Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sexuality in society
Sexuality in society
Sexual objectification theory sociology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sexuality in society
Women should come together in solidarity to fight against this demeaning term and crippling form of mind control. Because the sole objective of this term is to keep women in perpetual mental slavery. Isn’t it insidious that man is seen as a hero for embracing his sexuality but a woman is plummeted for doing the same? Chris Guillebeau in ‘the art of non-conformity’ talked about five monkeys that were kept in an open cage but if one of the monkeys tries to escape captivity for a better life others will drag her down and even beat her up till none of them had the courage to leave the cage. The story is a perfect illustration of what we are experiencing collective as women. When a woman refers to another as a slut, she tightens the mental chains
on all including her. A few weeks ago on snap chat, a lady was blatantly calling one of the participants of the ongoing BBA a slut. Now whatever the activity going on in the house is debatable and not the purpose of this article. However, there has been loads of scathing remarks on social media and blogs about the lady calling another a slut.
Women should not be forced to put up with any unwanted sexual advances from men. This is a major problem throughout the world yet it seems to fly under the radar. We need to make sure all women know it is okay to speak up about this and not feel ashamed for something that is not their fault. However, articles that reject these ideas such as "Women Can Dump Jerks Without Help of Lawyers", by Judy Jarvis make it difficult for women to feel comfortable enough to voice their problems. In her writing, Judy Garvis expresses her distaste of the concept of women who "play the victim". However, I actually do feel that women should no longer stay quiet on this topic and once and for all destroy this idea that women must suck it up and live in an environment
Before social media was ever a thing, there was not much meaning when a girl was singled out and called a slut. When called a slut, the girl definitely knew that she as was being bullied and harassed. However, today the word “slut” is so casually used that it is almost like greeting someone. “Through the “slut” greeting, girls and young women hail each other the way police officers hails the citizens” (Tanenbaum, 2015, pg.113). It has been so widely used by many girls that
There are many things to learn from this article written by Donald Baer, Montrose Wolf, and Todd Risley. It is a very informing article in which you can learn about the current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. The seven dimensions mentioned are: applied, behavioral, analytic, technological, conceptually systematic, effective, and generality.
...relabeling them as “pigs”! I’m not saying women should not criticise each other but the binary that she constructs to restore unity is in itself divisive, if she considers sex positive feminists as ‘selling out’.
The civilization of men is called chivalry and is earned by women at the price of their own civilization. “For the female, civilized behavior means chastity before marriage and faithfulness within it. Chivalrous behavior in the male is supposed to protect that chastity from involuntary defilement” (Griffin, 516). Unfortunately, the definition of civilization for women requires them to be feminine, dainty, and submissive while men are strong and dominant. This robs women of the mentality that they can be strong and independent and forces them to seek protection from men instead of finding it in themselves. This mentality and dependence deprives women of the ability to protect themselves from men creating a world of fear for them to live in. It also keeps women submissive because they do not want to step out of line and risk being hurt. Essentially, men keep women submissive by defining womanhood and using it like a cage to restrict their behavior and thoughts. In addition, their chivalrous protection does not apply to women who step outside of their required behavior. This means that women who act independently cannot be raped, they are beyond violation and an open target for all men. This double standard serves to make rape an acceptable and even encouraged behavior while keeping women quiet and well-behaved, lest they be mistaken for a bad girl worthy of
The word “cunt” used in modern language carries a heavy offensive potency in just one syllable. Saying phrases such as “You’re a cunt!” “Stop being such a cunt” or “You fucking cunt” for those with more gusto for its use, reveals the misogyny that the word possesses. After all, “cunt” is another, albeit derogatory, word for vagina and (most) females have a vagina; and the vagina is the central powerful symbol for femininity. What does it mean then to essentially be a “vagina” (read cunt)? Furthermore, as a woman, what does it mean to have such a pejorative word aimed towards you with the intent to offend, harm, and essentially oppress one’s own femininity? Yet, as British journalist Zoe Williams states, the word “vagina” is not used to insult women; however, cunt” is. To be called a “cunt,” then, suggests that the offender is attempting to dishonor this very symbol of womanhood, by scandalizing the word in attempt to claim and perpetuate its pejorative power, thus diminishing the woman, and inadvertently her power.
