Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime reduction and prevention
Introduction on how to reduce crime
Crime reduction and prevention
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crime reduction and prevention
“The murder capital”(ward ,room,staff.np), inefficient, are all ways the city of Chicago and its police force are being portrayed by the documentary Chicagoland. Chicagoland gives a poor representation of what chicago reilly is. The documentary only gives half the story, it only shows Chicago in its bad times when it seems the police have no control over the violence in chicago, but it fails to show how much they actually do to keep the city of chicago safe, with keeping guns of the street and the decreasing of violence . I believe that the documentary is biassed and wants to have chicago seen as a place nobody should ever want to go and for that it should be taken down.
Gun violence has gotten out of control, the amount of illegal guns
…show more content…
In the documentary chicagoland that is what they want to put the emphasis on without giving actual fact on how the police are cracking down on gun violence.What the documentary considers as factual evidence is the simple fact that guns are all over the city and police have no idea where they are getting them from, and they have done little to take the guns off the streets or find out where they are getting the guns from so that makes them ineffective police.The truth to that is police have been hard at work trying to get guns off the street. In fact in 2012 police seized more than 7,400 guns including more than 300 assault weapons(Guns, Seized.np). This just show the effectiveness of the chicago police and how they reily are trying to make a difference in the city.Another example used by the documentary is that a 14 year old boy was shot while walking by a safe passage route(chicagoland.np). The documentary tries to emphasis on …show more content…
This is seen a large number of deaths in chicago, but the question is how do you get to a number like that the answer is police inefficiency.in 2012 even with over 500 homicides being recorded the city ended up witnessing a 17% decrease in homicides in inglewood(Yaccino.np).This goes to show that even with a large number of deaths in the city the police have not given up they are trying to lower that number no matter what even if they have to go town by town.NBC5 stated that the city of chicago recorded 500 homicides exceeding New York with 419 and LA with 299 homicides(Ward,room,staff.np). This is trying to show that the city of chicago is an unsafe place to be because of the ineffectiveness of the police.Despite being the murder capitol chicago was still safer than other us cities when crime was viewed per capita. What this represents is that police a relly are maintaining the murder rate it just some years there is an unlucky amount of deaths.With being called “the Murder capitol” (ward ,room,staff.np).chicago is still trying to keep its composure and is doing a great job at
According to the newspaper the Chicago Tribune there has been 876 homicides since the beginning of January 2014. Making shootings like the one of Laquan McDonald seem irrelevant. The only reason I was able to become aware of this shooting was because the procedures and policies that were being implemented by the police department and city of Chicago were not right. This led a reporter named Brandon Smith who wanted to know the reason why a teen with a knife was gunned down with 16 shots by a police officer who was not alone in this fight. The reporter sued the police department demanding them to release the video of the police cruiser that caught the whole incident on tape. In the video, it shows Laquan walking in the middle of the road, when several police cruisers pull in front of him. As soon as Laquan notices the police officers getting off, he starts moving away from the police cruisers. This is when police officer Van Dyke unloads his weapon and hitting Laquan with 16 shots leaving him for dead on the road. According to the Rules of Conduct by the Chicago PD, found online at the website chiacagopolice.org, it states under Rule 11 “Incompetency or inefficiency in the performance of duty”. This is a rule that should well known to every officer not only in Chicago and it was not followed by officer Van Dyke because the video clearly shows him
When help presented itself, many of the people at least made an effort to change and realize that violence was not the answer. The amount of people that are shot and killed in Chicago is a surprising number. Many of the violence does not come from someone necessarily being a bad person, but someone who is unwilling to back down from any situation (Kotlowitz, 2012). In Chicago many believe that “death before dishonor” is a good motto to live life by (Kotlowitz, 2012). The funerals that people attend are just a reminder to them, that one day the way they live their lives on the street will catch up to them (Kotlowitz, 2012). The violence interrupters are working hard in Chicago to help the people in the society, but if people do not want to change it is hard to make a difference (Kotlowitz, 2012). The people in Chicago also have to put in the work to make the community a better place, so that they feel safe leaving their houses instead of feeling like “every time [they] go outside somebody is going to get killed” (Kotlowitz,
