Chris Mccandless Flaws

553 Words2 Pages

Shaun Callarman's argument about Chris McCandless, the protagonist of Jon Krakauer's "Into the Wild," is highly critical. Callarman asserts that McCandless was both intelligent and ignorant, lacking common sense, and accuses him of romanticizing his adventure to an unrealistic and dangerous degree. Callarman criticizes McCandless for making mistakes out of arrogance and dismisses any admiration for McCandless's courage or ideals, ultimately branding him as "just plain crazy." To assess Callarman’s argument, it is necessary to explore both the merits and flaws of McCandless’s journey. While I understand and partially agree with Callarman’s perspective, I also believe that it overlooks some crucial aspects of McCandless’s character and intentions. …show more content…

McCandless embarked on his journey with inadequate supplies, minimal survival training, and a lack of crucial equipment such as a detailed map. These oversights undeniably reflect a lack of practical planning and an underestimation of the challenges he would face, supporting Callarman’s critique. Moreover, Callarman's point about McCandless’s arrogance has merit. McCandless’s decision to venture into the wild with minimal preparation could be seen as a manifestation of youthful hubris and an overestimation of his own abilities. His rejection of societal norms and refusal to seek guidance or support underscores this point. McCandless’s actions suggest a desire to prove something to himself and others, which might have clouded his

Open Document