Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Court observation paper
Court observation term paper
Court observation term paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Court observation paper
The court case is United States District Court Southern District of Texas. United States of America ~vs~ Adrian Torres the location is on 515 Rusk Street, Houston Texas 77002. The presiding Judge is David Hittner in room 8509 at 10:30 a.m. The people in the court room were not that many but it felt like it was taking for ever to hear the judge call him up to the stand to hear his case outcome. The experience was different being that I was just there to observe the process and I was sort of amazed on how professional a direct the judge was. The judge readdressed that he was given an opportunity and failed to comply with the rule but yet again had failed the system and was aware that he was at fault. You could hear it in his tone of voice that he already had a …show more content…
Where the plaintiff was Don Connor and the defendant was Fredrick Connor which were cousins. The suite began because while Mr. Don Connor was in the vehicle with his cousin Fredrick Connor the were pulled over for disturbing the peace. Mr. Fredrick Connor was the person driving and with music loud when a police officer pulled him over and was cited but when Don Connor was license was ran he had a warrant for bank fraud and was arrested. Mr. Fredrick signed the bond papers for his cousin to be released and payments needed to be made by Don but he felt it was not his responsibility to pay the bond payments. So, Mr. Fredrick Connor sued for $1100. Which was the remainder of bond payments that were outstanding. Mrs. Judge Judy heard both sides to the story and ruled in favor of Mr. Fredrick Connor.
My opinion about court shows like Judge Judy are that they are not as serious and professional than live court. I believe that the television shows are only for the ratings and the outcome is screened and played out by the parties and audience. It would not shock me if the people on the shows are paid to present their case on
This is a good case to show how it isn’t always the poor, black, or Hispanic groups getting tried for something they haven’t done. It shows that a white doctor could get his life destroyed by an unfair Judge and prosecutors.
In United States, there is a dual court system. The dual court system is divided into Federal Courts and State Courts. Each hears different type of cases; neither is completely different of the other. The Constitution of the United States gives powers to the federal courts and reserves the rest for the state.
The following assertion intends to provide an in-depth insight into my personal experience observing a trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria. This paper will outline a selection of many pressing issues noticed throughout my observation, more specifically those regarding the law and language in legal arenas along with symbolic and architectural traditions that reinforce prejudice towards those from a low socio-economic background and ethnic minority groups. Furthermore, it will argue how symbolism, architecture and practices within a court are in place to create a power dynamic and reinforce the courts British-'western' sovereignty and royal-like wealth which in turn intimidates members of the community especially from ethnically diverse or disadvantaged groups. I intend to demonstrate the power and authority of judges and the courts by drawing comparisons between the judges status in a court room with royalty and religious pastors, through the observation of attire, title and actual positioning in a court room.
For my court ethnography I observed plea, bail, and family court in the city of Milton. However, it was called the Ontario superior court of justice. When I first entered a court it looked exactly like what I had seen in movies. The court setup, the vernacular used, and the customs of the court employees were exactly like what mainstream media has displayed to the public over the years. Entering the court, symbols of justice were exhibited everywhere in the courtroom. In the courtroom all kinds of cases were occurring, and people from all types of backgrounds were involved. Observing the inner workings of our justice system gave me invaluable insight on how law and order is preserved in our society. Furthermore, I also got to witness the specific
Bring the proper documentation, during your court trial or hearing, you or your attorney will have the opportunity to explain the facts of your case to the Judge or Commissioner. Make sure your paperwork is organized and that it supports your claim. Examples include receipts, contracts, letters, bills and photos. If you plan to enter your paperwork into evidence during your trial or hearing, bring 4 copies (1 original and 3 copies). You must give the Court the original, give one copy to the other side, keep one copy for yourself and have the third copy available should you decide to use it when questioning a witness. Bring a pencil and paper with you to take notes about your case.
