Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of colonization on the native indians
European colonization impact on native americans
European colonizations effect on native americans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of colonization on the native indians
While some believe that the United States gave the Pueblos land by granting them treaties, many believe that it was unfair for the government to make treaties since they were the ones to instigate the invasion of Pueblo territory. The Pueblo Tribe is located at the heart of Southwestern part of the United States, known mostly for their agriculture and innovative multi-storied homes. From the beginning of their emergence, the Pueblos have depended on hunting and farming as a way to gain sustenance, meaning that land was valuable for them to support themselves. However, their peaceful lives came to an abrupt end when the Spanish claimed the Pueblo Region in 1539. With no remorse, the Spanish dominated the Pueblo land and “ in 1540, quickly and …show more content…
brutally pacifying all indigenous resistance” (Pueblo Indians). When the Spanish took control of the Pueblos, massive bloodshed followed, leaving the Pueblos vulnerable and helpless to more attacks. Furthermore, the loss of land to the Spanish meant that it became very difficult for the Pueblos to collect food and water, leaving many Pueblos homeless and hungry. In addition, with Spanish colonization came the forceful implementation of Spanish lifestyle and beliefs. The Spanish forced Christianity upon the Pueblos, leading them to “ adapt to colonial rule through syncretism” ( Pueblo Indians Culture). The forceful practice of Christianity meant that the Pueblos had to stray away from their own culture and beliefs. They had no choice but to follow this system or else they would get punished. Every aspect of Pueblo life became governed by the Spanish; the Pueblos had very little freedom to do what they wanted. As a result of the constant abuse, “ in 1680, the Pueblo Revolt led by Pope allowed for Pueblo resistance for more than a decade, ending in 1691” ( Pueblo Indians). This revolt signified the hardships the Pueblos went through for almost a century and a half. They had to fight wars and lose members just to try and gain back control of their lives and their lands. However even today, the Pueblos still face major problems. The effects of climate change and global warming has caused “ limited resources and poor economic conditions” (Unique Challenges). The Pueblos have received no assistance from the United States, who in fact put the Pueblos in the position they are in now. In fact, climate change has caused “ a decline to grown corn, wildfires affecting wildlife, and the erosion of sand dunes” (Unique Challenges). Many families are left with no food to eat because there is not enough livestock and crops for them to eat. The erosion of sand dunes has displaced many families and has destroyed habitats of native plants and land. Additionally, with the destruction of their lands, many future families will have nowhere to go in their already limited space. As a result of these conditions, poverty has become, “heavily prevalent in Native populations as almost a quarter of them live in poverty, almost double the U.S. population” (Unique Challenges). The Pueblos, being that they receive no aid from the government in their tough situation, have nowhere to turn to for help. For centuries, they have been constantly ignored. Even with the poverty and starvation, the government still has not decided to do anything. On the bright side, groups such as Pueblo of Jimenez have started a, “utility-scale solar project to help bring resources to tribes in the Southwest” (Unique Challenges). In spite of minimal government support, there are still groups like the Pueblo of Jimenez who try to assist the Pueblos. They give the Pueblos resources the they are lacking; such as food, air, and shelter. This will at least help the Pueblos to stand and get back on their feet. Today, about 75,000 Pueblos proudly stand strong in hopes to bring attention and to preserve their life and culture. Chiefs’ Speeches In Chief Tecumseh’s Address to General William Henry Williamson, Tecumseh uses hyperboles and exaggerations to bring attention the greed of the “white man,” while in Chief Seattle’s A Letter to President Pierce, Seattle uses casual relationship to show how the actions of the Americans will also harm the Americans in the end.
