Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How effective is the death penalty
Effect of capital punishment
Capital punishment crimes in united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How effective is the death penalty
1188 people have been executed in the United States between the years of 1977 and 2009.[1] Most death penalty cases involve the execution of murders.[2] However, capital punishment can be applied to other crimes such as espionage and treason.[3]
When it comes to the death penalty there are many opinions as to why this form of punishment is a good thing. Those opinions include things such as:
• The death penalty is the ultimate warning toward would-be criminals.[4] If a potential criminal knows that the punishment for their actions is going to be death, then fewer criminals will commit the crimes.
• The death penalty provides the victim’s families closure.[5] While the victim themselves are not alive to gain any closure from the situation, the execution of the perpetrator does bring a feeling of relief at no longer having to think about the ordeal.
• The death penalty is the only thing that these criminals fear.[6] Murderers have exhausted all options of appeals in order to prevent being executed themselves.
• The death penalty is not cruel.[7] Forms of execution that are utilized are methods where the brain does not have a chance to feel pain.
• The death penalty is the best answer for murder.[8] Our justice system attempts to have the punishments fit the crime. In the instance of homicide, why should the perpetrator be given the same punishment as the offender in a serious non-violent offence?
Each of these arguments are great reasons for continuing with the death penalty as a punishment. However for every argument supporting the death penalty there is an equally strong argument for reasons to abolish this punishment and they include:
• The death penalty teaches the criminals nothing.[9] How can we teach a person to learn fr...
... middle of paper ...
...ence of their action in either getting burned themselves or seeing a friend get burned or watching as something was caught on fire. I feel that the same type of logic needs to be applied to the death penalty, I think by making more of an example of the ones that are convicted of premeditated murder and where the death penalty is imposed then the consequence needs to be followed through. People sit on death row sometimes for years and years, now the death penalty is just a threat. For example, if I chose to plot and commit a murder I might be sentenced to death, but even with concrete evidence against me, I could sit on death row for the remainder of my life anyway. While that may effectively deter many people from committing the crime, it does not deter everyone. I think that if we followed through with the punishment more, we would then have a greater deterrent.
In recent years, the practice of capital punishment has come under scrutiny. Some say that no longer holds the same impact as it once had. An article discussing the concept of the death penalty “Bungled executions, Backlogged courts, And three more reasons the modern death penalty is A Failed Experiment” by David Von Drehle is summarized and the thoughts, ideas, and principles therein are subject to response.
The death penalty, as administered by states based on their individual laws, is considered capital punishment, the purpose of which is to penalize criminals convicted of murder or other heinous crimes (Fabian). The death penalty issue has been the focus of much controversy in recent years, even though capital punishment has been a part of our country's history since the beginning. Crimes in colonial times, such as murder and theft of livestock were dealt with swiftly and decisively ("The Death Penalty..."). Criminals were hanged shortly after their trial, in public executions. This practice was then considered just punishment for those crimes. Recently though, the focus of the death penalty debate has been on moral and legal issues. The murderers of today's society can be assured of a much longer life even after conviction, with the constraints of the appeals process slowing the implementation of their death sentence. In most cases, the appeal process lasts several years, during which time criminals enjoy comfortable lives. They have television, gym facilities, and the leisure time to attend free college-level classes that most American citizens must struggle to afford. Foremost, these murderers have the luxury of time, something their victims ran out of the moment their paths crossed. It is time this country realized the only true justice for these criminals is in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous crimes.
There are many pros to the death penalty. Some claim that there is a preventative effect on potential murderers, although there is a lot of debate about this and just about every other argument for or against capital punishment. Another is the idea of incapacitation. Truthfully, why should someone have the right to live if they have taken that right from another person? The purpose why this writer supports capital punishment is because in observing victims’ families and their grief over murdered loved ones. This writer believes anyone who murders should be put to death. One reason for this is because people should not have the right to live after they have killed a fellow human being. The death penalty is a topic dealing with ethics, a set of moral principles or values. This issue is constantly filled with mix feelings and attitudes which the writer will attempt to present in the following paragraphs.
The purpose of the death penalty is to spare future victims of murder by carrying out the threat of execution upon convicted murderers. The death penalty punishes them not for what they may or may not do in the future but what they have already done. It's unclear that the murderer has the same right to live as their victim. Thomas Geraghty states “opinion polls report that more than 70% of Americans do not favor the death penalty for murder.
