More handpicked essays just for you.
The theory of relevance of counseling
Strengths and weaknesses of evidence surrounding genetics and crime
Social causes of crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Every single one of us has a fear of something. For some, it’s of heights. For others, it’s of spiders. But if we were to admit the one thing that all of us were scared of at one point of our lives, it would have to be the universal serial killer. One person who we bring to mind when we hear “serial killer” is Charles Manson. With the brutal murders he committed of nine celebrities and famous “insane eyes” he is known for, Charles Manson is clearly a man of violence. These “insane eyes”, however, weren’t always there on Manson’s face. There is a reason why certain people choose to take different, more violent paths than others, and this reason lies in their backgrounds and the dominance of nurture.
Looking into the childhoods of past criminals
…show more content…
gives us a common pattern of child abuse and difficulty. NCCM found that out of sixty two serial killers, 48% of them had been rejected as children. Charles Manson himself grew up abandoned by his 16-year-old mother and taught under an abusive teacher in an orphanage. Stephen French, another violent individual, also went through a violent upbringing. According to Jones, his sister beat him with a baseball bat when he was three, and he was a victim of bullying. Such brutal childhoods in both criminals, as well as the fact that most criminals missed a proper education, weren’t mere coincidences. These cases clearly show that a person’s upbringing and environment is a large determining factor of the person’s future and identity. The psychological studies of childhood exposure to violence have also proved the dominance of nurture.
According to Help for Families, violent upbringing was proved to cause fear, frustration, anger, cruelty, and violence. Child abuse also embeds a violent-tolerant mindset in individuals that could lead to immorality. In addition, the University of Exeter’s scientific study of zebra finches in 2013 shows tests of the origins of a finch’s personality. It found that foster parents had a greater influence on finches than their birth parents. Such results proved genetic traits to be at loss against environment and upbringing. In this way, scientific studies of the psychological effects to events confirms the dominance of …show more content…
nurture. Of course, it is important to note that human beings do have separate natures and personalities that make us different from each other.
Just as some have calm, peaceful personalities, others have rougher, less emotional mindsets that they are born with. This type of personality may naturally be found in a lot of criminals, giving credit to nature in causing violence. However, such personalities, no matter how “evil”, stand weak against a person’s environment or upbringing. We can see this in the character of Roger in Golding’s Lord of the Flies. Roger had an inner nature of evil that caused his immoral actions throughout the novel. However, what controlled this nature of evil from the beginning to the end was Roger’s environment. His upbringing of law and order was what first limited his evil nature, and the lack of order and law in the island’s environment was what ultimately brought his violent nature
out. Looking into the study of another criminal named “Greg” in Dye’s article proves that a person’s nature loses against the environment and people around him. According to researcher Van Soest, Greg once was a diligent and hard-working student in the past. This diligence may have been his true personality. However, he was also a victim of an abusive father’s “torture”, as his mother claimed. There even was a time when he was blinded in one eye by his brother sticking a wire in it. Had someone noticed Greg’s diligent character and nurtured it correctly instead of allowing such a violent childhood to happen, Greg would have been able to escape his violent future as a murderer. The people and environment around a person do have power to determine what he becomes in the future, which Greg’s family failed in noticing. To reiterate, the criminals of this day and their similar pasts of violence along with the psychological proofs of nurture’s dominant effects clearly shows just how strong nurture is determining a person… even enough to win over nature. I believe that such knowledge should always been remembered, as all of us are and will continue to be part of families who can play a part in another’s childhood. The nurture of others significantly determines a life. Whether you choose to build a serial killer or not is in your hands.
Mankind is innately evil. The allegorical novel, The Lord of the Flies, allows for little interpretation about human nature. William Golding depicts the idea, “evil is an inborn trait of man” (Golding). Throughout the novel the children who have crash landed on the island begin to uncover their savage nature. Although all of the children somehow succumb to a heinous behaviour, Jack, Ralph, and Roger become most noticeably corrupt. Ultimately, it becomes clear that malicious intent is intrinsic in mankind.