In Tecumseh’s speech, he calls the General to recognize the “white man’s” excessive greed for land. Tecumseh, showing how outrageous to the General the issue of land is, states, “ Sell a country?! Why not sell the air, the sea, as well as the earth? Did not the Great Spirit make them all for the use of his children” (L.30-31). By using hyperboles to exaggerate the situation, Tecumseh brings forth ignorance of the General and the “white man” towards taking Native land. In the 19th century, the government and the “white man” thought it was okay for them to just encroach on Native land with no consequences. However, by pointing out the obvious objects in nature such as the air and sea, Tecumseh describes the extent to how much the white man wants to take everything, even when it is not necessary. Further, Tecumseh hopes to instill thought into the white man, especially the General, to rethink further actions in taking Native land. On the other hand, Chief Seattle uses casual relationship to get his message across to the President. Describing the effects of the white man’s actions, Seattle states, “The whites, too shall pass- perhaps sooner than the tribes. Continue to contaminate your bed, and you will one night suffocate in your own waste” (L.35). By using casual relationship, Seattle is able describe and show the effects to “whites”that by abusing the environment and the resources, the white man is also harming his own land. Land was a major asset for the government in the mid-1850s, as it allowed the country to grow, meaning that their will be more to gain money from. Many of the audience thought that taking and abusing the land was the only
to be able to earn money. So, by telling the white man that the land is being destroyed and quickly put to waste, and Seattle wants the white man to think of the consequences their actions will do in the future. Furthermore, Seattle suggests that because of the lack of thought for the future, the white man will run out of their own resources.
To many of the English colonists, any land that was granted to them in a charter by the English Crown was theirs’, with no consideration for the natives that had already owned the land. This belittlement of Indians caused great problems for the English later on, for the natives did not care about what the Crown granted the colonists for it was not theirs’ to grant in the first place. The theory of European superiority over the Native Americans caused for any differences in the way the cultures interacted, as well as amazing social unrest between the two cultures.
Andrew Jackson believed that the only way to save the Natives from extinction was to remove them from their current homes and push them across the Mississippi River. “And when removal was accomplished he felt he had done the American people a great service. He felt he had followed the ‘dictates of humanity’ and saved the Indi...
Both conversion of the Native Americans and Native Americans being pressed in to slavery were practiced in the Spanish colonies extending into the areas that will one day be called, New Mexico, Texas, Arizona, and California. The most dominant nation in these regions were the Pueblo Indians. In order to control the Pueblos, the Spanish made the once free people live in peasant communities, forts and missions so they could keep a close eye on them. Oppressing these proud people gave cause to resistance by the Pueblos. An influential Pueblo leader known as El Pope rose up to lead his people from oppression.
The land of the Native Indians had been encroached upon by American settlers. By the
Powhatan was the chief of a large Confederacy consisting of around thirty-two tribes living in the Virginia area. He was viewed as a strong and powerful leader who wants the best for his people. He explains that the reason for his speech is that he is near the end of his life and is concerned about their relationship when his successor takes place. Chief Powhatan wants peace between the English and the Powhatan people. “I exhort you to peaceable councils…” Willing to Chief uses the phrase “I wish their experience was equal to mine,” meaning he wants his children to have the same relationship with the colonists as his generation has enjoyed. Chief Powhatan states that Native Americans have the love for colonists, “not be less than ours to you”.
Cronon raises the question of the belief or disbelief of the Indian’s rights to the land. The Europeans believed the way Indians used the land was unacceptable seeing as how the Indians wasted the natural resources the land had. However, Indians didn’t waste the natural resources and wealth of the land but instead used it differently, which the Europeans failed to see. The political and economical life of the Indians needed to be known to grasp the use of the land, “Personal good could be replaced, and their accumulation made little sense for ecological reasons of mobility,” (Cronon, 62).
Although the 160 acres of land per Indian seemed generous, the land was barren and dry. The government did not know, however, that black oil seeped out of the earth, and many Indians became very wealthy because of their “worthless” pieces of land. As a result of the Indians’ wealth, hundreds of white businessmen, fortune-hunters, traders, thieves, and swindlers swarmed to the reservation to make cash.
The Indians thought of land very differently to the white man. The land was sacred, there was no ownership, and it was created by the great spirit. They could not sell their land to others, whereas the white people could fence off the land which belonged to them, and sell it freely to whoever they wanted. The Europeans didn't think that the Indians were using the land properly, so in their eyes, they were doing a good favour to the earth. To the Indians, the land was more valuable than the money that the white man had brought with him, even though it didn't belong to them.
...convince us Indians that our removal was necessary and beneficial. In my eyes, the agreement only benefited Andrew Jackson. It is apparent that Jackson neglected to realize how the Indian Removal act would affect us Indians. When is the government justified in forcibly removing people from the land they occupy? If you were a Native American, how would you have respond to Jackson? These questions need to be taken into consideration when determining whether or not Jackson was justified. After carefully examining these questions and considering both the pros and cons of this act, I’m sure you would agree that the removal of Native Americans was not justified under the administration of Andrew Jackson. Jackson was not able to see the damaging consequences of the Indian removal act because of his restricted perspective.
