Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Us canadian magazine dispute
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Us canadian magazine dispute
I don’t believe that the U.S.-Canadian magazine dispute was genuinely motivated to protect Canadian culture. From reading the article in Globalization 101 it appears that the Canadian government saw magazines coming in from the United States as an opportunity to add a new tax to a product that was entering their market space. Although this was changed shortly after the dispute was settled by the WTO (1997). It appears that the Canadian government moved more towards wanting a ‘cultural uniqueness’ after the United States threatened to impose retaliatory measures against Canadian steel, textiles and apparel, wood products and plastics. The Canadian magazine industry has only 11 percent of magazine sales in Canada. This is testament that …show more content…
You could argue that there is no longer space in the market for Canadian magazines due to imported magazines but if that were the case then that would have its own ongoing or settled dispute. It appears more that the Canadian public has taken to the globalization of magazines from the amount of sales that they have in the country and the fact that Canadian magazines only add up to 11% of …show more content…
With that being said, it is understandable that they want the magazines to have a certain percentage of Canadian content and also that they want the advertisements to come from local businesses. The benefits that come from Canadian businesses being able to advertise in the magazines that are the top sellers in the country absolutely outweigh the benefits the government got from adding a small tax to the foreign magazine producers. In that each business that gets more business from its advertisement in the magazines, means that they will be paying more tax at the end of the year so that the government is effectively making their money still, just in a different way. I don’t believe that it is fair to the Canadian public to be forced to pay a higher premium (in this case via a tax) to subsidize local publications. The Canadian public should be free to purchase any magazine they choose, whether it is a Canadian one or a foreign one. If sales of local magazines are low then it should be on the writers and owners of those magazines to enhance the content to make it more appealing to the Canadian public. People will pay for something that interests them, it won’t matter to the mass
In my opinion, the U.S. – Canadian dispute was extremely motivated by genuine desires to protect Canadian culture. Government of Canada was quite serious in terms of protecting its culture from foreign influence. Even though Canadian magazines were less produced domestically still the government recognizes it “as an important touchstone of Canadian national identity”. In favor of Canadian culture, governmentof Canada took a decision “In1920s, imposed protective tariffs on foreign magazines. In 1965 also, Canada furthermore prohibited the importation of split-run editions of foreign-published magazines into their country”.
When radio was first introduced in Canada it was privately owned, this gave leeway for American companies to absorb the rights to broadcasted content. The Prime Minister at the time, R.B. Bennett became convinced that the “existing system of private radio would almost inevitably lead to the Americanization of a crucial cultural industry.” (Vipond, 2000, p. 41). Therefore regulations were implemented to “contribute to the development of national unity and provide a...
and police personnel to the operations. As of March 2007, Canada was ranked 59th out
"Canada to Tax Bitcoin Users - CoinDesk." CoinDesk RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.
In order for Canada to share an equal part in the overall media industry as any other country, Canadian content regulations must be in place. CanCon regulations should be enforced on Canadian media content, as it is a crucial aspect of national culture, representative of the country as a whole. Without such regulations determined by CanCon, Canadian society risks becoming lost within the commotion of international media and their varied interests.
in the last decade. Canadian exports to the U.S. grew by 21% in 1994 and are
Many people argue whether not Canada has any culture at all, and why American culture seems to have such a big influence on Canadian music, art and television. Over the years the Canadian government has tried to protect and develop talent in Canada. Once British traditions started to fade away, the influence on Canada from America became stronger. If Canada was to become a strong independent country they needed their own identity. The government support has played an important role in the arts development, as has the establishment of numerous art schools and colleges across the country .Canada has produced a variety of well-known films, actors, and authors. Even though American culture has strongly penetrated and influenced Canadian culture, the government has created many different openings for Canadian culture to be protected and expanded throughout Canada using things like; the national film board, creation of the CBC and the Canadian content rule.
the production of magazines turned into a trade dispute with the United States. Canada tried to protect their culture through magazine production by establishing tariffs and prohibitions on foreign magazines. This caused American magazine producers to begin creating split-run editions of Canadian magazines. In 1995, Canada raised taxes on spilt-run publications which violated the World Trade Organization’s principle of non-discrimination between foreign and domestic producers.(www.globalization101.org) When the WTO ruled Canada tax on foreign publications was discriminatory Canada accepted the decision. Later in the 1998 Canada tried a new method to protect it magazine industry by creating Bill C-55 which prohibited foreign publishers from supplying advertising services to Canadian market. (www.about.com)This only created new problems in trade between Canada and the United States. This disputes were later settle with a new modified versions of the bill that both countries agreed to.
The Canadian committee on mass-media had concluded in this is not one of the first attempts Canada has made in order to protect its culture from domination by its neighbor. America being a much larger may also seem like a threat to the much smaller country up north. Canada has imposed protective tariffs on foreign magazines in the 1920’s and prohibited the importation of split-run editions of foreign-published magazines in 1965. These actions, as it seem to me, are strictly economical and financial rather than a result of cultural concern. I feel like the Canadian magazine dispute was not motivated by the claimed genuine desires of protecting Canadian culture.
Since the beginning Canada has always strived to characterize its self as more of an independent country, from joining the league of nations as a separate nation from Britain to supporting major companies such as the NFB and the CBC. However this has not been easy for the Canadian government as major influences from the united states have been captivating the Canadian audiences by large.American media has had a momentous revolutionizing effect on Canada, The influence of American culture helped Canada become the modern country it is today.
sense, the small percentage of magazines sold in Canada in the 1990's that were of Canadian origin
...my Malkin, Kimbrlie Wornian, and Joan Chrisler, argues that women magazines more than men magazines makes the individual feel inadequate due to the appearance of articles relating to diet, exercise, and cosmetic surgery. Conversely, today's women are health conscious and are looking for ways to balance their health, beauty, and their everyday lives. In conclusion magazines just simply play the role of giving the individual the option of being informed. Also, magazines that appeal to men do not always appeal to women and that is why content differs.
Depending on the magazine, the opinions of authors can be liberal, conservative, or anywhere in between. However, almost all mainstream publications place limits on how far left or right the opinions will reach. After a certain point, the magazine's potential audience begins to decrease rapidly and will not generate enough income to make a profit. Therefore, the most popular magazines (i.e. TIME, Newsweek) seek to present the most popular opinions. Some mainstream magazines extend to the far left (Sierra) or right (National Review), but they have a limited audience. In the interest of making a profit, marketing strategy is simply an issue of supply and demand. Thus, when thes...
American cartoons always hid different meanings or had subtle undertones to their television shows. For instance cartoons had little hints here and there so that kids watching wouldn’t be fazed by it but guardians or caregivers could hear this meaning and start to reevaluate what they know. American television was simple as long as it made viewers agree with their government on how to handle war and stopped them from asking questions. Joining efforts with hollywood, Canada started to copy the Americans example of changing people's opinions through TV (Steinberg). Not to mention America's control on their news and media, they somehow managed to get journalists to join/sign up for the army so that writes could feel like they had a first person story all while being manipulated on how the see and take things in. Canadian’s felt like they had so much to learn and instead of setting the examples and figuring things out first the choose to follow in the footsteps of the American’s (Family News). Hiding different meanings became something cool when people wanted
I can not help but wonder why if these magazines are so popular in regards to circulation figures, are tabloids such as People and US Weekly more prevalent in everyday lives? When you go shopping and are ready to pay for your items do you see at least 10 different tabloid magazines and digests before the AARP magazine or those published by Jehovah’s Witnesses? Are pictures of Paris Hilton putting on weight over the weeks and Kim Kardashian’s new clothing item or “viral video” more important than aging advice and health insurance?