Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of divorce on children
The emotional effect of divorce on children
The effect of divorce on children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of divorce on children
Although some people believe children who are raised with both parents receive more attention and better emotional support, this is not true in all circumstances. For example, it would not be beneficial for children to be raised with both parents who constantly argued and said very mean things to each other on the daily for the children to hear. When children are raised in households with nothing but violence, they grow up thinking these behaviors are ok and acceptable. This in turn might lead to the children growing up trying to emulate the lifestyle their parents raised them in. On the other hand, a child could be raised by a single parent who makes it their duty to do all the things necessary to instill the right morals and beliefs into
their children. Not all families are fortunate enough to have both the mother and father be able to get along good enough to stay together for their children’s entire childhood. It is also important for single parents to have the correct amount of help from the government to back them up while dealing with the struggles of raising children on their own. With the help of the government and a hardworking dedicated parent, the life of a child raised in single parent household can be just as healthy as in other household.
Two-parent families consist of a mother and father living in a home with dependent children. The family may consist of a biological mother and father or a step-parent. In two-parent families found little or no negative effects. Researchers suggest that children from two parent families are less likely to have social issues. Children raised in two-parent homes are more likely to complete high school and attend college. Cho, Lee, and Kuchner (2007) found that students raised in two parent homes demonstrate better behavior, have less absences and tardies and have much higher grade point averages. Researchers suggest that children from two parent homes have better grades and achieve academically as well as socially because the parents have more time to devote to the upbringing of the children oppose to single parents.
A child needs both of their parents’ love and affection while growing up. A child that grows up with both has a higher chance of being a more stable person. However, not all children have this luxury; some children are born into dysfunctional families that consist of only one parent like the children in the Wingfield family. “A study of 1,977 children age 3 and older living with a residential father or father figure found that children living with married biological parents had significantly fewer externalizing behavioral problems than children living with at least one non-biological parent” (Consequences of Fatherlessness). The absent parent in the Wingfield family affected everyone in the family, not only the children. The absent father,
So in every way a child is better off being with both parents rather than with only one; given that there is not some kind of abuse in the home. Again, this is not to beat up on single parents because I am one myself. I do believe single parents give it their all and they probably even give more because they are giving for two. I know first-hand that single parents give everything they have got and more, because there is no other way to survive. I absolutely commend all of those single moms and dads for giving everything they’ve got to be both parents rolled into one and to love for
The slightest dysfunction in a family structure can be detrimental to a child’s development. Children often act out and take part in delinquent activities. In order to increase a child’s chance to succeed in life, they must be raised in a stable environment involving two parents. This helps them to feel included in the family and will help build their confidence and independence later in life.
the simple fact that two parents together make more rules and are more likely to
Throughout history a one-parent household has been deemed as a nontraditional family, but in today’s society it seems more and more common with every day. Although the reason and causes vary, each year the number of children raised by a single parent increases. Most people don’t seem to realize how much this can change a child’s future. The impact of childhood experiences simply set the disposition of adulthood and the rest of their lives. There is not one sole factor that affects child development, but one very important one is the role and relationship created with one’s parents. How a child is parented and raised leaves a lasting impression on them, commonly for a lifetime. You can see how this might alter a child, being that one parent is missing. Child development based off of living in a one-parent household is very circumstantial because each child and each parent are different individuals. But one thing is for sure; all areas of child development can be affected due to a missing parent, including social, cognitive emotional, and physical areas. I sat down with Dr. Carlos Antoline, a children’s school psychologist to see what the real impact of growing up in a one-parent household has on child development.
Which behalf is the best side, the single parent versus the traditional family? A traditional family is defined or described as two parents working together to solve anything that goes on in their house. The advantage of a traditional family is that they are going to have a more stable income that will buy them a reasonable house or an apartment. “The traditional families have two parents, the mom and the dad, jointly raising kids with help and advice from each other” (Magnier). An accustomed family also expresses their feelings towards one another and has respect among others in their home. A dysfunctional family is usually described as conflicted adults living on their own. Although a dysfunctional family may sound inadequate, it is quite reputable. “ Single parenting is already becoming a rapidly growing trend in the society” (Magnier). Single parents are very common in the US. Statistics say that one out of every two children in the US will live in a single parent household at one point before they reach their adult age. “The situations of single parents vary greatly: it may be that you are divorced, widowed or never married” (all-about-motherhood.com/advantages). Being a single parent states that an individual is strong enough to carry the parts of two roles in a house. Single parents are a good influence on their children and any other individuals because they can take care of their financial problems, have greater control over their kids, and the children tend to have greater independence when living with a single parent.
when to do their homework or even in some cases when to go to bed.
