Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the theme of inherit the wind
What is the theme of inherit the wind
The wind rises analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is the theme of inherit the wind
Inherit the Wind is a play written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. It is based upon the monkey trial of 1925. Henry Drummond is the defense attorney for Bertram Cates. While Matthew Harrison Brady is the prosecuting attorney. Cates is on trial for teaching the theory of evolution, rather than the teachings of the holy bible. Rachel Brown is the 22-year-old daughter of Reverend Jeremiah Brown. She is someone who dislikes controversy. Rachel is a fearful character at the beginning of the play. She is a character that is transforms throughout the play, through her experiences and the decisions she decides to make. The reader can truly realise Rachel’s transformation by comparing her character in the first and the last act of the play. …show more content…
The audience is introduced to Rachel when she visits Cates in jail.
She is nervous because she does not know what to expect. She is fearful because she knows her father will not approve of her visiting Cates. Rachel tries to convince Cates to admit he was wrong. She wants him to be on the "right side of things”,she says “Bert it’s still not too late. Why can’t you admit you’re wrong?” (7). This statement shows Rachel’s desperation to please everyone. She wants him to be on the side of her father, the only side she’s ever been exposed to. Rachel’s father Reverend Brown, taught his daughter to fear any thoughts that she might have that are different than the teaching of the bible. For Rachel, it was simply just better not to think at all. Before the trial, she is dependant on Cates to tell her what to do. She says to him, “Bert, can you hear me? Bert, you’ve got to tell me what to do. I don’t know what to do-” (28). This show us that she does not think for herself. She depends on people to tell her how to think and what to do. In this act Rachel is a weak and easily manipulated character that does not think for …show more content…
herself. In the second act of the play I believe Rachel is very confused and she starts questioning the teachings of her father and The Bible.
Rachel is very confused as she loves Cates, a man who believes in freedom of thought. Yet Cates’ beliefs oppose her father’s strict teachings of the bible. Rachel is very conflicted and does not know what to do. I believe Rachel’s transformation begins after testifying when says to herself “I wanted to run to my father, and have him tell me I was safe, that everything was alright. But I was always more frightened of him than I was of falling. It’s the same way now” (48-49). This shows when Rachel starts resenting her father. She no longer finds comfort in her belief. Her transformation continued at the prayer meeting. When her father orders the whole town to pray that Cates be destroyed, Rachel defends Cates. She starts thinking for herself, she realises what her father was doing was wrong. Her father calls for her to be destroyed too. Disappointed, Rachel faces the fact that her father and his beliefs, are very small-minded and
intolerant. Rachel is very independant by the end of the play. The fact that she chooses to leave her father shows that she is no longer fragile, confused and trying to please everyone. It shows that she can make her own decisions and think for herself. When asked by Cates where she is going, Rachel responds, “I’m not sure. But I’m leaving my father” (110). This clear, concise decision greatly portrays her newfound independence. Rachel is significantly more tolerant. By reading the evolution book, she teaches everyone the concept of tolerance. Rachel does not understand the book. The parts she does understand she does not like, but she now believes everyone has the freedom to think for themselves. Rachel says the Cates, “This is your book, Bert. I’ve read it. All the way through. I don’t understand it. What I do understand, I don’t like. I don’t want to think that men come from apes and monkeys. But I think that’s beside the point” (111). This quote sets a perfect example of how a sensible, and tolerant, person should act. Rachel completely transforms into a mature, intelligent woman at the end of the book, much unlike the fearful and intolerant young women she was. Rachel Brown's extreme change ultimately helps to expose the theme of the play. The character of Rachel Brown went through a series of changes from beginning to end. She came out a better woman. More importantly a women that can now think for herself.
Reverend Jeremiah Brown - Hillsboro's minister. He is a hard- hearted man who feels no qualms about convincing the town to condemn Bert Cates and his daughter as incorrigible sinners.
