Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical Decision Making and Behavior
Importance of moral dilemma
Ethical Decision Making and Behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical Decision Making and Behavior
What Would You Do? Lindsey Tyler 2 June 2015 Grantham University What Would You Do? It is essential to make an honest effort to understand the, “What Would You Do”, situation to distinguish the facts from opinion. It requires the ability to recognize a decision or issue as an ethical decision or issue. In certain situations, issue identification becomes the first step and determining the facts becomes the second step. In this scenario as the person initially finding the iPod, after class the student should take the iPod to the campus lost and found with the hopes that the person who lost it will look there to locate their lost iPod. The scenario suggests the student thinks really hard about whether or not they should keep …show more content…
It would be best to have a clear conscious that an attempt was at least made to find the owner before keeping it. Perhaps the person might decide to keep it based on the likelihood of finding the owner, and that if they don’t keep it the next person will. Another alternative would be returning early for the next class to see who is sitting at the desk, or finding out who the previous class teach was and turning it in to them. As the friend of the person who found the iPod, the friend should encourage their friend to turn the iPod over to the campus lost and found to prevent being accused of stealing the iPod. Yet, doing the right thing does not always come naturally to everyone. Unfortunately, some people just do not have any type of guilt on their conscious, for whatever reason. As their friend, I would encourage them to do the right thing and find the owner. Not to mention, the individual who lost the IPod will most likely be looking for their property, and would appreciate someone returning …show more content…
“Moral imagination is the element that distinguishes good people who make ethically responsible decisions, from good people who do not,” according to Hartman & DesJardins (2013). Not just the obvious options with regard to a particular dilemma are considered, but also the more subtle ones that might not be evident at first. In the case of discovering a lost iPod, one person might decide to keep it because they decide that the chances of discovering the true owner are slim, and that if they don’t keep it, the next person to discover it will. Another alternative could be to return early for the next class to see who is sitting at the desk. Also, they could find out who the previous class teacher was and ask that teacher for help in identifying the owner. The most helpful way to evaluate the impact of each alternative is to place oneself in the other person’s
The call of conscience is continuous and it “summons” people to the challenge of assuming the ethical responsibility of affirming their freedom through resolute choice. For instance, people can structure and live their existence in a meaningful and moral way (Hyde, 2006, p. 39). Call of conscience is a driving force that pushes people to do what is morally right not only for them, but for others as well. Furthermore, call of conscience is a call of Being, “the call of Being demands courage from those who remain open to it and, in doing so, stand ready to acknowledge how their ways of thinking and acting may not be as authentic and respectful as they could possibly be” (Hyde, 2006, p. 51). A call of conscience persuades someone to do the right thing no matter what, even if a person helping someone else has the potential of having negative percussions for doing
So, over all, this helps you get a better understanding that ethical dilemmas happen for all people, in all walks of life, in many different situations. It shows us we must pay attention to our actions and the actions of others around us. As long as we follow the rules, and ask for a little direction when we don’t know what to do, we will all be better off in our careers as helpers.
A man is running late to work one day when he passes by a homeless person asking for help. This man and many others usually consider this particular man to be generous, but since he is late, he ignores the homeless person and continues on his way. One can assume that if he had the time, he would have helped. Does that matter, though, seeing as in that situation, he did not in fact help? Scenarios like this supports Lee Ross and Richard Nisbett’s idea that it is the situation that influences a person’s behavior, not he or she’s individual conscience. Although a person’s individual conscience could play a part in how one behaves in a given scenario, ultimately, the “situational variable” has more impact on the actions of the person than he or she’s morals.
moral decisions, we will be analyzing why this scenario poses a dilemma, possible actions that
The human moral compass serves the purpose of regulating judgment and deciding what is morally and socially right and wrong. While Walter White’s moral compass originally guided him toward legitimacy and integrity throughout his teaching career, he is eventually forced into a business filled with danger and corruption due to the financial demands of his chemotherapy bills. Existentially, our moral compass can deteriorate and be altered to become an impressionable state of mind, which can be influenced through choices and consequences in life. At first, Walter White is a virtuous, credible man who earns his living to provide for his family. But White’s career takes off and steers his ethics away from honesty.