Is Judy still keeping audiences entertained by giving the court system a new attitude? Will court systems ever get back its dignity? Not as long as the cameras still role. Cameras in the courtroom have been very beneficial in certain cases, but it has caused a lot of harm. The human race has taken the solemnness of these meetings, and has changed it to a form of entertainment only clowns would be involved with. The public is so involved with this newfound form of fun, that they don't realize the actual damage that it is causing in the judicial system as well as human life. I feel that even though cameras are a very innovative way to educate people about unknown situations, they need not be in courtrooms involved with high profile cases.
The court proceeding I witnessed was on the fourteenth floor of the Dirksen Building. The court proceeding was a civil case between the plaintiff, Paul Myvett, and the defendants which were a group of detectives and police officers. The court proceeding was in a courtroom with the jury on the right side. The judge was sitting in the top box where the judge normally sits. The court proceeding I went too was between the plaintiff who is accusing the defendants of manufacturing evidence to frame the plaintiff. Myvett had been previously charged with attempted murder of a shooting that happened at a restaurant years ago.
Working as a court reporter is an interesting but pretty straight forward job. But, sometimes, things don’t always go the way you expect them to. From a court reporter who had to transcribe the Nuremberg trials of accused Nazi war criminals and the actions of the infamous Third Reich, to grizzly depictions of dead bodies that court reporters in murder cases sometimes see.
I went to the Albany City court house and observed Andra Ackerman on 11/3/16. The court cases were a lot more interesting then I originally perceived it was going to be. The most interesting thing I noticed is that most of the cases were for marijuana charges and the defendants just had to go to a few meetings and then all charges would be dropped. I thought it was crazy that there were so many people with the same charge and the punishments were so minor even for people with multiple prior arrests. Also in one of the marijuana cases the police and officials behind the window started talking about times they have used marijuana in college or at parties. I was shocked because they are supposed to be the justice system and they are telling stories
The topic that has interested me so far is of “Federal courts” so far from what I read, the federal court system contains only three main levels, the first one being district courts, the second is courts of appeal, and last the Supreme Court of the United States, this is the final level of appeal in the federal system. There are 13 circuit courts, 94 district courts, and only one Supreme Court throughout the country.
Supreme court the final judge in all cases involving laws of congress,and the highest law of all the Constitution
Court visits are meaningful enrichments for law students to further understand the Australian court system through actual participation in court proceedings and understanding the justice system works is vital in deepening that knowledge. After attending the Brisbane Supreme court on 6th September 2017, I was able witness and observe a court hearing of some sort and during my confrontation of the supreme court I witnessed sentences and trials which were engaging and model cases at the most. When attending the court, it was visible to me that arrangement of the benches and all spaces drew a layout which distinguished the different roles amongst powers. The courtroom itself was not very large but was large enough for each voice that was spoken
A jury trial is a legal proceeding in which a jury makes a decision or findings of fact which then direct the actions of the Judge. The jury trial has been traced back many times with different findings each time. However, for my research I could trace it back as far as Ancient Greece. In 350 BCE Aristotle first described the Athenian jury system. In Aristotle’s description jurors are selected at random and assigned at last minute, then drops their ballot in one out of two jars after hearing both sides of the case. At this time the jurors were expected to know or least have some knowledge of the Athenian law (Soft Schools). Then later on England also establishes a system of law that upholds the jury system. When King John signed the Magna Carta
Let’s talk about government. One of the most vital parts of the U.S. government in my opinion would be the Supreme Court. I’m not really one for long introductions, so let’s jump right in.
In conclusion, the popularity of the show Judge Judy can be linked to individual’s aspiration to see a real courtroom proceeding, because she is known for her blunt behavior and being one of toughest judges in New York City (Neubauer & Fradella, 2014). She is very sarcastic and opinionated, which makes her very entertaining to watch on television. In my opinion, the way she conducts her cases by bringing justice and humor may influence individuals to want to see if this type of behavior is conducted during actual court proceedings. Although, shows such as Judge Judy, are entertaining they do not show how actually court proceeding are handle, which can be misleading to viewers. In actually court proceedings, the judge doesn’t not conduct themselves