Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of World War 2 on global politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This primary source, is a speech given by Charles Lindbergh, on April 23, 1941, at an America First Committee meeting in New York, where he addressed prime reasons for the war from a practical viewpoint. He believed in order for a nation to survive, its principles must be supported by reasoning of military practicability.
In the 1960s the Cold War was at its peak, with both the USSR and America trying to spread their ideologies onto the rest of the world. The world was still uneasy due to the Korean War. In the public’s eyes, nuclear Armageddon was only a press of a button away. The Space Race was a welcome peaceful distraction for the world. The USSR and the United States were constantly trying to best each other in celestial exploration. In 1962, American President, John F Kennedy announced to America that by the end of the decade America would land a man on the moon. Kennedy carefully chose the audience and language of his speech to convince the public to support the Apollo Moon Program.
Charles Lindbergh played a significant role during the World War II era by acting as an example of a neutral countries changing mindsets. America of the 1930 's had believed in isolationism and neutrality. Dealing with the depression on the home front was more important to the people than some foreign threat affecting Europe. For many Americans, the imminent war and atrocities that would soon affect European countries seemed inconceivable. But the events of the war would soon push and pull them further away from their isolationist views and start a change within the country.
The Pearl Harbor address to the nation is probably one of the most famous speeches made throughout time. In this essay I will evaluate the rhetorical effectiveness of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's famous speech and show that his speech is a successful argument for the United States of America. I will focus on the speaker's credibility, all the different appeals made throughout the speech, as well as the purpose and the audience of the speech. Also, I will discuss whether or not there are any logical fallacies that may have weakened his speech.
Keller, H. (1916, January). Strike Against War. Speech Presented at Carnegie Hall, New York City, New York.
On a bitter cold, snow-laden, 1961 January morning, twenty thousand people waited in front of Capital Hill to listen to John F Kennedy’s (JFK) inaugural address. Besides that, his audience included eighty million Americans viewing it on televisions, and about three billion listening over the radio. JFK was elected during a time period in which the United States seemed to be at its peak. The mood from the 1950’s was that of an affluent society, a capitalistic golden age where there was a classless middle class, a rise in white-collar job, and very high paying unionized blue-collar jobs. However, there were also underlying inequalities, like the race divisions in the south, and a great fear of confrontation with communistic countries. Additionally, JFK’s predecessor created an inactive government of insufficient action and only went so far as to placate problems but not solve them. JFK needed to convince the country to change. His purpose was to challenge to young generation to get involved and contribute to society,
President John Fitzgerald Kennedy uses ethos in his inauguration speech to appeal to the audience. Halfway down the second page President Kennedy says “...not because the Communists are doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right.”. This phrase appeals to the audience ethically by saying “right”. President Kennedy strengthens this use of ethos by saying two choices followed by the ethical decision. Then near the end of page three President Kennedy says “...to struggle against the common enemies”. President Kennedy appeals to his audience by calling them to “bear the burden of a long twilight struggle”. President Kennedy calls the audience to do the right thing and not to surrender to “the common enemies of man”. Which,
In Martin Luther King, Jr.’s speech, “I have a Dream,” he inspires the crowd to take a stand with the following words, “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” Clay felt like he had been quite for far too long, listening to Lula the Hyena harass him with her belittling words. Lula tells lies, is deceitful, and manipulative; these characteristics represent the oppressive white community. I will describe to you how Clay’s reactions, Dutchman, were solely based on Lula preying upon his weaknesses, like the troubles that the black race felt while battling Civil Rights.
Many people attain an impatient tone of voice when trying to fight for what they believe is the correct thing to do in a time of opposition. Everybody has their own opinion of what is right and some will go to extreme lengths to prove how theirs will better benefit their cause. Before the revolutionary war many had their own opinion of what would be best for our country as a whole including Patrick Henry. Patrick Henry's “Speech to the Second Virginia Convention uses imagery, diction, and details to build the impatient tone of the speech giving his view on what should be done in terms of breaking away from Great Britain.
On April 11, 1962, John F. Kennedy held a news conference in which he discussed the hike in steel prices despite the fact that he repeatedly called for stable prices and wages as part of the program of national sacrifice due to it being a period of economic distress. After analyzing Kennedy’s remarks diligently, it is evident that he used the rhetorical strategies of syntax, language, and details to develop and strengthen his purpose throughout his speech.
Abraham Lincoln, known for his revolutionary campaign that was the first to state slavery was wrong. History portrays Abraham Lincoln as someone who wanted equal rights for all races that statement is not necessarily true. He wanted the slaves to be free but did not think that whites and blacks could live peacefully together. He changes the way he words things in his speeches in order to gain both sides of the disagreement in order to hold office. His views on slavery increases dramatically while the United States becomes closer to fighting in the civil war.
Frederick Douglass was an African American who escaped from slavery in 1838. After buying his own freedom in 1847, Douglass created The North Star, an abolitionist newspaper, and also wrote an autobiography. Douglass became a well respected author, and in 1852 was asked to give a speech in Rochester, New York. In his speech, the The Meaning of July Fourth to the Negro, which was delivered in Rochester, New York on July 5, 1852. Douglass spoke of the nation's problems with hypocrisy, and mistreatment of African Americans.
To best describe the attitude, which seems to be the same all over the country, around the Irish voting system and general elections I have decided to look back to Charlie Chaplin’s ‘The Great Dictator’ speech. Nearing the end of this speech he says, “In the 17th Chapter of St Luke it is written: the Kingdom of God is within man - not one man nor a group of men, but in all men! In you! You, the people have the power - the power to create machines. The power to create happiness! You, the people, have the power to make this life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure. Then - in the name of democracy - let us use that power - let us all unite. Let us fight for a new world - a decent world that will give men a chance to work
William Cuthbert Faulker was a writer that lived through the first half of the 20th century. He wrote many different kinds of things in his life, from short stories, to novels, to poems, and screenplays. He however is most famous for his novels and stories that take place in a fictional county which is based on the one where he grew up. Faulkner was awarded the 1949 Nobel Peace Prize for Literature due to some of his writings. The reason for this was, as quoted by the board that gives out the award. “...his powerful and artistically unique contribution to the modern American novel.” (Nobel Prize). When he received the award at the banquet he gave an acceptance speech as any other person would. Faulker speech is thought of by most to
Vance, Laurence. “What is the purpose of the military” antiwar.com, December 16, 2007, web, 18 May, 2014
His character, method, and goal in life make a man. Ultimately, a person’s behavior, speech and function, and objective in life determine the man he becomes. In Harper lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, a prominent lawyer, Atticus Finch, faces an arduous case through which he exposes his nature, declamation skills, and intentions. Through this trial, he displays three main things: his humble disposition, rhetorically proficient manner of speech, and ultimate pursuance of the greater good or truth. Evidently, these qualities prove profitable and distinguishing and share in Christ’s character, for Christ was meek and displayed oratory prowess and his end goal was to promote and lift up the Father and speak truth. Thus, from the previous two statements, it can be deduced that Atticus