NEED SUBTITLE HERE. Not Sure what.
The aim of this thesis is to build on this historiography by treating genealogical chronicle rolls as literary and historical objects. It aims to develop the understanding of the narrative of genealogies and how they represent broader medieval political concepts, perceptions and structures. By using Canterbury MS 1 as a case study, it will examine the portrayal of political ideas in a royal genealogy, addressing themes such as political prophecy, kingship and kingdoms. As explained, previous approaches to genealogical chronicle rolls have tended to focus on the dynastic and propagandist context of these manuscripts, while the representation of broader political concerns has not yet been examined. Analysing
…show more content…
This will offer a genealogical and mythical perspective on prophecy while supplementing the existing scholarship on political prophecy. It will consider the foundation of a historical and cultural England through the treatment of prophecy on Canterbury MS 1. Political prophecies were a medieval phenomenon popular in England. Prophecies were an accepted element of political thought and life in medieval England. However, by assessing the use and manipulation of political prophecies in the text of Canterbury MS 1, this chapter argues that they were selectively used for laying down the conceptual and historical foundations of an English kingdom, and to exert a form of Lancastrian cultural hegemony through assertion and authoritative interpretations of prophecies. To do this, the chapter will consider prophecies that make their appearance on the roll as case studies. They include prophecies that include major figures in the history of England, such as Brutus, Arthur, Cadawalladr and St Edward the Confessor. Although genealogical rolls and prophecies have been examined before, this is the first comprehensive assessment of multiple prophecies on the single roll. Combined, these cases of political prophecy that appear on the roll highlight key moments of the history of Britain and England. In particular, they address the origins and …show more content…
This will be discussed alongside the historical context of the early 1430s, which is approximately at the same time that this manuscript was most likely produced. This is the first analysis that specifically considers the ‘international relations’ that is presented on a genealogical chronicle roll. The chapter will assess the portrayals of Scotland, Wales and France on Canterbury MS 1, and what this can reveal about the English perceptions of these foreign territories. England during the late medieval period was preoccupied with Owain Glyndŵr’s rebellion, which accounts for the great interest that the roll has in Welsh affairs. Furthermore, the roll’s representation of the royal lineages of England and France united through hereditary descent offers yet another dimension of the genealogical manuscript. This chapter argues that English interests in France and the insistence of the ‘dual kingdom’ concept played an important part in the purpose and construction of this genealogical chronicle roll. By comparing the depiction and treatment of foreign dominions and territories, this chapter argues that Canterbury MS 1 was invested in creating a genealogical narrative of England’s foreign relations that corresponds to the early fifteenth
- - - The New Penguin Atlas of Medieval History. London, England, Penguin Books, no publication
with the intent of widespread entertainment, elements of comedy and other aspects of entertaining film can, at times, cloud the message and content of the documentary. An anti-war advocate, Terry Jones’ presentation of matter so closely related to strong personal sentiments can also introduce a degree of bias in the presentation and approach taken to analyzing the events detailed in the series. However, the documentary incorporates the input and analysis of several highly-regarded medieval historians, including Jonathan Riley-Smith, Suheil Zakkar, Fikret Isiltan, David Lazenby, and Christopher Tyerman. This group of historians, all highly esteemed individuals in the field, are able to offer a balanced and likely unbiased account of what they believe to be true about the
The Agreement between Lord and Vassal is an account of a relationship between Hugh of Lusignan and William V of Aquitaine (who was also Count of Poitiers ). This account is seen through the perspective of Hugh, and provides examples of different powers, actions, and decisions of lords and vassals. According to the introduction of the Agreement, this account was "wrote or dictated " between 1020 and 1025 . Through criticism and analysis of this source, I hope to determine what information historians can gather from a first-person document and how/if this document has a place in the milieu of history.
With any new monarch’s ascension to the throne, there comes with it changes in the policies of the country. From Elizabeth’s new council, to Henry’s documented polices and even to William the Silent’s inaction in response to threats were all policies that needed to be worked out by the new rulers. This group of rulers all had something in common; they chose to let their people make their religious preference solely on their beliefs but they all differed in their ways of letting this come about. This was monumental for the time period in which they lived, but it was something that needed to be done to progress national unity.
In conclusion, although Froissart Chronicles is written based on the historical events that occurred during the Hundred Years’ War period, the reports of these events can be erroneous and inaccurate, which is a main characteristic of medieval historical writing. Hence, historians must view
Winston, Jessica "A Mirror for Magistrates and Public Political Discourse in Elizabethan England." Studies in Philology 101 (2004): 381-400. MLA International Bibliography. EBSCO. Web. 6 Nov. 2009.
It truly must have shocked the people of that era when Caesar went to the Capitol against all warnings, because “Elizabethans generally believed that prophecies were to be taken seriously, and certainly that no prudent statesman could run the risk of ignoring them” (Ribner 58). The people of the Elizabethan era were very proper, and to see someone, even if only a character in a play, break one of the laws of nature in which they so firmly believed, was quite astounding.
Powell wrote, “…the feudal age is most important for the development of Western Europe: this importance lies chiefly in the process of state-building which had its origins here” (Powell 1). The monarch of this feudal society was responsible for state-building, centralization, and maintaining unity. Therefore, the throne was heredity, so that a single family maintained political power throughou...
Holinshed R. Historie of Scotland (2nd Ed. Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland 1587) "Historie of Scotland"
Breisach, Ernst. Historiography; Ancient, Medieval, and Modern. 3rd. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2007.
Talking of the Royal Family. London: Routledge, 1992. 173. Print. Blackmore, Simon Augustine.
Throughout time, history has taken some strange turns. A single ruler establishing some new form of government can transform entire civilizations, or a single event can lead to the creation of a great new people. Whatever the case, history can repeat itself in time. One possible exemption of this could be Britain’s time period of the Middle Ages. Bearing a distinct and unique culture relative to the time period, some of the values and the customs held during this time have yet to be repeated in history. It is perhaps the most unique period of all time for the British Isles.
Markus Fischer, “Feudal Europe, 800-1300: Communal Discourse and Conflictual Practices”, International Organization Vol. 46, No.2 (Spring 1992), pp. 427-466.
Burns, Julia. "Notes MLA 6318". Church and State in Early Modern England. Fall 2013. Dr. D. David.