Wythe moved to the Pacifi...
On April 12, 1861, Abraham Lincoln declared to the South that, the only reason that separate the country is the idea of slavery, if people could solve that problem then there will be no war. Was that the main reason that started the Civil war? or it was just a small goal that hides the real big reason to start the war behind it. Yet, until this day, people are still debating whether slavery is the main reason of the Civil war. However, there are a lot of facts that help to state the fact that slavery was the main reason of the war. These evidences can relate to many things in history, but they all connect to the idea of slavery.
Medicine has developed so dramatically over the last century that it is difficult to imagine a world in which its many benefits did not exist. Even as humans manage to eradicate some diseases, a look at history reminds us that there was a time when these and other diseases were rampant, and good health was the exception rather than the norm. There are many comparable time periods that medicine was needed and was used. With each, there were drastic changes to medical procedures and medical rules. Of the many different time periods that medicine was used; the comparison of medical care during the American Civil War and medical care during World War I is the most interesting. How did Civil War battlefield medicine compare with World War I battlefield medicine? That's a question that cannot be simply answered, but can be broken down into the overall sanitation of individuals, medical techniques, and overall medical staff for armies.
The Civil War had more deaths than all previous wars combined. Most people think those soldiers in the Civil War died of wounds or amputations, but the truth is that most died from common diseases that they never had been exposed to. Twice as many soldiers died from diseases than those soldiers who died in battle.
During winter months, basic huts were constructed from wood when it was available. During the civil war, most of the soldiers fought only 75 percent of the time. When they were not fighting, their day usually started at 5:00 in the morning during the summer and spring, and 6:00 in the morning during the fall and winter. Soldiers would be awakened by fifes and drums, then the first sergeant would take a roll call, and all the men sat down to eat breakfast. During the day, soldiers would be engaged in sometimes as many as five 2-hour long drill sessions on weaponry or maneuvers.
Here at the Chelsea Naval Hospital, the influx of patients arriving home from the war inflicted with "battle wounds and mustard gas burns," has created a shortage of physicians and it is becoming increasingly difficult to fight this influenza. Even our own physicians are falling ill from the disease and dying within hours of its onset. Today I received a letter from Dr. Roy, a friend and fellow physician at Camp Devens, who describes a similar situation:
In the early years of the Civil War, it became clear that disease would be the greatest killer. Twice as many Civil War soldiers died of disease than those killed in combat. This was due to unsanitary and filthy conditions, untrained medical personnel and poor medical examination of new soldier’s. One fact from the Civil War was 315,000 soldiers died from illnesses that included: 44,558 from diarrhea/dysentery, 10,063 from malaria, 34,833 from typhoid, 958 from typhus and 436 from yellow fever. The sanitary conditions that a cured during the civil war were shocking.
Before the Civil War, people would receive infections in their injured limbs, causing death. The book Eyewitnesses to the Civil War stated, “The grisly procedure of amputation became emblematic of the Civil War medicine because it was often the only option for saving a wounded soldiers life” (Kagan 344). Frank Freemon in his book Gangrene and Glory stated: “Surgery was quick, bloody, and brutal. Taking the knife in his [Surgeon] bloody hands he called out ‘Next’. Another soldier was lifted and placed, not too gently, on the operating table” (Freemon 109).
If a soldier had an injured limb they appear to have had little choice but to have it amputat-ed. Use of the “Guillotine” technique left many soldiers with infections and additional prob-lems
The Work of Death seemed inevitable to soldiers who embarked on the journey known as the Civil War. Throughout the Civil War, human beings learned how to prepare for death, imagine it, risk it, endure it, and seek to understand it. All the soldiers needed to be willing to die and needed to turn to the resources of their culture, codes of masculinity, patriotism, and religion to prepare themselves for the war ahead of them. Death individually touched soldiers with it’s presence and the fear of it, as death touched the soldiers it gave them a sense of who they really are and how they could change on their death bed.
The American Civil War, also known as the War Between the States, or simply the Civil War in the United States, was a civil war fought from 1861 to 1865, after seven Southern slave states declared their secession and formed the Confederate States of America . The states that remained in the Union were known as the "Union" or the "North". The war had its origin in the fractious issue of slavery, especially the extension of slavery into the western territories. Foreign powers did not intervene. After four years of bloody combat that left over 600,000 soldiers dead and destroyed much of the South's infrastructure, the Confederacy collapsed, slavery was abolished, and the difficult Reconstruction process of restoring national unity and guaranteeing rights to the freed slaves began.
Sarah Rosetta Wakeman's tale is not unusual. Wakeman was one of many who died from chronic diarrhea. Eventually dysentery would kill nearly half a million soldiers during the war. The Civil war was a terrible, bloody war, and many facts are still unknown or unconfirmed, Wakeman’s letters offer a rare glimpse into civil war life that is confirmed and accurate. This is true simply because her letters were written during her serving actively in the army, rather than a set of memoirs or stories compiled after the fact for publication purposes.
The anxiety of the battle to begin in combination with the sounds and sights of battle help in explaining why over 300,000 mean deserted during the Civil War. Some men were so desperate to escape the monstrosities of this war that some would resort to shooting themselves in the foot or in the hand. This would seem counterproductive however, due to the poor medical care they would receive.
During the Civil War they really worked towards building more hospitals and it drove the nursing profession to grow and have a large demand for nurses, but they were more like volunteers, such as wives or mistresses who were following their soldier men. Being a war nursing at that time was seen as a job for the lower class and no “respectable” woman could be seen in a military hospital. During the Civil War Phoebe Levy Pember, a young widow, went north to the confederate capital of Richmond. She eventually ran the world’s largest hospital, where on an average day she would supervise the treatment of 15,000 patients who were cared for by nearly 300 slave women. The war then led to a greater respect for nurses which was noticed by Congress. They then passed a bill providing pensions to Civil War nurses, but more importantly this led to the profe...