Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of technology on communication
Effects of technology on communication
Challenges of global communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of technology on communication
Is it Worth the Risk?
Both Jamal Albarghouti and Eddie Ho just happened to be in the right place at the right time to become citizen journalists, with their cell phones in hand, giving them the opportunity to record a media worthy event while it was taking place. They are not professional reporters, just two young men who knew they were witnessing terrifying events that news media outlets would be interested in seeing from a first person perspective. Accordingly, did their actions endanger others or were they endangered, if so, was it worth the risk that Albarghouti and Ho took to record these events?
For sure this was a frightening event experience for these two young men. Jamal Albarghouti who is Palestinian, found himself in a position to
…show more content…
Furthermore, it is evident that every journalist has a different concept of danger and what is hazardous to one person may not be considered hazardous to another. The individual desire to record human tragedy also differs from person to person (9). According to Gabe Mythen, the attraction of citizen journalist to media internet sites is that, “For technophiles, a substantial increase in peer-to-peer interactions has eroded gate-keeping hierarchies as public-based social news sites that set their own topics and agendas. Thus, one of the vaunted distinctions drawn between citizen journalism and professional journalism is that ‘no editor comes between the author and the reader” (Mythen, …show more content…
So when he heard gunshots on the Virginia Tech campus he knew without a doubt, that a news media event was taking place (Washington Post). By the same token, in the United States, we do not have the same associated risks of recording police circumstances such as those in other countries. Whereas, the possibility of recording government genocide of a people has been often a daily occurrence and the personal risk of injury or death is heightened. As a result, without citizen journalist the world might not know the extent or severity of a catastrophic event such as the Indonesian tsunami or of the government genocide of its people in Middle Eastern countries like Syria. Hence, the technological world is a much smaller place with the ability to share news events in a matter of moments. Therefore, for many who live in war torn countries, know it is worth the risk to inform the world of their government’s atrocities, the personal tragedies of its people. For instance, I can only think back to the years prior to World War II, and had the world known sooner of the genocide taking place in Germany, surely world nations would have intervened sooner had there been citizen journalist posting pictures on the internet of Jews and other non desired people (according to the Nazis), being cordoned off in
In the eighty-five pages play, Lafferty, Sherlock, and Wood exert their utmost effort to document, organize, and reconstruct a collage of verbatim testimonies, reports, and interviews eyewitnesses of the Syrian Revolution .The interviews were conducted by Laffery in collaboration with veteran war correspondents: Sherlock and Wood. Lafferty and colleagues conducted interviews incognito with ordinary people, activists, businesspersons, defectors, Free Syrian Army soldiers, and medical staff. Subsequently, Lafftery not only edited and adapted the play for theatre performance, but also directed it. The three compliers risked their personal safety and arranged to be covertly smuggled into the Syrian precarious land. Were they caught, they would have been, unquestionably, exposed to the horrendous Syrian torture, killing machine. The Assad regime banned Western media, and journalists no longer had any immunity. They could have been a legitimate target of any attack.
This investigation analyzes how the reports of the Beltway Sniper Attacks were given (newspaper or television, etc.) changed the public’s reaction the amount attention that was given to this event. To be able to analyze this, I will look at different newspaper reports that were published discussing the different ways that the media took to reporting about this event. The varying reasons for differing reports will be explored; along with the different ways these reports affected American citizens.
Wang’s studies have shown that news industries are now tabloidizing news because it elicits the attention of their viewers. Now the only thing considered as “entertainment” in the news is “crimes, accidents, and disasters”. Wangs writes “News that bleeds seem to still lead the primary broadcasts” (Wang 722). People nowaday only tune in when a disaster has occurred and anything other that is not “interesting”. Unfortunately, people would rather watch Isis in action then heard about Obama releasing innocent victims from prison. The reporter in “Gray Noise” proves Wang’s words true when he records on his lens about a mother who had just lost her
Self-motivation and determination are two of the main ideals of being journalist. If a journalist does not have the desire to find and report a story, he has no career. A journalist depends on finding the facts, getting to the bottom of the story and reporting to the public, whether it’s positive or negative. Janet Malcom states in the book The Journalist and the Murderer, “Every journalist who is not too stupid or too full of himself to notice what is going on knows that what he does is morally indefensible.” (Malcolm, 3) Her starting words speak volumes about “the Journalist and the Murderer” and the lessons that can be learned.
These two literary works, 40 Hours in Hell by Katherine Finkelstein and Third World by Dexter Filkins, both present diverse perspectives on what occurred during the World Trade Center attack. Although both texts approach the coverage of this attack differently, as reporters, they both base their news using normative theory. Normative theory is the consideration of what is morally correct or incorrect. In relation to normative theory is the Social Responsibility Theory. This theory deals with how an individual must complete their civic duty, since they are apart of the press, as well as their actions must benefit society. Nonetheless, of these two texts, 40 Hours in Hell best fulfills the requisites of the Social Responsibility Theory.
