Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alternative medicines better than modern
Alternative medicines better than modern
Essays on the advantages of direct to consumer advertising
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alternative medicines better than modern
We live in a world where being medicated has become a societal norm. Modern health care practices have set the stage for the proliferation of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs by pharmaceutical manufacturers. Some of these practices include the emergence of managed care organizations (MCOs), the legalization of DTCA of prescription drugs, the emergence of the Internet as an alternative promotional channel, the increased desire by patients to become more involved in their own health care decisions, the disillusionment with traditional medicine, and the rise of ‘alternative’ medicine, to name a few. There is an ongoing debate as to the ultimate harm or benefit of this relatively recent practice of pharmaceutical manufacturers to direct their promotional efforts away from the physician and towards the consumer. With the ongoing expansion of technology, being “at risk” has become a common diagnosis that requires its own cycle of prescriptions and treatments. It’s almost like biomedicalization has become a disease like state in itself. Fosket uses this perspective to analyze the emergence of pharmaceuticals as credible strategies for breast cancer prevention and the analogous emergence of a group of women designated “high risk” for breast cancer and targeted for pharmaceutical interventions. These interventions include Chemoprevention, which is “the practice of ingesting pharmaceuticals or nutraceuticals to prevent disease” (Fosket 331). This practice of Chemoprevention was also seen in many articles we read this semester, some of which is Dumit’s “Pharmaceutical Witnessing and Direct-to-Consumer Advertising”, where he mentions how people may experience things that may not be pathological, like heart burn, b... ... middle of paper ... ...ars to be the most promising agent in primary prevention of breast cancer. It changed the way prevention is perceived by biomedicalizing it. Prevention is seen as equivalent to risk reduction. Also, it is the only United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) approved drug for reducing breast cancer risk in high-risk women. Promising as it may seem, the scope of primary prevention has been restricted to women at high risk of developing breast cancer because of inherent limitations of these strategies. Knowledge is power, “The lack of knowledge in the realm of breast cancer prevention makes for greater investment in chemoprevention”. Owing to failure of etiologic studies in breast cancer research to identify primary prevention strategies suitable for the general population, reducing mortality through early detection of breast cancer still remains the mainstay.
In Melody Peterson’s “Our Daily Meds” , the history of marketing and advertising in the pharmaceutical industry is explored. The first chapter of the book, entitled “Creating disease”, focuses on how major pharmaceutical companies successfully create new ailments that members of the public believe exist. According to Peterson, the success that these drug manufacturers have experienced can be attributed to the malleability of disease, the use of influencial people to promote new drugs, the marketing behind pills, and the use of media outlets.
The Prescription for Disaster is written, directed, produced, and hosted by Gary Null. Gary Null received an associate’s degree in business administration. His alma mater is a Mountain State, a 2-year college. He later goes to Union Institute and University for his Ph.D. in human nutrition , but he still does not have enough education or experience to speak on medical drugs compared to others in this field. He offers valid issues in the pharmaceutical industry, but most of his complaints are exaggerated and generalized to all in the medical field. The extreme bias of the Prescription for Disaster puts the validity of this documentary into
...er year (Ventola 1). In Canada DTCPA is not completely illegal, it allows pharmaceutical companies to mention only a drug’s name, price, and quantity (CHSRF 1). “Reminder ads” are the advertisements that tell consumers to “ask their doctor” and they usually only promote the drug name (CHSRF 1). It is claimed by the pharmaceutical industry that drug advertisements are meant to simply educate the public by raising awareness of newer therapies, which as a result will improve the overall health of the country (CHSRF 1). The problem with any kind of direct-consumer advertising is that it only stimulates the sales of new drugs that have been recently released into the market that are also more expensive than pre-existing medications on the market. Another problem with new drugs released into the market is that they are not necessarily any better than existing medications.
Breast Cancer is a disease that can sometimes lead to ovarian cancer and has caused a lot of women’s deaths. “About five to ten percent of breast cancer cases are thought to be hereditary, meaning that they result from gene defects called mutations inherited from a parent”. Related Risks: early menstruation, oral contraceptives and child bearing 20 percent. An environmental risk is that toxins can damage breast DNA. Over time, damaged DNA can lead to cancer.
There are many risks that affect breast cancer. One of the reasons it is more common, is because we have better medical equipment that detects breast cancer at an earlier stage than before. An estimated 192,370 new cases of breast cancer will occu...
Chemotherapy is the use of chemicals to cure cancer. Chemotherapy is also known as “chemo”. The term for chemo came from the German bacteriologist Paul Ehrlich around the year 1900. He came up with the term when he was examining aniline dyes and arsenicals as possible treatments for diseases such as syphilis. He envisioned “magic bullets” that would be able to target invading organisms but still leave the host unscathed. This goal has been providing therapeutic benefits without many side effects in all areas of drug development. There has been a lot of success with compounds that modulate normal biochemistry within the body.
