In the essay "College is a Waste if time and money," Caroline Bird's overall arguement is that college is a complete waste of time and money. One of the main arguements she uses to support her claim is that students are only attending college because it is the "thing to do" (428) or because it's what society expects from them and she beleives that that is a waste of time and money because most students don't even want to be there in then first place. They're unhappy there, but feel like they need to go. Bird conducts studies and according to her "most professors and administartors, when pressed for a candid opinion, estimiate that no more than 25% of their students are turned on by classwork" (428), and then she states that the other 75% think of college as more of a social center or even a prison. Although there may be some truth to those words overall I do not agree with her arguement. To some, …show more content…
college may be a place to avoid having to deal with the real world for a couple more years, but to some, college is a place that offers high level education for those looking to be successful in their future careers. Bird says that there is no evidence to support that going to college grants you a higher income or makes youl more successful in the future, but shes wrong. Such evidence does exist according to the U.S. Census Bureau , the annual salary average differences between people who graduate highschool and people who get their college degree is staggering. On average high school gradutes make an average of $27,915 and college graduates with atleast a bechelors degree average $51,406. That is quite the differnce. There is no denying that higher education is now critical obtaining a better job because that demand for skilled labor is rising. This essay was wrote in the 70's so maybe the sitituation was differnt back than but it's not the same anymore. Workers without a college degree will be outplaces in the work place by people who do have a college degre, so yes college is expensive but it's only a waste of money if thne students attends and waste their time doing nothing. College for me is similar to highschool, I don't want to go but i need to go; not because it's expected of me of because my parents force me to go but because i know it'll benifet my future.
I attend because despite what Bird thinks I do not beleive it's wasting my time of money. I'm both learning abd preparing for my future. Bird thinks knowledge is more earned working a real job rather than in college but now-a-days in order to get a "real job" you need to have a college degree. I hear about people who are extremely successful even though they didn't go to college but those people are usally extremely lucky. My Uncle for example didn't attend college yet he earns six figures a year maybe even more but he was lucky enough to run into the right people at the right time, not all of us will be that lucky. We can't all be in the right place at the right time, it's just not possible. That's why i think students attend college so they don't have to rely on luck in order to be successful. A college degree will greatly improve you chances in finding a good paying
job. College is expensive, sometimes the price for college is more than a new car, but unlike Bird I do not think it's a waste. Sometimes college may seem like a waste or you may feel you are wasting your time or money by attending, but once you get your degree and see how much it helps you you'll relize it was worth it. With a college degree buinesses will most likely consider you for the job over someone else who doesn't have their college degree. So despite some truth in Bird arguement overall there just ins't enough evidence to back up her claims.
Linda Lee, the author of “The Case against college”, uses rhetorical devices to sway the readers opinions. Most people can agree college is very important, while others have different opinions. Lee believes not everyone needs a higher education. She is forgetting the reason college is so important and why so many people receive a college education. Everyone should attend college, college graduates make more money, have more job opportunities, become more independent, and have more stability.
In the article “College is Not a Commodity. Stop treating it like one,” Hunter Rawlings explains how people today believe that college is a commodity, but he argues that it’s the student’s efforts; which gives value to their education. Rawlings states that in recent years college has been looked at in economic terms, lowering its worth to something people must have instead of earn. As a professor Rawlings has learned that the quality of education has nothing to do with the school or the curriculum, but rather the student’s efforts and work ethic. Rawlings explains the idea that the student is in charge of the success of his or her own education, and the professor or school isn’t the main reason why a student performs poorly in a class. Rawlings
College corrupts people, changes people and segregates families. Many people know the risk of pursuing a college education and still decide to move forward with their decision. We must ask ourselves if the cost is worth it.
Charles Murray was able to pose and answer the question about whether or not too many people are going to college. In his essay,"Are Too Many People Going to College," he argues that most students should not be going to college to attain a bachelor 's degree when their skills and interests lie elsewhere (240). Murray 's argument on this topic is felt strongly by him, he believes that going to college is helpful for those who have the academic ability to absorb a college-level education, it is the appropriate thing to push a student in that direction since they are likely to gain wisdom (238). On the other hand, there are students in America that learn their core knowledge from kindergarten through eighth grade and are set for their future.
