More handpicked essays just for you.
Chief Seattle's rhetorical strategies
Analysis of chief seattle's speech
Chief Seattle's rhetorical strategies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chief Seattle's rhetorical strategies
Chief Seattle Speech is about how the whites have come over into the Indians land and how they have tried to destroy and remove the Indians. He was totally against the actions of the whites. Trying to get them to understand how his people felt about the things they were doing, he used rhetorical devices. To strongly show his feelings to describe how he feel about the whites, Chief used hypophora, appeal to emotion, and imagery. To begin with, Chief used hypophora to describe his feelings towards the white. “Where is the thicket? Gone. Where is the eagle? Gone.”, he questioned. He answered his own question because he honestly didn't want a response from them, he wanted them to be aware that everything was going to be gone if they continued
In the New York Times article “When a Crop Becomes a King”, author Michael Pollan argues there is an overproduction of corn that does more harm than it does good. He writes this in response to a farm bill signed by then President Bush to increase the budget for corn production which caused much controversy. Pollan uses an infuriated and frustrated tone in order to convince American consumers that corn has taken over their environment and economy. Michael Pollan uses rhetorical strategies to challenge conventional views of corn and to argue against additional corn production.
It is the perspective of the Natives and how they feel they have been wrongfully treated. All perspectives must be looked at to figure out where the truth lies. Pokagon gives a very strong one-sided story. He does give way too few who stood up for the Native way of life, but remains not to believe it was all in the name of progression. He believes very adamantly that is was all in the name of greed. The greed for gold drove out his kind, not the need to progression. He proves his point by sharing what happened to the lives of the Natives, using such things as alcohol and railroad systems. Those two things were used to break treaties and push out tribes from their native lands. The strongest point he uses is slavery. Recalling how the Natives accepted and helped the settlers, but weren’t repaid with the same kindness. He is specifically speaking to the pale face who stole everything from his people. While history books portray Natives as the problem, he uses all he knows to repaint a different story. He does not shy away from the eventuality of progression, but rather believes it could have been another
American Sniper is the movie that I chose to analyze because it is full of moral and ethical decisions that have to be made. The movie starts off with a boy at school that has to go pull a bully off of his little brother and he ends up beating the bully up so bad that blood is all over his face. The boys name is Chris Kyle. The film then skips forward to when he is in his twenties and is riding a bronco at the rodeo since that is his passion. He then decides to join the Navy and become a SEAL after he feels like his purpose was to serve his country. He gets deployed to Iraq and the mental part is hard on him especially when he has to shoot a women and a kid when he sees them trying to throw a grenade at a group of Marines. He tries to help
In Florence Kelley's speech to the people attending the NAWSA convention, she uses emotional appeal to motivate her audience to convince their male counterparts to legalize voting for women, and also to persuade the males to help put an end to child labor.
He states that Native Americans have love for colonists when he mentions “not be less than ours to you” implying that his experience with the colonists has been nothing more than a positive one and that he would like this relationship to continue peacefully. The Chief makes himself credible by exercising his authority when he explains “ In such circumstances my men must watch, and if a twig should break, all would cry out “Here comes Captain Smith””. This is evidence of how he is the authority and shows in first hand in the terror the natives
In the same also different way, the coach in Marshall speech also using pathos when he said “ They don’t know your heart. I do. I’ve seen it. You have shown it to me...You have shown just exactly who you are in here.” This is pathos because the coach bring up how good the team have become. Whether they’re losing or winning, the only thing will matter is no one will have a great heart as the players have. They don’t need to win the championship to show that they’re the best, they just need to show how much passion they have with football to show that they’re the best team. The coach also said: “ When you take that field today, you’ve gotta lay that heart on the line, men. From the souls of your feet, with every ounce of blood you’ve got in your body, lay it on the line until the final.” He doesn’t put pressure on the players that they have to win, he speaked how he feel, he speaked from his heart, he just wanted that when the team take the field today, they just need to put all their effort and passion on the field.
Powhatan was the chief of a large Confederacy consisting of around thirty-two tribes living in the Virginia area. He was viewed as a strong and powerful leader who wants the best for his people. He explains that the reason for his speech is that he is near the end of his life and is concerned about their relationship when his successor takes place. Chief Powhatan wants peace between the English and the Powhatan people. “I exhort you to peaceable councils…” Willing to Chief uses the phrase “I wish their experience was equal to mine,” meaning he wants his children to have the same relationship with the colonists as his generation has enjoyed. Chief Powhatan states that Native Americans have the love for colonists, “not be less than ours to you”.
