Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Allegory of the cave story
Allegory of cave summary
Allegory of the cave story
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Allegory of the cave story
Allegory of the cave: Cave of ignorance
“ How could they see anything but the shadows if they were never allowed to move their heads?” (Plato,657). We are born ignorant. Ever since we were kids, we were told by adults about the facts of life, about what is wrong and what is right and what the reality is based on what was passed down to them. Little by little, we are being molded based on someone’s idea, someone’s perception and someone’s definition about reality. As kids, we ask a lot of questions. We try to question things because we are curious, because want to understand how things work. Asking questions lead our world to where it is now. More things are discovered with questions and efforts to find the answers. We ask questions in search for the truth, but the moment we stop asking it and just take in whatever we have in front of us is the moment we allow ignorance to take over our lives. In Plato’s essay “Allegory of the cave, he represented human beings as prisoners on the cave, he explains how humans see reality based on figures projected from the fire behind them. Plato’s idea about ignorance portrays how human beings are trapped in smaller worlds defined by society government and religion.
…show more content…
Our society often defines how our life should be and tell as what is acceptable and what is not.
“To them, I said, the truth would be literally nothing but the shadows of the images.”(Plato,657) We are “educated” by school about the facts that they want to tell us. In history books, we are told who the heroes and the villains are based on the authors of the book. But do we really know if the author’s perspective is the truth? Many people will settle with the facts they are getting without any efforts to question. Even exam questions are more on the author’s point of view than the student’s perspective. Intelligent people will read another author’s perspective and compare it with each other to get a new
answer. Government pretty much controls our minds and our lives. High authorities are respected and honoured by their services to their people. But beyond this, our governments have the power to control the flow of information and even sugar-coat facts. We obey them because they seem to be nice, professional and they show what the government is up to. Some people would actually just sit there and believe what they are seeing, while some people would keep asking questions. “Human beings living in an underground den, which has a mouth open toward the light and reaching toward the light and reaching all along.” (Plato,657) This sentence from Plato’s essay portrays how humans crave for the truth. As prisoners who cannot move their heads to look at the source of the light, they only see the reflection of the light against the wall. This represents how the government can sometimes prevent its citizen from seeing what’s really happening. Shadows and figures are cast so people could see it as the reality of life. According to Albert J. Meigher’s journal, politicians around the world participate in government transparency to gain people’s trust by making their government more open to the public. This way, it would make it look like they want people to know but its not really clear how it works. According to Albert, we need more researchers and detailed questions to understands government transparency. Albert’s journal explains how further research are important. It gives us more knowledge to the things that we are uncertain about. Religion gives us hope, a hope that makes us feel safer and someone is watching over us. Often times, we are limited to live under the rules of a specific religion that we belong to. We believe in something that is passed down through generations and live with it without questions. It sometimes causes inner conflicts where we are questioning ourselves of what the truth is but we couldn’t voice it out because it would mean that we are disobeying our religion’s morals and beliefs. “In Mormon culture, authority is respected, obedience is revered, and independent thinking is not. I was thought as a young girl not to “make waves” or “rock the boat.” (William,315). This quotes from “The clan of one breasted women “is one of the proofs why culture can sometimes limit our knowledge. For some culture, it is unacceptable to question the authority. As a result, those questions that could lead us to the real world turns into mere thoughts and eventually gone in our mind and we continue living with the reality presented to us. We tend to believe that we all have the answers provided by our churches, bibles, prophets and our gods. Questions are essential of life. This past few years, we are making progress in searching for the truth with the help of immerging technologies. Social media, radios, media in general play big roles in our lives. Through this, more facts are passed around, different sides of the stories are heard and government hidden agendas are being exposed compared to the times when this type of communications are limited or doesn’t exist at all. This makes people keep asking questions to unravel the truth. “ I must question everything, even if it means losing my faith, even if it means becoming a member of a border tribe among my own people. Tolerating blind obedience in the name of patriotism or religion ultimately takes our lives “ (Williams,316). Some tries to remain silent because they don’t want to be the “disobedient” member of their religion and culture. Some people ask questions after questions after discovering new and extraordinary things while some chooses to remain silent and just believe whatever stories, ideas and informations are spoon-fed to them. This kinds of people remain silent either because they are afraid of the unknown or they feel contented living in a cave of ignorance. There’s nothing wrong with obeying governments, cultures and religions as long as we keep our minds open for other possibilities and not just trap ourselves in smaller worlds defined by other individuals. We only got one life, and we need to be able to explore the world and not just to depend on other people’s ideas and beliefs. Williams, Terry Tempest. “The Clan of One-Breasted Women” The Norton Reader: An anthology of Nonfiction. Shorter 13th edition. Linda Peterson, John Brereton, Joseph Bizup, Anne Fernald, Melissa A Goldthwaite. W.W Norton and Company, Inc. 2012. 312-318. Print Meiger, Albert J .”Intro to the special issue on government transparency” International Review of Administrative Sciences, Journalt.November26,2015
In society it is a person’s duty to teach others what they do not know. People do not need to tell others of their knowledge, but in order for society to function together people must all be taught the basics of reality. In the parable “Allegory of the Cave” the author and philosopher, Plato, uses hypothetical situation, rhetorical questions, and diction to tell his audience that a person’s reality depends on the environment they are raised in, and how it is the responsibility of the ones knowledgeable to teach others so society can thrive with most of the same beliefs.
Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” explains his beliefs on education of one’s soul and the core of the way they shape themselves. The rhetorical devices that Plato represents inside of his story explains how much freedom is worth in this world. The deeper meaning inside of what Plato describes can further be found out once a reader realizes the type of rhetorical devices are being used. For example, Plato portrays prisoners being locked inside of a cave without a way out. These prisoners never got to see the outside world, yet he mentions they “see shadows” which explains they are only able to catch a glimpse of reality from the outside. Plato’s use of imagery gives us a mental picture on the tease we may feel to notice reality but not be able to experience it. In reality, we do not value freedom as much as we are supposed to. We seem to not see the world as he sees it. With the help of personification, Plato uses human like characteristics to describe non-living things to give
In Plato’s “The Allegory of the Cave,” he suggests that there are two different forms of vision, a “mind’s eye” and a “bodily eye.” The “bodily eye” is a metaphor for the senses. While inside the cave, the prisoners function only with this eye. The “mind’s eye” is a higher level of thinking, and is mobilized only when the prisoner is released into the outside world. This eye does not exist within the cave; it only exists in the real, perfect world.
The Allegory of the Cave, and The Myth of Sisyphus, are both attempts at explaining some aspect of the way people think or why humans do as observed. Both stories illustrate the same idea: without necessary and proper exposure to change, thinking is limited and ignorance is the direct product.
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" presents a vision of humans as slaves chained in front of a fire observing the shadows of things on the cave wall in front of them. The shadows are the only "reality" the slaves know. Plato argues that there is a basic flaw in how we humans mistake our limited perceptions as reality, truth and goodness. The allegory reveals how that flaw affects our education, our spirituality and our politics.
“In Plato’s Allegory of the Cave” it represents an allegory that signifies real life meaning.Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” is about questioning the fundamental reality of experience.The information In Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave,” is interpreted with real life. I would say the genre of the allegory is nonfiction. It focuses on prisoners who are being held captive. They are being held inside of a cave.The prisoners cave freedom, however hopes being at an all time low due to the fact that the prisoners are bound and chained by the neck. The only thing to observe, a wall with shadows coming in from the fire light that blazes before them.The fire that blazed inside the cave would display shadows of other people walking throughout the cave holding
The Allegory of the Cave is Plato's explanation of the education of the soul toward enlightenment. He sees it as what happens when someone is educated to the level of philosopher. He contends that they must "go back into the cave" or return to the everyday world of politics, greed and power struggles. The Allegory also attacks people who rely upon or are slaves to their senses. The chains that bind the prisoners are the senses. The fun of the allegory is to try to put all the details of the cave into your interpretation. In other words, what are the models the guards carry? the fire? the struggle out of the cave? the sunlight? the shadows on the cave wall? Socrates, in Book VII of The Republic, just after the allegory told us that the cave was our world and the fire was our sun. He said the path of the prisoner was our soul's ascent to knowledge or enlightenment. He equated our world of sight with the intellect's world of opinion. Both were at the bottom of the ladder of knowledge. Our world of sight allows us to "see" things that are not real, such as parallel lines and perfect circles. He calls this higher understanding the world "abstract Reality" or the Intelligeble world. He equates this abstract reality with the knowledge that comes from reasoning and finally understanding. On the physical side, our world of sight, the stages of growth are first recognition of images (the shadows on the cave wall) then the recognition of objects (the models the guards carry) To understand abstract reality requires the understanding of mathematics and finally the forms or the Ideals of all things (the world outside the cave). But our understanding of the physical world is mirrored in our minds by our ways of thinking. First comes imagination (Socrates thought little of creativity), then our unfounded but real beliefs. Opinion gives way to knowledge through reasoning (learned though mathematics). Finally, the realization of the forms is mirrored by the level of Understanding in the Ways of Thinking. The key to the struggle for knowledge is the reasoning skills acquired through mathematics as they are applied to understanding ourselves. The shadows on the cave wall change continually and are of little worth, but the reality out side the cave never changes and that makes it important.