Vogel, VG (May 2008). Preventing breast cancer in high-risk women, 2008. Oncology, 22, 6. p.666. Retrieved from Academic OneFile
In the United States, starting from the first breast cancer case in 1930s to today, a woman's lifetime risk of breast cancer increases to one eighth (Gray et al.). Continuously increasing breast cancer rate has caused a lot of concerns among not only ordinary people but also scientists. For decades, scientists have been working on the causes of breast cancer in order to find the corresponding methods of treatment. However, only about 25% of the breast cancer cases got explained (Brody et al.); till today, heredity, lifetime exposure to environmental estrogen (the female sex hormone), and the dietary fat are the only major known causes (“Cover Story: Breast Cancer and Environment”). For the 75% unexplained breast cancers cases, scientists, through various of researches, have come up with several hypothetical breast cancer causes, in which synthetic chemicals and environmental radiations are the major ones.
This year 203,000 women will be diagnosed with Breast Cancer, and 40,000 of them are expected to die. Breast Cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death among women the ages of 35-54. There are numerous ways breast cancer can be treated if found early. The key to treating breast cancer is early detection, beast self-exams, and early mammograms. One out of every eight women will get diagnosed with Breast Cancer this year; therefore, new advanced technology of the treatment of Breast Cancer is the key to life after the disease.
On May 19, 1983 an advertisement for the pain reliever Rufen was broadcasted on television. Starting the debate whether or not drug manufactures should be able to advertise their product to the consumer. Although drug advertisements have become a common part of the average TV commercial brake. The debate still rages on with doctors, consumers and drug manufactures arguing whether or not this should continue. Lately many doctors have been speaking out against direct to consumer drug advertising. The American Medical Association has called for band on drug adverting. Stating that they encourage unnecessary treatments, increases medical costs, impacts doctors’ ability to treat patients and promotes unproven drugs.
The major issue with the direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertisement is premature advertisement of new drugs: Pharmaceutical companies rush into selling and advertising products
Direct to consumer advertising of prescription drugs should be banned as it does not promote public health. I argue that the direct advertising of prescription drugs leave consumers confused and misinformed about medications. Prescription drug advertisers possess an intrinsic and threatening financial conflict of interest that results in an exaggeration of the positive and, in a very real way, the marginalization of the negative qualities of a product. Such advertising biasly promotes only the most expensive prescription drugs as it simultaneously encourages the sense that prescription drugs are gender and race based solutions needed for most everyday problems.
Drug companies should not be allowed to advertise directly to consumers, due to the fact that these advertisements are conventional and misrepresent the potential health concerns. For instance, drug commercials do not portray a medical condition or ailment, but rather an enthusiastic restoration towards health. Medical companies set out to capture an incredibly compelling lifestyle of portraits where brand identities create an emotional bond with the consumer. Therefore, the viewer does not receive the full context of the specific drug purpose, or potential safety impacts it may have on an individual’s health. After an advertisement for Celebrex, a drug used for treating arthritis, there were approximately 100,000 deaths and over one-million hospitalizations from causes of heart attack and stroke. According to Bob Goodman. MD at Columbia University Medical Center, “these people are seeing their doctors
The global pharmaceuticals market is a unique, dynamic, and thriving industry. It is an industry that prospers on the mentally and/or physically sick by developing, producing, and marketing various medications. Due to an ever-increasing societal culture that has normalized the consumption of drugs for health and everyday problems, the pharmaceutical industry has flourished. According to the World Health Organization (World Heath Organization; WHO, 2016), the 10 largest drugs companies control over one-third of the pharmaceutical market, in which the top firms earned upwards of 10 billion dollars annually. These large pharmaceutical firms have earned their revenues by selling sickness to the masses, as they are “actively involved in sponsoring the definition of diseases and promoting them to both prescribers and consumers” (Moynihan, Heath, & Henry, 2002). They use their power and expertise to medicalize everyday life. Moynihan, Heath, and Henry (2002) describe this over medicalization as disease mongering, where pharmaceutical companies turn
Both physicians and consumers/patients rely on the Pharmaceutical industry to adequately provide medication to address public health concerns ranging from depression to obesity, to name a few. Thus, an increased reliance on pharmaceutical industries leads to the creation of one of the largest and most profitable corporations to exist across the world. However, because pharmaceutical companies profit from the drugs they sell, they now have incentives to influence the public in buying the drugs they produce; the main objective of pharmaceutical companies then becomes primarily to maximize profit through the selling of drugs and disregard the well-being of the population (Moynihan and Mintzes 2010, 2). Thus, Pharmaceutical companies work to market