With an understanding of the inherent darkness in all men and first-hand experience with savagery and violence in World War II, William Golding used Lord of the Flies as not only a historical allegory and a pulpit from which to address the darkness in all men, but also as a metaphor and a example that no one is exempt from human nature. Golding’s characters in Lord of the Flies reflect this idea greatly, but none more so than Roger. Throughout Lord of the Flies, Golding uses the character of Roger to show the follies of mankind and the ability of all people to turn to savagery, as well as the inherent nature of man and society’s internalized acceptance of violence, stemming from Golding’s own experiences with the subject. Golding created Roger to be an extension of Jack’s own personality; Roger externalizes Jack’s internal sadism and amplifies his lust for power over others. From the beginning of the novel to the end, he exemplifies the sadism of the savages on the island and catalyzes much of the violence that goes on throughout, from the viciousness of the pig hunts to the premeditated death of Piggy. While not being a central character in Lord of the Flies, and while remaining a primarily static character throughout, Roger becomes a pivotal example of the disintegration of the human condition and the ability of all men to turn to cruelty when presented with the opportunity and put in circumstances that foster anarchy and violence, such as those that the boys find themselves in in Lord of the Flies. Through a use of complex psychopathy, a disintegration of societal morality, and violent imagery and symbolism, Golding shows that, while everyone is potentially civilized, humans are essentially savage by nature.
Charles Manson, who is known today as the notorious criminal for the murder of not just one individual, but many. There are many books, movies, and journals about him and his actions that put society on pause for a while. As many today from past history, Charles Manson was a cult leader from the 1960’s. Some terms he describes himself, and what other individuals may describe him as are, a white supremacist, Nazi, a mass murderer, a druggy, and a cultist. The mind fogging issue here was that he didn’t commit the murders himself; he had his followers do all of the murdering, that’s how much of an influence he was the cult he led. He was born November 12th, 1934 in Cincinnati, Ohio making him 82 years old today, and still alive. His residence
There is a common saying something good comes out of everything. But how could this possibly apply to everything. Well if you can’t see it on the surface then you have to look deeper. Charles Manson, if you are familiar with the name then you may have felt instant hate, sorrow, or interest. This man may have changed history, he turned up soil that had never been tread, he sent a fear though thousands of people that paralyzed them until the case was closed. In this story I challenge you to look at it from a different perspective and try to see the good from the bad. Charles Milles Maddox also known as wild-eyed Manson had an occupation of murder and was the leader of a cult but he was also an inspiration to many young adults in the early 60’s.
As a child he was sent to many reform schools. He has spent the last four decades behind bars. He will never get out prison. He will eventually die in prison. This is the life of Charles Manson. Charles Manson is a sick and cruel criminal.
A person is not born evil, it is the surroundings that makes the person evil. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, the personalities of the characters transmuted while living on the island and one character whose personality significantly changed is Jack. Being stranded on a deserted island altered the lifestyle of all the characters, however this change made Jack’s personality show psychopathic tendencies. In the beginning of the novel, Jack was a fine choir leader and as he spent more time on the island, his nature became more violent. He started arguing and torturing the boys, sacrificing a dead pig’s head, and beating his tribe members for no reason and by the end of the novel, he was trying to kill Ralph. These actions how how the
Social deviancy is the violation of social norms. A deviant is someone who rejects folkways and mores. Any action that violates the values or rules of a social group is deviant behavior. In order to actually be characterized as a deviant, the individual must be detected committing a deviant act and be stigmatized by society. A stigma is a mark of social disgrace, setting the deviant apart from the group. Criminality is healthy for society. Deviance affirms our cultural values and norms. Responding to deviance clarifies moral boundaries and brings people together. There will always be people who break society’s rules and that’s important.
these things as AWTA, and claims that his “family gave their lives to unite the
Inherent evil is found in many places, particularly within humans. It usually is not present however, where law and order are present. In his novel, Lord Of The Flies, William Golding shows how difficult it is to remain innocent and pure, rather than corrupted and evil where no social order exists. When a group of young British boys crash on a n island, they try to act civilized and good. While the adult world is caught in an atomic war, these twelve year old boys struggle to remain orderly. Roger seems good at first, but commits evil deeds, like murder. Ralph becomes the chief, elected by the boys. Jack, another boy, tries to usurp Ralph's job as chief. Using Roger, Ralph and Jack, William Golding illustrates inherent evil in the human condition when outside forces are absent.
