More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on literary devices in the cask of amontillado
Literary elements used in the cask of amontillado
Essay on literary devices in the cask of amontillado
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Harry Potter plays a brilliant protagonist in the Harry Potter series. He makes the reader fear for his life at points, but at others, laugh. Stringing along with the topic of protagonists, Montresor leads the reader through “The Cask of Amontillado”, showing them his reasoning and plan of burying his friend alive, seemingly because of one insult. From “The Most Dangerous Game”, Rainsford shows the readers what he does to live in the three days that he is given in order to win “the most dangerous game”. After reading both short stories and comparing them, Montresor’s character plays a better protagonist than Rainsford. A protagonist should be able to convey the information that needs to be given in a way that allows the reader to understand what’s going on whilst making the reader want to know more. With Montresor, the information is expressed in …show more content…
While the reader has been informed that Fortunato, Montresor’s friend, said something that triggered Montresor, the reader doesn’t know what was said. The reader also doesn’t know what’s about to happen to Fortunato exactly, though can predict that something tragic is going to happen to Fortunato at some point from the use of the word immolation, meaning death or destruction, meaning death or destruction, the reader doesn’t know just how, exactly, the immolation is going to happen. On the contrary, in “The Most Dangerous Game”, almost everything that the reader needs to know is laid out in front of them, whether it be Rainsford processing information or him expressing it in some form or another. The reader is given the information that “I give him [the player] three hours’ start… If my quarry eludes me [Zaroff] for three whole days, he wins the game. If I find him he loses.” During the game, Rainsford explains all his traps and techniques, such as “[he] struck off from the rude
He gives very little information about Fortunato, past that he is a wine connoisseur. There is no mention of what Fortunato does for leisure, his family, or even his job. In fact, the only details the reader receives on Fortunato paint him as a fool, with his costume, his drunken attitude, and obliviousness Montresor is focuses on the facts that make Fortunato look bad; he not only wants Fortunato dead but he also wants Fortunato’s name discredited. Montresor tells the reader even less about himself because there is no background to who Montresor is, what he does, or even what kind of contact he has with Fortunato. The only true details of Montresor that are given must be implied and give a sense of intelligence. In addition, he gives little to no details about the carnival, such as where it was, why the carnival was happening, or even why he chose this particular day to enact his plan. From these details, or lack of details, it seems Montresor doesn’t want his audience to know this information. The audience is supposed to simply look at Fortunato a fool and Montresor a genius, the harbinger of death. The facts such as who these people were, the time, or the setting are not important to Montresor’s focus in the
Therefore, that means Montresor can do anything he wants, even if that means getting away with killing Fortunato. So, to get closer to Fortunato, he hangs out with him like they are friends. General Zaroff in the “Most Dangerous” game, gets hunters and makes them huntees. How Rainsford got to the island and his boat crashed and landed on an island and went to a rich man's house that he saw in a distance. In the meantime, Rainsford was having dinner with the general and the general was talking about how hunting animals was too easy to hunt.
The books Redwall by: Brian Jacques and the Harry Potter Series by: J.K. Rowling share many similar and different character traits, themes and symbols. Redwall takes place place during a medieval time in an abbey and the characters are woodland animals. The Harry Potter series takes place in modern day England primarily in school of magic where teenagers learn how to harness their magical powers and abilities. The two may not be similar in terms of plot, but Redwall and Harry Potter both share the themes and symbols of courage, compassion and evil.
In conclusion, Montresor is a very unique and demented character. This story strongly represents three characteristics that Montresor possesses. Montresor’s cleverness is the reason he can irony and detail to the situation. His determination is the driving force for all of his actions in the story. Finally, Montresor’s cruelty is what makes him a one-of-a-kind character with a unique course of action. All of these traits are what answer the question of who is
No matter how well executed, a crime of this magnitude will leave scars on the conscience, thus marring it’s perfection. Conflicting psychological emotions and actions plague the journey causing inner conflict ranging between pity and revulsion by the time the narrator concludes. Notwithstanding the shortage of information on Montresor’s life in the ensuing fifty years since Fortunato’s death; it can be surmised from the events leading to the murder that Montresor does, in fact, have a conscience and that it builds upon itself as the action
When they arrive at the Montresor estate, Montresor leads Fortunato down the stairs into the catacombs. Down here is where the Amontillado Fortunato is going to taste and where the revenge of Montresor is going to take place. As he get closer and closer, the narrator opens up more and more to how he is going to kill his "friend". It sound like it is a premeditated murder. Montresor seems so inconspicuous that he acts like he cares about Fortunato which is still a part of his plan.