In the beginning of this speech, he talks about how the “fight” between the Indians and whites was unfair because of the weapons the whites possessed. Despite this, the Indians still believed they had a chance to defend themselves, unfortunately they were no match for the guns. What initiated this fight was the land, belonging to the Indians, that was taken with no regards to the inhabitants. He wanted to explain that Indians were of no harm to the “white society” and wanted to carry on with their own way of life. He feared that Indians will lose their culture and will become similar to whites in a negative sense. Some similarities he lists include lying and hypocrisy, adulterers, lazy, all talk, and
Not only does repetition play a major role in Chisholm’s speech, but her dispersement of anaphoras indeed calls attention to her main point. Anaphoras allow her to emphasize her frustration and put forth the notion of the severity of discrimination and differences men and women had to endure during that time. An example of this is right in the beginning of her speech where she states: “It provides a legal basis for attack on the most subtle, most pervasive, and most institutionalized form of prejudice that exists,” where she explains how the Constitution was based on the equality of the American people, including between men and women. This quotation fulfills her point by expressing these prejudices in the superlative form. Because she placed
In December 2009, the world was shocked by Tiger Woods. News was released to the public of a scandal regarding Woods cheating on his wife with numerous women. As a well-known and respectful individual in the golfing world, it was important for him to take responsibility for his actions. More importantly, in order for Woods to keep his sponsors and save his reputation, he needed to apologize to his sponsors and family. His apologetic speech exemplifies his remorseful attitude through diction, or word choice, and the use of ethos, or credibility, and pathos, an emotional appeal, to the audience.
Florence Kelley uses an abundant amount of rhetorical devices in her speech to express her feelings about child labor. Kelley uses sarcasm, repetition, and imagery in her speech to explain her thoughts on child labor.
Is it Red Face vs. White Face, or Red faces and White faces? Chief Seattle, in this oration to Governor Stevens, discusses the comparatives and differences between these two conglomerations of people using rhetoric devices such as similes, concession, repetition, and tone. Through the use of these devices, Chief Seattle sets in his purposes of both warning the White Faces that although they hold the current power, and although the Native Americans want to live as one, that they have some power as well, and show his fellow brothers and sisters that although they may be weak now, not only in numbers but in strength, that they have power and might and the ability to eventually seek revenge on those who do them injustice.
The Choctaw were told that the Americans in Washington cared little for the situation. They wanted the Choctaw moved on their own, or by military force. The Indians were believed to be ignorant savages, but they were industrious farmers, merchants, and businessmen of all types. Some were educated people, many were Christians. They even had an organized system of government and a codified body of law. Some of these people were not even Indians, some were strangers and orphans had been taken in over the years. These were people who did not deserve what they went through.
oth persuasive pieces of literature are effective, but Patrick Henry has the better speech. This is true because of his technique on getting the rest of the people from the government, or the audience, to get on his side. He starts off by complimenting the people of the crowd and trying to get them on his side. The reader can understand this from the lines, “No man thinks more highly than I do for the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the house.” This is a smart way of going forward by creating common ground and not just going straight into the blender. In this, he is also mentioning that he has experience and knowledge. Later in the text, he says he has past knowledge again to prove that he has wisdom and has a perspective of the future. He says, “I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided , and that is the lamp of experience.” He's not only conveying the message that he's wise, but it also shows credibility, or ethos.
...ess the beauty of such unique ceremony.” As he told the very story with deep tones, he would raise his hand clutching a green blade. He said the oldest native gave it to him and that in the exchange the blade gave off light. In return the captain gave his most personal affect, his fathers pocket watch. His time with the natives he said was the best time of his life. The captain believed that the Indians were untainted beings; he said he could feel a connection between the people and believed that their power was routed by a natural energy, native to the land. But the Captain's stories were hard to take in full, the man had a thirst and he drank regularly. No matter how much he drank the captain only needed three hours of sleep to right him. He would wake up perkier than a horny pig and scold us till we joined him. With the captain gone. God to save us…