Charles Manson was born on November 12, 1934 is a serial killer who spearheaded a murderous campaign with his followers, the Manson Family cult. Famous for the brutal murders of actress Sharon Tate and other Hollywood residents, Manson was never actually found guilty of committing the murders himself. He was However, because of the terrible crimes he forced others to commit made him a living figure of evil.
There are many tragic events that happen in our world. But nothing is scarier than when it comes to the death of someone else committed by another person. In our world today, many sad and devastating events happen. There are many crazy people in our world. Some, whose names are still very well known nation wide due to some of the tragic events they have caused us. Even some that have happened many years ago. There is one man that stands out because of the tragedy he has brought to our world that no one will ever forget. His name is Charles Manson. Charles Manson is known as the worlds number one serial killer. Charles Manson he began a cult when he was in his twenties, went to prison numerous times and committed some murders people today will never forget.
Serial killers are defined to “be driven by instinct and desire to kill.” In a study done in 2000, Dr, Richard Davidson says, “people with a large amount of aggression – in particular people who have committed aggressive murders or have a social disorder – have almost no brain activity in the orbital frontal cortex or the anterior cingulated cortex while activity in the amyglade continued perfectly. The orbital frontal cortex and the anterior congulated cortex control emotional impulses while the amyglade controls reactions to fear.” Davidson concludes his research claiming that although environment can and will affect a serial killer’s thoughts, it is a killer’s genetic makeup that inevitably creates murderous thoughts.
Serial killers have many frightening facets. The most frightening thing about them is that experts still do not know what makes a human become a serial killer. Many experts believe serial killers become what they are because they have a genetic disposition or brain abnormality while other experts believe that a serial killer is created by childhood abuse; and some other experts believe that it is a combination of both brain abnormalities and abusive childhood experiences that creates a serial killer. A murderer is considered a serial killer when they “murder three or more persons in at least three separate events with a “cooling off period” between kills” (Mitchell and Aamodt 40). When defining a serial killer, their background, genes, and brain are not mentioned; perhaps one day those aspects of the serial killer can be included.
At the beginning of The Lord of the Flies, Roger is the mysterious boy who has a rough side to him. He kicks down sandcastles and shows no pity, but he also remains quiet and evasive when he should give input on various topics. Despite his minor mean streak and elusive behavior, Roger knows where to draw the line when the boys start their adventure. When he is throwing stones at the littluns, he acknowledges, “Yet there was a space around Henry that he dare not throw”(pg 64). Although Roger does not make the smartest decisions socially, he is still influenced British and societal morals. As the boys spend more time on the island, Roger gradually turns savage. He has broken away from Ralph’s clan and is now second -in-command of the hunters. Roger is Jack’s henchmen, and he does whatever he is told. Even the narrator acknowledges his social growth, from being the hunted to the hunter. Roger steadily climbs the social ladder so that he no longer is the submissive boy he was at the beginning of the novel, but a crude bully with wrongful intentions. He follows all of Jack’s commands with pride. Roger also takes part in a brutal killing of a pig, having no problem spilling the guts with vicious stabs. The difference between every single boy, from the beginning of their time on the island to the end, is substantial. Roger, to say the least, has also experienced change throughout the adventure. He went from an insignificant, shy boy to a cold blooded killer. Roger killed Piggy without any hesitation and terrorizes other islanders with no guilt whatsoever. In the novel, Golding uses Roger to represent the darkness that lurks in all people. No matter who we are or where we come from, every man has an evil side that is yet to be discovered. Under certain circumstances, that sinister side begins
So what makes a serial killer? Levin points out that contrary to popular belief, serial killers don't just 'snap'; or 'go crazy'; (Douglas, p. 137). Many of the serial killers have been the victims of childhood abuse. Jack Levin stated 'Research shows many serial killers suffered abuse, incest or neglect as children and develop poor self images'; (Douglas, p. 137). Serial killers often have a childhood marked by the absence of any nurturing relationship. 'They often come from families where the parents were absent or ineffective, where authority was not defined, and where they could engage in destructive behavior undeterred-violent play, cruelty to animals, and incidents of arson being some of the childhood behavior patterns noted among many serial killers'; (Clark, p. 206).