Freedom in mind, freedom in nature, and freedom in subjectivity of individual are three kinds of freedoms. However, freedom should be expressed within the limits of reason and morality. Having freedom equals having the power to think, to speak, and to act without externally imposed restrains. As a matter of fact, finding freedom in order to live free is the common idea in Plato with "The Allegory of the Cave"; Henry David Thoreau with " Where I lived and What I lived for"; and Jean Paul Sartre with " Existentialism". Generally, Plato, Thoreau, and Sartre suggested that human life should be free. They differ in what that freedom is. Plato thinks it is found in the world of intellect, Thoreau thinks freedom is found in nature, and Sartre thinks freedom is found in subjectivity of individual.
The basic premise of Plato’s allegory of the cave is to depict the nature of the human being, where true reality is hidden, false images and information are perceive as reality. In the allegory Plato tells a story of a man who is put on a Gnostics path. Prisoners seating in a cave with their legs and necks chained down since childhood. They are chained in such a way that they cannot move or see each other, only look into the shadows on the wall in front of them; not realizing they have three dimensional bodies. These images are of men and animals, carried by an unseen men on the background. Now imagine one of the prisoners is liberated into the light, the Gnostic path will become painful and difficult, but slowly his eyes will begin to accommodate what he sees and his fundamentalist view about the world will begin to change; soon he sees everything through anarchic thinking and reasons. When he return into the cave, his fellow prisoners don’t recognize him or understand anything he said. He has developed a new senses and capability of perception. This is the representation of the condition of the human nature, we live in a cave with false perception of reality that we’ve been told since childhood, these includes bias belief; but we must realize these present perception are incomplete.
In the contemporary world , culture refers to something as vast as the distinctive way of life of an entire community. Culture is everywhere and everyone has it; it is the mass of ideas, traditions, habits, stories, beliefs, and perspectives on life passed on to us from generation to generation through literature, language, art, myth, religion, family, and various other social institutions. Plato had many different ideas when it comes to human behavior and philosophy. Some of those things can be applied to today’s society, some of them can’t. Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, which is probably his most famous theory, as well as Krishnamurti’s essay on cultural conditioning of a mind, they both focus on cultural values and living within a culture and can still be seen in today’s society.
In the essay “The Allegory of the Cave,” Plato addresses how humans generally do not pursue knowledge. Most humans are satisfied with what they already know and do not want to expand their knowledge. Plato uses simple examples to help the reader understand his logic on why humans do not expand their knowledge.
This I feel is an initial starting point, a state of beginnings similar to man being shackled by the limits of its intellect at youth. In the "Allegory of the Cave," Plato encourages man to reach beyond his condition of ignorance
And especially during times of upheaval it is easier to believe images, words, or other forms of propaganda without really thinking critically. However easy it is to blindly follow along, if we are to be grounded in reality then the study of history and its examples of propaganda are paramount. But alas, this appears to be a weak point in human nature. Our leaders count on it. Perhaps that is the true power of
One of the biggest questions that humans have is “what is reality”. Plato suggests that, “ we are born in illusions,” (Plato) and that the truth is initially blinding. “The Myth of the Cave,” is a narrative story about the idea of reality, it is explored though an allegory about a man finding out the truth about reality coming from a life in the dark. They can only learn about true mainly through reason and truth. The story is told as a metaphor for what happens in the natural world and how people can be stuck in the dark about reality. Plato tells the story through the voice of Socrates, his mentor.
Cypher seems to suggest that there are times when ignorance is bliss, and one is better off maintaining a positive illusion than facing a hard truth that one is not ready to accept. His statement could also be viewed as rigid close-mindedness, a non-willingness to see reality for what it is; a refusal to consider conflicting ideas based on a desire to maintain one’s beliefs. Generally, The Matrix raises a profound question as to why human beings want to know the truth. This paper will argue why one cannot be justified in choosing the “bliss of ignorance.”