The author Charles Murray says there are too many people going to college without really saying it. The essay is written in a way that his audience will understand by the time they finish reading that he has many valid points. He Persuades his readers with facts and counters arguments to false stereotypes involving college and success. By questioning whether college is for everyone makes "you" the reader want to rethink if your time spent in college was really worth it in the end.
In the article “Are too many People Going to College” by Charles Murray a W. H. Brady Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, argues that our educational system needs improvement and that too many people are attending college. Some of Charles arguments on why too many people are attending college are obtaining a Bachelor’s Degree gives you a high paying job, college requires classes that are unnecessary, skill/talent may not need a degree and because they do not want to be labeled as dumb or lazy. Charles Murray makes a lot of good arguments on why too many people are going to college and I concur with his arguments.
In her article “College Is a Waste of Time and Money”, Caroline Bird attempts to pursued her readers that colleges are overflowing with students who don’t belong there. Her article first appeared in Psychology Today (May 1975). Since this material is outdated, I find it hard to believe that most of the responses by students and parents quoted in the article still hold true. The author has set out to pursue the readers that college is a bad and unnecessary choice for today’s youth. Yet the author holds a bachelors and a masters degree from two different universities. I would think that if she thought college was really a bad choice and a waste of time and money, she would not have gone back to get her masters degree.
Everything revolves around money and the economy. Hunter Rawling stated, “Most everyone now evaluates college in purely economic terms, thus reducing it to a commodity like a car or a house.” (Rawling, 2015, paragraph 3) I agree with the author with this quote because I personally think that college is reducing the commodity and also bringing it back up. College is not a commodity, economic value is not all there is to college. “If we were to treat college as a commodity, and an expensive one at that, we should at least grasp the essence of its economic nature.” (Rawling, 2015, paragraph 4) I like this quote because, everyone thinks of commodity as something good. But, really in reality it is not. It makes you think twice and not want to discuss things that are important. The most important thing for
...ing from 18 and older and an online survey in order to determine what people felt about college education. At the end of the survey they realize that a majority of the people felt that college education is worth their investment and a few felt it was not worth but rather costly, due to the debt they had to pay after their college degree. The article also emphasized that it is high time the government finds ways and means to cut the cost of college tuition so that people can changed their minds of not continuing with their education. The source contributes to my essay in a way that it gives the readers the idea to why people may or may not value college education. The information in the article is accurate and reliable because pew research center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world.
The argument about if college is worth it or not has been one of the biggest arguments throughout the media for decades. Students suffer a lot from the debts that they get from college and also the amount of studying that they do in college and when they graduate they ask themselves “is graduation from college really worth all the money that we paid and all the work that we have done?”
Both views that Caroline Bird and Mr. Toby Coles had on what college does for a student are opposing, but both are interesting. I don’t feel that college has been a waste of my time or money. At least not yet.
If students do not go to college to learn, then it will actually be a waste of time and money, and they will not get anything out of their career. Pharinet also goes against what she wrote, she says, “There is no doubt that every person has the right to an education.” Then she says, “But not every person should attend college.” She says that everyone should get an education, but everyone should not attend college. Pharinet contradicts what she said.
Throughout her text she gives different reason as to why she believes college is a waste of time and money. She first gives the example of what would happen if college students were to put all the money they spent on school into savings. They would have ended up having more money than someone who went to school and that they would also be learning
People have very different reasons on why going to college and getting an education is important for them. Some people go to college because that is what is expected of them, and others go because they have nothing else better to do. However, I am interested in going to college and obtaining a good education because it will benefit my family, my country, and me.
College is a very important thing. If you go to college you will most likely get better pay in your career. Also, with a college degree, you have more opportunities. Everything that I have stated is true and is why I believe that everyone should go to college. College is actually a very good thing for people to do. It just takes some effort and time. If everyone goes to college then society saves a lot of money and they have a higher chance to be healthier. So what if college costs some money won’t it be worth it in the