...istics, 1999). McBride, Brent A., Sara K., Sullivan, and Ho-Ho (2005) reported about the achievement levels in a adolescent who grows up with a father, “A study of 1330 children from the PSID showed that fathers who are involved on a personal level with their child schooling increases the likelihood of their child's achievement. When fathers assume a positive role in their child's education, students feel a positive impact.” (p. 201-216). Children who do not grow up in a two parent homes, are more likely to fail and repeat a grade in school. It is also important to note that children who grow up in single parent families are less likely to have parents involved with the school, 62% of children with two parent homes have parents that are involved in school, while children from single parent homes have half of them involved in school (Nord, Winquist, West, 2001).
Single parent households are becoming so common that is is expected. The amount of children living with their father has gone up but it is still pretty low compared to children living with their mothers. Which parent you are raised by is important. Each parent can only teach you what they learned. You mother can only teach you how to be a mother and your father can only teach you how to be ...
An estimated two million children are being raised in a single or same sex parent in the United States. The exact number of children raised in this type home cannot be determined due to the secrecy resulting from the stigma associated with homosexuality (Perrin, Siegel 3). Families of same sex parents often resemble step families formed after heterosexual couples divorce. Due to social acceptance of diversity in sexual orientation (Perrin 2), same sex parenting is forever changing the traditional make-up of the American Family (working biological father, biological mother and children.) There are conflicting researches on the impact of a child being raised in a same sex parent family. Many argue that a child’s well-being should focus more on a loving, nurturing, and supportive environment while others argue that children of same sex parents are at a greater disadvantage due to the social stigma associated with being gay, lesbian or bisexual. This controversial issue has received national attention throughout the media and the United States Supreme Court.
If the adolescent feels like they are being supported they are more likely to have a positive attitude instead of a negative one. This is why when the child is middle childhood it is not very affect, because the grandparent or other adult in the household, besides single-parent mother, might see raising the child a different way and then the child gets confused on who to follow directions from. For adolescents having the other adult in the household that is the same sex helps them accept authority and will be better prepared to work in the work field. The single-mother just needs to make sure that she has a positive influence in the household for the adolescent and even the middle childhood.
When one thinks of having children, he or she typically desires the “American Dream”: a big house with a yard, a perfect husband or wife, and four perfect children. The idea of having a conventional family is very appealing to most people, because it is what has been socially acceptable for a long time. There are many pros that go along with having a socially-accepted family. One has the love and support from his or her spouse, which is huge today, especially in the United States. In the U.S. alone there is nearly a 50 percent divorce rate (Divore Rate). Therefore, most people see those statistics, and realize that they want to be different and have their spouse by their side. To have both parents in a child’s life is important for the child as well. Studies show that by having both a mother and a father in a child’s life, the child is more likely to succeed in school, work related activities, as well as have better inter-relational skills. Yet, this does not mean that all children in un-conventional families are at a disadvantage, they can do just as well as the children that are in what we call “normal” families.
Should raising a child be the responsibility of both parents? Some people think the responsibility lies on both parents since it took two participants to bring the child into the world. Others don’t think both parents are needed in raising a child or that they should be held responsible and be made to contribute if they don’t want to, therefore shouldn’t be an issue. After researching both sides of the issue, I strongly believe that it is the responsibility of both parents to raise the child they brought into this world together. I say this with the understanding that the child has not been given up for adoption, but remains with one or both of the biological parents.
What people must understand is that properly raising a child does not rely on the structure of a family but should be more focused on the process When a topic such as this one has a broad amount of variables it is impossible to simply link these problems to only having one parent. In the article, “Single-parent families cause juvenile crime”, author Robert L. Maginnis states, “Children from single-parent families are more likely to have behavior problems because they tend to lack economic security and adequate time with parents”. The simple statement that raw criminals are products of single-parent adolescence is absurd. What this writer must understand is that it can be extremely difficult for one parent to raise a child by themselves for many reasons. A single-parent must work full time to be able to afford to provide for themselves and their child.