Since the first segment of the series was released in 1997, Harry Potter has been challenged by churches and parents due to the practicing of magic by children found within the books. The books have been removed from school shelves, discouraged by churches, and censored by parents. It is claimed that Harry Potter is devilish, satanic, and encourages children to practice the occult, damaging their religious views (LaFond). Therefore, many parents keep their children from reading the book series. Yet, Harry Potter has been such a positive influence on my so many lives. Evident through the movies, theme parks, stores, and much more, J.K. Rowling’s series has been an overwhelming success for many reasons (“Because it’s his…”). In order to encourage
1. What can the reader infer about Montresor’s social position and character from hints in the text? What evidence does the text provide that Montresor is an unreliable narrator? We learned from paragraph 23 to 24 that Montresor owns a Palazzo and also has lot of retainers based on that evidence, the reader can infer that Montresor is a very wealthy and successful man. About his character, the reader can imply that Montresor is a heartless, cold blooded, sneaky, manipulative, and untrustworthy man, as well as a man who hold on to grudges. Moreover, Montresor is an unreliable narrator, because he reveals in the first paragraph that he intends to have a revenge on Fortunato, but he did not indicate or clearly prove to the readers how Fortunato
In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado,” Montresor sets out on a vengeful mission that will end Fortunato’s life in an untimely fate. Montresor appeals to Fortunato’s love for wine to tempt the unsuspecting fellow to his impending doom. While Montresor tricks the foolish Fortunato frightfully, it is ultimately Fortunato’s pride that leads to his demise in the crypt. Poe uses several literary devices to foreshadow this murderous exploit of Montresor. Through the use of irony, symbolism, and imagery, the story entices readers to delve into the relationships and differences between Montresor and Fortunato.
Because Montresor narrates the story in the first person, the reader is able to perceive his thoughts and understand his motivations and justifications for his ruthless murder in a manner which a third person point of view would not allow. Montresor’s personal narration of the events of the story does not justify his crime in the audience’s eyes, but it does offer a unique opportunity for the audience to view a murder from the perspective of a madman killer. It is Poe’s usage of this unique angle that causes the story to be so captivating and gruesomely fascinating. As the story opens, Montresor explains why it is necessary that he “not only punish but punish with impunity” to avenge for Fortunado’s insult to him. This justification for his crime is a piece of information that the audience is able to learn only because they are permitted inside the mind of the protagonist. In the final scene, when Montresor is carrying out his murder pl...
The first indirect factor that could contribute to Montresor’s vengeful act, and thus the story’s theme of revenge, is the character of Montresor. Montresor tends to harbor feelings of resentment and has a hard time not taking things out of context (Womack). He also plans the murder of Fortunato in advance and devises it in such a way that he will not be caught. In killing Fortunato, Montreso...
Excessive daydreaming and introspection, careful balancing of considerations before reaching decisions, and withdrawal under stress are also typical of the introverted personality”(Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2017). It was Montresor’s feelings that made his character dark, revengeful, and in pain and misery, while longing for revenge to Fortunato. Montresor is a person who doesn’t forgets about past dealings and must seek revenge when the opportunity is right. But it alls falls in line with his family’s beliefs also, according to his family
After having read the stories “The Most Dangerous Game” and “The Cask of Amontillado”, “The Most Dangerous Game” is my favorite of the two. Although Edgar Allan Poe is the more famous author, Richard Connell’s story made me think more deeply than did Poe’s story. General Zaroff , in the end, got what he wanted; he won the game. In contrast, Poe’s story held few surprises for this reader. The “thousand injuries of Fortunato” was the only element that befuddled me throughout the story. Montresor never explained the ways in which Fortunato so maligned him or, possibly, the family Montresor so that the narrator’s only recourse was to murder Fortunato in such a malicious, calculated manner. On the other hand, Connell’s
This immediate familiarity helps the reader to see inside the calculating mind of Montresor, whom we later learn is a killer. When talking about the past insults of Fortunato, he takes on a cold, determined tone: “At length I would be avenged; this was a point definitively settled […] I must not only punish, but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong” (Poe, 618).
The main reasons for Montresor’s traits are his family arms and family motto. He mentions his family arms as, “[a] huge human foot d’or, in a field of azure; the foot crushes a serpent rampant whose fangs are imbedded in the heel” (Poe). This quote, to me, means as, “[a] ...