She is extremely prideful and blindly enslaved to her father, attached to him like a parasite. Leah exhibits a tomboyish personality that immediately shocks the Congolese peoples. Her tomboyish characteristics are illuminated when she states “I’ve always been the one for outdoor chores anyway, burning the trash and the weeding, while my sisters squabble about the dishes and such (pg. 35).” Instantly Leah is set apart from her sisters, the readers seeing that Leah is a lover of nature and a very special treasure to watch closely throughout the novel. “I knew God’s scale to be vast and perfectly accurate… I vowed to work hard for His favor, surpassing all others in my devotion to turning the soil for God’s glory (pg.36).” Her faith is strong, never dwindling. She loves God and is dedicated to serving Him instead of others, yet she ultimately praises her father Nathan as well. Leah spends all her time following in her father’s footsteps. She always tags along and tries to help him but he rarely notices her. She loves the God her father serves and is after all the only one who cares to be on Nathan’s righteous side. From the
Mark Haddon, the man that created this quote, said, “ Reading is a conversation. All books talk. But a good book listens as well.” This connects to the theme of the story The Ghost bird because Mr. Tanner is saying how he sees a rare bird and no one but one little girl named Hannah believes in him. In the story The Ghost Bird by Roland Smith, There is a little girl named Hannah who is neighbors with an old guy named Mr. Tanner. One day Mr. Tanner claims to have seen a rare bird that was said to be extinct. No one in the town believes him except for the little girl Hannah. Hannah sticks by his side and eventually comes to figure out that it helps her in a good way. The author uses the setting and conflict to convey the theme of believing can lead to good turnouts.
Joy, Fear, and Impatience are what a good character makes you feel. A thoughtful and interesting character always leaves you wanting more, like a good movie, once it’s done, you’re always left wanting more. The characters that took me on a roller coaster ride were, Jane from Jane Eyre, John and Mustapha from Brave New World, and Edgar from King Lear. These characters lead me up and down on roller coaster full of joy.
... while she still has time (257). She fails at first, thinking her father is “bereft of his senses” in his second marriage (258). She believes this despite the Torah saying, “a man must have a wife to keep him pure, otherwise his eyes are tempted by evil” (259). Gradually, Sara begins to understand her father: the only thing he has in life is his fanatical adherence to traditions; “In a world where all is changed, he alone remained unchanged” (296). Reb has a deep and true fear of God, to expect him to change beliefs that he believes have been handed down by God, beliefs that have persisted for thousands of years, is illogical. It is impossible to reconcile fully the New World with the Old, and it is the responsibility of the New to be the more flexible, unfair as it may be.
Sarah, initially, reminds Rachel that Matthew is asleep in the next room and suggests that their voices be lowered. However, by the end of her conversation with Rachel, Sarah's voice reaches high volumes as well, as she declares her support for Matthew. Rachel begins the conversation in a low voice as she explains her dream of being chained to the witness chair, which acts as exposition and offers an allusion to the past trial scene. As Rachel explains her disgust with Matthew and the way he used her as a witness, her voice becomes steadily louder, drawing attention to the urgency of her argument. Sarah occasionally offers her opinion on her husband's handling of Rachel's testimony,
Of course, Rachel being 11 years old, she does not have a broad mindset which is the cause of her simplistic phrases that include repetition that help reflect her true age. “Not mine, not mine, not mine” repeating that the “ugly sweater” was not hers but clearly not being understood, Rachel must repeat this phrase -only in her head- just like any child would when not being listened to. Not only does this phrase inform the reader of Rachel’s weakness to stand up for herself but also of how she is accustomed to not being listened which has her thinking that she must repeat herself. Finding comfort in not only burying her face but in the thought of “mama's cake” and “everybody singing happy birthday”, she demonstrates that she feels smaller physically and emotionally so she continues this saying in her head to get her through her moment of the “sick feeling”. After constant wishing of being “102”, or “invisible” Rachel finally decides that it is too late for “mamas cake, “candles, presents and everybody will sing happy birthday” because she no longer feels “ten, and nine, and eight, and seven, and six, and five, and four, and three, and two, one” she no longer needs closure of her
The author’s use of Rachel’s perspective is important because it establishes a connection between the reader and the character. Noting that Rachel is eleven years old justifies her childish point of view that is expressed all throughout the piece. The entire story focuses around Rachel’s teacher trying to give Rachel back a sweater. Since Rachel’s considers the sweater ugly, she believes that she will be made of for it. For example, when Mrs. Price put the
Do the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few? The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few with some exceptions. In this essay will explain why the needs of the many of the many outweigh the needs of the few in some cases. This is not something new or rare in the world. This is something very common in history and in society. Sometimes the sacrifice is worth it and sometimes is not. Also sometimes humans have to decide if they’re going to sacrifice the life of many for many more. In situations it’s very easy to decide because of the ignorance of important leaders and in other times it’s very difficult to decide because great leaders have a great moral compass and they care about their people.