The Indian Removal Act drove thousands of natives off their tribal lands and forced them west to new reservations. Then again, there are those who defend Jackson's decision stating that Indian removal was necessary for the advancement of the United States. However, the cost and way of removing the natives was brutal and cruel. The opposition fails to recognize the fact that Jackson’s removal act had promised the natives payment, food, and protection for their cooperation, but Jackson fails to deliver any of these promises. Furthermore, in “Indian removal,” an article from the Public Broadcasting Service, a description of the removal of the Cherokee nation is given.
Natives were forcefully removed from their land in the 1800’s by America. In the 1820’s and 30’s Georgia issued a campaign to remove the Cherokees from their land. The Cherokee Indians were one of the largest tribes in America at the time. Originally the Cherokee’s were settled near the great lakes, but overtime they moved to the eastern portion of North America. After being threatened by American expansion, Cherokee leaders re-organized their government and adopted a constitution written by a convention, led by Chief John Ross (Cherokee Removal). In 1828 gold was discovered in their land. This made the Cherokee’s land even more desirable. During the spring and winter of 1838- 1839, 20,000 Cherokees were removed and began their journey to Oklahoma. Even if natives wished to assimilate into America, by law they were neither citizens nor could they hold property in the state they were in. Principal Chief, John Ross and Major Ridge were leaders of the Cherokee Nation. The Eastern band of Cherokee Indians lost many due to smallpox. It was a year later that a Treaty was signed for cession of Cherokee land in Texas. A small number of Cherokee Indians assimilated into Florida, in o...
The Shawnee also claimed these lands but, of course, were never consulted. With the Iroquois selling the Shawnee lands north of the Ohio, and the Cherokee selling the Shawnee lands south, where could they go? Not surprisingly, the Shawnee stayed and fought the Americans for 40 years. Both the Cherokee and Iroquois were fully aware of the problem they were creating. After he had signed, a Cherokee chief reputedly took Daniel Boone aside to say, "We have sold you much fine land, but I am afraid you will have trouble if you try to live there."
As the West of the Appalachian Mountains became known as the “Indian Land” proclaimed by the King of England in 1763, as properly known as the Proclamation Line of 1763, the U. S. government believed it to be part of their land after their gain of independence from Britain. The reason for this happening was due to the fact that the Indians lost to the French in the French and Indian war which was also known as the brutal Seven Years’ War from 1754-1763. As a result, The U.S. took advantage of the situation and insisted on acquiring the land of the Indians in the West through three different policies (Chris ...
When viewing a map of the country of Mexico prior to the American westward expansion, it was actually larger than the United States had been at that time. Some lands that Mexico lost in the Mexican - American war under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, are Texas (the second largest state in the present US), California (the third largest state in the present US) and New Mexico (the fifth largest state in the present US). Due to this defeat Mexico lost half of its national territory. Half of Mexico’s lands were gone and half of Mexico’s people displaced making them Americans and no longer Mexicanos. This occurred without their approval or consent. In the book “My History Not Yours” written by Genaro M. Padilla are accounts of men and women living in the lands of Texas, California and New Mexico during the this unruly time of loss and the unknown. The pages of this book contain the actual written accounts of Mexicanos and their feeling of outrage sadness and anger against the insurgence of their mother lands. The feelings of accommodation and resistance are a present among the writers within Padilla’s book but some lean towards one side and some the other. All humans are different and the people of Mexico handled and felt differently about the loss of their lands. Some possessed the mindset that the overtaking of their lands by the Americans was unacceptable and they resisted and resented the presence of the Anglo-Saxons that now occupied their territory. While others possessed more of an accommodating view. That being, they saw the Americans as a potential asset to develop the lands and that the US was more powerful than they so it would be best to tr...
The American Indians Between 1609 To 1865. Native Americans or American Indians, once occupied the entire region of the United States. They were composed of many different groups, who spoke hundreds of languages and dialects. The Indians from the Southwest used to live in large, terraced communities and their way of sustain was from the agriculture where they planted squash, pumpkins, beans and corn crops. Trades between neighboring tribes were common, this brought in additional goods and also some raw materials such as gems, cooper.