LEB 323 Ethics Assignment
1. Identify the dilemma you are discussing and describe the choices the decision maker is facing. In this paper I will be discussing the Club Fundraising Case. Kalaya, the decision maker, is facing an ethical dilemma as to whether or not she should continue asking people for donations to her club. Kalaya’s organization has recently enacted a rule that she believes to be a violation of her freedom of expression. Outraged, several club members created a petition in the hopes that the rule would be revoked. Her friend, Frances, has decided to retaliate against the organization’s leadership further by telling potential donors not to make contributions until the petition is addressed, and has asked Kalaya to do the same.
…show more content…
Her first duty would be to honor her commitment to the organization. She must consider that by pausing her fundraising efforts, she has the potential to negatively impact the financial capabilities of the organization as well as relations with its donors in the present and for the future. On the other hand, Kalaya also has a duty to remain loyal to her friend. There is a risk that continuing to fundraise may offend Frances and jeopardize their friendship. Conversely, by choosing not to partake in fundraising activities, there is a possibility that she may hurt other members of the organization who are working hard to raise money for the club. Above all, Kalaya has a duty to herself to protect her personal freedom. She must ultimately make the decision that is most appropriate for …show more content…
The first heuristic that comes into play is the false consensus effect. Kalaya may falsely believe that other members of the organization, the club’s officers, and even the potential donors may share similar views to her regarding freedom of expression. Consequently, this may lead her to think that her protest against fundraising is justified, supported by others, and ultimately is the most effective way to have the rule revoked. The second heuristic at work in this scenario is obedience to authority. Kalaya may feel a responsibility to her superiors to continue her fundraising efforts because she is worried about what they might think of her despite the unethical rule they enacted against members’ individual freedoms. The third heuristic that may influence Kalaya’s decision would be over-optimism. She may have a greater sense of confidence that her decision to stop fundraising will convince the club’s officers to reverse the rule. Her heightened conviction of the protest’s success may backfire, resulting in the rule staying in place and the loss of all the funds she could have acquired during the strike. Lastly, Kalaya may be affected by role morality. In her role as a committee member, she has a duty to collect donations for the organization and strive for its success. Yet in her role as a friend, Kalaya has a moral duty to support her friend’s protesting efforts against what she perceives to be
By looking further into this dilemma using various ethical standpoints allows for a broad understanding of principles and complexity in a specific situation with these paradigms. The focuses are three prominent ethical paradigms such as: teleological utilitarianism, deontological duty theories and virtue based ethics. Each of these three paradigms will be applied to the aforementioned dilemma, each will be evaluated and the best option will be revealed.
Nye, Howard. PHIL 250 B1, Winter Term 2014 Lecture Notes – Ethics. University of Alberta.
The stakeholder in an ethical dilemma is anybody that is affected by the outcome of the decision. In this scenario, Mark Solomon and Garza Lupe will be both subjected by the end result of the decision. The conflict is ...
Bowan, S (2007). Ethics and Public Relations. Retrieved on February 14, 2012 from : http://www.instituteforpr.org/topics/ethics-and-public-relations/
a dilemma is taking place due to its content. Based on moral obligations, the action to coming to
In his article, the author Peter Singer presents valid points within his work in a way that provokes one to question their morals and ethics. He rationalizes the gift of donation in an unconventional but motivating manor. The purpose of “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is to encourage people to reevaluate his or her ability to contribute to the underprivileged people of the world. Singer is addressing this article to any person with the ability to donate. The author makes it clear that nearly everyone has the ability to make a difference is others lives. Additionally, in “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, the author explain that we have a duty to give, but he is not stating whether it is a duty of justice in Narveson’s sense. He is not stating if would be morally correct for anyone to force us or impose to us to give to the needy. This author is trying to persuade or convince people to give voluntarily. The author is not enforcing to do something, this is contrary to Narveson’s position “enforced fee”. “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” addresses the urgency for a more generous world. Peter Singer presents valid points within his work in a way that provokes one to question their morals and ethics. He rationalizes the gift of donation in an unconventional but motivating manor. The main purpose of “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is to
As per request of the first assignment of this course, I watched the movie “A Civil Action” starring John Travolta (Jan Schlichtmann), as a plaintiff’s lawyer and Robert Duvall (Jerome Facher) and Bruce Norris (William Cheeseman) as the defendant’s lawyers of W.R. Grace and J Riley Leather companies. The movie depicted the court case fought in the 1980’s among the previously mentioned companies and the residents of Woburn a little town located in Massachusetts. After watching the movie, an analysis using the ethical tools reflected in the chapter 1 of the course textbook will be used to portray the ethical issues of the movie.
The purpose of this paper will be to identify and describe ethical tactics used in the Jeanne Lewis case. The writer will also discuss Jeanne Lewis's ethical behavior in light of her decision to work with her employees until she was confident in the strength of her team.
A study was conducted in which participants were presented with three dilemmas. One dilemma was called the Trolley Dilemma: a trolley is headed toward five people standing on the track. You can switch the trolley to another track killing only one person instead of five. Subjects were asked to decide between right and wrong.
An ethical dilemma is only examined in a situation which has the following conditions; the first condition takes place in a situation, when an individual has to make a decision on which course of action is best. The second condition is there must be more than one course of action to choose from. The third action is no matter what course of action is taken, certain ethical principles are conceded. In other terms, there is no perfect result. When defining what forms an ethical dilemma, it is important to make a division between ethics, morals, values, laws and policies.
When traveling in the Himalayas, the author of The Parable of the Sadhu, Bowen H. McCoy is faced with a difficult and ethically perplexing dilemma when he encounters the hapless sadhu on one of the less taken paths near the summit of the mountain. Afterwards, McCoy’s reflection of the events that occurred, as well as his colleague, Stephan’s response, makes him question whether what he did was ethical or unethical. Through the ethical guidelines of the Golden Rule and the Public Disclosure Test McCoy’s decision can be analyzed thoroughly. McCoy also compares his choice to corporate ethics decisions, which makes him think if corporations are actually ethical in their decision-making. While other might disagree, such as Stephan, McCoy made the
Pollack (2017) outlines the steps in analyzing a dilemma to help a person work through the problem and come to a solution. Pollack (2017) states the following five steps, “identify the facts, identify important values and concepts, identify all possible dilemmas and then decide what is the most immediate dilemma, decide what is most immediate moral or ethical issue facing the individual, resolve the ethical or moral dilemma by using an ethical system or some other means of decision making” (p. 17-19). In the given dilemma for the following question we start with the first step to analyzing to come to a solution. Identifying the facts in the dilemma are; all students have been instructed that the test is closed book/notes and your classmate
This paper will examine this ethical dilemma further, including why it is an important issue...
Many managers and organisations make the mistake of assuming that what’s wrong is illegal and what’s legal is right and if it’s legal it must be ethical. Yet many ethical dilemmas present themselves before the decision makers where right and wrong can not be clearly identified. They involve conflict between interactive parts – “the individual against the organisation or the societ...
4. Write out specific statements that will assist you and others in making day-to-day ethical decisions.