Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of censorship
Effects of censorship in literature
Effects of censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of censorship
The Grapes of Wrath. The Catcher in the Rye. The Diary of Anne Frank. The Scarlet Letter. The Great Gatsby. These literary classics have been vital to the education of many, especially for the children and adolescents. Unfortunately, these books along with other novels have been banned at one point from school shelves even though they teach important values and educate children about world affairs and classic themes. In this essay, I will write as to why public schools should unban these book as well as stop banning them because it is an infringement of the First Amendment, education should be open to everyone, and that parents should be responsible and monitor what their own child reads but not have the authority to ban books to where other children can’t read them. …show more content…
An example of a difficult topic that some books handle, is homosexuality. Books like "Heather Has Two Mommies," by Leslea Newman and "Daddy's Roommate" by Michael Willhoite (both books written for youth with gay parents) were banned because they talked about homosexuality, an issue that some parents want to tell their children themselves or not tell them at all. Although it is a valid argument, it is only dancing around the big picture. One of the reasons why schools ban books is so that they can protect the children and their innocence, but by doing so, it is just preventing the child from learning about these uncomfortable topics. This act of prohibiting books is just the parents way of evading the conservation with their child about these sensitive topics. The books listed earlier were banned because they informed the child about homosexuality. Homosexuality and other touchy issues are a part of everyday life, and by banning the books so that children can’t learn about these issues is not helping
Books that have shaped America are slowly starting to disappear. Many of the previous social norms have fallen out of fashion, and because of this reason numerous books are beginning to become banned. Blasphemy, racism, sex, and violence are all ethical reasons for books to be censored.
Did you ever think that books that have sex, obscene language, and immoral subjects can make a good book? The Catcher in the Rye has been on the banned reading list for exactly those reasons. The book was mainly put on disapproval from between 1966 and 1975 in almost every school district in the United States. The book was said to be so bad that in 1960 a teacher in Tulsa, Oklahoma, was fired for assigning the book to an eleventh-grade English class. Despite some opposition to the novel, however, J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye should be on a reading list for the freshman students because it gives a crystal clear image on how the world is in violence, sex, and obscenity and the book also teaches the motifs of lying and deception.
Catcher In The Rye was written in 1951 and for this time period, the book’s content was extremely ahead of its time. Its frequent foul language and sex-driven themes led it to be banned by several school systems across the country since its release.
...etter than ignorance. Book censorship should not limit the amount of knowledge a child can receive, instead, books should be used to benefit children in their education and future career.
The banning of books started way back, back in 1637 to be exact (America’s First Banned Book and the Battle for the Soul of the Country). The banning of New English Canaan by Thomas Morton ignited a spark, but as years gone by, the spark has evolved into a roaring flame(America’s First Banned Book and the Battle for the Soul of the Country). In 1951, The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger was published ("Catcher in the Rye is published"). Ever since its publication, it has been the target to many people for this simple question: should the book be banned? As a matter of fact, in a mere 10 to 20 years, the book was added to the banned book list(Banned Book: The Catcher in the Rye). This angered many readers in the United States, and some tried
The Catcher in the Rye Should Not be Banned. & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Since its publication in 1951, The Catcher In the Rye, written by J.D. Salinger has served as a conflagration for debate and extreme controversy. Although the novel has been the target of scornful criticism, it has also been the topic of wide discussion. The novel portrays the life of sixteen year old, Holden Caufield. Currently in psychiatric care, Holden recalls what happened to him last Christmas.
the Rye, BRAVE NEW WORLD and TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD for being "anti-white" and "obscene."'
As the American Library Association notes, books are usually banned "with the best intention…to protect others, frequently children, from difficult ideas and information." (Brunner). If a book has frightening or controversial ideas in them, adults willing often censor that book from children. From 2000 to 2009, of the 5,099 challenges that were reported, 1,639 of these challenges were in school libraries and 30 challenges in academic libraries. (Frequently Challenged Books). At various times in American history, even some of the tamest books have been banned. Harriet the Spy, was banned because it supposedly taught children to "lie, spy, back-talk, and curse." Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl was banned for being too depressing. A Light in the Attic, by Shel Silverstein, was banned because it might encourage kids to break dishes so they won't have to dry them. (Frequently Challenged Books). While some of these excuses are more reasonable than other excuses, the banning of these books prevents the children from empathizing...
“It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer. The children are the real losers because they are the ones that are not able to read the classic works of literature which are the backbone of classroom discussions all across the United States.
The banning of books has long since been a tradition for the censorship of the media, and no book has seen the red tape more than J. D. Salinger’s picaresque novel The Catcher in the Rye. Salinger’s Catcher examines Holden Caulfield, an emotionally conflicted teenager takes New York City after leaving his prestigious school to find his way back home. Upon the opening of the novel, Holden explores controversial slang, curses, and sensitive topics. The language of the novel, which includes but is not limited to, curse words, coarse language, and slang all are a major factor people often have for disputing Catcher. Holden often uses common curses from “hell” (234, 4, 74, 173), to the shortened “damn” (72) from “goddam” (234, 97, 185), as well
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database. This article addresses some of the reasons that censors attempt to remove books from the curriculum: Many censors feel that works are not age appropriate for students. Staff, Wire Reports. (2002 October 3). Book banning spans the globe.
I strongly believe that the banning of this book is a huge loss for the future generation of these young readers. Mississippi placing 49th among the 50 states for quality of education can be put into consideration that the banning of the book is questionable. Why do schools with higher academic achievements not ban this book? Parents perceive censoring as protection, but by doing so we are posing a threat to freedom of choice. Supporting the idea of parents making decisions on behalf of their children, forcefully shaping the child’s way of thinking, ending up marginalizing the lives of young readers.
Countries, states, towns ban these books using such argumentations as “racial insensitivity”, “weak morals”, “conflictions with values”, and “pornographic and obscene” (Banned). Whether or not such ideas are expressed into the books, no one should be stripped of their ability to find pleasure in such books. Banning books will not only take away joy from a reader, but also knowledge. Every public school in the United States utilizes books as a tool for education, an equipment to teach their students of morals and values. Well-known, classical novels are being banned because officials fear of the strong influence that their citizens may have with from such impactful books, but the influence is certainly not negative.
Schools and parents don't their children to go home talking about how there were curse words in their book, or that something happened in which someone died or they did something bad like did drugs. Things along the line of that is why books are banned. Students don't need to be exposed to that kind of