Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Court case observation report
Court case observation report
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Court case observation report
COURT VISIT REPORT
DUNCAN v INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION (S101/2015)
Court from which cause removed: New South Wales Court of Appeal
Date cause removed: 25 May 2015
Between:
The TRAVERS WILLIAM DUNCAN (Appellant) and INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION (Respondent).
The responding persons are:
FRENCH (Chief Justice)
KIEFEL (Justice)
BELL (Justice)
GAGELER (Justice)
KEANE (Justice)
NETTLE (Justice)
GORDON (Justice)
And the lawyer from the appellant is Mr. N.C. HUTLEY, SC
Introduction
Mr. Travers Duncan is a substantial shareholder in Cascade Coal Pty Ltd (“Cascade”), a company of which he was a director from February to July 2009. In June 2009, following expressions of interest to the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Cascade was selected to receive a coal exploration license for an area known as Mount Penny.
…show more content…
Findings made by ICAC in its report included that Mr. Duncan and the other directors of Cascade had engaged in corrupt conduct within the meaning of the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 (NSW) (“the Act”). That conduct was the taking of steps to deceive public authorities as to the involvement of the Obeid family in the creation of the Mount Penny tenement.
Mr. Duncan commenced Supreme Court proceedings, seeking a declaration that the finding of corrupt conduct on his part was a nullity because, in making it, ICAC had exceeded its jurisdiction. On 29 July 2014 Justice McDougall dismissed Mr. Duncan’s
Case, Adeels Palace v Moubarak (2009) 239 CLR 420 entails a defendant, Adeels Palace Pty Ltd and two plaintiffs, Anthony Moubarak and Antoin Fayez Bou Najem. On New Year’s Eve 2002, a function, hosted by Adeels was open to members of the public, with a charged admission fee. A dispute broke out in the restaurant. One man left the premises and later returned with a firearm. He seriously injured both respondents. One was shot in the leg and other in the stomach. The plaintiffs separately brought proceedings against the defendant in the District Court of New South Wales (NSW), claiming damages for negligence. The trial judge issued Bou Najem $170,000 and Moubarak $1,026,682.98. It was held that the duty of care was breached by the defendant as they ‘negligently’ failed to employ security for their function. The breach of duty and resulted in the plaintiff’s serious injuries.
There is one appellant and three respondents involved in these proceedings. Equuscorp Pty Ltd (referred to as “Equuscorp”) is the appellant. Ian Haxton, Robert Bassat and Cunningham’s Warehouse Sales Pty Ltd (referred to as “the respondents”) are the respondents. This matter was heard in the High Court of Australia in front of Chief Justice French and Judges Gummow, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell.
The Case of R.V Machekequonabe Machekequonabe is charged with shooting and killing his foster father. The difficulty of this case revolves around the fact that his particular pagan Indian tribe believed in the existence of evil spirit wendigos which assume human form and pose a threat to their community. On one hand, there are rules against killing other humans, and on the other, Indian common law says that it is acceptable to kill wendigos (which the defendant believed he was doing). This essay will show how this conflict and ruling can be explained completely by Dworkin's theory of law and judicial reasoning.
This case commentary discusses the different approaches used to be taken in Victoria and NSW, presuming that the admissibility of the Evidence in ss 97, 98 and 101 is of the same decision, not separate decision .
McCulloch v Maryland 4 Wheat. (17 U.S.) 316 (1819) Issue May Congress charter a bank even though it is not an expressly granted power? Holding Yes, Congress may charter a bank as an implied power under the “necessary and proper” clause. Rationale The Constitution was created to correct the weaknesses of the Articles. The word “expressly” particularly caused major problems and therefore was omitted from the Constitution, because if everything in the Constitution had to be expressly stated it would weaken the power of the Federal government.
R N Howie and P A Johnson, Annotated Criminal Legislation NSW, 2011-2102, (Lexis Nexis Butterworths 2012) 17769-1774
...nduct, for instance, take in strong consideration any information or complaints received from the public or any other source that goes against the officers’ integrity. (“Recommendations for Corruption Prevention.” ICAC.NSW.GOV)
When dealing with corruption, first question to ask or to clarify is what corruption is. NSW Research (2002) describes corruption anything from gaining materialistically by virtue of position (for eg. getting a special discount at stores) to engaging in ‘direct criminal activities’ (eg. selling drugs). Newburn (1999) believes that there is a thin line between the definition of ‘corrupt’ and ‘non-corrupt’ activities as at the end, it is an ethical problem. For common people, however, bribery generalises corruption.
ruled by a similar group to that of our Supreme Court because, the members of
Facts: Robert J. Triffin, the Plaintiff-Appellant, appeals a case from November 5, 2009 which dismissed his complaint seeking to collect a dishonored check originally issued by Liccardi Ford, Inc, the Defendant- Respondent in The Superior Court: Law Division for criminal court. Triffin owns a business in buying dishonored checks, and attempting to collect on them. The check was postdated, and the check cashing service which Triffin purchased made a payment in violation of Check Cashers Regulatory Act of 1993(Act), N.J.S.A. 17:15A-30 to-52. The Superior Court: Law Division for criminal court held that the check cashing service was not a holder. Triffin’s complaint was properly dismissed based on evidence that the check was stolen from Liccardi.
R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd and others [1999] All ER (D) 1173.
The Tennessee vs. John T. Scopes trial was a high school biology teacher who went against the state of Tennessee for supposedly teaching students about the theory of evolution however, teachers were not aloud to teach this subject due to the Butler Act. This law was passed by the state of Tennessee stating, “forbidding the teaching in public schools of any theories that denied the story of creation as found in Genesis. This act was written because of the increasing alarm of many fundamentalist Christians who feared the challenge that science and evolutionary theory presented to a literal interpretation of the Bible”("The Scopes Trial, 1925."). Scopes was appointed to go against the grand jury, with the trial being highly publicized throughout
At the behest of Solicitor General John Les, an inquiry was launched in February o...
According to A Report issued by the Justice Policy Institute, it showed that in 2002 the number of African American males in prison have grown to five times the rate it was twenty years ago (“Prison”). Many have speculated that reasons the population of African Americans in prison are so high is that the Justice System is corrupted and shows that Racism is alive and well. In some cases they may have been guilty, but there should never be a case were a citizen was striped from their rights and accused of a crime they didn’t commit or was protecting themselves from being killed. The Justice System is corrupted towards the African American race because they are given poor legal representation, death penalty with insufficient evidence and longer sentences than any other races that statistics can show.
Victorian Stevedoring & General. Contracting Co Pty Ltd & Meakes v Dignan (1931) 46 CLR 73