Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How the stolen generation changed today
How the stolen generation changed today
Reflection on the stolen generation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How the stolen generation changed today
Chasing the Lollyman, an Australian, comedic, one-person play, communicates urban Aboriginal identity and effectively uses the elements of drama. The actor, Mark Sheppard, successfully applies the human context through characterisation and his constant focus during the show. His characterisation, with the use of minimalistic costumes and movement, effectively portrayed the dramatic meaning of the play and allowed the audience to understand the actor’s stories. By allowing the audience to understand, the director of the play, Liz Stitch, successfully brings up the stolen generation and the destruction of the community through the stories told by Sheppard. These stories with the exploration of the elements of drama, the dramatic meaning was conveyed and allowed the audience to identify what the play intended to communicate. Sheppard demonstrates his experiences with an aspect of the elements of …show more content…
He continuously speaks about the Spirit of Australia and the elements of an Aboriginal. He addressed this concept in an act of a cooking show describing the how to make a Murray Fusion. Sheppard stated that, to make a Murray Fusion… you need to throw in some traditional language, aboriginal nose, and contemporary song lines. The use of these specific ingredients describes what it means to be aboriginal and why it is important to have these aspects. The use of a cooking show in the As well as a cook, he takes on the role of Australia’s future prime minister. Sheppard, while in the role of the Prime Minster, states about the lollies. This is a significant moment in the show, strongly communicates the dramatic meaning. As the speech continues, he mentions about aboriginality and brings up the concept of the stolen generation. He talks about the land that was taken from aboriginals and the unification between Australians and the indigenous
Through this hypothetical scenario the actor highlights, that as Australians we have never seen an aboriginal family on television. Thus through, integrating and placing an aboriginal family into the show scenario, it enables the communication of dramatic meaning as it demonstrates that it is possible of both indigenous and non-indigenous people accept to one
Yesterday night I reviewed the play “The Miss Firecracker Contest” In Wilmington, North Carolina at Big Dawg Productions. The play started out as Carnell Scott, 24-year-old orphaned southern girl who lives in Brookhaven, Mississippi. She is tap dancing in her room with a purple leotard and some kitchen utensils used as creative batons practicing her routine for The Miss Firecracker Contest.
The performance ‘Chasing the Lollyman’ by Debase productions succeeded in using the Dramatic Languages to create a Dramatic Meaning that comments on a social and political issue. This, along with the effective manipulation of the dramatic conventions, has allowed Debase to successfully recognised the Epic Theatre style. Chasing the Lollyman is one man show starring one of Queensland's most dynamic and funny Indigenous performers, Mark Sheppard. He shares many stories, a celebration of urban Indigenous identity and takes a satirical look at the media and popular culture. Playing a variety of characters, Mark pokes fun at everything from Neighbours (what would it be like if a Murri family moved into Ramsey street) to polities. The dramatic meaning of the performance is if Australia wants to become one, we need to learn to accept each other for their differences.
The first is Paul Keating’s Redfern speech of December 1992, during the Mabo case. Keating spoke about the injustices committed against Indigenous people since European settlement of Australia and the need to acknowledge and remedy these. The conflicting source is an interview of John Howard on the 7.30 report in 1997, 4 years after the Mabo decision. Howard deals with the perceived implications of the Mabo and subsequent land title decisions for land ownership across Australia. The two sources conflict as they are taken from opposing parts of the mainstream Australian political spectrum. They reflect the so-called History Wars, a debate regarding the unresolved cultural struggle over the nature of the Indigenous dispossession and the place it should assume in Australian self-understanding. The Redfern Speech sets out the views of the left wing, progressive spectrum of Australian political views. John Howard’s interview sets out the arguments against the political and economic effects of the Mabo decision and subsequent land title decisions and largely reflects right-wing political views. The sources differ not only in their political views but also the time that they were given. Keating sets out his moral perspective regarding the need to rectify the past wrongs and improve the future prospects for Australian indigenous people. It was delivered before the final Mabo high court decision, and so cannot deal with the social, economic and political implications of said decision. Contrastingly, John Howards interview was 4 years after the Mabo decision, during which several subsequent land title decisions had been made. Consequently, his interview focused on his views of the implications of those subsequent events for Australia’s political, social and economic
Samuel Wagan Watson presents an Aboriginal perspective on Australian identity, exploring the marginalization of Aboriginal culture. Watson associates
In the opening of the speech he uses rhetorical questions like “Who are we?” and “What sort of country do we want to be”. He does this to get us as the audience to connect to his purpose and understand where he as an Indigenous is coming from. He also uses repetition of “Australian Dream” throughout his speech to let the audience remember what his purpose is and to deepen our thoughts about our ‘Australian dream’ and what it really means. Stan Grant uses these techniques and many more to portray his ideas and to clearly get across to the audience's perspective of the ‘Australian
Both Keating’s and Rudd’s speeches are firmly based on the ideas of recognition and reconciliation for the wrongs that European settlers, and their decedents, have inflicted on Indigenous Australians. To explore this idea I believe that it is necessary to take a closer look at both the plight of Eddie Mabo and the stories of the Stolen Generation.