Looking back at the number of homicides in the city of San Jose, CA for the year 2000 it was 20, then there was an average increase of 8 murders per year for the next 8 years. Then in 2010, despite a population increase of over one hundred thousand people, there were only 20 murders in the city of San Jose. Now in 2011, up to the month of July, there have been 26 homicides, which means based upon the current rate San Jose is on track to have more than 50 homicides in 2011, which would theoretically be over a two decade maximum. Now despite having lived in a small town, I consider San Jose as a home away from home because I go there often. I have had a job there and my dad has worked in San Jose for 28 years. In 2009 the San Jose area was rated as the seventh safest area in the country and when that happened it made me feel thankful that my family and I have lived in such a safe area. Yet nowadays it seems like I have been reading about a different murder every week, which has caused me to ask many questions about the possible causes of this rise in murders. From the research I have done, the cause seems to be a rise in gang violence and rival gang murders. In San Jose, the two rival gangs, Norteños and Sureños, have begun to be bolder with their killings as shown with the already high and rising murder rate of 2011. Solutions must be determined in conjunction with the San Jose Police Department and governmental gang task forces to establish the best course of action to stop the continuing rise in violence (Associated Press).
Tarm, Michael. "Chicago Violence: FBI To Look For New Ways To Stem Crime, Reduce Homicides In Windy City." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 2 Dec. 2013. Web. 9 Dec. 2013.
This documentary takes place in Newark, New Jersey. One of the most crime filled cities in the United States. Murder, drugs, and gangs fill this city. Many police officers work hard to keep their city safe and others for other intentions. This documentary shows how the police work, their tactics, and the reality of how police officers are working with the community.
John Luik author of the article “The Increased Availability of Guns Reduces Crime” and Sabina Thaler the author of the article “The Claim of Increased Gun Availability Reduces Crime is Unfounded” are two examples of people having different opinions on such a debatable topic. Both authors talk about guns taking people’s lives, Thalers article focuses on guns taking innocent people’s lives, and Luiks article focuses on guns being innocent people’s protection. Many gun supporters will say that more guns will bring down the crime rate. These same believers will give facts stating that the more guns in a state, the less likely gun owners will use them. “The chances of innocent people being the victims of violent crime, including murder, decrease—not increase—when access to guns is made easier” (Luik).
They have strict gun laws in which ban the purchase of guns within their city limits, ban the possession of any assault weapons, and they enforce steep fines if guns which are stolen or lost are not reported to the any police department in good time. The Chicago Police Department had seized 7,400 guns used in crimes in 2012, according to Richard Berk a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. Yet Chicago is the middle of its worst period of gun violence in the past years. The implementations of laws are good but they would need to focus on enforcing them with their police force. If we are to compare Chicago’s city to New York, they had 414 homicides in 2012 which is their all-time low. If it had Chicago's murder rate, New York would have totaled more than 1,400. Both cities share the fact that they have strict gun laws and have the problem of guns coming from outside their borders. New York, however, has distinguished itself by its anti-gang program which Chicago could benefit a ton from along with proper police training. Though people could say that New York and Chicago are different cites with different factors in each play, New York's work in reducing gang violence is a game-changer. "If you remove gang-related incidents from the Chicago homicide statistics, the homicide rate involving normal citizens is much lower," says James Alan Fox, a criminologist at
Those who argue for gun control usually state guns are a part of most violent crimes. However, this is not always true. While it is true that limiting gun ownership with laws could prevent individuals from possessing guns, it does not prevent people from illegally having or using guns. Those who carry guns legally are not the problem. According to Mark Gius, the author of “Gun Ownership and the Gun Control Index”, “…only about 25% of total violent crime is committed by a person using a gun, no inferences...
In the same year the UK flooded the country with over 20,000 cops so the homicide rates would decrease. John R. Lott, Jr., PhD, gun rights activist, once said that "The problem with such [gun control] laws is that they take away guns from law-abiding citizens, while would-be criminals ignore them”.