So far, conformity has been discussed in terms of group identification and social roles. However, individuals also tend to change prior beliefs to seek group acceptance. Asch (1951) investigated the effect of group pressure on conformity by asking participants to make a line judgment with seven confederates that gave the same obviously incorrect answer. Yet, 37% of participants conformed by giving the incorrect majority answer, whereas in the absence of group pressure, less than 1% of participants conformed (Asch, 1951). There are implications on normative influence as individuals, despite knowing the majority opinion was incorrect, may conform to avoid social punishment (Breckler et al., 2005). However, Turner and colleagues (1987) argued
In what ways do I choose to conform? In what ways do I choose not to conform? How do I express my individuality? What do I think the poet is saying about conforming? These are the questions asked from today’s poem called Non Conformist by Angela Shelf Medearis. After thinking about this question, I realize that I conform to many of the rules my parents give me but I don't always conform to what my friends say. For example, when my mom says to empty the dishwasher, I do it, not because I enjoy the work, but because I live in our home and our family, so I should contribute to helping out. However, when my friends tell me to do something such as wearing certain types of clothes, I don't always conform to what they say because I don't always like
Due to the girl’s current lifestyle and behavior, the mother is focused on sharing the value to save her daughter from a life of promiscuity. The mother fears her daughter will become a “slut” and insists that is exactly what the daughter desires. Moreover, the mother is very blunt with her view when she uses repetition with the statement, “… the slut you are so bent on becoming.” (Kincaid92). It is very clear that the mother holds a reputation to such a standard that it could determine the overall quality of a woman and her life. Therefore, a woman’s sexuality should be protected and hidden to present the woman with respect and to avoid the dangers of female sexuality. The mother is very direct in calling out certain, specific behaviors of the daughter. Such as, the way the daughter walks, plays with marbles, and approaches other people. The mother is very persistent that the daughter must act a certain way that can gain their community’s respect. She fears the social consequence of a woman’s sexuality becoming
...rms of power and source of pride in society. Emphasizing sexism in language and rising the concern with words can be a vital feminist strategy to provoke social change (Weatherall, 2002). Language can produce a false imagination and represents women and men unequally, as if members of one sex were somehow less wholly human, less complex, and has fewer rights than members of the other sex. Sexist language also characterizes serotypes of women and men, sometimes to the disadvantage of both, but more often to the disadvantage of women. (Wareing & Thomas, 2012). As a result, it is necessary that individuals have the right to define, and to redefine as their lives unfold, their own gender identities, without regard to genitalia, assigned birth sex, or initial gender role. Language about women is not a nonaligned or an insignificant issue but profoundly a political one.
The sexualization of women in the 21st century has led many to wonder whether or not the feminist movement actually resulted in more harm than good. Although the progress and reform that came out of the feminist movement is indisputable, things such as equal rights under the law, equal status and equal pay, the reality is that the subjugation of female roles in society still exist, and the most surprising part about this is that now women are just as much as at fault for this as men are. Ariel Levy defines female chauvinist pigs as “women who make sex objects of other women and of ourselves” (Levy 11). This raunch culture is mistakenly assumed to be empowering and even liberating to women when it is in fact degrading and corrupting to the modern feminist movement and makes it more difficult for women to be taken seriously in society. The shift in the nature of the feminist movement is in Levy’s opinion attributed to by the massive industry now profiting off of the sexualization of women, the reverse mindset now adopted by post-feminists and women in power roles in our society, and ultimately the women who further their own objectification as sex objects and thus, so by association, deem themselves lesser than man.
They exposed cultural codes, ways in which “culture instructs us to feel and act in particular ways” (Dunn 5) so that the public was more aware of their actions. These codes, if broken, have consequences, and American meritocracy supports that citizens should be held accountable for their actions. This mindset leads to victim blaming. Feminists’ biggest job was to convince people that victims should never be acceptable; there cannot be “blameless” and “blameworthy” victims. This labeling mechanism is a “social constructionist approach toward ‘deviance’...a matter of definition rather than of ‘fact’ or the inherent qualities of an actor or action” (Dunn 12). For example, a woman wearing revealing clothing may be considered a “blameworthy” victim because her clothing was suggesting. However, this assumes that “men can’t control their sexuality enables society to give men a ‘Get out of Jail Free’ card, a pass to commit sexual harassment, assault, and rape with the ready-made excuse” (Cappiello and McInerney 181). According to feminists, rape is a direct result of our culture’s differential sex role socialization and sexual stratification” (Rose 78). Because men cannot see women as human, sexual assault persists.
In a society that is overrun by social networks, such as Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter, the idea of nonconformity is obsolete. Two great philosophers of the Transcendentalist Movement, Henry David Thoreau and Waldo Ralph Emerson, have commented on conformity in the modern world. Thoreau took the idea of nonconformity to a completely new level in his philosophical novel Walden, and Emerson, a great friend and contemporary of Thoreau, made various comments on conformity in the modern world. Thoreau advocates complete nonconformity in all areas of life, but this view is controversial among many individuals. In contemporary society, many individuals believe that people should always follow the accepted norm or should always march to their own drummer, but people should take a moderate approach and march to their own drummer in some areas of life and follow the accepted norms in others.
Conformity can be seen everywhere in my personal life because I am a teenager which is stereotyped as the age of non-conformity, I have been in and a part of peer pressure situations and I am usually classified in the non-conformist class. As of now I definitely see more individuals trying to conform to the crowd or at least their group of friends and I believe this is because everyone wants to be a part of a group, no one gladly accepts being a loner or an outsider but these traits are given to you by the choices of others and not the actual rebels themselves. Usually large groups of boys who are next to each other any time they can all have the same clothes, personalities, haircuts and humor. I personally have never been friends with people
Women’s oppression is not just unique to our history alone. Different civilizations around the world have portrayed women despicably. In Japan during world war two, teenage girls were rounded up into sex camps. “An estimated one hundred thousand to four hundred thousand girls were forced to do sexual favors for Japanese soldiers, some of the girls were as young as 11 years old. They serviced up to 50 Japanese soldiers a day, while enduring beatings, starvation, sterilization and abortions. Even today, over half the 27 million people enslaved are woman in underground sex brothels.” [Robinson]