Certain criminal proceedings have had an enormous impact in the ideal American character. One example was the 1925 Monkey Scopes Trial in which John Scopes was being prosecuted for teaching Evolution. In a similar vein the speeches led by Senator Joseph McCarthy and the trials known as the “Red Scare” enraged many American authors and producers, leading these individuals to spread their own ideas and to defend civil rights. Two playwrights who lived through the “Red Scare” trials, Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, addresses the oppression of the McCarthy trials by a meek character called Bert Cates throughout their play named Inherit the Wind. A nationally recognized lawyer, Henry Drummond, uses his gift of freedom of speech to support Cates. Cates love interest, Rachel Brown, grows intellectually and portrays the change that Lawrence and Lee want to see in Americans. Furthermore, Brady comes to prosecute Cates for teaching Evolution throughout the schools in Tennessee. In this allegorical play Lawrence and Lee’s use of symbolic characters challenges the status quo and inspires American intellectual growth.
The characters in the novel Unwind are remarkably different in the beginning, even though they share the same ultimate fate of being unwound; but towards the end their circumstances made them all grow as an individual. Connor comes from a home with two parents and a brother but his parents just decided he was too “bad” of a teen. Risa came from a state home, where kids were sent to be unwound due to tragic budget cuts. Then, there was Levi, or Lev for short. He came from a seemingly loving religious family that believed in tithing 10 percent of every worldly thing: even children. Lev just so happens to be the 10th child- the 10 percent.
Through Rachel Getting Married, Demme was able to truthfully display the pain and misery that family members are able to inflict upon each other, even during an event that is presumed to be celebrating family. The film miraculously captured that intangible quality many of us can recognize with: the happiness of being around loved ones we see too rarely and the high of having everyone together in the same place. The center of the celebration was two sisters, Kym and Rachel. Both of complete opposites: one with a Ph.D. in psychology and one self-destructive addict. Our first introduction to Kym didn’t present us with an exactly positive image: she’s a caustic young woman with a history of drug-addiction, run-ins with the law, selfishness and
to the Pet cemetary. Louis answers her honestly and later Rachel and him have an
Through the work of "Young Goodman Brown," Hawthorne is able to express his views of hypocrisy in Puritanism. Goodman Brown was convinced that his Puritan family was sinless and deserved to be honored. When traveling through the forest he says, "My father never went into the woods on such an errand, nor his father before him. We have been a race of honest men and good Christians since the days of the martyrs" ("Young Goodman Brown" 238). What Goodman Brown does not know is that his previous generations have taken part in these sinful actions that occurred in the woods. Although Brown's ancestors were supposedly righteous Puritans, they were involved in lashing a Quaker woman and setting fire to an Indian village, according to the traveler speaking with Brown. Through these stories that the traveler tells, Hawthorne makes known to his readers that Puritan's are hypocrites because they say they are holy and pure when in reality they are committing impious actions. Throughout this story Young Goodman Brown takes his journey through the woods and sees nearly eve...
After finding out that everyone believes Godfrey has pawned the Moonstone, Rachel becomes frantic and declares that “This is [her] fault [… and she] must set it right” (96). She then says that she knows “the hand that took the Moonstone”, but does not reveal his name (97). Her determination to clear Godfrey’s name reveals that she cares about others and is not mean as she appears earlier in the novel. It also adds to the mystery of the novel since Rachel claims that she knows who has stolen the Moonstone. This revelation does not help her as a suspect as it appears that she has stolen her own diamond. However, Rachel’s caring side clears her as the criminal when Franklin goes to confront her at Mr. Bruff’s house. She reveals that Franklin has stolen the Moonstone; however, she has “kept [his] infamy a secret” (158). After Franklin asks her why she did not confess, Rachel explains that she could not tell the truth about him and the Moonstone because “there was some infatuation in [her] mind which [would not] let [her] give [him] up” (163). Because of her love for Franklin, Rachel refuses to expose the truth about what happened to the Moonstone. As a result, it causes much confusion during the investigation. It also explains why she acts so hostile toward everyone during the investigation; she is angry at Franklin for not confessing but also wants to protect him. Rachel’s