Paul Keating’s “The Redfern Address” is a text that allows responders to explore and understand the possibilities of belonging. The text is specifically aimed at helping non-indigenous Australians explore and understand the possibility of not belonging. This is communicated through the constant use of personal pronouns, e.g. ‘us’ or ‘we’, to direct the entire text at non-indigenous Australians like Keating.
The Stolen Generations refers to the forcible removal of Aboriginal, mostly those who were not full blooded taken between the 1830’s and the 1970’s. They were removed due to their mixed heritage, consisting of Indigenous mothers and European fathers. The Stolen Generations have had a damaging effect on the native owners of Australia, their culture, their identity and most importantly, their sense of belonging,
On October 3, 2016, I watched The Woodsman in class at Brigham Young University. James Ortiz directed the play, along with the production team Claire Karpen (Director), Molly Seidel (Costume Design), Catherine Clark and Jamie Roderick (Lighting Design) and Becca Key (Production Manager). A Broadway Production, The Woodsman epitomized the strength of technical design while allowing the audience to fall in love with the characters.
...rial covered in the unit Aboriginal People that I have been studying at the University of Notre Dame Fremantle, Aboriginal people have had a long history of being subjected to dispossession and discriminatory acts that has been keep quite for too long. By standing together we are far more likely to achieve long lasting positive outcomes and a better future for all Australians.
In Linda’s work she talks about identity and Canada. She clearly states “Distinctly Canadian identity in the face of a colonial past,” which connects to Thomas King’s work where he is distinctively describing the “Indian” that people have engraved into their minds. He repetitively says “I’m not the Indian you have in mind,” as well as “he may well have a secret song, a dance he’ll share, a long lost chant,” which in turn connects to Linda also speaking on culture in Canada.
“Today we honour the Indigenous peoples of this land, the oldest continuing cultures in human History. We reflect on their past mistreatment. We reflect in particular on the mistreatment of those who were Stolen Generations—this blemished chapter in our nation’s history. The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia’s history by righting the wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future. We apologise for the laws and policies of successive Parliaments and governments that have inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians” (apology by Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, 16th November 2009, Parliament House, Canberra.)
The Stolen Generation has had a profound impact on every aspect of the lives of Indigenous communities. It has jeopardised their very survival. It has impoverished their capacity to control and direct their future development. The Stolen Generation has corrupted, devastated and destroyed the souls, hopes and beliefs of many Australian lives through damaging assimilation policies established in an attempt to make a ‘White Australia’ possible. Discrimination, racism and prejudice are some of the many permanent scars upon Indigenous life that will never be repaired. However, recently Rudd and the Australian public have sincerely apologised for the detrimental effects the Stolen Generation had caused. The Stolen Generation has dramatically shaped Australian history and culture.
The 2008 Apology speech was greatly significant in the struggle for Indigenous Rights and Freedoms, this is because the Indigenous community suffered from much oppression and inhuman acts against them through the time of the 1900’s such as segregation and persecution, racism is still present in todays’ society towards their culture. After many years of this, former prime minister; Kevin Rudd vocalised his apology towards those of the stolen generations in 2008. His speech acknowledges the wrongs of the past and apologises for those who wronged the indigenous people. In Rudd’s speech he persistently uses language that makes viewers understand the hardships and wrongs of the past. The apology holds much significance because the prime ministers refused