In Korsgaard’s article on The Authority of Reflection, Korsgaard presents the idea that all rational beings have a unique ability to reflect on our actions and how it plays a role in determining what obligations we have. This means that rational beings can weigh the pros and cons of our options before we decide on what to do, influencing what obligations we will have. This is opposed to acting on one’s first instinct without reflecting on the action first. This essay expands on Korsgaard’s argument on practical identity, moral identity, and the different characteristics of these identities that influence how one acts.
The purpose of this essay is to reflect and critically study an incident from a clinical setting whilst using a model of reflection. This will allow me to analyse and make sense of the incident and draw conclusions relating to personal learning outcomes. The significance of critical analysis and critical incidents will briefly be discussed followed by the process of reflection using the chosen model. The incident will then be described and analysed and the people involved introduced. (The names of the people involved have been changed to protect their privacy) and then I will examine issues raised in light of the recent literature relating to the incident. My essay will include a discussion of communication, interpersonal skills used in the incident, and finally evidence based practice. I will conclude with explaining what I have learned from the experience and how it will change my future actions.
(Jensen, 2005, p. 69) could be compared with the importance of desired moral reasoning. The
Human beings are confronted with numerous issues throughout his or her lifetime that would require him or her to examine the best action to take to avoid the damaging consequences. In most cases, individuals restrain his or her action to take into consideration the consequences that may lead to the right or wrong behavior. One’s ethical and moral standards are first learned at an early age from his or her culture, how he or she is raised, religious background, and social system. Scientifically, there are various ethical theories, such as the virtue theory, deontological ethics, and utilitarianism (Boylan, 2009). By understanding these theories one can compare, contrast and uncover the reasoning behind his or her ethical and moral standards.
More often than not, a person will encounter themselves in a difficult and problematic situation. Life is not a walk in the park when it comes to making decisions. Making choices may not be feasible when under pressure and stress. Ideally, this applies to those choices that are not black and white. In relation, this is where a person's morality comes into play which reveals their
These phases may change people’s perspectives on how they will approach certain situations. It would help if everyone could apply these phases in their daily lives because it would eliminate tough situations where there is no time to think. Wheelwright gives his readers a better understanding of what an ethical person should think like. In Gig, Thomas uses two out of wheelwright’s phases, but even then he still wasn’t satisfied with the result. It all depends if these phases are applied in our lives correctly. They may not work one hundred percent correctly, but they will help make our lives a little easier.
In this assignment we will be identifying an ethical dilemma an individual has experienced. We will begin with a short introduction of what an ethical dilemma is, moving on to providing brief details of the dilemma an individual has experienced. We will then go on to selecting one ethical theory, to show how it can help an individual understand and deal with the situation when placed within, followed by a conclusion.
In contrast to the time prime study by Gino and Mogilner (2014), Jones (1991) found a relationship between time deliberation and moral judgment. When people feel time constrained, people may act less ethically. As gathering facts is needed, making moral judgments takes time and energy, having more time to make a decision could discourage unethical behavior, decrease the incentive to cheat and increase moral awareness. Jones is not alone in investigating the relationship between time and moral judgment, in a study by Suter and Hertwig (2011), 67 psychology students were randomly assigned to either the no-time pressure conditi...
Studying the people in society reveals that more people use common sense than those that don’t. These people seem to be better decision makers, find easier way of handling tasks, and always think ahead to the final outcome of any situation. Wearing a seatbelt and not texting while driving show one way that people use common sense and consider the consequences. It is known that not wearing a seatbelt and allowing distractions while driving could possibly lead to a wreck that may cause serious injuries. For those who do not use common sense with daily tasks, the final outcome of a situation is not as important. These people are known to be bad decision makers. Smoking is a perfect example of someone who does not use common sense. These types of people know that smoking can cause serious health issues and an unsound judgement is still made to continue smoking no matter the consequences. The same proves true for a person that chooses to drink and drive. The consequences are known, but have no effect on a person’s
The study that Gino and Mogilner have conducted is conclusive in its evidence. Their methodology to find a convincing link between self-reflection and morality is reliable and understandable, however, we should not assume that there is a link between time, money and morality, as there may be other variables, which affects ethical behaviour other than time. Further, the results are not substantial enough to stand alone in generalizing the results to an entire population.