Firstly, the journalists are reporting from two vastly different locations. One is reporting from the comfort of an office and familiar surroundings, while the other is reporting from a war stricken foreign land. Although, there is a common tie, they both involved and had the ability to effect the government and they were all in danger. All of the journalists had the opportunity to report on the truth, even if it were to have political and even personal repercussions. Thus, due to the political nature, all of the journalists were putting their lives at risk and were aware of this. They also had the ability of putting other lives in danger. Woodward and Bernstein discovered how the information they were gathering had to be used strategically in order to not harm their sources, and Flynn and Henderson had the ability to create further conflict and terror for the country they were reporting about. Thus, all of the journalists had to learn how to use precautions while investigating, writing, and reporting on their given
June 17, 2015, was a tragic day for many families. Dylann Roof killed nine people at a church in Charleston South Carolina, he was motivated by racist opinions. During the reporting of this incident, each News outlet is different. Some outlets such as NBC and the New York Times took a more emotion-based route, focusing on family issues and his childhood. Whereas The Washington Post took a rational route to reporting the incident, focusing on Dylann’s Roof’s confession and the incidents following his arrest. Overall the media is spilt on their rhetoric, some want the readers to sympathize with Roof and others seek to paint him in a negative light. Nonetheless, they seem to agree on not calling him a terrorist. Roof’s actions can be labeled as
According to Apel (2014), on August 9,2014, Michael Brown,18, an unarmed black man of Ferguson, Missouri was shot and killed by a white police officer named Darren Wilson. Considering the evidence, a grand jury decided not to indict Wilson. This sparked a nationwide protest. People came from near and far to protest the judge’s decision. It was no peaceful protest, it might have appeared to start out as a nonviolent protest, but like many protests, it quickly turned violent. People wanted justice and the people felt as though the system once again had felled them. Barnett (2014), a reporter says that after the shooting groups such as the “New Black Panthers,” demanded a rebellion against the officer who shot Brown. For a while the head of police was not going to reveal the name of the officer who killed the Brown, but after a series of violent protest, the head of police released the officer’s name. If violence was not used during the protest it would not have received worldwide attention. Furthermore, the public would not have known the officer who killed Brown. Due to the amount of attention the Michael Brown’s case received and because of the amount of passion the protestors had and how they were willing to die to get their point across sparked attention. Requiring many people who were in the political spotlight to
“The media is the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that is power because they control the minds of the masses.” (Malcolm X). One of the most controversial matters that was on local and international TV news, radio stations, newspapers, magazines and social media sites is the Boston Marathon Bombings which occurred in April 15th last year. There were many opinions about who committed that massacre. Many media outlets were with the thought that the whole crime was staged on the other hand some of them were quick to point the finger at Tamerlan Tsarnaev and his brother Dzhokhar . In this paper I have chosen to put the light on three of the famous media resources which are: the Boston Fox 25 News TV, CNN TV and Press TV (Iranian).
In this era of globalization, news reporting is no longer just a means of communications, but it has also developed into a tool for change. Prominent journalists like Julian Assange, Nick Davies, Sir Charles Wheeler and many more has changed the landscape and outcomes of information, war and news reporting itself. But Martin Bell has challenged the fundamentals of journalism that is to be balanced and impartial with what he calls ‘Journalism of Attachment’. He even coined the phrase, ‘bystanders’ journalism’ for continuing the tradition of being distant and detached (Bell 1997), which he criticizes “for focusing with the circumstances of violence, such as military formations, weapons, strategies, maneuvers and tactics” (Gilboa 2009, p. 99). Therefore it is the aim of this essay to explain whether it is ethical for reporters to practice what Martin Bell calls the Journalism of Attachment by evaluating its major points and its counterarguments, and assessing other notions of journalism such as peace journalism.
SCHECHTER, Danny (2001). "Covering Violence: How Should Media Handle Conflict?" mediachannel.org. Online at: http://www.mediachannel.org/views/dissector/coveringviolence.shtml, consulted on March 27, 2004.
Media surveillance can have good as well as bad consequences. Misinterpretation and panics fabricated by news media have often threatened security in good policies, people, and products. The individuals and economic implications have been huge. For instance, suspicious stories that challenged the well-being of bioengineered foods lead to the lose millions of dollars in the damaged
The fact that citizen journalism is an amateur work done by an eyewitness of an event or someone who takes it as a hobby, brings some issues and disadvantages to this discipline. Firstly, common issue is with its inaccuracy. Social media users tend to share and spread messages before making sure if such information is correct and make it go viral. Secondly, due to the lack of editorial controls, citizen journalism, may be troubling for its creators, as very often they are not aware of the legal actions that may be taken against them, after sharing specific images and texts. “Citizen journalists may be not aware of questions of privacy or what legal restrictions there may be.” (Cooper, 2015, p.3) It is also worth mentioning that apart from legal actions that citizen journalists can face, there is also a risk of putting themselves in a major danger, trying to get the footage from violent protests, terror attacks and so on. There are also examples of several arrests while reporting demonstrations or riots as photographers put themselves in the sight of
Like citizen journalists, there are both advantages and disadvantages of professional journalists’. The disadvantages of professional news will be presented. For example, if we refer to “Free for All” a book, the author says that “the challenge for newspaper facing a future dominated by the Web has been that it was [insufficient] to transplant content, [associations], and business models from old media to new.” Previously, writers working in newsrooms delivered news coverage, and people in general needed to pay to acquire the paper (King ix). But not everyone can pay for that piece of paper and there comes the new method of reporting news. The new mode helps citizens gain their information for free and anywhere at any time because in 2016 we
The way that people receive news has traditionally been through channels of journalists who report over newscasts or in newspapers. Over the last few decades this has changed drastically. The birth of widespread internet, technology and social media began this revolution of change. Anyone with a smartphone today can instantly capture a story and begin circulating it within a matter of minutes. The occupation of journalism itself carries an inherent risk; whether citizen or professional. In recent history, professional freelance journalists have been killed, jailed and hurt. Citizens who step up and report in dangerous situations may be opening themselves up to this same