Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Risk management practices in software companies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Risk management practices in software companies
This week case is about Luxor technologies, a company that for four years (1992-1996) grew exponentially thanks to a strong technical community that produced low cost, high quality applications of the state of the art technology. Their production was characterized by secrecy, and they never shared license with any other company. More than that, all their complete production was from their own shelf in order to protect the patent. Their success allowed them to dismiss the need for technical risk management on the company, even when their product did not reached the desired specifications.
By the end of 1996 Luxor technology became aware of the advances of their competitors, and it was estimated that by 1998 Luxor will no longer be a market
leader. In 1999 Luxor outsource to measure the potential damage for the company which concluded pointing out important technical risks for the company. By this year, competitors had already caught up to Luxor and the dilemma was to continue as followers, or to fight to keep being leaders on the market. Two reports were produced to determine the impact of deciding to keep working to maintain the company as leaders of their market: the marketing report point out the possible limited growth of the company, the change in quality and costs of their products, and the need to outsource. The engineering department report was mainly about making more investments for R&D, and acquiring personnel from competitors.
Instead of the above letter, assume that at Pablo’s retirement dinner, the chairman of the board of directors of Xerxes Corps., in his speech, said “In view of the fact that you have been faithful to Xerxes Corp. for 30 years and have resisted efforts of our competitors to hire you away from us, the corporation promises to pay you a pension of $100,000 a year for life.” Pablo stood up and said, “I accept your pension promise with gratitude.” Is Xerxes Corps.’s promise enforceable by Pablo and if not, what would be necessary to make it enforceable? Explain.
In this analysis includes a summary of the characters and the issues they are dealing with, as well as concepts that are seen that we have discussed in class. Such as stereotyping and the lack of discrimination and prejudice, then finally I suggest a few actions that can be taken to help solve the issues at hand, allowing the involved parties to explain their positions and give them a few immersion opportunities to experience their individual cultures.
A. As Human Resources Director for Techfite’s new location in Dellberg, I feel it is necessary to implement policies that reflect and maintain our company culture of workplace collaboration and leadership development. In an effort to also encourage employee empowerment and engagement in corporate decision making, I propose the following corporate policies that reflect a virtue-based perspective of ethics, be implemented immediately.
1. How was Lincoln able to grow and prosper for so long in such a difficult commodity industry that forced out other giants such as General Electric, Westinghouse and BOC? What is the source of Lincoln’s outstanding and enduring success?
However, RLK’s competitors are downsizing and outsourcing R&D and exploiting on the cost advantages. If RLK decides to invest more money into R&D and should the new product stall on launch, they face the danger of becoming bankrupt.
In his analysis, Charles Fine goes on to note that as the speed of an industry accelerates, the advantage one company may gain shortens – advantages are temporary. This conclusion is somewhat intuitive since the research and development to production cycle gets s...
Kelley,T. (2005, Oct.). The 10 faces of innovation. Fast Company, 74-77. Retrieved 6th March’ 2014 from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=9&sid=1d6a17b7-c5f7-4f00-bea4 db1d84cbef55%40sessionmgr10&hid=28&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=bth&AN=18386009
The issues in this case revolve around the launch of a mini-oxidation product which will solve global clean water issues. Their filtration unit has already experienced two failures in the launch of this product. Vyas, the business manager of this unit, is convinced that the unit can be turned around by innovativeness. He revives an abandoned oxidation technology and recommends his team to develop a small-scale oxidation system with the capacity of disinfecting waste-water in small batches. While the market analysis of the product proved promising, marketing the product was a tussle and it failed due to defects in the design and lack of interest in the market. Through a three-phased process recommended by Cynthia Jackson, Vyas team was able to come up with a feasible business proposal for the implementation of the product. Both Cynthia and Vyas are tense about accepting the proposal due to its past failures but promising future.
Nunes, P. & Bellin, J. (2014). Elon Musk’s patent decision reflects three strategic truths. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://vlib.excelsior.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=118647474&site=eds-live&scope=site
Jonathan, a childhood friend, who had a PHD in Automotive Engineering, was looking for a good job. Oliver, who wanted to help Jonathan, teamed up with him and started a manufacturing company. Oliver wanted to conserve the company’s money, so Oliver only hired 20 people. The 20 people that he hired, though, were the best in the world at designing and manufacturing cars. He hired 10 people to work with him to program the design the computer within the car, and he hired 10 people to work with Jonathan to design the motor, outside design, and all of the other parts of the car. Within just 1 year, their company had produced the first hovercar! The hovercar was a great success, and after manufacturing for just 1 more year, Oliver’s company had made tens of
James R. Chesney, a veteran engineer underemployment at NASA, was able to create a blueprint for a “functional components architecture” but this forced him to pursue his project in the private sector but it required financial funding. Chesney and his colleague were in their midst of constant negotiations with Malaysian Venture Capitalist Group to have the opportunity to venture into TelSys International, Inc. If Chesney is able to receive funding, he plans to produce and market high-quality satellite ground station communications equipment based on his patented designs. TelSys’s stocks were allowed to be publicly traded as they desired liquidity in their investment.
Tesla Motors Inc. is an American public company which is known worldwide because of its experience in designing, manufacturing and also the selling of electric cars and electric components for vehicles. The motor was started back in the year 2003 in San Carlos, California in the United States (Teslamotors.com, 2014). The company had its headquarters in Palo Alto and at the time of its inception, Elon Musk was its chief executive officer (CEO) (Hunger, 2010).
Owners of all inventions must be cautious and careful to keep the invention a secret until the application is successful. The novelty of the invention may be compromised if the idea has already been commercially exploited or advertised. A non-disclosure agreement must be drawn up if the invention needs to be disclosed to a third party.
Watkinson, Jim, and Tom Nutile. "Innovation at Work." Innovation at Work. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2014
Technology projects can be challenging to complete on-time and within budget. Analysis of some 13,000 plus projects provides a sobering account of technology project challenges. The Standish Group's "CHAOS Summary 2009," showed that only 32% of all projects succeeded and were delivered on time and within budget; 44% were late, over budget, and/or with less than the required features and functions. An astounding 24% of the projects examined failed, were cancelled prior to completion, or delivered and never used.