The Kansas City Gun Experiment was a study that took place between 1992 and 1993. The goal of the study was to examine if increased police patrol in a “hot spot” of the city would help to reduce the amount of gun-related crime. The data collected by the research team was solely quantitative as it mainly consisted of statistics and other data numerical in nature of the increase/decrease of gun violence in these beats. After the twenty-nine week period of the study, the experiment’s findings showed that an increase in police patrol, as well as seizure of illegally carried guns, did help to eliminate gun-related crimes.
People who do not research the owning of handguns and form their opinion off of what they see on the news are left in the dark. One of the most misunderstood concepts is that more guns cause more violence. This is false more guns do not mean more homicides. In 1973, the handgun stock was 36.9 million and the homicide rate was 9.4 per 100,000. In 1992, the handgun stock was 77.6 million but the homicide rate dropped 8.5 percent. In 1994, the U.S. bureau of justice static's made a survey that stated 100,000 lives are saved by handguns. According to criminologist Gary Kleck, guns are fired in only about 24 percent of cases in which they are used for self-defense.
Ultimately, it is a person’s choice to use firearms to commit violent crimes. So criminals should be controlled, not the guns which they share with millions of law-abiding citizens. Gun control supporters claim that gun control lowers crime rate. We as people need to take a stand and fight for our Second Amendment and the right to bear arms. Gun control advocates need to realize that passing laws that honest gun owners will not obey is a self-defeating strategy. Gun owners are not about to surrender their liberties or their right to bear arms. The Federal Govement of the United States should not be able to take away the right of law-abiding citizens to own a gun.
They believe that if background checks were required for private sales, which they describe as “firearms sold at gun shows, through classified newspaper ads, the Internet, and between individuals virtually anywhere” then the “Gun Show Loophole” would be eliminated (Coalition to Stop Gun Violence). As evidenced by the call for an increase in gun control after mass shootings people believe that with stricter gun control, we would have less incidences of gun violence. Gun control advocates argue that if we have stricter gun control then we will have a safer country, with less shootings. According to a study done by the University of Wisconsin and Bowling Green State University between 2005-2007, the number of police officers who “were convicted of firearms violations” were convicted “at a .0002% annual rate” (Fund). According to this study .0002% is “about the same rate as holders of carry permits in states with “shall issue” laws”
With the media shining so much light upon this topic, it is evident that mass murders in the United States of America are more frequent and deadly. In fact, studies have found that the USA has more mass public shootings than any other country (Christensen). These numbers have only been increasing in the past decades. This is shocking because the USA holds only 5 percent of the world’s population, but as a nation, contributes to 31 percent of mass murders (Christensen). Although these murders continue to be a rare phenomenon, weak gun laws, the need for fame, and issues with societal views are the main causes of the increase in cases.
You can’t turn on the television, or read the paper without hearing about violence in our cities and world. In a report from “Stand Up for Kids” in Chicago, they analyze the relationship between low wages, income inequality, and the epidemic of violence in Chicago’s low income neighborhoods. This report found that in 2012 there were nearly 7,700 gun-related crimes reported in the city. The city of Chicago has the third highest overall metropolitan poverty rate in the nation. Nearly one quarter of all Chicago residents live below the federal poverty threshold according to this report. ("Chicago Not Only Leads the Nation in Gun Violence Rates, but Also in Measures of Urban Poverty." Stand Up Chicago, 1 Feb. 2013. Web. 7 Oct. 2014.) Decades of research have demonstrated that there is a statistically significant link between low wages, income inequality and crime. The analysis presented in this report shows that when a city’s economic conditions improve, the violent crime rates go down.( "Chicago Not Only Leads the Nation in Gun Violence Rates, but Also in Measures of Urban Poverty." Stand Up Chicago, 1 Feb. 2013. Web. 7 Oct. 2014.) Parents and children are turning to violent acts to provide for their family needs. Policy makers and the government need to address the issues of persistent poverty and income inequality such as raising the minimum wage to a living wage and create satisfying jobs for the