------The death penalty has been debated for years and while many people have different viewpoints on it everyone has the same question: does the death penalty have an effect on crime? Whether or not the death penalty is morally correct or wrong the it’s effect on crime is what people tend to focus on the most in making the decision in whether it should be used in their country or not. Many tend to believe that the death penalty does have an effect on crime while others believe that it does not.
For the victim, or the victim’s family, they would be able to come to a place of closure knowing that the trauma they had just gone through will no longer be a problem. However, the family members would have to deal with the consequences of pursuing the death penalty. They would also still have to grieve, and deal with the trauma they went through, but it would be lot harder to move on knowing the convicted criminal is still alive. The family members of the convicted criminal to be executed will be upset about the outcome, but they would more then likely be upset about their loved one being involved in the first place.
Many who disagree with the death penalty believe it is immoral, discriminates, is very expensive, increases crime, and is only a way to carry out revenge. This, however, is not true. Capital punishment should be legal because it is moral, by not allowing criminals to roam the streets once again. It does not discriminate against those of color or the poor, and is actually less expensive than life imprisonment. The most important reason why the death penalty should be legal is because it deters crime.
Some even claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment. I would like to shed light on the issue and inform everyone as to why we should keep the death penalty and possibly even use it more than we do now. First of all, it is hard for anyone to argue that we already use the death penalty too much because facts say that we hardly use it at all. Since 1967, there has been one execution for every 1,600 murders. There have been approximately 560,000 murders and 358 executions between 1967 and 1996(UCR and BJS).
Death penalty is the punishment of execution that is carried out legally on a criminal convicted of a capital crime (Banner & Stuart 7). While some argue that death penalty helps reduce the number of murders in the society others, argue that it is inhumane, and these offenders should be given the chance to correct their bad behavior. It’s high time more states in the U.S enforced the death penalty punishment to deter crimes in their societies. Crime and criminals are everywhere in the society. They have become part of our lives, and something must be done to make our societies safer.
In my opinion, common sense tells me that the death penalty is going to deter individuals in society from committing murder. The fear of death alone will deter me from committing murder. Punishments such as life sentences are less feared by criminals facing those charges. How many murderers ask for the death penalty versus life in prison? Hardly any person would ask for something of that nature. The death penalty deters individuals from committing murder and it protects citizens from future
"Common sense, lately bolstered by statistics, tells us that the death penalty will deter murder... People fear nothing more than death. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death... life in prison is less feared. Murderers clearly prefer it to execution -- otherwise, they would not try to be sentenced to life in prison instead of death... Therefore, a life sent...
According to Desmond Tutu, “To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice.” The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is given to people who have committed acts of murder or other serious crimes. It is believed to be a just punishment for their crimes. Thirty two states allow the death penalty. Since 1976, 1,465 people have been executed, and there alone has been 23 executions in 2017 (executions-year).
The death penalty has been an ongoing debate for many years. Each side of the issue presents valid arguments to explain why someone should be either for or against the subject. One side of the argument says deterrence, the other side says there’s a likelihood of putting to death an innocent man; one says justice, retribution, and punishment; the other side says execution is murder itself. Crime is an unmistakable part of our society, and it is safe to say that everyone would concur that something must be done about it. The majority of people know the risk of crime to their lives, but the subject lies in the techniques and actions in which it should be dealt with. As the past tells us, capital punishment, whose meaning is “the use of death as a legally sanctioned punishment,” is a suitable and proficient means of deterring crime. Today, the death penalty resides as an effective method of punishment for murder and other atrocious crimes.
The death penalty deters murder. The death penalty is the best way to stop a killer from killing someone else. Some say that prison is enough, but it isn’t. Death is necessary because if they are only sent to prison there is always the risk that some day the same killer that brutally killed a 5-year old or raped and strangle a college student might return to the streets.
Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death penalty! Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event such as murder. Without the death penalty, criminals would be more inclined to commit additional violent crimes. Fear of death discourages people from committing crimes. If capital punishment were carried out more it would prove to be the crime preventative it was partly intended to be. Most criminals would think twice before committing murder if they knew their own lives were at stake. Use of the death penalty as intended by law could actually reduce the number of violent murders by eliminating some of the repeat offenders. The death penalty has always been and continues to be a very controversial issue. People on both sides of the issue argue endlessly to gain further support for their movements. While opponents of capital punishment are quick to point out that the United States remains one of the few Western countries that continue to support the death penalty. The deterrent effect of any punishment depends on how quickly the punishment is applied.